scholarly journals Derecho a la Salud: recurso extraordinario y arbitrariedad

Author(s):  
Luciana Eleas ◽  
Enzo Pautassi

El caso en análisis, que plantea un conflicto entre un particular y su obra social por la cobertura de una prótesis importada, nos remite a cuestiones que, están íntimamente ligadas con el derecho a la salud, tanto de índole procesal como sustancial. Ello así, analizaremos - en primer lugar - las nociones fundamentales sobre el derecho a la salud y particularmente su vinculación con los conflictos entre afiliados y obras sociales. Por otra parte, ahondaremos en la acción de amparo como la vía idónea para encaminar los reclamos tendientes a obtener la tutela efectiva del derecho a la salud. Profundizaremos las exigencias para su admisibilidad y revisaremos si las limitaciones procesales propias de aquella acción son compatibles con el derecho de defensa de las obras sociales. Nos abocaremos también al estudio del criterio de nuestro Supremo Tribunal con respecto de arbitrariedad de sentencias denegatorias de recursos. Por último, analizaremos el voto en disidencia del Dr. Rosatti y las cuestiones procesales derivadas del mismo.   The case under analysis, which raises a conflict between a person and his health insurance for the coverage of an imported prosthesis, refers us to issues that are closely linked to the right to health, both procedural and substantial in nature. In this way, wewillanalyze - in the first place - the fundamental notion saboutt he right to health and particular lyits link with the conflicts bet ween affiliates and health insurance companies. On the other hand, we will delve into the amparo proceedings as the ideal way to direct claims aimed at obtaining effective protection of the right to health. We will deepen the requirements for its admissibility and review if the procedural limitations of that action are compatible with the right of defense of health insurance companies. We will also study the criteria of our Supreme Court regarding arbitrariness of judgments denying appeals. Finally, we will analyze the dissenting vote of Rosatti and the procedural issues derived from it.

Author(s):  
Silke Piedmont ◽  
Anna Katharina Reinhold ◽  
Jens-Oliver Bock ◽  
Enno Swart ◽  
Bernt-Peter Robra

Abstract Objectives/Background In many countries, the use of emergency medical services (EMS) increases steadily each year. At the same time, the percentage of life-threatening complaints decreases. To redesign the system, an assessment and consideration of the patients’ perspectives is helpful. Methods We conducted a paper-based survey of German EMS patients who had at least one case of prehospital emergency care in 2016. Four health insurance companies sent out the questionnaire to 1312 insured persons. We linked the self-reported data of 254 respondents to corresponding claims data provided by their health insurance companies. The analysis focuses a.) how strongly patients tend to call EMS for themselves and others given different health-related scenarios, b.) self-perceived health complaints in their own index case of prehospital emergency care and c.) subjective emergency status in combination with so-called “objective” characteristics of subsequent EMS and inpatient care. We report principal diagnoses of (1) respondents, (2) 57,240 EMS users who are not part of the survey and (3) all 20,063,689 inpatients in German hospitals. Diagnoses for group 1 and 2 only cover the inpatient stay that started on the day of the last EMS use in 2016. Results According to the survey, the threshold to call an ambulance is lower for someone else than for oneself. In 89% of all cases during their own EMS use, a third party called the ambulance. The most common, self-reported complaints were pain (38%), problems with heart and circulation (32%), and loss of consciousness (17%). The majority of respondents indicated that their EMS use was due to an emergency (89%). We could detect no or only weak associations between patients’ subjective urgency and different items for objective care. Conclusion Dispatchers can possibly optimize or reduce the disposition of EMS staff and vehicles if they spoke directly to the patients more often. Nonetheless, there is need for further research on how strongly the patients’ perceived urgency may affect the disposition, rapidness of the service and transport targets.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2018/1) ◽  

The health insurance market in Poland reflects global trends – such as the rising awareness of personal health impact on quality of life. As a consequence, the health insurance market has seen substantial growth during the last years, which is forecasted to continue at over 20 percent more than life or P&C insurance globally. However, private health insurance has not yet unlocked its full potential.


2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 477
Author(s):  
Beáta Gavurová ◽  
Adela Klepáková ◽  
Ladislava Ivančová

The day surgery is a highly effective tool for providing health care which has been used in Slovakia only for the last decade. The unified system of payment for inpatient or outpatient (day care) surgeries causes the reduction of health insurance companies´ spending. Incorrectly configured and economically demotivating system of refunding is a cause of lagging behind the European average in utilization of day surgery. Without the evaluation of day surgery it is not possible to link the progress in the social sphere, which leads to the restriction of day surgery availability for some social groups and thus the subsequent stagnation of day surgery in Slovakia. This contribution presents a pilot study conducted in Slovakia and its partial findings focused on the development and trends in the implementation of day surgery in order to increase the efficiency healthcare system.


Author(s):  
Igor M. Akulin ◽  
Lubov Yu. Zhiguleva

The RF health care reform is gaining momentum. A thorough consideration should be given to the discussion on the need to exclude health insurance companies from the compulsory health insurance system (CHI). Formation of the National Health Care System of Russia is the main problem of the national health care at this stage of reforms. Additional payment for medical services in the CHI by the general public is not advisable. Changes in the regulatory framework of the CHI system is deemed to be the basis for reforming the system of compulsory and voluntary health insurance in Russia.   


1996 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 263-263
Author(s):  
R J H

Readers may be surprised to see the article "Separation or Synthesis: A Holistic Approach to Therapeutics" in this issue. There are no core content statements related to this article. Yet, from time to time, I exercise my editorial prerogative to publish something that is outside the usual—to stimulate, to look ahead to what may be important in the future, and to provoke our readers. There is a great deal of interest today in alternative medicine. An article in The New England Journal of Medicine reports that nearly one third of Americans use some form of alternative medical therapy.1 There is now an Office of Alternative Medicine at the National Institutes of Health supporting grants in this field, and some health insurance companies recently began providing (for an added premium) coverage for these therapies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  

Malnutrition is a significant negative factor for surgical patients in the entire perioperative period. However, this factor can be controlled and is easy to detect in the outpatient setting. Starting from May 1, 2020, surgeons have the possibility to prescribe sipping under certain conditions for a limited period of 4 weeks. Thereby they have become able to strongly impact any altered nutritional status both preoperatively and postoperatively. The authors describe scoring questionnaires used for the detection of malnutrition and required by health insurance companies. Additionally, prescribing conditions and potential mistakes in the outpatient setting are analysed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (6-7) ◽  
pp. 519-536
Author(s):  
Thomas Gerlinger

Zusammenfassung Ein vielgestaltiger Wandel in Gesundheitssystem und Gesundheitspolitik erschwert den Verbänden der Ärzte und Krankenkassen die Wahrnehmung ihrer Aufgaben im Rahmen der gemeinsamen Selbstverwaltung. Erstens steigert die mit der Einrichtung des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses verbundene transsektorale Ausweitung der korporatistischen Verhandlungssystemen die Komplexität der Akteurs- und Interessenkonstellationen in der gemeinsamen Selbstverwaltung. Zweitens trägt der ordnungspolitische Wandel in Richtung auf einen regulierten Wettbewerb zu einer Binnendifferenzierung der Interessen in der Ärzteschaft und bei den Krankenkassen bei. Drittens erschwert auf der Seite der Ärzteschaft zusätzlich die Ausdifferenzierung von Disziplinen, Versorgungseinrichtungen und -formen sowie von beruflichen Identitäten die für das Funktionieren der gemeinsamen Selbstverwaltung erforderliche Aggregation von Interessen und die Kompromissfindung. Abstract A multi-faceted change in the health system and health policy makes it difficult for associations of doctors and health insurance companies to carry out their tasks within the framework of joint self-government. First, the transsectoral expansion of corporatist bargaining systems associated with the establishment of the Joint Federal Committee increases the complexity of stakeholder and stakeholder constellations in joint self-government. Second, regulatory change towards regulated competition contributes to an internal differentiation of interests in the medical profession and in the health insurance funds. Third, on the side of the medical profession, the differentiation of disciplines and care as well as of occupational identities further complicates the aggregation of interests and compromise-finding necessary for the functioning of joint self-administration.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document