PECULIARITIES OF PARTICIPATION OF DEFENDER IN THE COURT PROCEEDINGS OF CRIMINAL CASE IN THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Павел Петрович Фантров ◽  
Ярослав Александрович Кузин
Keyword(s):  
Research Topic ◽  
Defense Attorney ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Correct Interpretation ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Criminal Process ◽  
Court Proceedings ◽  
Degree Of Participation ◽  
Court Of First Instance

Актуальность темы исследования обусловлена тем, что немаловажное значение в уголовном судопроизводстве имеет правильное толкование процессуального положения защитника в судебном разбирательстве в суде первой инстанции. В статье охарактеризована степень участия защитника на рассматриваемой стадии уголовного процесса: исследование им доказательств; заявление ходатайств; изложение суду своего мнения по существу обвинения и его доказанности; выступление в судебных прениях. The relevance of research topic lies in the fact that the correct interpretation of procedural position of a defense attorney in court proceedings in the court of first instance is of no small importance in criminal proceedings. The article describes the degree of participation of defense attorney at the considered stage of criminal process: his research of evidence; application of petitions; presenting to the court his opinion on the merits of accusation and it's proof; speech in judicial pleadings.

Execution of a Sentence in the Structure of Criminal Proceedings: Procedural Stage or Special Court Proceedings?

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 97-106
Author(s):  
V. V. Nikolyuk ◽  
◽  
L. A. Pupysheva ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Criminal Process ◽  
Self In Relation ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Court Proceedings

The article analyzes the concept of execution of a sentence as an independent stage of the criminal process (the stage of criminal proceedings). Arguments are given that point to its certain illogicality and inconsistency. The authors on the basis of existing legislation and taking into account the positions of Plenum of the Supreme Court additionally reasoned and substantiated the thesis of the existence of the criminal process self in relation to a criminal case of criminal procedure, regulated by Chapter 47 of the Code of criminal procedure.

scholarly journals Subject and limits of examination evidence in the proceedings of the criminal case in the court of first instance

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 186-195
Author(s):  
Ilya N. Yefimovykh
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Court Proceedings ◽  
Court Of First Instance ◽  
Special Order

The article analyzes the norms of the criminal procedure law, the opinions of scientists, judicial practice materials related to the examination of evidence in criminal proceedings in the court of first instance, on the basis of which the author proposed definitions of the notions subject of examination evidence and limits of examination evidence they were compared with the concepts of subject of proof and limits of proof. The study used such research methods as logical, system-structural, statistical. As a result of a study of specific court decisions in criminal cases, differences in the understanding of evidence and the examination of evidence were revealed. A distinction has been made between the subject and the object of the study of evidence at the court hearing. The question of determining the subject matter and the limits of the examination of evidence was analyzed, including with regard to the consideration of the criminal case in a special order of judicial decision of the court, with the consent of the accused with the accusation. The rationale for the view that the examination of evidence takes place during the examination of a criminal case under a special court procedure is given, the circumstances that can be established during the court session, namely, the circumstances that may lead to exemption from punishment, as well as the postponement are analyzed. serving the sentence. These circumstances, if any, are mandatory to be established in court proceedings through the examination of evidence. According to the results of the analysis, proposed measures to improve the norms of the criminal procedure law governing the consideration of the criminal case in a special order of the trial. The question of the scope of the examination of evidence was considered in conjunction with the norms of the criminal procedure law, which established the grounds for the return of the criminal case to the prosecutor.

CONCERNING THE STRUCTURE OF PUBLIC LEGAL INTEREST IN CRIMINAL COURT PROCEEDINGS

2021 ◽  
pp. 26-30
Author(s):  
Алексей Викторович Дашин ◽  
Петр Михайлович Малин ◽  
Алексей Васильевич Пивень
Keyword(s):  
Preventive Measures ◽  
Criminal Court ◽  
Public Authority ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Criminal Process ◽  
The Public ◽  
House Arrest ◽  
Legitimate Interest ◽  
Court Proceedings ◽  
Constituent Elements

В статье анализируется структура публичного законного интереса в уголовном судопроизводстве, входящих в него элементов на примере института домашнего ареста. Авторская модель публичного законного интереса участников уголовного процесса «привязана» к стадийности и может распространяться не только на вопросы, связанные с мерами пресечения. По мнению авторов, публичный законный интерес в контексте рассматриваемой проблемы воплощается в жизнь на основе нормативно установленного действия, содержащего конкретно сформулированные правила, устанавливающие четко определенные права и обязанности участников правоотношений. Данная деятельность сопряжена с определенными этапами (стадиями), которые в той или иной степени характерны соответствующей мере пресечения, и возможна в той стадии, где осуществляется оценка действий, предпринятых должностным лицом, осуществляющим производство по уголовному делу. Реализация публичного законного интереса, заявленного следователем, дознавателем на избрание домашнего ареста, зависит от того, как соответствующие устремления оценят другие должностные лица - руководитель следственного органа, прокурор (не обладающие правами реализации публичного законного интереса), то есть от их усмотрения. Законодатель не предоставляет следователю, дознавателю возможность «непосредственно» обратиться в суд - участнику процесса, наделенному правом реализовать их устремление на избрание меры пресечения. Подобные «преграды» не предусмотрены в законе для иных участников уголовного процесса, не наделенных публичной властью и стремящихся реализовать свой законный интерес. The article analyzes the structure of public legitimate interest in criminal proceedings, its constituent elements on the example of the institution of house arrest. The author's model of the public legitimate interest of participants in the criminal process is «tied» to the stage and can extend not only to issues related to preventive measures. According to the authors, public legitimate interest in the context of the problem under consideration is brought to life on the basis of a normatively established action containing specifically formulated rules establishing clearly defined rights and obligations of participants in legal relations. This activity is associated with certain phases (stages) that are more or less characteristic of the corresponding measure of restraint, and is possible at the stage where the actions taken by the official conducting the criminal proceedings are evaluated. The realization of the public legitimate interest declared by the investigator, the investigating officer for the election of house arrest depends on how the relevant intentions will be evaluated by other officials - the head of the investigative body, the prosecutor (who do not have the rights to realize the public legitimate interest), i.e. on their discretion. The legislator does not give the investigator, the inquirer the opportunity to turn «directly» to the court - a participant in the process, entitled to realize their intentions for the election of measures of restrain. Such «barriers» are not provided in the law for other participants in the criminal process who are not endowed with public authority and who seek to realize their legitimate interest.

scholarly journals DEVELOPMENT DIRECTIONS OF THE SPECIAL JUDICIAL PROCEDURE

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1(63)) ◽  
pp. 134-139
Author(s):  
Илья Степанович ДИКАРЕВ
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Legal Interpretation ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Dialectical Method ◽  
Methodological Basis ◽  
Court Proceedings ◽  
Judicial Procedure ◽  
Written Materials

The complicated application of the special judicial procedure significantly reduces the procedural savings achieved in criminal proceedings. In this regard, the question arises of compliance with modern realities of the complicated procedure for decision-making on the application of the considered form of court proceedings. Purpose: to develop proposals for improving the criminal procedure legislation in order to make it possible to simplify the application of the special judicial procedure. Methods: the author uses the methods of analysis, synthesis, legal interpretation as well as systemic and logo-legal methods; the methodological basis of the research is a dialectical method. Results: it is reasonable to conclude that the change in the role of the court in proving when applying the special judicial procedure, expressed in imposing on it the obligation independently, on the basis of written materials of the case and some judicial investigative actions, to establish the factual circumstances of the criminal case, will simplify the procedure for applying the considered procedural form by refusing to agree with the representatives of the prosecution.   

scholarly journals TACTICAL COMPONENTS OF THE PROSECUTOR’S ACTIONS TO CONCLUDE A PLEA AGREEMENT FOR THE ACCUSED

2021 ◽  
pp. 243-257
Author(s):  
I. Kohutych
Keyword(s):  
Media Coverage ◽  
Situational Analysis ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Criminal Process ◽  
Support Provision ◽  
Negotiation Tactics ◽  
Court Proceedings ◽  
State Of Affairs ◽  
Effective Use ◽  
Constituent Elements

The article is devoted to the study of certain tactical aspects of the he prosecutor’s participation in the conclusion of an agreement on the confession of guilt by the accused. It is concluded that it is necessary to develop a system of forensic recommendations regarding the provision of this direction of the prosecutor’s activity in court proceedings. It is stated that the institution of criminal procedure has appeared in Ukraine based on agreements, that is, a mechanism with separate contractual (compromise) elements during the resolution of criminal legal conflicts, which belongs to the so-called special orders of criminal proceedings. It is noted that, in contrast to the sufficient attention of scientists to the issues of procedural regulation of criminal proceedings based on agreements, the tactical aspects of the activities of the prosecutor almost get out of sight of scientific research, which is in no way consistent with modern challenges of combating crime. It has been established that the activities of the prosecutor to conclude an agreement on the confession of guilt by the accused and his/her judicial approval are cognitive and organizationally diverse, requiring appropriate tactical support (provision). This support will be a new direction of tactical and forensic support of the so-called compromise procedures in criminal proceedings. It should contain recommendations, at least regarding localization of an unproductive conflict between the prosecution and the accused, as well as unpredictable compromises between other participants in criminal proceedings. It should contain recommendations the availability of adequate ways to convince the accused of the futility of his/her opposition to the prosecutor and the court and the need to cooperate with them based on feedback, taking into account the specifics of professional defense and a situational analysis of one or another variant of defense tactics. In the context of the prosecutor’s activities to conclude an agreement on the plea of the accused, the most relevant is the so-called negotiation tactics. In the mainstream of the analyzed subject, it would be more expedient to call it the tactics of prosecutorial persuasion and ensuring compromise procedures in the criminal process. Its constituent elements are a system of recommendations regarding the organizational, informational and resource-personnel support of the prosecutor’s activities to conclude an agreement on the plea of the accused in order to a) make it impossible for the relevant participants in the criminal process to formally treat their duties; b) prevent unpredictable compromises between the defense and the victim, as well as prosecution witnesses; c) promote exclusively objective media coverage of the real state of affairs (in conditions of journalistic interest in a specific compromise procedure). At least, this will already become the basis for the effective use of tactics of creating conditions for the preparation and direct conclusion of an agreement on the plea of the accused.

scholarly journals The institution of suspicion and the initial stage of the criminal process: interrelated prospects of development

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (4) ◽  
pp. 121-131
Author(s):  
Ol'ga Polikarpova
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Radical Change ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Initial Moment ◽  
Criminal Prosecution ◽  
Constitutional Rights ◽  
Kyrgyz Republic ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Criminal Process ◽  
Initial Stage

The article considers the question of the interdependence of the improvement of the institution of suspicion and the transformation of the initial stage of the Russian criminal process. The article highlights the problem of the legislative limitation of the period of the procedural status of a person as a suspect in the event of a criminal case being initiated not against him, but upon the commission of a crime and insufficient evidence of the involvement/non-involvement of such a person in a criminal offence committed at the initial stage of the investigation, which often does not allow avoiding unreasonable restrictions on the constitutional rights and freedoms of this participant in criminal proceedings. The relevant experience of some post-Soviet states that followed the path of a radical change in the criminal procedure model after the collapse of the USSR is analysed. The article compares the provisions of the criminal procedure legislation of the Russian Federation and the Kyrgyz Republic directly related to the institution of suspicion, including the moment of triggering criminal prosecution and the duration of a suspect’s keeping the specified procedural status. The arguments given in the article substantiate the need to reform the initial moment of the emergence of the procedural status of a suspect in Russian criminal proceedings and the associated expediency of abolishing the stage of initiation of a criminal case in order to increase the guarantee of the rights and legitimate interests of the person introduced into the procedural status we are analysing.

scholarly journals Some Questions Arising in the Trial of Civil Lawsuits in the Criminal Court of First Instance

2021 ◽  
pp. 33-41
Author(s):  
Nataliya Osodoeva
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Court ◽  
Material Damage ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Criminal Process ◽  
Civil Process ◽  
Special Procedure ◽  
Civil Lawsuits ◽  
Court Of First Instance ◽  
Court Hearing

The article discusses some problems of considering a civil claim during a criminal court hearing. It is argued that settling a civil claim during criminal proceedings has a higher priority than a trial in a civil process. The author justifies the position according to which filing a lawsuit during criminal proceedings is a right and not an obligation of a person in a criminal trial. The author also believes that in filing a civil claim in a criminal process, the civil plaintiff should present proof of the incurred costs with the purpose of further recovery of the material damage; besides, the person who will pay the damage or compensate for the moral harm should be established. Based on the analysis of court practice, it is proven that the settlement of a civil claim during a special procedure of a criminal court trial is possible, however, the accused should agree not only with the accusation, but also with the size of the damage (harm). The cases in which the courts can eliminate violations of criminal procedure legislation during preliminary investigations are examined.

scholarly journals The Role of the Prosecutor in the Prevention and Elimination of Investigative Errors: Russian and German Experience

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 424-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Holm Putzke ◽  
Aleksey Tarbagaev ◽  
Аleksandr Nazarov ◽  
Ludmila Maiorova
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Court ◽  
Criminal Prosecution ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Criminal Process ◽  
Police Investigation ◽  
Leading Role ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
Court Proceedings

The paper is devoted to the prevention, identification and correction of mistakes during the preliminary criminal investigation because establishing the offence and all the circumstances that constitute evidence forms the basis for a just verdict, helps prevent crimes against justice and reach other goals of punishment. The authors present the conceptual and normative background for the model of permanent prosecutors supervision as the dominant control and supervision activity in the pre-trial criminal proceedings that allows to effectively implement the strategies of criminal prosecution and protection of human rights. This model establishes the authority of the prosecutor for the procedural management of the criminal prosecution in the criminal process as a significant supervision authority. The tasks of identifying, correcting and preventing (not making) mistakes in pre-trial investigations are equally urgent in Russia and in Germany. Although the Criminal Procedure Code of Germany gives the prosecutors office the leading role in the investigation, in practice the investigation is more often carried out by the police while the role of the prosecutor is reduced to summarizing the results of the police investigation and making the final decisions. At the same time, the prosecutors office has considerable powers of discretion regarding the initiation or non-initiation of criminal prosecution, the prosecutor uses his/her own discretion to determine the procedure and method of investigation. It is important to examine some aspects of the prosecutors role in German criminal court proceedings within the framework of correcting investigation mistakes in Russian criminal process. The model of prosecutors supervision presented in the paper does not preclude the legislative provisions for the transfer of some authority of the court to the prosecutor at the pre-trial stages of the criminal process. This model of prosecutors supervision allows timely and effective identification, correction and prevention of investigation mistakes at the pre-trial stages of criminal court proceedings.

SOME ISSUES OF PROSECUTOR'S PARTICIPATION IN THE SIMPLIFIED PROCEEDINGS ON CRIMINAL MISDEMEANORS IN THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yevhen Nemchynov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Legal Order ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Current Regulation ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
General Order ◽  
Judicial Proceedings ◽  
Court Proceedings ◽  
Court Of First Instance ◽  
Court Hearing

The article is devoted to problematic issues of the legal order of the court hearing of the indictment on the commission of a criminal misdemeanors. The author notes that according to the content of Part 3 of Art. 382 of the CPC of Ukraine, it is not clear from which stage of the court proceedings such hearing should begin: from preparatory proceedings or immediately from trial. Also, legislator does not define how court should check the indictment for a criminal misdemeanors for compliance with the requirements of the CPC of Ukraine and the correctness of jurisdiction, as well as to address other organizational and legal issues of the possibility of trial. Based on the analysis of judicial practice, it was concluded that current regulation of simplified proceedings for criminal misdemeanors is imperfect and leads to unequal participation of subjects of judicial proceedings, including prosecutor. The article expresses the opinion that in case of shortcomings of indictment regarding the commission of criminal misdemeanors, if any doubts about the correctness of the jurisdiction or the need to suspend the proceedings have appeared, court should appoint a preparatory hearing with the participation of prosecutor to resolve relevant issues under Art. 314 of the CPC of Ukraine. Instead, in the case of receipt of indictment for a criminal misdemeanors without a request from prosecutor for its consideration in summary proceedings or without statements of the suspect or victim, as defined in Part 3 of Art. 302 of the CPC of Ukraine, court is obliged to consider the proceedings in the general order. All other issues that arise during consideration of indictment in summary proceedings do not require a preparatory hearing, and can be resolved by summoning the participants in the criminal proceedings immediately before the trial.

PARTICIPATION OF AN INTERPRETER IN CRIMINAL PROCESS OF THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 97-103
Author(s):  
Nigora Abdurashitova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Criminal Process ◽  
Criminal Proceeding ◽  
Legal Assessment ◽  
Sufficient Knowledge ◽  
Court Proceedings ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Right

The article examines the criminal procedural status of an interpreter as a guarantor of ensuring therights and freedoms of participants in criminal proceedings. It is known that in a multinational country, it is especially important to respect the right of a participant in a criminal proceeding to choose a language, to have a reliable and accurate translation of case materials. The author, through the analysis of legislative norms, tries to give a legal assessment to the translator, as a specialist, calledupon to clarify the provision of justice in pre-trial and court proceedings. According to the author, it is the competence of the translator in the criminal process, his knowledge of his rights and obligations, sufficient knowledge of special legal vocabulary that is the most important factor in achieving the goals set for criminal justice. The article contains proposals for improving the legalstatus of the translator

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document