Acoustic Hemifields in the Spatial Release from Masking of Speech by Noise

2003 ◽  
Vol 14 (09) ◽  
pp. 518-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.P. Phillips ◽  
B.K. Vigneault-MacLean ◽  
S.E. Boehnke ◽  
S.E. Hall
Keyword(s):  
Speech Intelligibility ◽  
Angular Separation ◽  
Hearing In Noise ◽  
Noise Masker ◽  
Spatial Release ◽  
Neurophysiological Data ◽  
Significant Release ◽  
Left And Right ◽  
Noise Test ◽  
Release From Masking

The Hearing-in-Noise Test (HINT) is able to measure the benefit to speech intelligibility in noise conferred when the noise masker is displaced 90 degrees in eccentricity from a speech source located at zero degrees azimuth. Both psychoacoustic and neurophysiological data suggest that the perceptual benefit of the 90-degree azimuth separation would be greatest if the speech and noise were presented in different acoustic hemifields, and would be smallest if the two sources were in the same acoustic hemifield. The present study tested this hypothesis directly in ten normal-hearing adult listeners. Using the HINT stimuli, we confirmed the hypothesis. Release from masking scores averaged 8.61 dB for "between-hemifield" conditions, 6.05 dB for HINT conditions, and 1.27 dB for "within-hemifield" conditions, even though all stimulus configurations retained a 90-degree angular separation of speech and noise. These data indicate that absolute separation of speech and noise alone is insufficient to guarantee a significant release from masking, and they suggest that what matters is the location of the stimulus elements relative to the left and right spatial perceptual channels. La Prueba de Audición en Ruido (HINT) permite medir los beneficios para la inteligibilidad del lenguaje en ruido que ocurre cuando el enmascarador de ruido es desplazado 90 grados de la fuente de lenguaje localizada a 0 grados azimut. Tanto los datos psicoacústicos como neurofisiológicos sugieren que el beneficio perceptual de la separación de 90 grados azimut sería mayor si el lenguaje y el ruido fueran presentados en diferentes hemicampos acústicos, y sería menor si las dos fuentes estuvieran en el mismo hemicampo. El presente estudio evaluó esta hipótesis directamente en diez sujetos adultos normo-oyentes. Utilizando los estímulos del HINT, confirmamos la hipótesis. Los puntajes de liberación del enmascaramiento promediaron 8.61 dB para las condiciones de "entre-hemicampos". 6.05 dB para las condiciones del HINT, y 1.27 para las condiciones "dentro del hemicampo", a pesar de que la configuración de todos los estímulos retuvo una separación angular de 90 grados entre el lenguaje y el ruido. Estos datos indican que la separación absoluta del ruido y lenguaje solos es insuficiente para garantizar una liberación significativa del enmascaramiento, y sugieren que lo que importa es la localización de los elementos del estímulo con relación a los canales perceptuales espaciales derecho e izquierdo.

scholarly journals Validating a Rapid, Automated Test of Spatial Release From Masking

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 507-518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kasey M. Jakien ◽  
Sean D. Kampel ◽  
Meghan M. Stansell ◽  
Frederick J. Gallun
Keyword(s):  
Speech Intelligibility ◽  
Strong Predictor ◽  
Target Sentence ◽  
Anechoic Chamber ◽  
Older Individuals ◽  
Spatial Release ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Release From Masking ◽  
Test Repetition ◽  
Future Work

Purpose To evaluate the test–retest reliability of a headphone-based spatial release from a masking task with two maskers (referred to here as the SR2) and to describe its relationship to the same test done over loudspeakers in an anechoic chamber (the SR2A). We explore what thresholds tell us about certain populations (such as older individuals or individuals with hearing impairment) and discuss how the SR2 might be useful in the clinic. Method Fifty-four participants completed speech intelligibility tests in which a target phrase and two masking phrases from the Coordinate Response Measure corpus (Bolia, Nelson, Ericson, & Simpson, 2000) were presented either via earphones using a virtual spatial array or via loudspeakers in an anechoic chamber. For the SR2, the target sentence was always at 0° azimuth angle, and the maskers were either colocated at 0° or positioned at ± 45°. For the SR2A, the target was located at 0°, and the maskers were colocated or located at ± 15°, ± 30°, ± 45°, ± 90°, or ± 135°. Spatial release from masking was determined as the difference between thresholds in the colocated condition and each spatially separated condition. All participants completed the SR2 at least twice, and 29 of the individuals who completed the SR2 at least twice also participated in the SR2A. In a second experiment, 40 participants completed the SR2 8 times, and the changes in performance were evaluated as a function of test repetition. Results Mean thresholds were slightly better on the SR2 after the first repetition but were consistent across 8 subsequent testing sessions. Performance was consistent for the SR2A, regardless of the number of times testing was repeated. The SR2, which simulates 45° separations of target and maskers, produced spatially separated thresholds that were similar to thresholds obtained with 30° of separation in the anechoic chamber. Over headphones and in the anechoic chamber, pure-tone average was a strong predictor of spatial release, whereas age only reached significance for colocated conditions. Conclusions The SR2 is a reliable and effective method of testing spatial release from masking, suitable for screening abnormal listening abilities and for tracking rehabilitation over time. Future work should focus on developing and validating rapid, automated testing to identify the ability of listeners to benefit from high-frequency amplification, smaller spatial separations, and larger spectral differences among talkers.

Reception Thresholds for Sentences in Quiet and Noise for Monolingual English and Bilingual Mandarin-English Listeners

2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (04) ◽  
pp. 239-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Stuart ◽  
Jianliang Zhang ◽  
Shannon Swink
Keyword(s):  
Masking Effect ◽  
Group Differences ◽  
Hearing In Noise ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
English Speaking ◽  
Continuous Noise ◽  
Noise Test ◽  
Release From Masking ◽  
L1 And L2

Background: Bilingual (BL) listeners' difficulties in adverse noise conditions are exacerbated when perceiving their second language (L2) relative to their first language (L1). Perception of L2 is also significantly poorer by BL listeners compared to native monolingual (ML) listeners. Purpose: The purpose of the study was to examine the effect of stationary and nonstationary energetic noise maskers on L1 and L2 speech perception in native and nonnative listeners. Research Design: A mixed multivariate quasi-experimental design was employed. Study Sample: Two groups of 12 ML English-speaking and BL Mandarin-English-speaking normal-hearing young adult female volunteers participated. Data Collection and Analysis: An adaptive technique was employed to determine reception thresholds for sentences (RTSs) in quiet and in backgrounds of competing continuous and interrupted noise. The noises differed only in their temporal continuity. The sentence stimuli employed consisted of the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) and the Mandarin Hearing in Noise Test (MHINT). ML participants received the HINT stimuli while the BL participants received both HINT and MHINT stimuli. Between-group differences in RTSs were examined for the same stimuli (i.e., HINT) and for L1 stimuli (i.e., HINT vs. MHINT). Within-group differences in RTSs were examined with the BL participants' perception of L1 and L2 stimuli (i.e., MHINT vs. HINT). The amount of “release from masking” (i.e., the difference of RTS signal-to-noise ratios [SNRs] in interrupted and continuous noise) was also examined between and within groups. Results: In quiet there was no significant difference in mean RTSs between the BL and ML participants with their respective L1 stimuli; MLs had significantly lower mean RTSs in English compared to the BLs; and mean RTSs for the BLs were significantly lower for L1 versus L2 stimulus. In noise, a significantly higher RTS SNR was found for the MLs in continuous noise but not interrupted noise for L1 stimuli compared to the BLs; BLs had a significantly higher mean RTSs in English compared to the MLs; and BLs had significantly higher mean RTSs for L2 versus L1 stimuli. The release from masking was significantly greater for MLs compared to BLs with their respective L1 stimuli and with the same English stimuli. There was no significant difference for the BLs' release from masking with L1 versus L2 stimulus. Conclusion: BL listeners display significantly poorer performance when perceiving nonnative L2 sentences in quiet and in continuous and interrupted noise relative ML listeners. When listening to their respective native L1 sentences, only a difference in continuous noise was found. This difference was attributed to differential masking effect on the English stimuli. Similar performance in the interrupted noise between the ML and BL participants with L1 stimuli and the equivalent release from masking with the BL participants for both L1 and L2 stimuli suggest comparable basic auditory temporal resolving capacities between these ethnic groups.

Amplified Earmuffs

2005 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas G. Dolan ◽  
Dennis O’Loughlin
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Speech Intelligibility ◽  
Noise Exposure ◽  
High Input ◽  
Industrial Noise ◽  
Low Input ◽  
Speech In Noise ◽  
Hearing In Noise ◽  
Noise Test

Purpose: To determine how amplified earmuffs affect the intelligibility of speech in noise for people with hearing loss, and to determine how various brands of amplified earmuffs compare in terms of speech intelligibility and electroacoustic response. Method: The Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) was used to measure the intelligibility of speech for 10 participants with hearing loss when they listened in a background of recorded industrial noise at 85 dBA. Participants listened with 3 different sets of amplified earmuffs (Peltor Tactical 7-S, Elvex COM 55, and Bilsom 707 Impact II), with a set of passive earmuffs (E-A-R Ultra 9000), and with ears unoccluded. Two measurements of sentence threshold were obtained under each of the 5 listening conditions. Gain was measured electroacoustically across a range of input levels and frequencies for each amplified earmuff. Results: Electroacoustic measurements indicated that each electronic earmuff amplified at low input levels and attenuated at high input levels. However, gain characteristics varied greatly across devices. HINT sentence thresholds were not significantly different across the 5 listening conditions or across the 2 trials. Conclusion: Results suggest that each type of earmuff can be used to reduce the noise exposure of people with hearing loss without compromising their ability to understand speech.

scholarly journals Effect of competitive acoustic environments on speech intelligibility

2021 ◽  
Vol 2069 (1) ◽  
pp. 012162
Author(s):  
G E Puglisi ◽  
A Warzybok ◽  
A Astolfi ◽  
B Kollmeier
Keyword(s):  
Speech Intelligibility ◽  
Informational Content ◽  
Noise Sources ◽  
School Settings ◽  
Listening Tests ◽  
Noise Type ◽  
Spatial Release ◽  
Release From Masking ◽  
Acoustic Environments ◽  
Design Of Learning Environments

Abstract Excessive noise and reverberation times degrade listening abilities in everyday life environments. This is particularly true for school settings. Most classrooms in Italy are settled in historical buildings that generate competitive acoustic environments. So far, few studies investigated the effect of real acoustics on speech intelligibility and on the spatial release from masking, focusing more on laboratory conditions. Also, the effect of noise on speech intelligibility was widely investigated considering its energetic rather than its informational content. Therefore, a study involving normal hearing adults was performed presenting listening tests via headphone and considering the competitive real acoustics of two primary-school classrooms with reverberation time of 0.4 s and 3.1 s, respectively. The main objective was the investigation of the effect of reverberation and noise on the spatial release from masking to help the design of learning environments. Binaural room impulse responses were acquired, with noise sources at different azimuths from the listener’s head. The spatial release from masking was significantly affected by noise type and reverberation. Longer reverberation times brought to worst speech intelligibility, with speech recognition thresholds higher by 6 dB on average. Noise with an informational content was detrimental by 7 dB with respect to an energetic noise.

scholarly journals The Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test for Children

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 233121651983712 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lena L. N. Wong ◽  
Yuan Chen ◽  
Kam P. Leung
Keyword(s):  
Speech Intelligibility ◽  
Correction Factors ◽  
Sound Fields ◽  
Hearing In Noise ◽  
Age Correction ◽  
Noise Test ◽  
Two Stages ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Specific Correction ◽  
Primary And Secondary School

The aim of this study was to develop a children's version of the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT-C). This was accomplished in two stages. First, a total of 120 sentences understood by children aged 6-7 years were selected from the original pool of CHINT sentences and were grouped into 12 lists, each containing 10 sentences composed of 10 characters. Following this, 260 primary and secondary school children, with ages ranging from 6 to 17 years, and 21 adults of age 18 or older were administered the CHINT-C to determine its reliability/validity, normative data, and age-specific correction factors. The result showed good interlist reliability, and test–retest reliability for the CHINT-C. The speech perception skills assessed using the CHINT-C do not reach adult level until after 11-13 years of age. Correction factors were established that could be used to determine age-specific norms for the evaluation of speech intelligibility of children in various sound fields.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document