scholarly journals Effect on Patients’ Outcomes of a Change to Biosimilar Filgrastim Product in Autologous Stem Cell Mobilization

2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Fenna ◽  
Micheal Guirguis ◽  
Caroline Ibrahim ◽  
Neeta Shirvaikar ◽  
Irwindeep Sandhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Biosimilar Product ◽  
Biologic Drugs ◽  
Originator Product ◽  
Cell Mobilization ◽  
Résultats Cliniques ◽  
Biosimilar Filgrastim

Background: Following addition of a biosimilar filgrastim product to the formulary, sites in the authors’ provincial health authority transitioned from using the originator filgrastim to the biosimilar for autologous stem cell mobilization. Objective: To assess the effect on patient outcomes of a universal change to use of the biosimilar filgrastim in stem cell mobilization. Methods: This retrospective pre–post study included patients undergoing autologous stem cell mobilization at 2 cancer hospitals in Alberta, Canada, between July 1, 2018, and November 30, 2019. Clinical outcomes were investigated for patients treated with a granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (biosimilar or originator product) for mobilization before stem cell transplant, approximately 6 months before and after the defined date of product change. Results: In total, 102 patients were treated with the originator product and 101 patients with the biosimilar. Effectiveness was similar between the originator and biosimilar products, with 98% successful harvest of stem cells in all patients treated. Independent t tests showed no statistically significant differences between patients receiving the originator and those receiving the biosimilar in terms of time from mobilization to collection (difference of means –0.9 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] –2.12 to 0.32), time for neutrophil engraftment (difference of means 0 days, 95% CI –0.36 to 0.36), time for platelet engraftment (difference of means 1 day, 95% CI –0.55 to 2.55), average length of stay (difference of means –0.7 day, 95% CI –2.71 to 1.31), and CD34+ value (difference of means –1 × 106/kg body weight, 95% CI –2.11 to 0.11). A 98% rate of conversion to use of the biosimilar filgrastim was achieved, with an estimated annual drug-cost saving of $67 500. Conclusions: In this pre–post study, changing to the biosimilar product from the originator maintained clinical effectiveness outcomes while decreasing overall drug expenditures. A well-planned change to the biosimilar product, executed in conjunction with clinician consultation and monitoring of effectiveness outcomes, can ensure appropriate patient therapy while significantly improving the uptake of biosimilars and decreasing expenditures for biologic drugs. RÉSUMÉ Contexte : À la suite de l’ajout d’un produit filgrastim biosimilaire à la liste des médicaments, les sites relevant de l’autorité sanitaire provinciale des auteurs sont passés de l’utilisation du filgrastim princeps à la version générique pour la mobilisation des cellules souches autologues. Objectif : Évaluer l’effet sur les résultats des patients d’un changement généralisé visant à utiliser le filgrastim générique pour la mobilisation des cellules souches. Méthodes : Cette étude rétrospective pré-post comprenait des patients soumis à une mobilisation des cellules souches autologues dans deux hôpitaux de cancérologie en Alberta (Canada) entre le 1er juillet 2018 et le 30 novembre 2019. L’examen des résultats cliniques des patients traités à l’aide d’un facteur stimulant les colonies de granulocytes (G-CSF) (générique ou princeps) pour une mobilisation avant la greffe de cellules souches a eu lieu environ six mois avant et après la date du changement de produit. Résultats : Au total, 102 patients ont été traités à l’aide du produit princeps et 101 patients à l’aide du générique. Les deux produits présentaient une efficacité similaire, et 98 % de réussite dans la récolte de cellules souches chez tous les patients traités. Des tests t indépendants n’ont montré aucune différence statistique significative entre les patients recevant le princeps et ceux recevant le biosimilaire en termes de temps allant de la mobilisation à la collecte (différence des moyennes –0,9 jour, intervalle de confiance [IC] 95 % –2,12 à 0,32); temps de la prise de la greffe neutrophile (différence des moyennes 0 jour, IC 95 % –0,36 à 0,36); temps de la prise de la greffe des plaquettes (différence des moyennes 1 jour, IC 95 % –0,55 à 2,55); durée moyenne du séjour (différence des moyennes –0,7 jour, IC 95 % –2,71 à 1,31) et valeur CD34+ (différence des moyennes –1 × 106/kg masse corporelle, IC 95 % –2,11 à 0,11). Un taux de conversion de 98 % visant à utiliser le filgrastim générique a été atteint, avec une estimation des économies annuelles sur le coût des médicaments de 67 500 $. Conclusions : Dans cette étude pré-post, le passage du produit princeps au générique a préservé l’efficacité des résultats cliniques, tout en diminuant les dépenses générales liées au médicament. Un changement bien programmé pour passer au produit générique, mené conjointement avec la consultation d’un clinicien et un contrôle des résultats d’efficacité, peut assurer une thérapie du patient appropriée tout en améliorant grandement la prise de produits génériques et en diminuant les dépenses associées aux médicaments biologiques.  

The Role of Stem Cell Mobilization Regimen on Lymphocyte Collection Yield and Survival after Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 1174-1174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis F. Porrata ◽  
Suzanne R. Hayman ◽  
Morie A. Gertz ◽  
Martha Q. Lacy ◽  
Angela Dispenzieri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
Cell Labeling ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Cell Mobilization

Abstract We previously have reported that autograft absolute lymphocyte count (A-ALC) is a possible prognostic factor for survival after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant (ASCT) for myeloma (MM). Factors affecting A-ALC in MM are unknown. We hypothesize that method of stem cell mobilization, hematopoietic growth factor (HGF) vs. HGF+Cytoxan chemotherapy (C+HGF), directly affects A-ALC collection. 191 consecutive MM patients between 1994 and 2004 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients generally were mobilized with C+HGF prior to 2003. Thereafter, C+HGF was reserved largely for those with ≥4% circulating peripheral blood plasma cells (PC), a negative prognostic indicator. No patients were transplanted in disease relapse or refractory disease. Patients also were matched for age, sex, β2-microglobulin, conventional cytogenetics, LDH, c-reactive protein, number of prior therapies, plasma cell labeling index (PCLI), pre-mobilization ALC, and % bone marrow (BM) PC. The groups HGF (n=80) and C+HGF (n=111) differed with respect to the conditioning regimen (p < 0.0001), and presence of (≥4%) circulating peripheral blood PC (p<0.005). The primary end-point of the study was to assess the correlation between HGF vs C+HGF, and A-ALC. The secondary endpoint was to determine if HGF vs C+HGF affected survival post-ASCT. Patients mobilized with HGF had a higher A-ALC compared to those mobilized with C+HGF [0.764 x 109 lymphocytes/kg (range: 0.146–1.803) vs. 0.212 (range: 0.016–1.26), p<0.0001]. No association was identified between A-ALC and conditioning regimens (p = 0.19) and PC (p = 0.31). Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were longer in those mobilized with HGF vs. C+HGF (not reached vs. 48 months, p<0.0150; not reached vs. 21 months, p<0.007, respectively). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age ≥50 vs age ≤50 (p<0.05) and A-ALC ≥0.5 vs <0.5x109 lymphocytes/kg (p<0.0397) were independent predictors of OS. Factors influencing PFS in the multivariate analysis included circulating PC ≥4% vs <4% (p<0.0157), PCLI ≥ 1% vs PCLI ≤ 1% (p<0.0107), and A-ALC ≥0.5 vs <0.5x109 lymphocytes/kg (p<0.0042). On multivariate analysis, the method of stem cell mobilization and the conditioning regimen did not have a statistically significant effect on either OS or PFS. We hypothesize that the differences in PFS and OS seen between the HGF vs C+HGF mobilization groups are mediated through the A-ALC. These data suggest that mobilization regimens should not only collect CD34+ stem cells, but also be optimized to collect an A-ALC target which may impact on PFS and OS post-ASCT.

Phase III Randomized Stem Cell Mobilization Trial Comparing Standard Vs Double-Dose G-CSF Vs Standard Doses of G-CSF Plus GM-CSF in Hard to Mobilize Patients Undergoing An Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT).

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3228-3228
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Berger ◽  
Christopher Seet ◽  
Mala Parthasarathy ◽  
Tulio Rodriguez ◽  
Scott E. Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Control Group ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Gm Csf ◽  
Cell Mobilization

Abstract Abstract 3228 Poster Board III-165 Introduction Using standard dose G-CSF (10 μg/kg) for stem cell mobilization, 25-40% of patients, deemed to be hard to mobilize based on prior therapy, will not collect sufficient HSC (> 2-2.5 × 106 CD34/kg) to proceed to a prompt autotransplant. Strategies to improve CD34/kg yields have included dose escalating G-CSF up to 30 μg/kg or combining G-CSF and GM-CSF. While dose escalated G-CSF is effective in increasing CD34 yields in normal donors as is the combination of G-CSF and GM-CSF, their comparative value in pre-treated patients has not been tested. To determine the value of these strategies, we performed a randomized comparison of high dose G-CSF (30 μg/kg as 2 doses 12 hours apart), to the combination of simultaneous single daily doses of G-CSF (10 μg/kg) plus GM-CSF (5 μg/kg), to a control group receiving G-CSF at an equivalent total dose of cytokine to the combination arm (15μg/kg) as a single dose. Patients and Methods Patients were eligible if heavily pre-treated, defined as: a minimum of 10 total cycles of combination chemotherapy and two prior regimens, or a total of 6 chemotherapy cycles if the patient also received RT to marrow bearing sites, platinum-based chemotherapy or 2 or more cycles of any BCNU or fludarabine containing regimen. Baseline WBC had to be > 3000/μl, ANC > 1500/μl and a platelets > 100,000/μl. Twelve liter aphereses began on day 5 of mobilization, and continued until ≥ 4 × 106 CD34/kg were collected or a maximum of 5 aphereses. Patients typically proceeded to transplant if they had ≥ 2.5 × 106 CD34/kg collected and were always re-mobilized if they collected < 2.0 × 106 CD34/kg. CD34 subsets (CD34+/CD33- and CD34+/CD38-) were also assessed for the 3 groups to determine if more primitive HSC were mobilized by the 2 novel strategies. The sample size was calculated based as follows: 60% of the control group would collect 2.5 × 106 CD34/kg and this would rise to 90% in one or both study arms. The detection of such differences with a power of 80% and a 2-sided alpha level of 0.025 required a total sample of 120 patients. Results A total of 120 patients were randomized; 119 were eligible. Patient demographics, shown in the Table, were matched among the three groups: The % of patients collecting ≥2.5 × 106 CD34/kg was: standard G: 60%, high dose G: 57% (p = 1.0), G + GM: 41% (p = 0.1). Median CD34 collected in first mobilization were, 3.6 × 106/kg, 3.0 × 106/kg (p = 0.22) and 2.0 × 106/kg (p = 0.05) respectively in a median of 4, 4, and 5 aphereses (p = NS). Re-mobilization rates: standard G; 37.5%, high dose G: 35%; G + GM: 50% (p = NS). Total median CD34 collected from first and any second mobilizations were: standard G: 4.8 × 106/kg, high dose G: 3.9 × 106/kg, and G + GM: 3.5 × 106/kg. One patient in the standard G arm and 3 in high dose G did not proceed to transplant due to poor initial mobilization and progression in 2, and one each for progression or poor mobilization alone. There were no significant differences in median engraftment times: for ANC, 10, 11 and 15 days respectively for the standard G-, high dose G- and G + GM arms and for platelets, 11, 13 and 14 days respectively. The overall survivals @ the median f/u time of 37 months were 59.8%, 61.8% and 48.1% respectively (p = 0.272) for the three groups. The % primitive HSC (CD34+/CD33- and CD34+/CD38-) from the first mobilization were identical in the 3 patient groups. Conclusions We found no advantage to dose escalated G-CSF nor to the combination of G-CSF and GM-CSF to mobilize HSC for autotransplantation in heavily pre-treated patients. We also did not find higher numbers of more primitive CD34 subsets mobilized by these newer strategies. Alternative approaches, e.g. the combination of plerixifor + standard dose G-CSF (Stiff et al: BBMT; 15:249-56, 2009) would appear to be the preferred method of initial HSC mobilization for heavily pre-treated patients. Disclosures Stiff: Genzyme: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Phase I Study of Bortezomib(Bz), Pegylated Doxorubicin(DOX) and Dexamethasone(dex); ( VDD) with Escalating Doses of Cyclophosphamide(Cy) in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 617-617
Author(s):  
Melissa Alsina ◽  
Rachid Baz ◽  
Jose L Ochoa ◽  
Jyotishankar Raychaudhuri ◽  
Kara Kosakowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Cell Mobilization ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 617 Background: The VDD treatment regimen has been shown to be highly effective as initial therapy for multiple myeloma. Given the established synergy between bortezomib and alkylating agents, incorporating an alkylator to VDD may increase the depth of response and may improve long term outcome. We report the results from a Phase I trial combining VDD with escalating doses of cyclophosphamide ( CVDD) in patients (Pts) with newly diagnosed myeloma. Methods: Pts received Bz 1.0–1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, 11, DOX 30mg/m2 on day 4, Dex 20 mg on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12 and Cy 250-750 mg/m2 on day 1, for up to eight 21-day cycles, at four planned dose levels (Cy/Bz: 250/1.0, 500/1.0, 750/1.0, 750/1.3). Dose-escalation proceeded (three-pt cohorts) depending on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity; thrombocytopenia with platelets <10,000/mm3 on >1 occasion despite transfusion support; Grade 4 neutropenia for >5 days and/or resulting in neutropenic fever; inability to receive cycle 2/day 1 dose due to drug-related toxicity). Pts with Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy (PNY) were excluded. Responses were assessed by International Working Group criteria. Pts with at least partial response ( PR) and standard risk cytogenetics could proceed to autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) after 6 cycles. Responsive pts with high risk cytogenetics defined as the presence of one of the following at diagnosis; deletion of chromosome 13 by cytogenetics, hypodiploidy, or t (4;14), t(14;16) or deletion of 17 p by FISH, completed 8 cycles of therapy. Results: 26 pts have been enrolled to date: 12 in phase l, and 14 additional pts at the maximum planned dose (MPD). Median age 60 yrs, 62% men, 50% IgG MM, 81% with ISS stage II/III. Pts have received a median of 6 cycles; 17 have completed all 6-8 cycles, 1 has discontinued therapy. No DLTs were observed in the phase I portion of study. Dose reductions in cycle 2 and beyond have occurred in 31% of patients. Toxicities to date have been manageable, including all Grade 3/4 hematological toxicities (4-35%), Grade 3 hand foot syndrome( 15%), Grade 3 pneumonia (8%), Grade 3 UTI (8%), and Grade 3/4 metabolic (19%). There were no grade 3/4 PNY. There was 1 treatment-related mortality secondary to infection. The overall response rate in patients that have completed at least 4 cycles of therapy (ORR; ≥PR) is 90%, including 57% ≥VGPR, and 24% CR. ORR and VGPR rates were similar in patients with standard or high risk cytogenetics. Nine patients have proceeded to transplant and all have had successful stem cell mobilization with G-CSF alone. Conclusions: CVDD produces high quality responses and is well tolerated in newly diagnosed MM pts, regardless of their cytogenetic status or ISS stage. MPD has been reached at CY 750 mg/m2, Bz 1.3 mg/m2, DOX 30 mg/m2, and Dex 20 mg, with phase II enrollment ongoing. Stem cell mobilization has been successful in all pts, with transplant course in pts otherwise unremarkable. Updated efficacy will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Alsina: Millenium: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ortho Biotech: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Plerixafor and G-CSF For Autologous Stem Cell Mobilization In AL Amyloidosis: A Single Center Experience

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4516-4516
Author(s):  
Esha Kaul ◽  
Gunjan L Shah ◽  
Chakra P Chaulagain ◽  
Raymond L. Comenzo
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Cell Mobilization

Background Risk-adapted melphalan and stem cell transplant (SCT) is standard initial therapy for a minority of patients with systemic AL amyloidosis (Blood 2013;121: 5124; Blood 2011;118: 4298). Stem cell mobilization is often accomplished with high dose G-CSF (16μg/kg/d) (Blood 2011;118:4346). In the current era with effective new agents such as bortezomib, many AL patients are receiving initial therapy and achieving profound rapid cytoreduction with organ improvement (Blood 2012;119:4391; Blood 2011;118:86). But not all patients respond and in some cases the duration of response is limited. In addition, the use of SCT for consolidation after an initial response, although reasonable, has not been systematically evaluated. Whether SCT is employed as consolidation or as a second- or third-line option, the efficacy and tolerance of mobilization become important issues. Because AL patients have organ involvement limiting chemotherapy-based mobilization options, we decided to explore the option of Plerixafor and G-CSF for stem cell mobilization, based on the phase III experience in MM (Blood 2009;113:5720). We now report the first experience with this mobilization approach in AL. Patients and Methods Patients were evaluated and diagnosed by standard criteria including, in all cases, tissue biopsies showing amyloidosis. They were mobilized and collected between 4/16/12 and 6/19/13 with G-CSF 10μg/kg/d subcutaneously (SC) for 5 days (continued through collection process) and Plerixafor adjusted for renal function starting on day 4 and continuing until collection was completed. Results We report on 10 patients whose median age at mobilization was 58 years (range 46-72), 60% of whom were men. Median number of organs involved was 2 (range 1-3). Heart and kidneys were the most frequently involved organs (7 patients in each group). Median time from diagnosis to mobilization was 9 months (range 2-123). Eight patients had received prior bortezomib-based therapy. The median number of cycles was 3 (range 0-6). One had received a prior MEL 140 transplant 10 years prior and had relapsed, and 2 were treatment naïve, one of whom was 1 year status post orthotopic heart transplant. At the time of mobilization, 3 patients had non-responsive hematologic disease, 3 had achieved PR, 1 VGPR and 1 had achieved CR. Five patients had a creatinine ≥ 1.5 mg/dL including 2 patients on hemodialysis. The target cell dose was 10x106CD34/kg for all but one patient (with previous history of transplantation). The median number of collections was 2 (range 2-3). On day one, the median number of CD34+ cells collected per kg was 3.6 x106 (0.4-6x106) and on day two 6.4 x106 (2.7-19x106). The median total CD34+ cells collected per kg was 12.5x106 (5-18x106). Two patients had grade 1 bleeding from the catheter site during apheresis and one patient had dyspnea with suspected fluid overload which responded to a single dose of intravenous furosemide. There were no significant toxicities observed with Plerixafor in mobilization. All patients went on to receive high dose chemotherapy with melphalan followed by autologous stem cell transplant. The median length of hospital stay was 25 days (18-32). The median stem cell dose infused was 7.6x106CD34/kg and median days to ANC > 500 was 11 (10-22), to platelets > 20K untransfused 22 (15-44) and to lymphocytes > 500/μl 14.5 (11-25). One patient who had VOD and persistent thrombocytopenia was given the remainder of his stem cells on day +31 with full recovery and normalization of the blood counts by day +65. Conclusions In the era of more effective initial therapies, an era in which AL patients are living longer, many with moderate organ damage, mobilization with Plerixafor and G-CSF was well tolerated and made it possible to collect ample numbers of CD34+ cells with limited leukaphereses in previously treated patients and in those with advanced renal failure. This approach not only allowed the collection of sufficient CD34+ cells for optimal immediate stem cell dosing but also permitted the cryopreservation of aliquots for post-SCT boost and potentially for future cell-based therapies. Disclosures: Comenzo: Millenium: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Prothena: Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding.

Long-Term Outcome Of Patients With AL Amyloidosis Treated With High-Dose Melphalan and Stem Cell Transplantation: 19 Year Experience At a Single Center

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3328-3328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vaishali Sanchorawala ◽  
Gheorghe Doros ◽  
Karen Quillen ◽  
John Mark Sloan ◽  
Anthony C Shelton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Al Amyloidosis ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Cell Mobilization

Abstract Aggressive treatment of AL amyloidosis with high dose intravenous melphalan followed by autologous stem cell transplant (HDM/SCT) is effective in inducing hematologic and clinical remissions associated with prolonged survival. We have performed 593 transplants from July 1994 to December 2012 in the Amyloidosis Center at Boston Medical Center/Boston University School of Medicine. Patients were enrolled in several sequential institutional review board–approved protocols during the 19-year study period. Eligibility criteria for all protocols required biopsy proof of amyloid disease; evidence of a plasma cell dyscrasia and exclusion of other types as appropriate; at least one major affected organ; and adequate measures of cardiac and pulmonary function, and performance status. Functional measures included cardiac ejection fraction 40% or greater, absence of symptomatic pleural effusions, absence of heart failure or arrhythmias resistant to medical management, oxygen saturation of 95% or greater on room air, lung diffusion capacity of 50% or more of predicted, supine systolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or greater, and Southwest Oncology Group performance status score of 2 or less unless limited by peripheral neuropathy. Age, renal function, time from diagnosis, prior therapy, and details of the conditioning regimen varied among the trials. Overall, the median age of patients treated with HDM/SCT was 57 years (range, 28-80). Treatment-related mortality (TRM) defined as death occurring within 100 days after SCT occurred in 51 patients, leading to overall TRM of 9% (n=51/593). Additionally, there were 11 deaths during stem cell mobilization and collection phase. No death has occurred since 2005 during stem cell mobilization and collection and TRM has improved to 5% (n=11/235). Total of 324 patients (55%) received full dose melphalan at 200 mg/m2 and 269 (45%) received modified dose melphalan at 100-140 mg/m2 per protocol, based upon age and organ function. Hematologic CR, as defined by international consensus criteria, occurred in 40% (n=202/508) of evaluable patients measured at 6-12 months post SCT; by intention-to-treat the CR rate was 34%. Hematologic CR occurred in 44% (n=129/291) patients who received 200 mg/m2 of HDM compared to 34% (n=73/217) patients who received 100-140 mg/m2 of HDM (chi square p=0.015). Hematologic relapse occurred in 40 patients (20%) with CR at a median of 3.9 years (range, 1.6-12.4). The median overall survival (OS) is 6.7 years with a median follow-up of 4.5 years. The median OS has not been reached for patients achieving a hematologic CR but exceeds 12.4 years, compared to 5.9 years for those not achieving CR (log-rank p<0.001). The median OS for patients following hematologic relapse is 3.5 years. Twenty-five % of patients are alive, up to 19 years after undergoing HDM/SCT. These data highlight the remarkable long-term survival results that can be obtained in patients with AL amyloidosis treated with HDM/SCT. While survival is strongly dependent upon achieving a hematologic CR, the survival of patients who do not achieve a CR and of those who relapse after CR also is notable, suggesting a benefit of treatment. Strategies to improve risk-stratification of patients and reduce TRM, as well as using sequential or combination therapies to increase the CR rate, will likely improve outcomes in the future for patients who just a few years ago were considered to have a rapidly fatal diagnosis. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Stem Cell Mobilization after Various Induction Regimens in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5433-5433
Author(s):  
Jakub Radocha ◽  
Vladimir Maisnar ◽  
Miriam Lanska ◽  
Jiri Hanousek ◽  
Katerina Machalkova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Rapid Development ◽  
Autologous Transplantation ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Mobilization ◽  
Stem Cell Collection

Abstract Stem cell mobilization after various induction regimens in patients with multiple myeloma Introduction: Rapid development of novel therapies for multiple myeloma has led to a significant improvement in response to the treatment. Stem cell mobilization before autologous stem cell transplantation is a source of considerable costs of transplant procedure. Whether modern induction regimens affect outcome of stem cell mobilization has not been extensively studied. Aim: The goal of this study was to compare efficacy of stem cell mobilization after different induction regimens in patients with multiple myeloma. The primary goal was to compare CTD (cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, dexamethasone), CVD (cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, dexamethasone) and VTD (bortezomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone) and regimens in terms of succesful stem cell collection. Methods: All patients with multiple myeloma who have been planned for stem cell collection and were treated with one of the above mentioned regimens were included in this retrospective analysis. The demographic data, amount of stem cells collected, number of days needed to reach the target collection were recorded. All patients received high dose cyclophosphamide 2,5 g/m2 prior to stem cell collection and were primed with G-CSF twice daily from day 5. The collection was started at day 10. Collection goal was 8x106/kg CD34+ cells. Results: 15 patients received CTD, 25 patients CVD and 16 patients VTD regimen before stem cell collection. Groups were comparable according to age, gender and myeloma stages. Mean collected cells at the end of collection were 9.2 (SD 2.8) for CTD, 12.3 (SD 5.6) for CVD and 10.1 (SD 2.1) for VTD (p=0.066). Mean daily harvest was 3.4, 8.0 and 7.6 x106/kg respectively (p=0.01). Mean days needed to reach desired harvest were 3, 2.25 and 1.6 days (p=0.001). No collection failure was observed. Conclusion: The best collection results were seen in patients after induction with CVD or VTD regimen. VTD regimen also required the least days for collection and seems to be most beneficial for cost of collection. CTD regimen shows the least efficacy in stem cell collection before autologous transplantation. All patients managed to harvest for at least one stem cell transplant. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Comparison of biosimilar filgrastim, originator filgrastim, and lenograstim for autologous stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma

Transfusion ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 57 (10) ◽  
pp. 2359-2365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katharina Lisenko ◽  
Marc‐Andrea Baertsch ◽  
Renate Meiser ◽  
Petra Pavel ◽  
Thomas Bruckner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
Cell Mobilization ◽  
Biosimilar Filgrastim

scholarly journals Biosimilar G-CSF Versus Originator G-CSF for Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization: A Comparative Analysis of Mobilization and Engraftment

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3345-3345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Stakiw ◽  
Waleed Sabry ◽  
Mohamed Elemary ◽  
Mark J. Bosch ◽  
Pat Danyluk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Similar Efficacy ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
P Value ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Cell Mobilization

Abstract Biologic agents are among the fastest-growing classes of therapeutic products. A biosimilar therapeutic product is defined as one that is similar to an already licensed reference product in regard to quality, safety, and efficacy and is often priced more competitively (Expert Committee on Biological Standardization, 2009; Publicover, et al., 2013). In 2016, the Saskatchewan Cancer Agency effectively changed from a granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) brand name product (Neupogen®) to a biosimilar (Grastofil®) for stem cell mobilization prior to autologous stem cell transplants (ASCT). However, because its efficacy in this setting is currently unknown, many institutions continue to use the brand name product. To address this, we reviewed patient charts and compared the efficacy of CD34+ collection in 170 patients who received Neupogen® and 47 patients who received Grastofil® between 2012 and 2018. Additionally, we analyzed efficacy of mobilization with both G-CSF products either alone or in combination with chemotherapy, patients requiring more than one apheresis day and requirement for Plerixafor®. Time to engraftment, and length of stay in hospital post ASCT were used as clinical efficacy parameters. This analysis is important to ensure that patient outcome is not compromised upon use of Grastofil® as opposed to the already approved reference, Neupogen®. The increased use of biosimilars would allow for decreased costs and more sustainable healthcare. Results Neupogen® and Grastofil® had similar efficacy for stem cell mobilization as 92.4% of the patients harvested with the brand name had a successful harvest compared to 100% of the patients given the biosimilar. A successful harvest is defined as a collection of ≥2x106 CD34+ cells for patients planned for one stem cell transplant and ≥4x106 CD34+ cells for patients planned for two transplants. Additionally, the two drugs did not display a statistically significant difference in Plerixafor requirement in a situation with low CD34+ count. Amongst all 217 patients, 25.9% of patients given Neupogen® required Plerixafor® as compared to 23.4% of Grastofil® patients. As seen from Table 1, by using the Wilcoxon test to compare the efficacy of Neupogen® and Grastofil® without chemotherapy for stem cell mobilization, there was no significant difference seen with a p-value of 0.53. Similarly, in patients mobilized with chemotherapy in addition to either Neupogen® or Grastofil®, similar efficacy was seen between the groups given a p-value of 0.95. There was no statistically significant difference between the patient groups with respect to requiring more than 1 day of apheresis. 59.4% of patients mobilized with Neupogen® required more than 1 apheresis day compared to 76.9% of Grastofil® patients (p = 0.11). Similarly, of the Neupogen® and Grastofil® groups mobilized with chemotherapy, 42.5% and 38.1%, respectively, required more than one apheresis day which was not statistically different (p = 0.71). Table 2 presents the engraftment data which also suggests that the two drugs behave with similar efficacy in this respect. Length of stay in hospital post autologous stem cell transplant was an additional variable analyzed. Again, there was no significant difference in length of stay between patients who received Neupogen® (median=18.5 days, IQR=17.0-21.0) or Grastofil® (median=19.0 days, IQR =17.0-22.0) without chemotherapy (p = 0.75). When chemotherapy was added to the mobilizing regimen, lengths of stay post autologous stem cell transplant increased but there was no statistically significant difference in length of stay between Neupogen® plus chemotherapy mobilization (median=22.0, IQR =20.0-26.0) versus Grastofil® plus chemotherapy (median=24.0 days, IQR =21.0-29.0) mobilization (p-value =0.10). In conclusion, when comparing the use of either a Neupogen® or Grastofil® based mobilization regimen in terms of stem cell harvest success, Plerixafor® use, more than one apheresis day required, time to engraftment, and length of stay in hospital, no significant difference was found indicating that both products, the reference agent and its biosimilar have similar efficacy. The use of such biosimilars can provide substantial cost savings to the health care system. Disclosures Elemary: Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Lundbeck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document