scholarly journals La Intertextualidad: Cruce De Discuplinas Humaní­sticas

Xihmai ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfonso Ángel Macedo Rodrí­guez
Keyword(s):  
Art History ◽  
Julia Kristeva ◽  
Literary Texts ◽  
Literary Critic ◽  
Educational Work ◽  
Information Retention ◽  
Comic Strips ◽  
Universal History ◽  
The World ◽  
Gerard Genette

Resumen El estudio de la intertextualidad es, dentro de los estudios literarios y de las ciencias del lenguaje, uno de los ámbitos más abordados por los crí­ticos y los teóricos de la literatura; sin embargo, el concepto de intertextualidad puede ana­lizarse en diálogo con otras disciplinas humaní­sticas, como la historia del arte, la historia universal, la filosofí­a, la antropologí­a y la mitologí­a, entre otras. La intertextualidad, término inventado por Julia Kristeva, es la relación entre un texto y otro (hipotexto e hipertexto, de acuerdo con la terminologí­a de Gérard Genette); este concepto puede funcionar no sólo para establecer la relación entre dos textos literarios, sino también para propiciar el diálogo entre dos obras de distintas disciplinas: los mitos griegos pueden ser analizados desde la pintura; las novelas y los cuentos pueden ser readaptados desde el mundo de las historietas; el cine toma ciertos recursos y temas del teatro. En todos estos casos y muchos más, la labor docente, dentro de las disciplinas humaní­sticas, podrí­a dirigirse a la creación de una red que comunique distintos temas y conte­nidos con el propósito de estimular la investigación y de desarrollar en los estu­diantes una serie de habilidades lingüí­sticas como la retención de información, la asociación, la comparación, la identificación del discurso paródico, la crí­tica literaria, entre otras.   Abstract The study of the intertextuality is, within the literary and sciences of the langua­ge studies, one of the most boarded scopes by the critics and the theoreticians of Literature; nevertheless, the concept of intertextuality can be analyzed in dia­logue with other humanistic disciplines, such as Art History, Universal History, Philosophy, Anthropology and Mythology, among others. Intertextuality, term invented by Julia Kristeva, is the relation between a text and another (hypotext and hypertext, according to the terminology of Gérard Genette); this concept might work not only to establish the relation between two literary texts, but also to cause the dialogue between two pieces of different dis­ciplines: the Greek myths can be analyzed from the painting; novels and stories can be readapted from the world of comic strips; cinema takes certain resources and subjects from the theater. In all these cases and many more, the educational work, within the humanistic disciplines, could go to the creation of a network that communicates different subjects and contents in order to stimulate the investiga­tion and development in students of a series of linguistic abilities like information retention, association, comparison, identification of the parodic speech, literary critic, among others.

scholarly journals Til sammenligning

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (127) ◽  
pp. 111-130
Author(s):  
Rikke Andersen Kraglund
Keyword(s):  
Literary Theory ◽  
Julia Kristeva ◽  
Roland Barthes ◽  
Literary Texts ◽  
Middle Ground ◽  
Discursive Space ◽  
Broad Concept ◽  
Universal Feature ◽  
The One ◽  
Gerard Genette

Generally, the conception of intertextual references in literary theory has been either very broad or very narrow and detail-oriented. On the one hand, Roland Barthes and Julia Kristeva conceive of intertext as a universal feature of all texts. No text is original and made by itself isolated from those existing before it. All texts, in short, are intertexts because they refer to other texts, conventions, and presuppositions beyond authors’ intentions. But this broad concept is difficult to work with in analyzing works of literature. It poses problems of identification and does not mark out a manageable area of investigation or object of attention with the undefined and infinite discursive space it designates and its idea about anonymous citations. Generally, the conception of intertextual references in literary theory has been either very broad or very narrow and detail-oriented. On the one hand, Roland Barthes and Julia Kristeva conceive of intertext as a universal feature of all texts. No text is original and made by itself isolated from those existing before it. All texts, in short, are intertexts because they refer to other texts, conventions, and presuppositions beyond authors’ intentions. But this broad concept is difficult to work with in analyzing works of literature. It poses problems of identification and does not mark out a manageable area of investigation or object of attention with the undefined and infinite discursive space it designates and its idea about anonymous citations.  On the other hand, we have the more restricted view that focuses on specific, readily recognized signs of intertextual relations between literary texts. Gérard Genette offers a vocabulary to describe the interaction between only two identifiable texts. In this article, I shall propose a third alternative that takes the middle ground and investigate what a rhetorical approach to intertextuality means for the understanding of the concept of comparison.

scholarly journals Studying the Place of Intertextuality in Iranian Painting (Case Samples: Qajar Era)

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Panahi Siamak ◽  
Farazjou Forough ◽  
Majdi Shima
Keyword(s):  
Art History ◽  
Julia Kristeva ◽  
Roland Barthes ◽  
Community Art ◽  
First Time ◽  
Gerard Genette

Intertextuality studies are as one of the significant approaches in literature and art. This term for the first time was proposed by Julia Kristeva 60s and later it was expanded by persons such as Roland Barthes, Gerard Genette & et al. Nowadays we are living in a world which is full of texts and these texts are born in it, grow and finally give their place to other texts but they aren’t disappeared. These texts are knotted to each other with intertextuality rules and they have interaction with each other. They sometimes deny or confirm each other but any way they influence on each other. In fact existence of sign world and existing texts and their effects in creation of each artistic effect are inevitable.This paper intends to consider the applicable studies of intertextuality in Iranian community art by concentrating on Qajar era painting. And it refers to the role of intertextuality in producing and reading the works by studying the case samples.The methodology in this research with review of art history and due to the analyses done on the works (sample to sample) will be analytic-descriptive according to the allegorical method.

Does Literature Matter Today? Thoughts of the Outside

CounterText ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 98-113
Author(s):  
Shaobo Xie
Keyword(s):  
Aesthetic Education ◽  
The Other ◽  
Human Values ◽  
Literary Texts ◽  
Lost Cause ◽  
Western Tradition ◽  
The World

The paper celebrates the publication of Ranjan Ghosh and J. Hillis Miller's Thinking Literature across Continents as a significant event in the age of neoliberalism. It argues that, in spite of the different premises and the resulting interpretative procedures respectively championed by the two co-authors, both of them anchor their readings of literary texts in a concept of literature that is diametrically opposed to neoliberal rationality, and both impassionedly safeguard human values and experiences that resist the technologisation and marketisation of the humanities and aesthetic education. While Ghosh's readings of literature offer lightning flashes of thought from the outside of the Western tradition, signalling a new culture of reading as well as a new manner of appreciation of the other, Miller dedicatedly speaks and thinks against the hegemony of neoliberal reason, opening our eyes to the kind of change our teaching or reading of literature can trigger in the world, and the role aesthetic education should and can play at a time when the humanities are considered ‘a lost cause’.

Boatmen, Wastrels, and Demons: Figures of Literature

CounterText ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simona Sawhney
Keyword(s):  
Social Studies ◽  
World Literature ◽  
Literary Texts ◽  
Sanskrit Text ◽  
Modern Democracy ◽  
Political Debates ◽  
The World ◽  
National Literatures

Engaging some of the questions opened by Ranjan Ghosh's and J. Hillis Miller's book Thinking Literature Across Continents (2016), this essay begins by returning to Aijaz Ahmad's earlier invocation of World Literature as a project that, like the proletariat itself, must stand in an antithetical relation to the capitalism that produced it. It asks: is there an essential link between a certain idea of literature and a figure of the world? If we try to broach this link through Derrida's enigmatic and repeated reflections on the secret – a secret ‘shared’ by both literature and democracy – how would we grasp Derrida's insistence on the ‘Latinity’ of literature? The groundlessness of reading that we confront most vividly in our encounter with fictional texts is both intensified, and in a way, clarified, by new readings and questions posed by the emergence of new reading publics. The essay contends that rather than being taught as representatives of national literatures, literary texts in ‘World Literature’ courses should be read as sites where serious historical and political debates are staged – debates which, while being local, are the bearers of universal significance. Such readings can only take place if World Literature strengthens its connections with the disciplines Miller calls, in the book, Social Studies. Paying particular attention to the Hindi writer Premchand's last story ‘Kafan’, and a brief section from the Sanskrit text the Natyashastra, it argues that struggles over representation, over the staging of minoritised figures, are integral to fiction and precede the thinking of modern democracy.

Text Prophetism

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 40
Author(s):  
Elvira Lumi ◽  
Lediona Lumi
Keyword(s):  
Key Words ◽  
Literary Texts ◽  
Modern World ◽  
Greek Mythology ◽  
Divine Inspiration ◽  
Religious Doctrine ◽  
The World ◽  
Poetic Text ◽  
Poetic Diction ◽  
Life On Earth

"Utterance universalism" as a phrase is unclear, but it is enough to include the term "prophetism". As a metaphysical concept, it refers to a text written with inspiration which confirms visions of a "divine inspiration", "poetic" - "legal", that contains trace, revelation or interpretation of the origin of the creation of the world and life on earth but it warns and prospects their future in the form of a projection, literary paradigm, religious doctrine and law. Prophetic texts reformulate "toll-telling" with messages, ideas, which put forth (lat. "Utters Forth" gr. "Forthteller") hidden facts from fiction and imagination. Prometheus, gr. Prometheus (/ prəmiθprə-mee-mo means "forethought") is a Titan in Greek mythology, best known as the deity in Greek mythology who was the creator of humanity and charity of its largest, who stole fire from the mount Olympus and gave it to the mankind. Prophetic texts derive from a range of artifacts and prophetic elements, as the creative magic or the miracle of literary texts, symbolism, musicality, rhythm, images, poetic rhetoric, valence of meaning of the text, code of poetic diction that refers to either a singer in a trance or a person inspired in delirium, who believes he is sent by his God with a message to tell about events and figures that have existed, or the imaginary ancient and modern world. Text Prophetism is a combination of artifacts and platonic idealism. Key words: text Prophetism, holy text, poetic text, law text, vision, image, figure

Pigs and Humans

2007 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Art History ◽  
Diverse Range ◽  
Domestic Pigs ◽  
Food Taboo ◽  
The World

Pigs are one of the most iconic but also paradoxical animals ever to have developed a relationship with humans. This relationship has been a long and varied one: from noble wild beast of the forest to mass produced farmyard animal; from a symbol of status and plenty to a widespread religious food taboo; from revered religious totem to a parodied symbol of filth and debauchery. Pigs and Humans brings together some of the key scholars whose research is highlighting the role wild and domestic pigs have played in human societies around the world over the last 10,000 years. The 22 contributors cover a broad and diverse range of temporal, geographical, and topical themes, grounded within the disciplines of archaeology, zoology, anthropology, and biology, as well as art history and history. They explore such areas as evolution and taxonomy, domestication and husbandry, ethnography, and ritual and art, and present some of the latest theories and methodological techniques. The volume as a whole is generously illustrated and will enhance our understanding of many of the issues regarding our complex and ever changing relationship with the pig.

Baroque and the Political Language of Formalism (1845–1945): Burckhardt, Wölfflin, Gurlitt, Brinckmann, Sedlmayr

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evonne Levy
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual History ◽  
Political Thought ◽  
Art History ◽  
Architectural History ◽  
The Political ◽  
Nazi Party ◽  
Political Views ◽  
The World ◽  
Art Historians ◽  
Central Argument

<P>This study in intellectual history places the art historical concept of the Baroque amidst world events, political thought, and the political views of art historians themselves. Exploring the political biographies and writings on the Baroque (primarily its architecture) of five prominent Germanophone figures, Levy gives a face to art history, showing its concepts arising in the world. From Jacob Burckhardt’s still debated "Jesuit style" to Hans Sedlmayr’s <I>Reichsstil</I>, the Baroque concepts of these German, Swiss and Austrian art historians, all politically conservative, and two of whom joined the Nazi party, were all took shape in reaction to immediate social and political circumstances. </P> <P>A central argument of the book is that basic terms of architectural history drew from a long established language of political thought. This vocabulary, applied in the formalisms of Wölfflin and Gurlitt, has endured as art history’s unacknowledged political substrate for generations. Classic works, like Wölfflin’s <I>Kunstgeschichtliche Grundbegriffe</I> are interpreted anew here, supported by new documents from the papers of each figure.</P>

Teaching How Language Reveals Character

2007 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARGARET METZGER
Keyword(s):  
Entry Point ◽  
Literary Texts ◽  
Veteran Teacher ◽  
Reading And Writing ◽  
The World ◽  
Literary Characters ◽  
Analytic Skills ◽  
Additional Reading

In this Voices Inside Schools essay, a veteran teacher shares her reflections on a classroom unit entitled "How Language Reveals Character." The goal of the unit is to help adolescents read and write critically through an exploration of literary characters' language. Beginning by drawing on adolescents' fascination with one another, Metzger first asks students to analyze the language of their peers as an entry point to thinking about how language and character may be connected. The unit then moves on to ask students to transfer their analytic skills to the world of fiction and how language reveals character in literary texts. Metzger focuses on life inside her classroom, how the unit is taught, how students respond, and how teachers can expand on the concepts of language and character through additional reading and writing activities.

scholarly journals On New Paths for the Exploration of the Armenian Art

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Levon Chookaszian
Keyword(s):  
Art History ◽  
Wall Paintings ◽  
State University ◽  
The World ◽  
History Of ◽  
History And Theory

During the last centuries, numerous books and papers were published on Armenian art in different collections of the world. Still there is an ocean of work to do in this field to fill in the gaps of the history of Armenian art. The members of the Chair of Armenian Art History and Theory at Yerevan State University were the first to carry out a systematic work in Romania in 2011-2017 and Iran in 2015-2019 exploring the Armenian miniatures, icons, wall paintings, silverwork, textiles etc. The results of this work were presented as papers during the conferences and published as articles.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document