scholarly journals Fertility preservation in young patients with cancer

2015 ◽  
Vol 04 (03) ◽  
pp. 134-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Virender Suhag ◽  
B. S. Sunita ◽  
Arti Sarin ◽  
A. K. Singh ◽  
Dashottar S.

AbstractInfertility can arise as a consequence of treatment of oncological conditions. The parallel and continued improvement in both the management of oncology and fertility cases in recent times has brought to the forefront the potential for fertility preservation in patients being treated for cancer. Many survivors will maintain their reproductive potential after the successful completion of treatment for cancer. However total body irradiation, radiation to the gonads, and certain high dose chemotherapy regimens can place women at risk for acute ovarian failure or premature menopause and men at risk for temporary or permanent azoospermia. Providing information about risk of infertility and possible interventions to maintain reproductive potential are critical for the adolescent and young adult population at the time of diagnosis. There are established means of preserving fertility before cancer treatment; specifically, sperm cryopreservation for men and in vitro fertilization and embryo cryopreservation for women. Several innovative techniques are being actively investigated, including oocyte and ovarian follicle cryopreservation, ovarian tissue transplantation, and in vitro follicle maturation, which may expand the number of fertility preservation choices for young cancer patients. Fertility preservation may also require some modification of cancer therapy; thus, patients’ wishes regarding future fertility and available fertility preservation alternatives should be discussed before initiation of therapy.

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (32) ◽  
pp. 4831-4841 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Levine ◽  
Andrea Canada ◽  
Catharyn J. Stern

Preservation of fertility is important to adolescent and young adult (AYA) survivors of cancer. Many survivors will maintain their reproductive potential after the successful completion of treatment for cancer. However total-body irradiation, radiation to the gonads, and chemotherapy regimens containing high-dose alkylators can place women at risk for acute ovarian failure or premature menopause and men at risk for temporary or permanent azoospermia. The most effective and established means of preserving fertility in this population is embryo cryopreservation in women and sperm cryopreservation in men before the initiation of cancer-directed therapy. Cryopreservation of mature oocytes is also becoming more commonplace as methods of thawing become more sophisticated. The use of in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection has added to the viability of sperm and oocyte cryopreservation. Cryopreservation and transplantation of gonadal tissue in both males and females remains experimental but continues to be evaluated. Hormonal suppression has not been shown to be effective in males but may have promise in females, although larger scale trials are needed to evaluate this. Providing information about risk of infertility and possible interventions to maintain reproductive potential are critical for the AYA population at the time of diagnosis. Given the competing demands of providing complicated and detailed information about cancer treatment, the evolving information related to fertility preservation, and the ethical issues involved, it may be preferable, where possible, to have a specialized team, rather than the primary oncologist, address these issues with AYA patients.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chung-Hoon Kim ◽  
Gyun-Ho Jeon

With improved survival rates among cancer patients, fertility preservation is now being recognized as an issue of great importance. There are currently several methods of fertility preservation available in female cancer patients and the options and techniques via assisted reproduction and cryopreservation are increasing, but some are still experimental and continues to be evaluated. The established means of preserving fertility include embryo cryopreservation, gonadal shielding during radiation therapy, ovarian transposition, conservative gynecologic surgery such as radical trachelectomy, donor embryos/oocytes, gestational surrogacy, and adoption. The experimental methods include oocyte cryopreservation, ovarian cryopreservation and transplantation, in vitro maturation, and ovarian suppression. With advances in methods for the preservation of fertility, providing information about risk of infertility and possible options of fertility preservation to all young patients with cancer, and discussing future fertility with them should be also considered as one of the important parts of consultation at the time of cancer diagnosis.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 117955811984800 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taichi Akahori ◽  
Dori C Woods ◽  
Jonathan L Tilly

Historically, approaches designed to offer women diagnosed with cancer the prospects of having a genetically matched child after completion of their cytotoxic treatments focused on the existing oocyte population as the sole resource available for clinical management of infertility. In this regard, elective oocyte and embryo cryopreservation, as well as autologous ovarian cortical tissue grafting posttreatment, have gained widespread support as options for young girls and reproductive-age women who are faced with cancer to consider. In addition, the use of ovarian protective therapies, including gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists and sphingosine-1-phosphate analogs, has been put forth as an alternative way to preserve fertility by shielding existing oocytes in the ovaries in vivo from the side-effect damage caused by radiotherapy and many chemotherapeutic regimens. This viewpoint changed with the publication of now numerous reports that adult ovaries of many mammalian species, including humans, contain a rare population of oocyte-producing germ cells—referred to as female germline or oogonial stem cells (OSCs). This new line of study has fueled research into the prospects of generating new oocytes, rather than working with existing oocytes, as a novel approach to sustain or restore fertility in female cancer survivors. Here, we overview the history of work from laboratories around the world focused on improving our understanding of the biology of OSCs and how these cells may be used to reconstitute “artificial” ovarian tissue in vitro or to regenerate damaged ovarian tissue in vivo as future fertility-preservation options.


Reproduction ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 156 (1) ◽  
pp. F11-F27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Fisch ◽  
Ronit Abir

Anti-cancer therapy, particularly chemotherapy, damages ovarian follicles and promotes ovarian failure. The only pharmacological means for protecting the ovaries from chemotherapy-induced injury is gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist, but its efficiency remains controversial; ovarian transposition is used to shield the ovary from radiation when indicated. Until the late 1990s, the only option for fertility preservation and restoration in women with cancer was embryo cryopreservation. The development of other assisted reproductive technologies such as mature oocyte cryopreservation andin vitromaturation of oocytes has contributed to fertility preservation. Treatment regimens to obtain mature oocytes/embryos have been modified to overcome various limitations of conventional ovarian stimulation protocols. In the last decades, several centres have begun cryopreserving ovarian samples containing primordial follicles from young patients before anti-cancer therapy. The first live birth following implantation of cryopreserved-thawed ovarian tissue was reported in 2004; since then, the number has risen to more than 130. Nowadays, ovarian tissue cryopreservation can be combined within vitromaturation and vitrification of oocytes. The use of cryopreserved oocytes eliminates the risk posed by ovarian implantation of reseeding the cancer. Novel methods for enhancing follicular survival after implantation are presently being studied. In addition, researchers are currently investigating agents for ovarian protection. It is expected that the risk of reimplantation of malignant cells with ovarian grafts will be overcome with the putative development of an artificial ovary and an efficient follicle class- and species-dependentin vitrosystem for culturing primordial follicles.


Genes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 701
Author(s):  
Ovidiu Bîcă ◽  
Ioan Sârbu ◽  
Carmen Iulia Ciongradi

This article reviews the latest information about preserving reproductive potential that can offer enhanced prospects for future conception in the pediatric male population with cancer, whose fertility is threatened because of the gonadotoxic effects of chemotherapy and radiation. An estimated 400,000 children and adolescents aged 0–19 years will be diagnosed with cancer each year. Fertility is compromised in one-third of adult male survivors of childhood cancer. We present the latest approaches and techniques for fertility preservation, starting with fertility preservation counselling, a clinical practice guideline used around the world and finishing with recent advances in basic science and translational research. Improving strategies for the maturation of germ cells in vitro combined with new molecular techniques for gene editing could be the next scientific keystone to eradicate genetic diseases such as cancer related mutations in the offspring of cancer survivors.


2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosalind J McDougall ◽  
Lynn Gillam ◽  
Clare Delany ◽  
Yasmin Jayasinghe

Young children with cancer are treated with interventions that can have a high risk of compromising their reproductive potential. ‘Fertility preservation’ for children who have not yet reached puberty involves surgically removing and cryopreserving reproductive tissue prior to treatment in the expectation that strategies for the use of this tissue will be developed in the future. Fertility preservation for prepubertal children is ethically complex because the techniques largely lack proven efficacy for this age group. There is professional difference of opinion about whether it is ethical to offer such ‘experimental’ procedures. The question addressed in this paper is: when, if ever, is it ethically justifiable to offer fertility preservation surgery to prepubertal children? We present the ethical concerns about prepubertal fertility preservation, drawing both on existing literature and our experience discussing this issue with clinicians in clinical ethics case consultations. We argue that offering the procedure is ethically justifiable in certain circumstances. For many children, the balance of benefits and burdens is such that the procedure is ethically permissible but not ethically required; when the procedure is medically safe, it is the parents’ decision to make, with appropriate information and guidance from the treating clinicians. We suggest that clinical ethics support processes are necessary to assist clinicians to engage with the ethical complexity of prepubertal fertility preservation and describe the framework that has been integrated into the pathway of care for patients and families attending the Royal Children’s Hospital in Melbourne, Australia.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (22) ◽  
pp. 2424-2429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kutluk Oktay ◽  
Volkan Turan ◽  
Giuliano Bedoschi ◽  
Fernanda S. Pacheco ◽  
Fred Moy

Purpose We have previously reported an approach to ovarian stimulation for the purpose of fertility preservation (FP) in women with breast cancer via embryo freezing with the concurrent use of letrozole. The aim of this study was to provide the pregnancy and FP outcomes when embryos generated with the same protocol are used. Patients and Methods In all, 131 women with stage ≤ 3 breast cancer underwent ovarian stimulation and received concurrent letrozole 5 mg per day before receiving adjuvant chemotherapy and cryopreserving embryos. Results Thirty-three of the 131 women underwent 40 attempts to transfer embryos to their own uterus (n = 18) or via the use of a gestational carrier (n = 22) at a mean age of 41.5 ± 4.3 years with a median 5.25 years after embryo cryopreservation. The overall live birth rate per embryo transfer was similar to the US national mean among infertile women of a similar age undergoing in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer (45.0 v 38.2; P = .2). Seven (38.8%) of the 18 pregnancies were twins with no higher-order pregnancies being encountered. No fetal anomalies or malformations were reported in 25 children after a mean follow-up of 40.4 ± 26.4 months. Seventeen of the 33 women attempting pregnancy had at least one child, translating into an FP rate of 51.5% per attempting woman. Conclusion Embryo cryopreservation after ovarian stimulation with the letrozole and follicle-stimulating hormone protocol preserves fertility in women with breast cancer and results in pregnancy rates comparable to those expected in a noncancer population undergoing in vitro fertilization.


2005 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 209-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
W Hamish B Wallace ◽  
Richard A Anderson ◽  
D Stewart Irvine

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 1114-1114
Author(s):  
Izhar Hardan ◽  
Dror Meirow ◽  
Avichai Shimoni ◽  
Jacob Levron ◽  
Noga Shemtov ◽  
...  

Abstract Loss of fertility is a major concern in young women undergoing high dose chemotherapy (HDT). Although it is generally accepted that therapy of the myeloabelative range is related with a high rate of fertility loss, we observed during the last years eight spontaneous pregnancies with normal deliveries in young women after bone marrow transplantation. Seven patients (pt’s) were with lymphoma and MM and were conditioned with BEAM regimen (n=6) and melphalan 200mg/sm (n=1) prior to an autologous SCT, while one patient had a secondary AML and underwent BEAM primed autologous SCT and Busulfex/FA primed allogeneic BMT. The median age at transplant of this group was 28y and median time from transplant to pregnancy was 25 months. More than 100 women of 18–40y.o were transplanted in our center during this period; however, obviously the fertility rate cannot be calculated as it is related with additional parameters including survival, post transplant complications and mainly patient’s preferences. Naturally we observed during the same period many young patients with ovarian failure post transplant, as well as one successful pregnancy from a cryopreserved embryo. Methods. We Therefore initiated in October 2000 a fertility preservation program in which all women of 18 – 40y.o were offered a pretransplant IVF with embryo preservation, and/or ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC), according to their clinical status. 651 pt’s were transplanted in our center in the last 44 months, of which 81 were women of 18–41y.o that were all enrolled in this program. Results. Seven pt’s of this group (8.6%) underwent IVF. The major causes of denying IVF were the need to delay BMT for more than clinically accepted, prolonged preexisting ovarian failure, lack of a suitable partner and patient’s preference. Seventeen pt’s (21%) underwent OTC. The major causes of denying OTC were patient’s preference (mainly due to no evidence of success with this method) and thrombocytopenia/neutropenia. During this period: One patient of this group was fertilized with her cryopreserved embryos 32 months after transplant and is at her 16 week of pregnancy. One patient underwent a successful transplantation of her cryopreserved ovarian tissue 2.5 years after HDC while in a documented ovarian failure, and gave birth to a healthy baby on June 2005. The OTC of this patient was performed after cis-platinum containing salvage therapy for relapsing NHL, prior to BEAM primed SCT, and immediately after a failure of hormonal stimulation for IVF. One patient underwent a cryopreserved ovarian tissue transplantation on July 2005 Conclusions: 1. Spontanous pregnancy after HDT, mainly at the younger age, is not a rare phenomenon. 2. Most young patients prior to HDT are not eligible for IVF. 3. Pretransplant ovarian tissue cryopreservation is a feasible tool in this set-up. The first success with this method is promising.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document