Agronomic and economic responses to integrated weed management systems and fungicide in a wheat-canola-barley-pea rotation

2006 ◽  
Vol 86 (4) ◽  
pp. 1281-1295 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. A. Holm ◽  
R. P. Zentner ◽  
A. G. Thomas ◽  
K. Sapsford ◽  
A. Légère ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weed Management ◽  
Management Systems ◽  
Integrated Weed Management ◽  
Zero Tillage ◽  
Economic Returns ◽  
Seeding Rate ◽  
Tillage Systems ◽  
Net Return ◽  
Tillage System ◽  
Herbicide Use

Changes in tillage intensity and herbicide use can influence the incidence of weeds, insects and diseases, crop yields and economic returns. We examined the effects of six integrated weed management systems (with varying combinations of tillage methods, seeding rate, seeding date, time when weed control was applied, and annual fungicide applications on pest incidence, grain yield and quality, and economic returns for a spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)-canola (Brassica napus L.)-barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)-pea (Pisum sativum L.) rotation in the Dark Brown soils of the Moist Mixed Grassland Ecoregion of Saskatchewan. Herbicide use intensity was reduced without a significant increase in weed biomass in five of the six systems in most crops and years. The complete elimination of herbicides in one system resulted in significant crop yield losses. Certain insects were more prevalent in the cropping systems with early planting dates. Zero tillage systems produced higher yields, and yields generally declined as tillage intensity increased. For all crops, the high herbicide-zero tillage system produced the highest yields, whereas the lowest yields were obtained in the no herbicide-high tillage system. Management method had minimal impact on seed quality. Application of fungicide generally increased yields of barley, wheat and pea, but the increases were not sufficient to recover fungicide cost. High herbicide-zero tillage, medium herbicide-zero tillage, and low herbicide-zero tillage systems produced the highest net return and no herbicide-high tillage system the lowest net return, under all grain price scenarios. Key words: Agronomic, economic, tillage, herbicide, fungicide, weed management systems, weed, insect, disease

An Integrated Weed Management Approach to Managing Foxtail Barley (Hordeum jubatum) in Conservation Tillage Systems

1999 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 347-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert E. Blackshaw ◽  
Greg Semach ◽  
Xiangju Li ◽  
John T. O'Donovan ◽  
K. Neil Harker
Keyword(s):  
Crop Yield ◽  
Weed Management ◽  
Conservation Tillage ◽  
Wheat Yield ◽  
Integrated Weed Management ◽  
Management Approach ◽  
Row Spacing ◽  
Seeding Rate ◽  
Tillage Systems ◽  
Perennial Plants

A 4-yr field experiment was conducted to determine the merits of combining cultural and chemical controls to manage foxtail barley in reduced-tillage systems. Factors studied were crop row spacing, seeding rate, and application rate and timing of glyphosate within a spring wheat-flax cropping sequence. Glyphosate applied preseeding at 400 or 800 g/ha killed foxtail barley seedlings but only suppressed established perennial plants. Glyphosate applied postharvest at 800 g/ha killed 60 to 70% of established plants. Combinations of preseeding and postharvest glyphosate gave the greatest reductions in foxtail barley biomass and seed production and resulted in the greatest increases in crop yield. Including flax in the rotation allowed use of grass herbicides such as quizalofop or sethoxydim that effectively controlled foxtail barley seedlings and provided some suppression of perennial plants. An increase in wheat seeding rate from 75 to 115 kg/ha reduced foxtail barley growth and increased wheat yield in 3 of 4 yr. Increasing the flax seeding rate from 40 to 80 kg/ha or reducing wheat and flax row spacing from 30 to 20 cm provided little benefit in managing foxtail barley or increasing crop yield. A multiyear approach combining agronomic practices and timely use of herbicides should allow growers to effectively manage foxtail barley in annual cropping systems using conservation tillage.

scholarly journals Modeling the Population Dynamics and Economics of Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) Control in a Corn (Zea mays)-Soybean (Glycine max) Rotation

Weed Science ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 269-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
John L. Lindquist ◽  
Bruce D. Maxwell ◽  
Douglas D. Buhler ◽  
Jeffrey L. Gunsolus
Keyword(s):  
Population Dynamics ◽  
Weed Management ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Seedling Emergence ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Parameter Estimates ◽  
Economic Returns ◽  
Net Return ◽  
Herbicide Use ◽  
Optimum Threshold

A simulation model was developed to predict the population dynamics and economics of velvetleaf control in a corn-soybean rotation. Data compiled from the literature were used to parameterize the model for two situations, one in which velvetleaf was infected by aVerticilliumspp. wilt and one without infection.Verticilliumwas assumed to have no effect on corn or soybean yield. In the absence of control, simulated seedbank densities of aVerticillium-infected velvetleaf population were 5 to 50 times lower than for an uninfected velvetleaf population. The model was used to evaluate a threshold weed management strategy under the assumption that velvetleaf was the only weed and bentazon the only herbicide available for its control. In the absence ofVerticillium, an economic optimum threshold of 2.5 seedlings 100 m−2afforded the highest economic returns after 20 yr of simulation. Simulations in which velvetleaf was infected in 8 out of 20 randomly assigned years indicated a 6% increase in annualized net return and an 11 % reduction in the number of years that control was necessary. Sensitivity analysis indicated the parameter estimates having the greatest impact on economic optimum threshold were seedling emergence and survival, maximum seed production, and herbicide efficacy. Under an economic optimum threshold of 2.5 seedlings 100 m−2, management practices that manipulate the most sensitive demographic processes increased annualized net return by up to 13% and reduced long-term herbicide use by up to 26%. Results demonstrate that combining an economic optimum threshold with alternative weed management strategies may increase economic return and reduce herbicide use.

Management in a modified no-tillage corn–soybean–wheat rotation influences weed population and community dynamics

Weed Science ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clarence J. Swanton ◽  
Barbara D. Booth ◽  
Kevin Chandler ◽  
David R. Clements ◽  
Anil Shrestha
Keyword(s):  
Weed Management ◽  
Community Dynamics ◽  
Early Years ◽  
Management Systems ◽  
No Tillage ◽  
Strong Response ◽  
Tillage Systems ◽  
Weed Communities ◽  
Herbicide Use ◽  
Over Time

Conservation tillage systems, such as no-tillage, are ecologically advantageous because they reduce soil erosion; however, they rely heavily on herbicide use. Our goal was to determine how weed communities of no-tillage systems are affected when the system is modified to reduce herbicide use through a combination of banded herbicides and interrow cultivation. To this end, we conducted a 9-yr study in a no-tillage corn–soybean–winter wheat rotation. All management systems had a preplant application of glyphosate, followed by either broadcast PRE herbicides (conventional no-tillage), interrow cultivation with banded PRE herbicides, or interrow cultivation alone. Aboveground weed densities were assessed each year and data were grouped into early (1991 to 1993) and late (1996 to 1998) time periods. Over time, weed communities became more distinct, showing a strong response to management and crop. In the early years, weed communities separated more in response to management than crop. In the late years, this was reversed. Weed communities in systems with interrow cultivation were more diverse than those in conventional no-tillage. The response to weed management system and crop was species specific. For example, the abundance of yellow foxtail was higher when interrow cultivation was employed, but abundance was equal in all crops. Dandelion was more abundant in conventional no-tillage of corn and soybean; however, it was equally abundant in all management systems in wheat. Seed bank species richness increased over time and was highest in systems with interrow cultivation. Herbicide use can be reduced in a modified no-tillage corn–soybean–wheat rotation by incorporating interrow cultivation, with or without banded herbicides, into the management plan. The weed community trajectory changes, and the weed community becomes more diverse. A more diverse weed community will not necessarily alter how we manage weeds.

scholarly journals Influence of Tillage Systems and Selective Herbicides on Weed Management and Productivity of Direct-Seeded Rice (Oryza sativa)

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. ABBAS ◽  
A. KHALIQ ◽  
M. SAQIB ◽  
M.Z. MAJEED ◽  
S. ULLAH ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sodium Fluoride ◽  
Weed Management ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Conventional Tillage ◽  
Cost Ratio ◽  
Zero Tillage ◽  
Tillage Systems ◽  
Weed Density ◽  
Dry Biomass ◽  
Tillage System

ABSTRACT: Weeds cause considerable damage to rice crop. To ascertain the influence of different weed management practices under different tillage systems, a field experiment was conducted during 2014-15. Experimental design was RCB with split-plot arrangement and with a net plot size of 6 x 2 m. Three tillage systems viz; zero tillage with glyphosate application and conventional tillage with and without stale seed bed, and seven weed management treatments viz; weedy check, manual weeding, oxadiargyl as pre-emergence, pyrazosulfuron as pre-emergence, pyrazosulfuron as post-emergence, fenoxaprop-ethyle + sodium fluoride as post-emergence and fenoxaprop-ethyle + sodium fluoride as post-emergence. Results revealed that all treatments including tillage systems and herbicides significantly (p<0.05) affected weed density and weed dry biomass. Minimum weed density (229.22, 159.22 and 127.77 m-2) and weed dry biomass (68.01, 49.29 and 41.08 g m-2) at 30, 45 and 60 DAS (days after sowing) were recorded for pyrazosulfuron (as pre-emergence), respectively, followed by fenoxaprop-ethyle + sodium fluoride (as post-emergence). Maximum 1000-kernel weight and kernel yield (19.15 g and 3.45 ton ha-1) were recorded for weed free treatments and it was 12 and 57% higher than weedy check. Maximum net benefit and benefit to cost ratio (USD$ 817 ha-1 and 1.76, respectively) were recorded for pyrazosulfuron applied at either pre- or post-emergence stage under zero tillage system. Conclusively, pyrazosulfuron (as pre-emergence) and fenoxaprop-ethyle + sodium fluoride (as post-emergence) gave the best weed control under conventional tillage with stale seed bed system, while pyrazosulfuron exhibited maximum benefit-cost ratio under zero tillage system.

Integrating Reduced Herbicide Use with Mechanical Weeding in Corn (Zea mays)

1993 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 382-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas A. Mulder ◽  
Jerry D. Doll
Keyword(s):  
Weed Control ◽  
Weed Management ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Field Research ◽  
Integrated Weed Management ◽  
Corn Yield ◽  
Minimal Risk ◽  
Economic Returns ◽  
Growing Seasons ◽  
Herbicide Use

Concern about the effects of pesticides on the environment and the desire to reduce purchased inputs are stimuli to reduce herbicide use. Field research was conducted at two locations for two growing seasons to identify integrated weed management practices in corn that are effective and economical. Weed control treatments included PRE application of a herbicide mixture of 1.8 kg ai ha−1of atrazine plus 2.2 kg ai ha−1of metolachlor alone, this mixture broadcast or band-applied at a reduced rate in combination with mechanical weeding, and mechanical weeding alone. Weed control, corn yield, and economic returns were generally higher in treatments combining herbicides and mechanical weeding than those using only mechanical measures. Without herbicides, timeliness of rotary hoeing was critical. Herbicide use can be reduced 50 to 75% in integrated systems with minimal risk of yield loss due to uncontrolled weeds.

Grass Weed Management Systems in Grain Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)

1991 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert H. Walker ◽  
Bobby E. Norris ◽  
John A. McGuire
Keyword(s):  
Weed Management ◽  
Field Experiments ◽  
Conventional Tillage ◽  
Grain Sorghum ◽  
Management Systems ◽  
Integrated Weed Management ◽  
Net Returns ◽  
Tillage System ◽  
Strip Tillage ◽  
Large Crabgrass

Field experiments in 1984 and 1985 near Headland, AL involved the influence of 18 integrated weed management systems incorporated from nine herbicide-tillage systems (H-T) and two row patterns on control of large crabgrass and Texas panicum, crop yield, and net returns in grain sorghum. The conventional-tillage system plus herbicide combinations; alachlor preplant incorporated (PPI), atrazine postemergence (POST), and paraquat POST directed, provided 90% or greater control of large crabgrass throughout the season and high sorghum yields in one of two years; and 90% or greater control of Texas panicum from mid-June through mid-August and high sorghum yields in both years. Results in 1984 and 1985 similar to those above were obtained with strip tillage plus herbicide combinations; alachlor PPI, atrazine POST, and paraquat POST directed; alachlor PPI and tridiphane plus atrazine POST; and tridiphane plus atrazine POST and paraquat POST directed. Row patterns did not consistently influence control of large crabgrass, Texas panicum, or sorghum yield. Economic net returns ranged from – $20 to $210 per hectare for the large crabgrass control systems in 1984; however, low sorghum yields in 1985 resulted largely in negative returns. Similar net returns were obtained in the Texas panicum experiment.

Weed Problems in Uruguayan Agriculture: Evolution and Current Situation

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 203-207
Author(s):  
M. Alejandro Garcia ◽  
Lucia V. Meneses ◽  
Tiago Edu Kaspary
Keyword(s):  
Weed Management ◽  
Agricultural Production ◽  
Production Systems ◽  
Integrated Weed Management ◽  
Zero Tillage ◽  
Weed Species ◽  
Management Tools ◽  
Herbicide Resistant ◽  
Species Frequencies ◽  
Agricultural Production Systems

Uruguayan agriculture has undergone dramatic changes in the last 50 years driven by the adoption of new agricultural production systems that incorporate zero tillage and herbicide resistant crops. This has resulted in a shift in weed species frequencies and the dispersion of introduced herbicide resistant weed populations. Finally, integrated weed management tools are being developed by research and extension services to manage herbicide-resistant (HR) weeds better and to reduce environmental impact of herbicides.

Economic Analysis of Four Weed Management Systems

Weed Science ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 846-849 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald W. Lybecker ◽  
Edward E. Schweizer ◽  
Robert P. King
Keyword(s):  
Economic Analysis ◽  
Weed Management ◽  
Management System ◽  
Conventional Tillage ◽  
Management Systems ◽  
Income Risk ◽  
Pinto Bean ◽  
System 2 ◽  
Herbicide Use ◽  
System 1

An economic analysis of four weed management systems employed on four crop sequences in a barley-corn-pinto bean-sugarbeet rotation in eastern Colorado was computed. Weeds were controlled in each crop with only conventional tillage or conventional tillage plus minimum levels of herbicides (systems 3 and 4), moderate levels of herbicides (system 1), or intensive levels of herbicides (system 2). Adjusted gross returns were higher for systems 3 and 4 where herbicide use was less/year and decreased over 4 yr than for systems 1 and 2 where herbicide use was higher/year and constant. When the four crop sequences were aggregated using yield and sucrose indices, the least herbicide-intensive weed management system had $440/ha/4 yr higher indexed adjusted gross return than the most herbicide-intensive weed management system. An income risk analysis showed that the herbicide-intensive weed management system was not risk efficient and that producers would select one of the other three less herbicide-intensive weed management systems depending upon their risk preferences.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document