scholarly journals Comprometimento da qualidade de vida de pacientes em quimioterapia paliativa e cuidados paliativos: Scoping Review / Life quality assessment of patients in palliative chemotherapy and palliative care: Scoping Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruna Eloise Lenhani ◽  
Dabna Hellen Tomim ◽  
Leonel Dos Santos Silva ◽  
Luciana De Alcantara Nogueira ◽  
Luciana Puchalski Kalinke
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Spiritual Care ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Palliative Chemotherapy ◽  
Life Quality ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Comfort Care ◽  
Physical Care

Objetivo:  avaliar os domínios que comprometem a qualidade de vida de pacientes com câncer avançado em tratamento quimioterápico paliativo e cuidado paliativo. Método: Trata-se de uma scoping review realizada de março a maio de 2018, nas bases de dados CINAHL, LILACS, PubMed, Cuiden e na literatura cinzenta (Google Scholar e referências encontradas nos artigos analisados), utilizando os descritores “palliative care”,“quality of life”,“emotionalcare”, “functional care”,“sexual care”, “physical care”,“social care”,“comfort care”,“spiritual care”,“palliative chemotherapy” e “cancer advanced”. Foi realizada avaliação da qualidade metodológica por meio do instrumento STROBE para estudos observacionais e o CONSORT para os ensaios clínicos. Resultados: Os nove artigos encontrados e analisados são internacionais, publicados entre 2012 e 2016, com boa qualidade metodológica. Os domínios identificados foram os físicos, sociais e emocionais; o internamento hospitalar e local de óbito são fatores que também comprometeram a qualidade de vida. Conclusão: os pacientes em quimioterapia paliativa possuem baixa qualidade de vida. Porém, a presença de familiar e o acompanhamento concomitante com o serviço de cuidados paliativos melhoram essa situação. A avaliação dos pacientes, com enfoque nestes domínios, permite à Enfermagem adotar estratégias para melhoraria da qualidade de vida.

scholarly journals Research Literature on the Intersection of Dementia, Spirituality, and Palliative Care: A Scoping Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 864-864
Author(s):  
Jennifer Palmer ◽  
Alyssa Smith ◽  
Sara Paasche-Orlow ◽  
George Fitchett
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Spiritual Care ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Research Literature ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Term Care

Abstract Dementia marks an increasingly prevalent terminal illness for which palliative care, including spiritual care, could improve quality of life. Research gaps exist in understanding the intersection of dementia, spirituality, and palliative care. Thus, we conducted the first scoping review examining the nature and breadth of peer-reviewed studies across these three topics. The scoping review followed methods from The Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual (2015). We developed a priori a scoping review protocol outlining the Population, Concept and Context for study, data sources, search strategy, inclusion/exclusion criteria, and procedure for screening, extracting, and analyzing data. The final sample consisted of 19 studies with the following themes: Characterizing Spiritual Needs, Preferences, and Resources; Characterizing Palliative or Spiritual Care; Predicting Provision of Spiritual Care; and Assessing Spiritual Care Interventions. Eighteen studies were published in the past decade, and eleven were based in Europe. The majority of studies focused on long-term care settings, grouped stages of dementia or did not specify dementia stage, and investigated interventions indirectly related to spiritual palliation. Many studies were limited in sample size and in generalizability / transferability and used less sophisticated research designs. Accordingly, research across dementia, spirituality, and palliative care needs to examine distinct stages of dementia; hospital-, home- and community-based settings; and formal spiritual care interventions (e.g., administered by chaplains) and needs to utilize rigorous study designs (e.g., randomized clinical trials). Such research could advance practice and policy that enhance quality of life for tens of millions of persons with dementia and their family members worldwide.

scholarly journals A scoping review of registry captured indicators for evaluating quality of critical care in ICU

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Issrah Jawad ◽  
Sumayyah Rashan ◽  
Chathurani Sigera ◽  
Jorge Salluh ◽  
Arjen M. Dondorp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Health Care Quality ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Background Excess morbidity and mortality following critical illness is increasingly attributed to potentially avoidable complications occurring as a result of complex ICU management (Berenholtz et al., J Crit Care 17:1-2, 2002; De Vos et al., J Crit Care 22:267-74, 2007; Zimmerman J Crit Care 1:12-5, 2002). Routine measurement of quality indicators (QIs) through an Electronic Health Record (EHR) or registries are increasingly used to benchmark care and evaluate improvement interventions. However, existing indicators of quality for intensive care are derived almost exclusively from relatively narrow subsets of ICU patients from high-income healthcare systems. The aim of this scoping review is to systematically review the literature on QIs for evaluating critical care, identify QIs, map their definitions, evidence base, and describe the variances in measurement, and both the reported advantages and challenges of implementation. Method We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane libraries from the earliest available date through to January 2019. To increase the sensitivity of the search, grey literature and reference lists were reviewed. Minimum inclusion criteria were a description of one or more QIs designed to evaluate care for patients in ICU captured through a registry platform or EHR adapted for quality of care surveillance. Results The search identified 4780 citations. Review of abstracts led to retrieval of 276 full-text articles, of which 123 articles were accepted. Fifty-one unique QIs in ICU were classified using the three components of health care quality proposed by the High Quality Health Systems (HQSS) framework. Adverse events including hospital acquired infections (13.7%), hospital processes (54.9%), and outcomes (31.4%) were the most common QIs identified. Patient reported outcome QIs accounted for less than 6%. Barriers to the implementation of QIs were described in 35.7% of articles and divided into operational barriers (51%) and acceptability barriers (49%). Conclusions Despite the complexity and risk associated with ICU care, there are only a small number of operational indicators used. Future selection of QIs would benefit from a stakeholder-driven approach, whereby the values of patients and communities and the priorities for actionable improvement as perceived by healthcare providers are prioritized and include greater focus on measuring discriminable processes of care.

scholarly journals Nocturnal digital surveillance in aged populations and its effects on health, welfare and social care provision: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matt X. Richardson ◽  
Maria Ehn ◽  
Sara Landerdahl Stridsberg ◽  
Ken Redekop ◽  
Sarah Wamala-Andersson
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Standard Care ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Care Provision ◽  
Digital Surveillance

Abstract Background Nocturnal digital surveillance technologies are being widely implemented as interventions for remotely monitoring elderly populations, and often replace person-based surveillance. Such interventions are often placed in care institutions or in the home, and monitored by qualified personnel or relatives, enabling more rapid and/or frequent assessment of the individual’s need for assistance than through on-location visits. This systematic review summarized the effects of these surveillance technologies on health, welfare and social care provision outcomes in populations ≥ 50 years, compared to standard care. Method Primary studies published 2005–2020 that assessed these technologies were identified in 11 databases of peer-reviewed literature and numerous grey literature sources. Initial screening, full-text screening, and citation searching steps yielded the studies included in the review. The Risk of Bias and ROBINS-I tools were used for quality assessment of the included studies. Result Five studies out of 744 identified records met inclusion criteria. Health-related outcomes (e.g. accidents, 2 studies) and social care outcomes (e.g. staff burden, 4 studies) did not differ between interventions and standard care. Quality of life and affect showed improvement (1 study each), as did economic outcomes (1 study). The quality of studies was low however, with all studies possessing a high to critical risk of bias. Conclusions We found little evidence for the benefit of nocturnal digital surveillance interventions as compared to standard care in several key outcomes. Higher quality intervention studies should be prioritized in future research to provide more reliable evidence.

scholarly journals Quality of life of patients with lung cancer: A scoping review

2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Turano Mota ◽  
Helder Márcio Ferreira Júnior ◽  
Fabiane Silva Pereira ◽  
Maria Aparecida Vieira ◽  
Simone de Melo Costa
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Prospective Studies ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
European Organization

Abstract Objective: To characterize scientific publications on the quality of life of people with lung cancer in order to explore current knowledge of the subject, with emphasis on assessment instruments and methodological aspects. Method: A scoping type literature review was performed. Articles were sought in the databases of the Virtual Health Library, in an integrative manner, with the descriptors: Quality of life and Lung Neoplasms, with no date of publication or language restrictions (n=138). The selection of articles was based on inclusion and exclusion criteria defined in the study proposal. Results: We included 18 publications published between 2006 and 2017, the majority (n = 10) of which had a cross-sectional design. Eight different instruments were used to evaluate the quality of life of patients with lung cancer, four of which were specific for people with cancer. There was a prevalence of the use of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Care Quality of Life Questionnaire - EORTC QLQ-C30 (n=8). Prospective studies (n=8) assessed quality of life before and after chemotherapy, physical therapy or pulmonary resection. The studies adopted different methodologies and provided conflicting results of quality of life. Cross-sectional studies with comparatively healthy subjects found an inferior quality of life for people with lung cancer. Conclusion: The scoping review contributed to the identification of the multiple evaluated instruments, both generic and specific. It found a lack of homogeneity in the methodological approaches of the studies. Further prospective studies with a specific instrument and methodological standardization to evaluate the quality of life of people with lung cancer are recommended.

scholarly journals Missing in Action: Reports of Interdisciplinary Integration in Canadian Palliative Care

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 2699-2707
Author(s):  
Maggie C. Robinson ◽  
Maryam Qureshi ◽  
Aynharan Sinnarajah ◽  
Srini Chary ◽  
Janet M. de Groot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Social Work ◽  
Spiritual Care ◽  
Psychosocial Care ◽  
Research And Practice ◽  
Barriers And Enablers ◽  
Special Concern ◽  
Missing In Action ◽  
Interdisciplinary Integration

Palliative care has an interdisciplinary tradition and Canada is a leader in its research and practice. Yet even in Canada, a full interdisciplinary complement is often lacking, with psychosocial presence ranging from 0–67.4% depending on the discipline and region. We sought to examine the most notable gaps in care from the perspective of Canadian palliative professionals. Canadian directors of palliative care programs were surveyed with respect to interdisciplinary integration. Participants responded in writing or by phone interview. We operationalized reports of interdisciplinary professions as either “present” or “under/not-represented”. The Vaismoradi, Turunen, and Bondas’ procedure was used for content analysis. Our 14 participants consisted of physicians (85.7%), nurses (14.3%), and a social worker (7.1%) from Ontario (35.7%), British Columbia (14.3%), Alberta (14.3%), Quebec (14.3%), Nova Scotia (14.3%), and New Brunswick (7.1%). Psychology and social work were equally and most frequently reported as “under/not represented” (5/14, each). All participants reported the presence of medical professionals (physicians and nurses) and these groups were not reported as under/not represented. Spiritual care and others (e.g., rehabilitation and volunteers) were infrequently reported as “under/not represented”. Qualitative themes included Commonly Represented Disciplines, Quality of Multidisciplinary Collaboration, Commonly Under-Represented Disciplines, and Special Concern: Psychosocial Care. Similar to previous reports, we found that (1) psychology was under-represented yet highly valued and (2) despite social work’s relative high presence in care, our participants reported a higher need for more. These finding highlight those psychosocial gaps in care are most frequently noted by palliative care professionals, especially psychology and social work. We speculate on barriers and enablers to addressing this need.

Does a Patient-Held Quality-of-Life Diary Benefit Patients With Inoperable Lung Cancer?

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moyra E. Mills ◽  
Liam J. Murray ◽  
Brian T. Johnston ◽  
Chris Cardwell ◽  
Michael Donnelly
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Standard Care ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Care Group ◽  
Consistent Difference ◽  
Life Questionnaire

Purpose To examine the effect of weekly completion of a patient-held quality-of-life (QOL) diary in routine oncology practice for palliative care patients. Patients and Methods In a pragmatic randomized controlled trial, 115 patients with inoperable lung cancer were randomly assigned to receive either standard care or a structured QOL diary (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 and the related lung cancer module LC13) that they completed at home each week for 16 weeks. Patients were encouraged to share the QOL information with health professionals involved in their care. Changes in QOL over time (measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Lung questionnaire and the Palliative Care Quality of Life Index), discussion of patient problems, and satisfaction with communication and general care were assessed at baseline and at 2 and 4 months after baseline. Results Analysis of QOL indicated a small but consistent difference between patients in the diary group and the standard care group. The diary group had a poorer QOL in many domains. Two different QOL summary scores (total and overall QOL) indicated a statistically significant between-group difference. No effects were found in relation to satisfaction with care, communication, or the discussion of patient problems. Conclusion The regular completion of a QOL questionnaire without appropriate feedback to health care professionals and without the provision of appropriate support may have a negative impact on inoperable lung cancer patients. Further research should focus on identifying features such as feedback loops that are required for the successful and meaningful use of QOL questionnaires in routine patient care.

scholarly journals Chemotherapy use and quality of life in cancer patients at the end of life: an integrative review

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elham Akhlaghi ◽  
Rebecca H. Lehto ◽  
Mohsen Torabikhah ◽  
Hamid Sharif Nia ◽  
Ahmad Taheri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Palliative Chemotherapy ◽  
Palliative Therapy ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related

Abstract Background When curative treatments are no longer available for cancer patients, the aim of treatment is palliative. The emphasis of palliative care is on optimizing quality of life and provided support for patients nearing end of life. However, chemotherapy is often offered as a palliative therapy for patients with advanced cancer nearing death. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the state of the science relative to use of palliative chemotherapy and maintenance of quality of life in patients with advanced cancer who were at end of life. Materials and methods Published research from January 2010 to December 2019 was reviewed using PRISMA guidelines using PubMed, Proquest, ISI web of science, Science Direct, and Scopus databases. MeSH keywords including quality of life, health related quality of life, cancer chemotherapy, drug therapy, end of life care, palliative care, palliative therapy, and palliative treatment. Findings 13 studies were evaluated based on inclusion criteria. Most of these studies identified that reduced quality of life was associated with receipt of palliative chemotherapy in patients with advanced cancer at the end of life. Conclusion Studies have primarily been conducted in European and American countries. Cultural background of patients may impact quality of life at end of life. More research is needed in developing countries including Mideastern and Asian countries.

The Palliative Care Quality Network: Improving the Quality of Caring

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 862-868 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Z. Pantilat ◽  
Angela K. Marks ◽  
Kara E. Bischoff ◽  
Ashley R. Bragg ◽  
David L. O'Riordan
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Care Quality

Depression and mental health in care homes for older people

2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom Dening ◽  
Alisoun Milne
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Mental Health ◽  
Older People ◽  
Good Practice ◽  
Life Quality ◽  
Psychosocial Interventions ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Term Care

About five per cent of ‐ generally very frail ‐ older people live in long‐term care in the UK; approximately a fifth of all deaths occur in care homes. Depression and dementia are prevalent mental health conditions in care homes; depression is reported in around a third of residents and dementia in two thirds. While there is some evidence about efficacy of medication in treating psychiatric and behavioural symptoms among residents, much less is known about the potential role of psychosocial interventions in enhancing mental health and quality of life. Quality of care varies widely across the carehome sector including support from primary and specialist health and quality and level of training. In terms of enhancing care quality, there is evidence that investing in staff training and conditions, establishing good links with healthcare providers, and developing care standards that genuinely promote good practice are likely to improve resident quality of life. This is an exciting area for research development and practice innovation for the future; taking account of users perspective, holds particular potential.

scholarly journals Longitudinal Pediatric Palliative Care: Quality of Life & Spiritual Struggle (FACE): Design and methods

2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 1033-1043 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald H. Dallas ◽  
Megan L. Wilkins ◽  
Jichuan Wang ◽  
Ana Garcia ◽  
Maureen E. Lyon
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Pediatric Palliative Care ◽  
Spiritual Struggle ◽  
Design And Methods
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document