Corporate Responsibility as The Legal Subject in Corruption Case to Ensure Legal Certainty

A corporation is an entity or legal subject whose existence makes a major contribution in increasing economic growth and national development, but in reality, corporations sometimes also commit various criminal acts (corporate crimes) that have a detrimental impact on the state and society. A corporation can be considered to have committed a crime based on the actions of a person who controls the management of the corporation. PT. Asuransi Jiwasraya (Company) as a state-owned company in recent years has been in the spotlight. PT. Asuransi Jiwasraya (Government company) is unable to fulfill its customer's maturity policy obligations of around Rp 12.4 trillion. The default of PT. Asuransi Jiwasraya (Government company) actually occurred in one of its flagship products, the JS Saving plan. JS Saving plan is a life insurance product as well as an investment offered through banking or bancassurance. In contrast to unit-linked insurance products where the investment risk is borne by the policyholder, the JS Saving plan is a non-unit-linked investment whose risks are fully borne by the insurance company. The purpose of this study was to determine the implementation of corporate responsibility in the case of PT. Asuransi Jiwasraya (Government company) and to determine the optimization of corporate responsibility for the perpetrators of corruption at PT. Asuransi Jiwasraya (Government company) in returning losses to the state and customers (the public). The type of research used in writing this thesis is a normative legal research type. The results obtained are that in the corruption case that occurred at PT. Asuransi Jiwasraya (Government company) there were several perpetrators who were charged, one of which was Heru Hidayat who is the main commissioner of PT Trada Alam Minera who also manages and controls corporations involved in criminal acts. Corruption Deviations in Financial Management and Investment Funds by PT. Asuransi Jiwasraya (Government company). Heru Hidayat as one of the main actors in the corruption case has now been sentenced to life imprisonment plus a replacement money of Rp 10.73 trillion. Meanwhile, the corporations that have been accused are 13 Investment Manager Companies which have been transferred to the Corruption Court at the Central Jakarta District Court and are currently in the trial process.

Download Full-text

SEPARATION AGREEMENT ASSET FOR INDONESIAN CITIZENS MARRIED ABROAD

Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum ◽

10.26532/jph.v8i1.13734 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (1) ◽

pp. 1

Author(s):

Bella Arwinilita ◽

Siti Anggraini ◽

Dwi Wisnu Wardana ◽

Asep Hermawan ◽

Setiawan Widiyoko

Keyword(s):

Legal Protection ◽

Civil Code ◽

Legal Certainty ◽

Conceptual Approach ◽

Foreign Nationals ◽

Research Results ◽

Legal Subject ◽

Marriage Contract ◽

Approach Method ◽

Made In

Legal protection in agreements on the separation of assets in marriage between Indonesian citizens and foreign citizens as well as analyzing the authority of a notary in making an agreement on the separation of assets in marriage between Indonesian citizens. and foreign nationals. This research uses empirical normative research. The approach method used is a statutory approach, conceptual approach and case approach. Based on the research results, it can be concluded that the making of a marriage contract can provide legal protection for the party who made it. The agreement deed made in the notary can be used as written evidence in court in case of problems at a later date. Based on Article 1868 of the Civil Code and notary authority in Article 15 of the notary office law, it is stated that notaries have the authority to make authentic deeds related to all agreements. Notaries must be able to provide legal certainty in people's lives because in the deed there is evidence that clearly determines a person's rights and obligations as a legal subject in society. Notary Deed as deed which has perfect evidentiary power makes the position of Notary Deed as the first and main evidence in civil evidentiary law.

Download Full-text

The Implementation of Inclusion in Corruption Case Handling

FIAT JUSTISIA ◽

10.25041/fiatjustisia.v12no1.1239 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 12 (1) ◽

pp. 14

Author(s):

Syachdin Syachdin

Keyword(s):

Law Enforcement ◽

Empirical Research ◽

Research Method ◽

Law Enforcement Officers ◽

Legal Certainty ◽

Corruption Case ◽

Enforcement Officer ◽

Law Enforcement Officer

The formulation of problem in the implementation of inclusion in handling corruption case has reflected the legal objectives which are legal certainty, justice, and expediency, and inconsistency in implementing the inclusion in handling corruption case, the purpose of the research is To find out and analyze the application of inclusion in handling corruption case has reflected the legal purposes which are legal certainty, justice and expediency and To find out and analyze the inconsistency in applying of inclusion in handling of corruption case, using empirical research method which resulted that there is indication that the implementation of inclusion is not yet implemented which causing inconsistency of law enforcement officer, i.e., Police, Attorney in applying the article of inclusion in handling of case corruption and inconsistency in the application of inclusion in corruption cases causes the occurrence of discrimination in the process of law enforcement, so that does not reflect the legal purpose of legal certainty. It is recommended that to create legal objectives, law enforcement officers must be consistent in applying the articles of inclusion in the handling of corruption cases and to achieve legal certainty should investigators, and prosecutors apply the juridical participation in corruption cases. Keywords: Implementation, Inclusion, Corruption Case

Download Full-text

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB NEGARA TERHADAP HAK EKONOMI, SOSIAL, DAN BUDAYA DI INDONESIA

Yustisia Jurnal Hukum ◽

10.20961/yustisia.v92i0.3810 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 92 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Sefriani , ◽

Sri Wartini ,

Keyword(s):

Corporate Social Responsibility ◽

Social Responsibility ◽

The State ◽

State Responsibility ◽

Legal Certainty ◽

Social Culture ◽

Legal Subject ◽

Environmental Destruction ◽

The Law ◽

Corporate Social

<h4>Abstract</h4> Indonesia has enacted the idea of corporate social responsibility (CSR) into the laws as a liability which bears sanctions. It is uncommon practice. The majority of state’s practices are putting CSR as a voluntary issue on the law instead of treating it as a liability which holds sanctions. Such enactment give rise allegation against the state which accusing it for transferring its obligation to fulfill the economic, social and culture rights (ESCR) to the company in the format of CSR. Indonesia has some arguments to justify such enactment such as 75% environmental destruction and social problems in Indonesia caused by company activities; the company is able to violate human rights even worse than other legal subject can do; the law which possess voluntary characteristic was ineffective in Indonesia since the legal culture and the awareness concerning the importance of CSR is still not quite; provide legal certainty and avoid inconstant interpretation upon CSR which might be conducted by company by elevating business ethic become legal norm; and integrate social, moral and law issue since three of them inseparable. The enactment of CSR as liability which hold sanction by Indonesia is not a form of transferring the state responsibility to corporate, however it is a manifestation of Indonesian government seriousness as the primary duty bearer, to perform its obligation concerning ESCR through effective legislation since the corporates activities are directly related to the enjoyment of the rights enshrined in the ICESCR. Allegation on the transfer of state obligation on to the company will be proved if the state is hands off and diverting its entire obligation to fulfill ESCR to company in the format of CSR program. Keywords: social responsibility, ESCR, state responsibility <h3>Abstrak</h3> Indonesia menormakan tanggung jawab social dan lingkungan (TJSL/CSR) dalam perundang- undangannya sebagai suatu kewajiban yang disertai sanksi. Suatu praktek yang tidak lazim dengan praktek Negara pada umumnya yang menormakannya sebagai kesukarelaan perusahaan bukan kewajiban apalgi disertai sanksi. Hal ini menimbulkan kecurigaan bahwa Negara hendak mengalihkan tanggung jawab pemenuhan hak ekonomi, social dan budaya (ekosob)-nya kepada perusahaan yang dikemas dalam bentuk kewajiban CSR. Penormaan CSR dalam bentuk kewajiban yang disertai sanksi sesungguhnya merupakan bukti keseriusan Indonesia melaksanakan tanggung jawab hak ekosobnya melalui penglegislasian yang mengikat karena budaya hukum di Indonesia belum memungkinkan untuk membuat aturan yang sifatnya sukarela. Penormaan CSR sebagai suatu kewjaiban disertai sanksi tidak akan menghilangkan karakteristiknya sebagai social responsibility karena hukum tidak bisa dipisahkan dari social dan moral. Masalah kerusakan alam dan masalah social yang ditimbulkan perusahaan sudah sangat besar di Indonesia, dan pengalaman menunjukkan perusahaan mampu melakukan pelanggaran HAM yang jauh lebih hebat dari yang dilakukan subyek hukum lain menjadi justifikasi bahwa penormaan yang sifatnya mengikat sangatlah diperlukan. Kecurigaan adanya modus pengalihkan tanggung jawab ekosob pada perusahaan akan terbukti bila Negara kemudian lepas tangan dan membebankan sepenuhnya tanggung jawab pemenuhan hak ekosob pada perusahaan melalui program CSR. Apabila itu terjadi maka Negara telah melakukan pelanggaran terhadap kewajiban hak ekosobnya mengingat Indonesia telah meratifikasi International Covenant on Economic Social Culture Right sejak tahun 2005 melalui UU No.11 Tahun 2005. Kata kunci: tanggung jawab sosial, hak Ekonomi-sosial-budaya, tanggung jawab negara

Download Full-text

PEMBATALAN SERTIPIKAT HAK MILIK OLEH KANTOR PERTANAHAN BERDASARKAN PUTUSAN PENGADILAN YANG TELAH BERKEKUATAN HUKUM TETAP DALAM PERKARA NOMOR:17/PDT.G/2009.PN.LB.BS

UNES Law Review ◽

10.31933/unesrev.v3i1.137 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 3 (1) ◽

pp. 1-12

Author(s):

Roni Roni ◽

Zainul Daulay ◽

Beatrix Benni

Keyword(s):

Strong Evidence ◽

Government Regulation ◽

Land Rights ◽

Legal Certainty ◽

Land Registration ◽

Legal Subject

One of the objectives of land registration is to provide legal certainty for land rights holders. Therefore, in order to make this happen, regulations regarding land registration are made, one of which is Article 32 paragraph (2) PP Number 24 of 1997. However, in reality there are still problems in terms of ownership of a parcel of land associated with this article, namely against a plot of land which has been controlled by a legal subject for years and has been equipped with a certificate. There are still outsiders demanding rights to the land with respect to the land. Until now, Article 32 paragraph (2) Government Regulation Number 24 Year 1997, which should have been a solution to the above problems, still creates differences. Given the existence of this article is not in accordance with the negative publication system adopted by land registration in Indonesia, where a certificate is not an absolute evidence, but a certificate is strong evidence.

Download Full-text

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB NEGARA TERHADAP HAK EKONOMI, SOSIAL, DAN BUDAYA DI INDONESIA

Yustisia Jurnal Hukum ◽

10.20961/yustisia.v4i2.8646 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 4 (2) ◽

Author(s):

Sefriani ◽

Sri Wartini

Keyword(s):

Corporate Social Responsibility ◽

Social Responsibility ◽

The State ◽

State Responsibility ◽

Legal Certainty ◽

Social Culture ◽

Legal Subject ◽

Environmental Destruction ◽

The Law ◽

Corporate Social

AbstractIndonesia has enacted the idea of corporate social responsibility (CSR) into the laws as a liability which bears sanctions. It is uncommon practice. The majority of state’s practices are putting CSR as a voluntary issue on the law instead of treating it as a liability which holds sanctions. Such enactment give rise allegation against the state which accusing it for transferring its obligation to fulfill the economic, social and culture rights (ESCR) to the company in the format of CSR. Indonesia has some arguments to justify such enactment such as 75% environmental destruction and social problems in Indonesia caused by company activities; the company is able to violate human rights even worse than other legal subject can do; the law which possess voluntary characteristic was ineffective in Indonesia since the legal culture and the awareness concerning the importance of CSR is still not quite; provide legal certainty and avoid inconstant interpretation upon CSR which might be conducted by company by elevating business ethic become legal norm; and integrate social, moral and law issue since three of them inseparable. The enactment of CSR as liability which hold sanction by Indonesia is not a form of transferring the state responsibility to corporate, however it is a manifestation of Indonesian government seriousness as the primary duty bearer, to perform its obligation concerning ESCR through effective legislation since the corporates activities are directly related to the enjoyment of the rights enshrined in the ICESCR. Allegation on the transfer of state obligation on to the company will be proved if the state is hands off and diverting its entire obligation to fulfill ESCR to company in the format of CSR program.Keywords: social responsibility, ESCR, state responsibilityAbstrakIndonesia menormakan tanggung jawab social dan lingkungan (TJSL/CSR) dalam perundang- undangannya sebagai suatu kewajiban yang disertai sanksi. Suatu praktek yang tidak lazim dengan praktek Negara pada umumnya yang menormakannya sebagai kesukarelaan perusahaan bukan kewajiban apalgi disertai sanksi. Hal ini menimbulkan kecurigaan bahwa Negara hendak mengalihkan tanggung jawab pemenuhan hak ekonomi, social dan budaya (ekosob)-nya kepada perusahaan yang dikemas dalam bentuk kewajiban CSR. Penormaan CSR dalam bentuk kewajiban yang disertai sanksi sesungguhnya merupakan bukti keseriusan Indonesia melaksanakan tanggung jawab hak ekosobnya melalui penglegislasian yang mengikat karena budaya hukum di Indonesia belum memungkinkan untuk membuat aturan yang sifatnya sukarela. Penormaan CSR sebagai suatu kewjaiban disertai sanksi tidak akan menghilangkan karakteristiknya sebagai social responsibility karena hukum tidak bisa dipisahkan dari social dan moral. Masalah kerusakan alam dan masalah social yang ditimbulkan perusahaan sudah sangat besar di Indonesia, dan pengalaman menunjukkan perusahaan mampu melakukan pelanggaran HAM yang jauh lebih hebat dari yang dilakukan subyek hukum lain menjadi justifikasi bahwa penormaan yang sifatnya mengikat sangatlah diperlukan. Kecurigaan adanya modus pengalihkan tanggung jawab ekosob pada perusahaan akan terbukti bila Negara kemudian lepas tangan dan membebankan sepenuhnya tanggung jawab pemenuhan hak ekosob pada perusahaan melalui program CSR. Apabila itu terjadi maka Negara telah melakukan pelanggaran terhadap kewajiban hak ekosobnya mengingat Indonesia telah meratifikasi International Covenant on Economic Social Culture Right sejak tahun 2005 melalui UU No.11 Tahun 2005.Kata kunci: tanggung jawab sosial, hak Ekonomi-sosial-budaya, tanggung jawab negara

Download Full-text

Theoretical and Conceptual Reflection Regarding Corporate Criminal Responsibilities Influencing the Formulation of Laws

Lentera Hukum ◽

10.19184/ejlh.v7i1.14297 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (1) ◽

pp. 17

Author(s):

Fitriani Rahmadia

Keyword(s):

Criminal Law ◽

Corporate Responsibility ◽

Corporate Crime ◽

Criminal Liability ◽

Criminal Code ◽

Policy Formulation ◽

Legal Subject ◽

Criminal Sanctions ◽

The Subject ◽

Corporate Criminal Liability

In Indonesia, the development of the corporation as the subject to criminal acts takes place outside the Criminal Code, regulated in special legislation. While the Criminal Code itself still adheres to the subject of criminal acts in the form of people, the corporation (juridical person) appears as a subject that can commit a crime and should also be accountable in criminal law. However, this condition has not been realized concretely in our Criminal Code. The formulation policy regarding corporate criminal liability for victims of corporate crime that exists or is currently in force has not been able to realize the corporate criminal liability. Although there are sanctions that can be imposed on corporations, most of these provisions only protect potential victims and are not responsible for actual or real victims. In other words, the current formulation policy has not been able to ensnare and impose criminal sanctions on corporations who commit crimes, especially criminal sanctions which are oriented to the fulfillment or restoration of victims' rights in the form of compensation payments after the crime. This paper will discuss the position and the responsibility of the corporation as a subject of criminal law in Indonesia and analyze policy formulation of the Criminal Code and the draft of the Criminal Code that related to corporate responsibility as a legal subject. Keywords: Corporate Criminal Responsibilities, Criminal Law, Corporate Responsibility.

Download Full-text

The micro-politics of corporate responsibility: How companies shape protest in communities affected by mining

World Development ◽

10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105322 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 139 ◽

pp. 105322

Author(s):

Paul Alexander Haslam

Keyword(s):

Corporate Responsibility

Download Full-text

Corporate Responsibility

10.1017/cbo9781139108041 ◽

2012 ◽

Cited By ~ 62

Author(s):

Archie B. Carroll ◽

Kenneth J. Lipartito ◽

James E. Post ◽

Patricia H. Werhane ◽

Kenneth E. Goodpaster

Keyword(s):

Corporate Responsibility

Download Full-text

HUKUM DAN TEKLOGI SUATU KAJIAN TEORITIS TERHADAP PENOMENA LAYANAN TRANSFORTASI ONLINE

Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu : Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan ◽

10.32493/jdmhkdmhk.v6i1.143 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 6 (1) ◽

pp. 20

Author(s):

Aria Dimas Harapan

Keyword(s):

Economic Growth ◽

Theoretical Study ◽

Legal Protection ◽

Creative Economy ◽

Legal Certainty ◽

The People ◽

The Government ◽

The Times

ABSTRACTThe essence of this study describes the theoretical study of the phenomenon transfortation services online. Advances in technology have changed the habits of the people to use online transfortation In fact despite legal protection in the service based services transfortation technological sophistication has not been formed and it became warm conversation among jurists. This study uses normative juridical research. This study found that the first, the Government must accommodate transfotation online phenomenon in the form of rules that provide legal certainty; second, transfortation online as part of the demands of the times based on technology; third, transfortation online as part of the creative economy for economic growth .

Download Full-text