Best Practices in Creating a Culture of Certification

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rhonda K. Fleischman ◽  
Laura Meyer ◽  
Christine Watson

Certification is the criterion standard of professional practice, distinguishing excellence in nursing care, mastery of knowledge, skills, and abilities beyond the scope of professional licensure. It is the validation of an individual nurse’s qualifications for practice in a defined area. Becoming certified is a personal and professional commitment that demonstrates the value that the individual nurse places on higher standards of practice and lifelong learning. The American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN) Beacon Award for Excellence, Magnet Recognition Program, and Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award all recognize certification as a key component of nursing excellence in specialty practice. Both the general public and nurse professionals increasingly recognize the need for practice on the basis of evidence to provide safe, quality patient care. In today’s rapidly changing and complex health care delivery system, certification is becoming the standard by which bedside practice and the impact of nursing care on patient outcomes are measured. This article will provide a review of current best practices in creating a culture of certification, including the journey of 3 hospitals selected as the 2010 Best Practice Roundtable presentations at the AACN National Teaching Institute.

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabrielle Rocque ◽  
Ellen Miller-Sonnet ◽  
Alan Balch ◽  
Carrie Stricker ◽  
Josh Seidman ◽  
...  

Although recognized as best practice, regular integration of shared decision-making (SDM) approaches between patients and oncologists remains an elusive goal. It is clear that usable, feasible, and practical tools are needed to drive increased SDM in oncology. To address this goal, we convened a multidisciplinary collaborative inclusive of experts across the health-care delivery ecosystem to identify key principles in designing and testing processes to promote SDM in routine oncology practice. In this commentary, we describe 3 best practices for addressing challenges associated with implementing SDM that emerged from a multidisciplinary collaborative: (1) engagement of diverse stakeholders who have interest in SDM, (2) development and validation of an evidence-based SDM tool grounded within an established conceptual framework, and (3) development of the necessary roadmap and consideration of the infrastructure needed for engendering patient engagement in decision-making. We believe these 3 principles are critical to the success of creating SDM tools to be utilized both within and outside of clinical practice. We are optimistic that shared use across settings will support adoption of this tool and overcome barriers to implementing SDM within busy clinical workflows. Ultimately, we hope that this work will offer new perspectives on what is important to patients and provide an important impetus for leveraging patient preferences and values in decision-making.


Author(s):  
Antonio Cartelli

The paper discusses the impact of IT/ICT on society by analyzing the effects it has on subjects and organizations. The recent proposal of frameworks for digital competence assessment and the construction of suitable instruments helping students in the acquisition of this competence are the main reason for the transfer to Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs). In this paper, the author compares knowledge phenomena in subjects with the strategies of knowledge management in the organizations. A framework for benchmarking best practices in SME and organizations is also given on the basis of the results obtained in virtual campuses. The author presents instruments for the acquisition of further information from all stakeholders, and possible interventions toward the improvement of digital processes in SMEs and organizations are discussed.


2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S1) ◽  
pp. s13-s13
Author(s):  
G.T. Hynes

The purpose of this presentation is to compare the lessons learned in acute nursing care in the post-disaster settings of Aceh Jaya, Indonesia (2004) and Port-au-Prince, Haiti (2010). The impact of such disasters disproportionally affects populations made vulnerable by poverty, marginalization, and structural violence. The recognition of these vulnerabilities heightens the role of the nurse as an advocate for the ill and injured. In addition, the lack of adequate human and material resources on all levels necessitates insisting on best practices for patient care despite the resource constraints. Consideration of best practices begins with rigorous personnel selection of nurses adequately trained in emergency/critical care, complex humanitarian emergencies, and disaster response. A proficient level of resource-specific triage knowledge is required to adequately provide the most effective care to patients. Not infrequently, disaster nursing care involves being tasked with a clinical skill or procedures that would be outside the scope of practice in the home country. While the expansion to such practices often is justified by need, an ethical framework demands consideration of the central tenet of “first do no harm”. A heavy burden of coordination among other caregivers, family, and the local staff is required by nurses in this environment. The substantial challenges include communication and continuity of care during the initial response phase among multiple partners with varied backgrounds and goals. Drawing from experiences in Haiti and Aceh, this presentation seeks to define the best practices in disaster nursing care and explore the ethical considerations that arise in such challenging environments.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S294-S295
Author(s):  
Catherine Carrico ◽  
Tonja Woods ◽  
Robin A Barry ◽  
Kevin Franke ◽  
Christine McKibbin

Abstract Background: The Project ECHO model utilizes a hub and spoke approach through which a team of experts co-mentors local providers in the management of complex cases while disseminating information about best practices and evidence-based care. Project ECHO is a promising model for improving patient care through transformation of the care delivery system. The UW ECHO in Rural and Frontier Care Transitions created an online community of practice comprised of local care coalitions dedicated to improving care transitions in Wyoming and Montana. This ECHO network provided a unique opportunity to support system- and provider-level implementation of best practices in care transitions. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with thirty ECHO attendees following participation in an ECHO session as either a participant or case presenter. Thematic analysis was used to analyze interview data. Results: Two overarching themes emerged 1) impact of the ECHO on the provider or healthcare team and 2) impact on the system. Participants indicated that the impact on the provider/healthcare team included an increased sense of community, increased awareness of community resources, increased knowledge of care transition strategies, and increased confidence in implementing best practices. Additionally, providers indicated increased utilization of community resources. Systemic impacts included increased involvement of interprofessional team members in patient care and utilization of ECHO recommendations to present systemic interventions and changes to colleagues, administration, and leadership. Conclusions: This ECHO network had a particularly strong impact on the provider and healthcare team as participants increased their knowledge, confidence, and use of best practices in care transitions.


Author(s):  
Ebba Lisberg Jensen ◽  
Karin Westerberg ◽  
Ebba Malmqvist ◽  
Anna Oudin

Air pollution is estimated to cause more than 7000 deaths annually in Sweden alone. To reduce the impact of air pollution and to plan and build sustainable cities, it is vital that research is translated into efficient decisions and practice. However, how do civil servants in a municipality access research results? How do they normally find relevant information, and what obstacles are there to accessing and applying research results? As part of the collaborative and transdisciplinary research project Air Pollution Research in Local Environmental Planning (ARIEL), these questions were explored through interviews and seminars with civil servants within the Malmö Municipality Environmental Office. We found that the civil servants generally have proficiency in processing research results, but often do not use such results as part of their everyday decision making and practices. Instead, the data and measurements used are mostly produced case-by-case within the municipal sector itself. Information about best practices is also collected via a number of knowledge access practices, involving the Internet or social networks within other municipalities. Lack of time, paywalls, and the insufficient applicability of research hinder the dissemination of up-to-date results. This slows down the process whereby research, funded by tax-money, can be put to best practice in the effort to create healthy and sustainable cities.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (30_suppl) ◽  
pp. 43-43
Author(s):  
Nabeela Ratansi ◽  
Aimee Langan ◽  
Irene Blais ◽  
Erin Svara ◽  
Karla Houser ◽  
...  

43 Background: As part of the Ministry’s Health System Funding Reform initiative, Cancer Care Ontario is tasked to develop and implement Quality-Based Procedures (QBPs) for programs such as GI Endoscopy and Colposcopy. QBPs are clusters of patients with clinically related diagnoses or treatments that have been identified by an evidence-based framework as providing opportunity for improving quality outcomes and reducing costs. As stated by the Ministry, the goal is to reimburse providers for the types and numbers of patients treated, using evidence-informed rates associated with the quality of care delivered. Methods: QBPs are multiyear and have four key deliverables: Clinical: developing clinical best practices. Funding: tying best practices to pricing. Capacity Planning: understanding procedure types/volumes for capacity management. Monitoring/Evaluation: measuring the QBP’s impact. Developing the QBPs has involved: Creating Clinical Expert Advisory Groups (CEAG) of clinicians who are recognized for their knowledge and expertise. Tasking the CEAG to define quality and develop best practices informed by literature reviews, jurisdictional scans, and guidelines. Documenting these standards and clinical pathways in a clinical handbook, providing information on the practices that should be implemented to ensure consistent care delivery. The development of best practices is imperative to the foundation of the QBP and spans multiple years. Once best practice development is complete, it will be tied to pricing, where the procedure will be micro-costed based on workload, equipment, supplies, and other administrative costs. Results: The QBPs continue to evolve and aim to: Reduce practice variation. Improve patient outcomes. Improve system accountability. Improve cost-effectiveness of services. Effectiveness will be measured through a performance management framework, including an integrated QBP scorecard measuring appropriateness, access, and efficiency. Conclusions: The underpinning for moving towards an evidence-based, patient-based funding model involves defining quality standards and clincal best practices, and applying these guidelines to determine the cost of quality care.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S765-S765
Author(s):  
Mark A Schmidt ◽  
John F Dickerson ◽  
Suzanne B Schmidt ◽  
Maureen O’Keeffe-Rosetti ◽  
Judy L Donald ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The goal of this project was to assess the frequency of sexually-transmitted infection (STI) testing and positivity among adult individuals initiating HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) within Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW). Methods We identified KPNW members, 18 years of age and older, who initiated PrEP (tenofovir+emtricitabine) between January 1, 2015 – December 31, 2018. Using data elements abstracted from the electronic health record system, we assessed demographic characteristics of those initiating PrEP and the rate of testing and positivity for HIV, chlamydia (CT) and gonorrhea (GC) and syphilis within a window around 120 days after PrEP initiation. Results Overall, 685 members initiated PrEP during our study period, 661 (96.5%) of whom were male. Mean and median ages were 38 and 36 years, respectively, with those 25-34 years of age comprising the highest proportion (241; 35.2%). The 460 PrEP initiators (67.2% of total) who continued use beyond 120 days were significantly older than those who discontinued use (39 vs. 36 years, p=0.0008). Among continuous users, 78.3% were tested for CT+GC and 83.9% were tested for syphilis roughly 120 days post-initiation, with positivity proportions of 6.9%, 6.7%, and 2.3%, respectively. Among those discontinuing, 39.6% were tested for CT+GC and 37.3% were tested for syphilis, with positivity proportions of 10.1%, 9.0%, and 2.4%, respectively. HIV testing was completed for 87.4% of continuous PrEP users and 40.9% of those who discontinued use; and we identified a total of three individuals who tested positive for HIV, all among the latter group. Manual chart review of these individuals confirmed that HIV exposure and infection occurred after PrEP discontinuation. Conclusion We found high rates of STI testing among individuals receiving PrEP, in accordance with recommendations. Our findings of a lower STI prevalence among PrEP users is encouraging, although further work is required to assess the impact of differential testing rates and age between those who continue and discontinue PrEP use as well as reasons for PrEP discontinuation. Regular testing remains an important part of comprehensive PrEP care management and should continue to be encouraged to identify and treat STI among those at high risk for disease. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amit Baumel ◽  
Theresa Fleming ◽  
Stephen M Schueller

UNSTRUCTURED Although many people access publicly available digital behavioral and mental health interventions, most do not invest as much effort in these interventions as hoped or intended by intervention developers, and ongoing engagement is often low. Thus, the impact of such interventions is minimized by a misalignment between intervention design and user behavior. Digital micro interventions are highly focused interventions delivered in the context of a person’s daily life with little burden on the individual. We propose that these interventions have the potential to disruptively expand the reach of beneficial therapeutics by lowering the bar for entry to an intervention and the effort needed for purposeful engagement. This paper provides a conceptualization of digital micro interventions, their component parts, and principles guiding their use as building blocks of a larger therapeutic process (ie, digital micro intervention care). The model represented provides a structure that could improve the design, delivery, and research on digital micro interventions and ultimately improve behavioral and mental health care and care delivery.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (S1) ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
K. Saraswathi ◽  
S. Manikandan

This paper is aimed to analyse the strategies applied for the best practices in Anna Centenary Library (ACL), Chennai. Best practice is a technique, used to advance the existing work process of an organization like library and information centers to achieve its purpose successfully. In the present day, public libraries are also started to focus on best practices as one of the services to retain the public. Anna Centenary Library falls under public library category, which follows best practices such as Orientation programme for civil service aspirants, weekly children programme and Ponmaalai Pozhudhu programme. A study was conducted among the readers of the library to analyze and know the impact of best practices followed by ACL particularly Ponmaalai Pozhudhu programme. It was revealed that Ponmaalai Pozhudhu Programme had a great impact among the readers of all the best practices being conducted by the library.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document