Frequency of Discordance of Diagnosis of Lymphoma by Histopathology alone versus Combined Histopathology and Immunohistochemistry
Background: Diagnosis of lymphoma is a critical issue in Bangladesh and still we have to rely on histopathology reports as limited number of centres doing immunohistochemistry (IHC) with panel of incomplete markers. Previously in most of the cases of lymphomas, IHC was not done due to financial constraint and lack of facilities. But IHC is essential for categorization according to WHO classification 2008, through which we can optimize appropriate therapy and predict outcome. Objective: To evaluate the discordance of diagnosis of lymphoma by combined histopathology and immunohistochemistry, and histopathology alone. Methodology: This is a comparative cross-sectional study of diagnoses of lymphoma by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in combination with histopathology of paraffin embedded tissue blocks with histopathology alone of suspected cases of lymphoma treated in the department of Haematology of National Institute of Cancer Research and Hospital (NICR&H) from May 2016 to November 2016. Preliminary histopathological examination was done on tissue biopsy in suspected case of lymphoma and subsequently IHC was done to know the discordance of initial diagnosis with final diagnosis after combined histopathology and IHC. Results: Out of 68 patients 57 (83.8%) were diagnosed as lymphoma on the basis of histopathology alone, among which 41 (60.3%) cases were diagnosed as Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) and 16 (23.5%) cases as Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL).After combined histopathology and IHC 61 (89.7%) cases were confirmed as lymphoma of which 50 (73.5%0 were NHL and 11 (16.2%) were HL. Discordance of diagnosis was found in 18 (27%) cases between the two methods of diagnosis. Conclusion: Subjective variation in the accuracy of diagnosis of lymphoma on the basis of histopathology alone may occur. Inclusion of IHC with histopathology improves the accuracy of diagnosis of lymphoma.