Micromechanical Model for Simulating Hydraulic Fractures of Rock

2005 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 127-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tian Hong Yang ◽  
Leslie George Tham ◽  
S.Y. Wang ◽  
Wan Cheng Zhu ◽  
Lian Chong Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Model ◽  
Stress Ratio ◽  
Failure Process ◽  
Micromechanical Model ◽  
In Situ Stress ◽  
Hydraulic Fractures ◽  
Breakdown Pressure ◽  
Heterogeneous Rocks ◽  
Material Homogeneity

A numerical model is developed to study hydraulic fracturing in permeable and heterogeneous rocks, coupling with the flow and failure process. The effects of flow and in-situ stress ratio on fracture, material homogeneity and breakdown pressure are specifically studied.

scholarly journals Numerical Investigation of Injection-Induced Fracture Propagation in Brittle Rocks with Two Injection Wells by a Modified Fluid-Mechanical Coupling Model

Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (18) ◽  
pp. 4718
Author(s):  
Song Wang ◽  
Jian Zhou ◽  
Luqing Zhang ◽  
Zhenhua Han
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Propagation ◽  
In Situ Stress ◽  
Hydraulic Fractures ◽  
Fracture Networks ◽  
Breakdown Pressure ◽  
Injection Wells ◽  
Mechanical Coupling ◽  
Stress Shadow ◽  
Well Spacing

Hydraulic fracturing is a key technical means for stimulating tight and low permeability reservoirs to improve the production, which is widely employed in the development of unconventional energy resources, including shale gas, shale oil, gas hydrate, and dry hot rock. Although significant progress has been made in the simulation of fracturing a single well using two-dimensional Particle Flow Code (PFC2D), the understanding of the multi-well hydraulic fracturing characteristics is still limited. Exploring the mechanisms of fluid-driven fracture initiation, propagation and interaction under multi-well fracturing conditions is of great theoretical significance for creating complex fracture networks in the reservoir. In this study, a series of two-well fracturing simulations by a modified fluid-mechanical coupling algorithm were conducted to systematically investigate the effects of injection sequence and well spacing on breakdown pressure, fracture propagation and stress shadow. The results show that both injection sequence and well spacing make little difference on breakdown pressure but have huge impacts on fracture propagation pressure. Especially under hydrostatic pressure conditions, simultaneous injection and small well spacing increase the pore pressure between two injection wells and reduce the effective stress of rock to achieve lower fracture propagation pressure. The injection sequence can change the propagation direction of hydraulic fractures. When the in-situ stress is hydrostatic pressure, simultaneous injection compels the fractures to deflect and tend to propagate horizontally, which promotes the formation of complex fracture networks between two injection wells. When the maximum in-situ stress is in the horizontal direction, asynchronous injection is more conducive to the parallel propagation of multiple hydraulic fractures. Nevertheless, excessively small or large well spacing reduces the number of fracture branches in fracture networks. In addition, the stress shadow effect is found to be sensitive to both injection sequence and well spacing.

scholarly journals The Influence of Bedding Planes and Permeability Coefficient on Fracture Propagation of Horizontal Wells in Stratification Shale Reservoirs

Geofluids ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-19
Author(s):  
Yuepeng Wang ◽  
Xiangjun Liu ◽  
Lixi Liang ◽  
Jian Xiong
Keyword(s):  
Permeability Coefficient ◽  
In Situ Stress ◽  
Stress Difference ◽  
Strength Parameters ◽  
Breakdown Pressure ◽  
Permeability Coefficients ◽  
Bedding Planes ◽  
Initiation Pressure ◽  
Shale Reservoirs

The complexity of hydraulic fractures (HF) significantly affects the success of reservoir reconstruction. The existence of a bedding plane (BP) in shale impacts the extension of a fracture. For shale reservoirs, in order to investigate the interaction mechanisms of HF and BPs under the action of coupled stress-flow, we simulate the processes of hydraulic fracturing under different conditions, such as the stress difference, permeability coefficients, BP angles, BP spacing, and BP mechanical properties using the rock failure process analysis code (RFPA2D-Flow). Simulation results showed that HF spread outward around the borehole, while the permeability coefficient is uniformly distributed at the model without a BP or stress difference. The HF of the formation without a BP presented a pinnate distribution pattern, and the main direction of the extension is affected by both the ground stress and the permeability coefficient. When there is no stress difference in the model, the fracture extends along the direction of the larger permeability coefficient. In this study, the in situ stress has a greater influence on the extension direction of the main fracture when using the model with stress differences of 6 MPa. As the BP angle increases, the propagation of fractures gradually deviates from the BP direction. The initiation pressure and total breakdown pressure of the models at low permeability coefficients are higher than those under high permeability coefficients. In addition, the initiation pressure and total breakdown pressure of the models are also different. The larger the BP spacing, the higher the compressive strength of the BP, and a larger reduction ratio (the ratio of the strength parameters of the BP to the strength parameters of the matrix) leads to a smaller impact of the BP on fracture initiation and propagation. The elastic modulus has no effect on the failure mode of the model. When HF make contact with the BP, they tend to extend along the BP. Under the same in situ stress condition, the presence of a BP makes the morphology of HF more complex during the process of propagation, which makes it easier to achieve the purpose of stimulated reservoir volume (SRV) fracturing and increased production.

scholarly journals Apparent Toughness Anisotropy Induced by “Roughness” of In-Situ Stress: A Mechanism That Hinders Vertical Growth of Hydraulic Fractures and Its Simplified Modeling

SPE Journal ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (05) ◽  
pp. 2148-2162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pengcheng Fu ◽  
Jixiang Huang ◽  
Randolph R. Settgast ◽  
Joseph P. Morris ◽  
Frederick J. Ryerson
Keyword(s):  
Hydraulic Fracture ◽  
High Stress ◽  
In Situ Stress ◽  
Height Growth ◽  
Hydraulic Fractures ◽  
Simple Relationship ◽  
Vertical Growth ◽  
Stress Profiles ◽  
Fracture Height

Summary The height growth of a hydraulic fracture is known to be affected by many factors that are related to the layered structure of sedimentary rocks. Although these factors are often used to qualitatively explain why hydraulic fractures usually have well–bounded height growth, most of them cannot be directly and quantitatively characterized for a given reservoir to enable a priori prediction of fracture–height growth. In this work, we study the role of the “roughness” of in–situ–stress profiles, in particular alternating low and high stress among rock layers, in determining the tendency of a hydraulic fracture to propagate horizontally vs. vertically. We found that a hydraulic fracture propagates horizontally in low–stress layers ahead of neighboring high–stress layers. Under such a configuration, a fracture–mechanics principle dictates that the net pressure required for horizontal growth of high–stress layers within the current fracture height is significantly lower than that required for additional vertical growth across rock layers. Without explicit consideration of the stress–roughness profile, the system behaves as if the rock is tougher against vertical propagation than it is against horizontal fracture propagation. We developed a simple relationship between the apparent differential rock toughness and characteristics of the stress roughness that induce equivalent overall fracture shapes. This relationship enables existing hydraulic–fracture models to represent the effects of rough in–situ stress on fracture growth without directly representing the fine–resolution rough–stress profiles.

scholarly journals Numerical Investigation of a Hydrosplitting Fracture and Weak Plane Interaction Using Discrete Element Modeling

Water ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 535
Author(s):  
Shuaiqi Liu ◽  
Fengshan Ma ◽  
Haijun Zhao ◽  
Jie Guo ◽  
Xueliang Duan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shear Stress ◽  
Principal Stress ◽  
Stress Ratio ◽  
Water Pressure ◽  
Maximum Shear Stress ◽  
Water Inrush ◽  
Discrete Element ◽  
Maximum Principal Stress ◽  
In Situ Stress

Water inrush caused by hydrosplitting is an extremely common disaster in the engineering of underground tunnels. In this study, the propagation of fluid-driven fractures based on an improved discrete element fluid-solid coupling method was modeled. First, the interactions between hydrosplitting fractures (HFs) and preexisting weak planes (WPs) with different angles were simulated considering water pressure in the initial fracture. Second, the influence of the in situ stress ratio and the property of WPs were analyzed, and corresponding critical pressure values of different interactions were calculated. Lastly, the maximum principal stress and maximum shear stress variation inside the pieces were reproduced. The following conclusions can be drawn: (1) Five different types of interaction modes between HFs and natural WPs were obtained, prone to crossing the WPs under inclination of 90°. (2) The initiation pressure value decreased with an increased in situ stress ratio, and the confining stress status had an effect on the internal principal stress. (3) During HFs stretching in WPs with a high elastic modulus, the value of the maximum principal stress was low and rose slowly, and the maximum shear stress value was smaller. Through comprehensive analysis, the diversity of the principal stress curves is fundamentally determined by the interaction mode between HFs and WPs, which are influenced by the variants mentioned in the paper. The analysis provides a better guideline for understanding the failure mechanism of water gushing out of deep buried tunnel construction and cracking seepage of high head tunnels.

Roughness of Hydraulic Fractures: Importance of In-Situ Stress and Tip Processes

SPE Journal ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 6 (01) ◽  
pp. 4-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.B. van Dam ◽  
C.J. de Pater
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Stress ◽  
Hydraulic Fractures

scholarly journals Numerical Investigation of the Impacts of Borehole Breakouts on Breakdown Pressure

Energies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 888 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hua Zhang ◽  
Shunde Yin ◽  
Bernt Aadnoy
Keyword(s):  
Hydraulic Fracturing ◽  
Shear Failure ◽  
In Situ Stress ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Breakdown Pressure ◽  
Borehole Breakout ◽  
Borehole Breakouts ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Mud Pressure

Borehole breakouts appear in drilling and production operations when rock subjected to in situ stress experiences shear failure. However, if a borehole breakout occurs, the boundary of the borehole is no longer circular and the stress distribution around it is different. So, the interpretation of the hydraulic fracturing test results based on the Kirsch solution may not be valid. Therefore, it is important to investigate the factors that may affect the correct interpretation of the breakdown pressure in a hydraulic fracturing test for a borehole that had breakouts. In this paper, two steps are taken to implement this investigation. First, sets of finite element modeling provide sets of data on borehole breakout measures. Second, for a given measure of borehole breakouts, according to the linear relation between the mud pressure and the stress on the borehole wall, the breakdown pressure considering the borehole breakouts is acquired by applying different mud pressure in the model. Results show the difference between the breakdown pressure of a circular borehole and that of borehole that had breakouts could be as large as 82% in some situations.

The Cross-Sectional Shapes of Longitudinal Hydraulic Fractures

1984 ◽  
Vol 106 (4) ◽  
pp. 554-561 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Segalman
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Formulation ◽  
High Stress ◽  
In Situ Stress ◽  
Hydraulic Fractures ◽  
Stress Distributions ◽  
Type Problem ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
The Cross ◽  
Sectional Shape

A mathematical formulation has been developed for calculating the cross-sectional shape of hydraulic fractures. This formulation treats the problem as a free-boundary-type problem and is modeled after mathematical formulations developed for contact and lubrication problems. Numerical solution of the resulting equations has been used to address problems involving particularly difficult in-situ stress distributions, including problems in which the fracture breaks through high-stress barriers. The technique is illustrated on two example problems.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document