‘Linking practice with research’ is both our cover slogan and our objective. arq
covers the broad spectrum of architectural endeavour – which comes together
in design and buildings – and publishes contributions from both academics and
practitioners. Take this issue.First, it covers and considers architectural research in many forms and ways.
There's Rem Koolhaas' research on shopping; a pioneering application of a passive
environmental system; a competition-winning scheme for new housing; an account
of a completely unknown project by Le Corbusier; and an introduction to an
alternative to air-conditioning in hot, dry climates. There's also a timely look back
towards the beginnings of university-based architectural research in the 1960s; the
first English translation of Freyssinet's remarkable essay on the sublime; and a
review of Zaha Hadid's recent work and its theoretical base.Second, each of this broad spread of topics is design and practice-related. Most of
the authors have academic affiliations but seven are also architects in practice and
one is a practising engineer. Just two are architectural historians. Two of the articles
– those on the design of the Jersey Archive and on passive downdraught evaporative
cooling are interdisciplinary and based on considerations of sustainability. Our
letters pages reveal a bias towards practice – but, although all our correspondents
are practising architects or engineers, most have strong connections with academia.But this issue takes things a step further: it is the very first arq to carry an article
directly based on an architect's drawings and design report – rather than on a piece
especially written for publication. ‘From table to basin: St Mary's Island’ (pp.
229–247) is a lightly edited version of a competition-winning entry for a large
‘brownfield’ site in South-East England. For many years, there have been very few
competitions of this kind. The Editors felt that Buschow Henley's scheme deserved
more coverage than it had enjoyed in the professional press. Our referees agreed
and made just one recommendation – that the architects should write a short
introduction outlining their theoretical position.In our second issue, in the middle of a lively debate then being conducted in our
pages (arq 1/1 and 2), Philip Tabor wrote a leader entitled ‘Design is research: is it?’
He asked whether ‘a design submission, entirely drawn and unaccompanied by text,
would be awarded a research degree in architecture? Or, closer to home, would arq’s
editor and referees, accept it for publication?’ The answer he concluded, was
‘Probably not.’ Six years on, ‘From table to basin’ represents a shift in editorial policy
and a demonstration of the way in which designers can reflect upon their work as
research in a way that journalists cannot.
Architectural and authentic
