Are the signs of collective dominance in law “On protection of competition” helpful for arbitration judges in taking right decisions?
The Russian officials extensively apply antitrust prohibitions in the domestic markets. Therefore, it is necessary to correctly determine the presence of dominant companies in the market. The article examines the signs of collective dominance in the antimonopoly practice in Russia. For this purpose, the author examines judicial acts for cases on cancellation of decisions of the Russian Antimonopoly authority concerning collective dominance for 2007-2017, and considers type I and type II errors arising in establishing collective dominance. The empirical analysis of the factors influencing judicial reviews shows that the predictions of economic theory are not sufficiently taken into account in law enforcement.
2010 ◽
Vol 1
(3)
◽
pp. 268
1989 ◽
Vol 25
(3)
◽
pp. 451-454
◽
2017 ◽
Vol 25
◽
pp. 2583-2594