Special relativity: Its inconsistency with the standard wave equation

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen J. Crothers
2001 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 347-365
Author(s):  
B. H. Lavenda

Abstract The transformation from a time-dependent random walk to quantum mechanics converts a modi­fied Bessel function into an ordinary one together with a phase factor e,ir/2 for each time the electron flips both direction and handedness. Causality requires the argument to be greater than the order of the Bessel function. Assuming equal probabilities for jumps ± 1 , the normalized modified Bessel function of an imaginary argument is the solution of the finite difference differential Schrödinger equation whereas the same function of a real argument satisfies the diffusion equation. In the nonrelativistic limit, the stability condition of the difference scheme contains the mass whereas in the ultrarelativistic limit only the velocity of light appears. Particle waves in the nonrelativistic limit become elastic waves in the ultrarelativistic limit with a phase shift in the frequency and wave number of 7r/2. The ordinary Bessel function satisfies a second order recurrence relation which is a finite difference differential wave equation, using non-nearest neighbors, whose solutions are the chirality components of a free-particle in the zero fermion mass limit. Reintroducing the mass by a phase transformation transforms the wave equation into the Klein-Gordon equation but does not admit a solution in terms of ordinary Bessel functions. However, a sign change of the mass term permits a solution in terms of a modified Bessel function whose recurrence formulas produce all the results of special relativity. The Lorentz transformation maximizes the integral of the modified Bessel function and determines the paths of steepest descent in the classical limit. If the definitions of frequency and wave number in terms of the phase were used in special relativity, the condition that the frame be inertial would equate the superluminal phase velocity with the particle velocity in violation of causality. In order to get surfaces of constant phase to move at the group velocity, an integrating factor is required which determines how the intensity decays in time. The phase correlation between neighboring sites in quantum mechanics is given by the phase factor for the electron to reverse its direction, whereas, in special relativity, it is given by the Doppler shift.


The ten equations are derived that govern, to the first order, the propagation of small general perturbations in the general unsteady flow of a general fluid, in three space-variables and time. The condition that any hypersurface is a wave hypersurface of these equations is obtained, and the envelope of all such wave hypersurfaces that pass through a given point at a given time, i. e. the wave hyperconoid, is determined. These results, which are all invariant under galilean transformation, are progressively specialized, through homentropic flow and irrotational homentropic flow, to steady uniform flow, for which both the convected wave-equation and the standard wave-equation, with their wave hypersurfaces, are finally recovered. A special class of reference-frames is considered, namely those whose origins move with the fluid. It is then shown that, for observers at the origins of all such reference frames, the wave hypersurfaces satisfy specially simple equations locally. These equations are identical with those for waves in a uniform fluid at rest relative to the reference frame, except that the wave speed is not constant but varies with position and time in accordance with the variable mean flow. These specially simple equations appear to be invariant for galilean transformations between all such observers. These results are briefly applied, in reverse order, to Maxwell’s equations, and to equations more general than Maxwell’s, for the electric and magnetic field-strengths.


Geophysics ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. E1-E10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Zhang ◽  
Guanquan Zhang ◽  
Norman Bleistein

One-way wave operators are powerful tools for forward modeling and migration. Here, we describe a recently developed true-amplitude implementation of modified one-way operators and present some numerical examples. By “true-amplitude” one-way forward modeling we mean that the solutions are dynamically correct as well as kinematically correct. That is, ray theory applied to these equations yields the upward- and downward-traveling eikonal equations of the full wave equation, and the amplitude satisfies the transport equation of the full wave equation. The solutions of these equations are used in the standard wave-equation migration imaging condition. The boundary data for the downgoing wave is also modified from the one used in the classic theory because the latter data is not consistent with a point source for the full wave equation. When the full wave-form solutions are replaced by their ray-theoretic approximations, the imaging formula reduces to the common-shot Kirchhoff inversion formula. In this sense, the migration is true amplitude as well. On the other hand, this new method retains all of the fidelity features of wave equation migration. Computer output using numerically generated data confirms the accuracy of this inversion method. However, there are practical limitations. The observed data must be a solution of the wave equation. Therefore, the data must be collected from a single common-shot experiment. Multiexperiment data, such as common-offset data, cannot be used with this method as presently formulated.


Geophysics ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 61 (6) ◽  
pp. 1813-1821 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Ehinger ◽  
Patrick Lailly ◽  
Kurt J. Marfurt

Common‐offset migration is extremely important in the context of migration velocity analysis (MVA) since it generates geologically interpretable migrated images. However, only a wave‐equation‐based migration handles multipathing of energy in contrast to the popular Kirchhoff migration with first‐arrival traveltimes. We have combined the superior treatment of multipathing of energy by wave‐equation‐based migration with the advantages of the common‐offset domain for MVA by implementing wave‐equation migration algorithms via the use of finite‐difference Green’s functions. With this technique, we are able to apply wave‐equation migration in measurement configurations that are usually considered to be of the realm of Kirchhoff migration. In particular, wave‐equation migration of common offset sections becomes feasible. The application of our wave‐equation, common‐offset migration algorithm to the Marmousi data set confirms the large increase in interpretability of individual migrated sections, for about twice the cost of standard wave‐equation common‐shot migration. Our implementation of wave‐equation migration via the Green’s functions is based on wavefield extrapolation via paraxial one‐way wave equations. For these equations, theoretical results allow us to perform exact inverse extrapolation of wavefields.


Author(s):  
Alireza Jamali

Motivated by the well-known contradiction of special relativity and the heat equation, a wave equation for temperature scalar field is presented that also resolves the old controversy of (Lorentz) transformation of temperature and entropy. After showing that the current dogma of temperature and entropy being emergent concepts is based on but a logical fallacy, it is proposed that single particles posses entropy. This principle of fundamentality of entropy is then shown to be compatible with the equipartition theorem by yielding corrections in the quantum gravity regime.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sangwha Yi

In the Cosmological Special Relativity Theory, we study Maxwell equations, electromagnetic wave equation and function.


2020 ◽  
pp. 179-202
Author(s):  
Jim Baggott

The problem of electron spin was in some way connected with special relativity. Dirac’s fascination with relativity and his already burgeoning reputation made the search for a fully relativistic form of the new quantum mechanics irresistible. An important clue was available in a treatment that Pauli had published in 1927, in which he had represented the spin angular momemtum operators as 2 × 2 Pauli spin matrices. Dirac presumed that a proper relativistic wave equation could be derived simply by extending the spin matrices to a fourth member, but quickly realized this couldn’t be the answer. As he played around with the equations, in 1928 he found that he needed 4 × 4 matrices, instead. This allowed him to derive a relativistic wave equation, and to show that electron spin was indeed the result. The two extra solutions were subsequently shown to belong to the positron. Dirac had discovered antimatter.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-100
Author(s):  
Vina Apriliani ◽  
Ikhsan Maulidi ◽  
Budi Azhari

One of the phenomenon in marine science that is often encountered is the phenomenon of water waves. Waves that occur below the surface of seawater are called internal waves. One of the mathematical models that can represent solitary internal waves is the modified Korteweg-de Vries (mKdV) equation. Many methods can be used to construct the solution of the mKdV wave equation, one of which is the extended F-expansion method. The purpose of this study is to determine the solution of the mKdV wave equation using the extended F-expansion method. The result of solving the mKdV wave equation is the exact solutions. The exact solutions of the mKdV wave equation are expressed in the Jacobi elliptic functions, trigonometric functions, and hyperbolic functions. From this research, it is expected to be able to add insight and knowledge about the implementation of the innovative methods for solving wave equations. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document