Counseling Program Evaluation: Inside and outside the Box

2012 ◽  
pp. 513-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry C. Loesch
Keyword(s):  
Program Evaluation ◽  
Counseling Program ◽  
Outside The Box

School Counselors Talk Program Evaluation in a Class-Based Qualitative Research Project

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (1_part_3) ◽  
pp. 2156759X2090356
Author(s):  
Morgan E. Kiper Riechel ◽  
Jordon J. Beasley ◽  
Ebony Howard ◽  
Kelly Culbertson
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Program Evaluation ◽  
School Counselors ◽  
Research Study ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Master's Level ◽  
Counseling Program ◽  
Graduate Course ◽  
Qualitative Research Study ◽  
School Counseling Program

Students in a master’s-level graduate course in school counseling program evaluation conducted a qualitative research study to investigate school counselors’ experiences with evidence-based program delivery and evaluation. We discuss the study’s findings that illuminated themes of challenges faced by school counselors with implications for evidence-based practice. The abbreviated methodology used in this study showed promise for school counselors in the field to conduct qualitative action research that may demonstrate adequate trustworthiness and credibility.

scholarly journals Competence in Program Evaluation and Research Assessed by State School Counselor Licensure Examinations

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 2156759X1879383
Author(s):  
John C. Carey ◽  
Ian Martin ◽  
Karen Harrington ◽  
Michael S. Trevisan
Keyword(s):  
Program Evaluation ◽  
School Counseling ◽  
School Counselors ◽  
School Counselor ◽  
State School ◽  
Counseling Program ◽  
Licensure Examinations ◽  
School Counseling Program ◽  
Research Competencies

This study investigated how state licensure examinations address school counseling program evaluation and research. In the 31 states that require them, examinations gave little attention to measuring competencies associated with designing and conducting a program evaluation. We found variability in how these examinations addressed research competencies. These results indicate a need for greater clarity and understanding on the part of state examiners regarding what school counselors need to know and be able to do in terms of program evaluation and research.

Development and Initial Investigation of the School Counseling Program Evaluation Scale

2008 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 2156759X0801100
Author(s):  
Susan C. Whiston ◽  
O. Tolga Aricak
Keyword(s):  
Program Evaluation ◽  
Social Development ◽  
School Counseling ◽  
School Counselor ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Academic Career ◽  
National Standards ◽  
Counseling Program ◽  
School Counseling Program ◽  
School Counseling Programs

This article evaluates the initial psychometric qualities of the School Counseling Program Evaluation Survey (SCoPES). SCoPES is a 64-item instrument designed to correspond to The National Standards for School Counseling Programs (Campbell & Dahir, 1997). Coefficient alphas on the overall score and the three subscales (i.e., Academic, Career, and Personal/Social Development) were all above .90. All items had significant factor loadings with the specified subscales. The loadings for Academic Development were .38 to .79; for Career Development, .42 to .78; and for Personal/Social Development, .36 to.70. The indexes of goodness-of-fit supported a three-factor instrument. Additionally, students with more contacts with their school counselor reported more career competencies than did students who had never met with a counselor.

EVALUATION INSTRUMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE GUIDANCE AND COUNSELING PROGRAM IN THE CULTURE OF HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS IN INDONESIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-104
Author(s):  
Atie Setiawati ◽  
Uman Suherman A.S ◽  
Nandang Rusmana
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Program Evaluation ◽  
Guidance And Counseling ◽  
Evaluation Instrument ◽  
Counseling Program ◽  
Comprehensive Guidance ◽  
Expert Opinions ◽  
Evaluation Instruments ◽  
Education Levels ◽  
The Right

Program evaluation in comprehensive guidance and counseling is very important to determine the level of goal achievement. In order for the evaluation results to provide the right information, a valid and reliable instrument is needed. At the higher education level, the comprehensive guidance and counseling program, including the program evaluation component, does not have many references that users can refer to. The available references focus more on primary and secondary education levels. This research is intended to produce the intended evaluation instrument. Descriptive methods and literature review were used in this study. The data were revealed using a Delphi technique questionnaire involving three experts, then analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. In this study, the constructs of evaluation instruments for comprehensive guidance and counseling programs were synthesized and modified from various expert opinions and professional organizations with two patterns of answers: yes and no, translated into 294 statements. The resulting evaluation instrument needs to be empirically tested for its feasibility by involving adequate participants.

scholarly journals Faktor Penghambat Pelaksanaan Evaluasi Program Bimbingan dan Konseling oleh Guru Bimbingan dan Konseling

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-27
Author(s):  
Rahmi Dwi Febriani ◽  
Triyono Triyono
Keyword(s):  
Program Evaluation ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
External Factors ◽  
Guidance And Counseling ◽  
Counseling Program ◽  
Internal Factor ◽  
Guidance Counseling ◽  
Quantitative Descriptive

This research was conducted from the factors inhibiting the implementation of the guidance and counseling program evaluation by teachers and guidance counseling. The research objective was to describe factors inhibiting the implementation of the guidance and counseling program evaluation by teachers guidance and counseling. This research is a quantitative descriptive. The population the guidance and counseling teachers amounting 89 people. Also 30 teachers there were chosen by random sampling cluster. The instrument used in this study was a questionnaire. The data obtained were analyzed by using descriptive statistic. The results of this study revealed that: 1) A total of 31.1% of teacher’s guidance and counseling  experiencing barriers to internal factor guidance and counseling program evaluation. 2) A total of 28.4% of teacher’s guidance and counseling experiencing barriers to external factors guidance and counseling program evaluation.

scholarly journals Hubungan antara Keterampilan Evaluasi dengan Keterlaksanaan Evaluasi Program BK di SMA Se-Kecamatan Cilinci Jakarta Utara

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-27
Author(s):  
Khairunisa Khairunisa ◽  
Ariyana Rustam ◽  
Ihsan Nurkholis ◽  
Anaway Irianti Mansyur ◽  
Maslikhah Maslikhah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Program Evaluation ◽  
High Schools ◽  
Quantitative Research ◽  
Survey Methods ◽  
Guidance And Counseling ◽  
Counseling Program ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Evaluation Exercise ◽  
School Guidance

This study aims to determine the relationship between evaluation skills and the implementation of a guidance and counseling program evaluation in Cilincing North Jakarta Sub-District High School. This research uses quantitative research using survey methods. The collection technique used in this study is a Guttman scale questionnaire and the data analysis technique used in this study is the Product Moment Correlation. This research was conducted in North Jakarta with the subjects of high school teachers in Cilincing Sub-District, North Jakarta City, 30 teachers were divided into 7 Public High Schools and 4 Private High Schools. The results of this study indicate the correlation coefficient between evaluation skills (X) with program evaluation exercise (Y) r_xy = 0.64> rtabel = 0.36, which means that there is a positive relationship between evaluation skills and the implementation of school guidance and counseling evaluation programs which means if the evaluation skills of the counselor are good, the better the evaluation of the guidance and counseling program at the school.

National Foreclosure Mitigation Counseling Program Evaluation: Final Report Rounds 1 and 2

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil S. Mayer ◽  
Peter A. Tatian ◽  
Kenneth Temkin ◽  
Charles A. Calhoun
Keyword(s):  
Program Evaluation ◽  
Final Report ◽  
Counseling Program
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document