A STATISTICAL EVALUATION OF THE 3M BRAND AUTOMATIC COLONY COUNTER1,2

1974 ◽  
Vol 37 (8) ◽  
pp. 435-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. S. Packard ◽  
Roy E. Ginn
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Evaluation ◽  
Raw Milk ◽  
The Other ◽  
Total Variance ◽  
Plate Count ◽  
Standard Plate Count ◽  
Culture Plate ◽  
Counter Model ◽  
Standard Plate ◽  
Colony Counter

The 3M Brand Automatic Colony Counter, Model 620, was evaluated and compared with three laboratory technicians on raw milk Standard Plate Count (SPC) cultures over the range of counts from 0–300 colonies per culture plate. Overall, the estimated total variance for the three technicians was 15.07, for the 3M unit 17.82. On plates averaging greater than 150 colonies the 3M unit and hand counts were about equal in Variability. On lower counts the 3M device was somewhat more variable, although within what would appear to be acceptable limits. For the range of data studied, 99.4% of the variance (for the average of three counts by either method) could be accounted for by a similar average of observations using the other method. The 3M unit averaged 2.33 counts higher than technician counts.

The 3M Automatic Colony Counter in the Bacterial Evaluation of Manufacturing-Grade Milk

1977 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 744-746 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. S. LaGRANGE ◽  
N. J. MOON ◽  
W. REED
Keyword(s):  
Raw Milk ◽  
Routine Analysis ◽  
Plate Count ◽  
Correction Factors ◽  
Standard Plate Count ◽  
Milk Samples ◽  
Large Numbers ◽  
Counter Model ◽  
Standard Plate ◽  
Colony Counter

Twenty-seven raw milk samples were analyzed for their bacterial quality by the Standard Plate Count (SPC) and the plate loop count (PLC). All resultant plates were counted by three different technicians either manually or with a 3M Brand Automatic Colony Counter, Model 630. Results emphasize the superiority of the SPC over the PLC for samples with high bacterial numbers. The automatic colony counter tended to underestimate the number of colonies on a plate. Correction factors for conversion of PLC counts to SPC and automatic to manual counts were calculated. It is recommended that the PLC and the automatic colony counter be used with appropriate correction factors for routine analysis of large numbers of samples.

Evaluation of the 3M Dry Medium Culture Plate (Petrifilm™ SM) Method for Determining Numbers of Bacteria in Raw Milk1

1984 ◽  
Vol 47 (10) ◽  
pp. 753-755 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. E. GINN ◽  
V. S. PACKARD ◽  
T. L. FOX
Keyword(s):  
Cold Water ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Raw Milk ◽  
Water Soluble ◽  
Gelling Agent ◽  
Plate Count ◽  
Suitable Alternative ◽  
Standard Plate Count ◽  
Standard Plate ◽  
Indicator Dye

The 3M Company has developed a sample-ready system (Petrifilm ™ SM) for enumerating bacteria in milk and other food products. The testing unit consists of Standard Methods culture medium coated onto a base film and overlaid with a second film coated with a cold-water-soluble gelling agent and tetrazolium indicator dye. As such, the system is ready to accept samples of product. A pipette or 0.001-ml plate loop continuous pipetting syringe can be used for applying samples. In this study, both methods of sample addition were used and results compared with those of the Standard Plate Count (SPC) and standard Plate Loop (PL) methods for determining bacteria numbers in raw milk. In total, 108 samples were analyzed in duplicate by each of the four methods. The correlation coefficients (r) between the 3M-SPC and SPC, 3M-PL and PL, 3M-PL and SPC and PL and SPC were 0.946, 0.935, 0.941, and 0.974, respectively. Repeatability, as measured by mean log10 variance for duplicate determinations, was essentially the same for the four methods, and in all instances less than 0.005. The mean log10 differences between the SPC and 3M-SPC, and SPC and 3M-PL were, respectively, −0.177 and −0.168. The preceding statistical criteria suggest the Petrifilm™ SM method to be a suitable alternative to the SPC or the PL procedure.

Preliminary Incubation Count as an Index of Raw Milk Microbiological Quality During Storage

1984 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 206-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. J. RYAN ◽  
R. H. GOUGH ◽  
C. H. WHITE
Keyword(s):  
Microbiological Quality ◽  
Storage Period ◽  
Raw Milk ◽  
Plate Count ◽  
Bacterial Counts ◽  
Sample Group ◽  
Psychrotrophic Bacteria ◽  
Standard Plate Count ◽  
Milk Samples ◽  
Standard Plate

During a 5-month period, 200 raw milk samples were collected from two Louisiana milk plants. Standard Plate Count (SPC), Psychrotrophic Bacteria Count (PBC), and Proteolytic Count (PC) of each sample were initially determined, then monitored daily during a 5-d storage period at 2.2°C. As hypothesized, all bacterial counts increased during the storage period. The magnitude of the increase in bacterial numbers during storage was further investigated by dividing the milk samples into bacteriologically acceptable and unacceptable groups based on SPC or Preliminary Incubation (PI) count. An SPC of 1.0 × 105/ml and PI counts of 1.0 × 105/ml, 1.5 × 105/ml, 2.3 × 105/ml, and 3.0 × 105/ml were used to repeatedly dichotomize the 200 raw milk samples into two groups. Median SPC, PBC, and PC for each acceptable and unacceptable group were then calculated. Dichotomization based on PI counts yielded acceptable sample groups having consistently lower bacterial counts during storage than did the acceptable sample group, which resulted from the dichotomization based on a SPC of 1.0 × 105/ml. The results of this study indicated that the PI count is of considerable value for raw milk quality control.

Subpasteurization Heat Treatment to Inactivate Lipase and Control Bacterial Growth in Raw Milk

1982 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 513-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. F. SENYK ◽  
R. R. ZALL ◽  
W. F. SHIPE
Keyword(s):  
Heat Treatment ◽  
Lipase Activity ◽  
Raw Milk ◽  
Heat Treatments ◽  
Plate Count ◽  
Psychrotrophic Bacteria ◽  
Standard Plate Count ◽  
Heat Treated ◽  
Standard Plate ◽  
And Control

Raw milk was heat-treated under subpasteurization and suprapasteurization conditions, cooled and stored for up to 72 h at 4.4 and 6.7°C. Milk lipase activity and bacteria counts were monitored in both unheated and heated milks. Inhibition of milk lipase activity ranged from 42 to 98% for treatments of 57.2°C for 10 sec to 73.9°C for 10 sec, respectively. The logs of Standard Plate Count after 72 h of storage at 6.7°C were 6.56, 4.86, 4.31, 4.00 and 2.82 for unheated and 10-sec heat treatments at 57.2, 65.6, 73.9 and 82.2°C, respectively. Psychrotrophic Bacteria Counts were also lower in the heated milks than in the unheated milk. The logs of Psychrotrophic Bacteria Counts after 72 h of storage at 6.7°C were 6.21, 2.45, 2.27, 1.33 and 1.00 for unheated and 10-sec heat treatments at 57.2, 65.6, 73.9 and 82.2°C, respectively. Heat treatment of raw milk supplies would result in limiting action of the milk lipase system and growth of bacteria.

THE QUALITY OF RAW MILK FROM SELECTED OHIO MARKETS.

1966 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 118-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. P. Ohri ◽  
W. L. Slatter
Keyword(s):  
Raw Milk ◽  
Plate Count ◽  
High Count ◽  
Coliform Count ◽  
Standard Plate Count ◽  
Milk Samples ◽  
Bacteriological Method ◽  
Standard Plate ◽  
Bulk Tank

Summary An 8-month survey of the bacteriological quality of bulk tank produced fluid milk supplies for four major markets in Ohio, was made utilizing the Standard Plate Count (SPC), the preliminary incubation count (PI), the thermoduric (pasteurized milk) count, and the coliform count. In terms of maximum standards of 200,000 and 100,000 organisms/ml, the SPC would have eliminated 13% and 20% of the milk samples, respectively. A SPC of 50,000/ml, a PI count of 200,000/ml, a thermoduric count of 500/ml, and a coliform count of 100/ml would have eliminated 37%, 34%, 40%, and 40%, respectively, of the samples but not all of the samples eliminated by one test were eliminated by another test. All of the tests employed showed a seasonal trend especially in the high count categories but the trend was less noticeable in the results of the preliminary incubation count. A combination of two of the methods was superior to any single bacteriological method employed in detecting unsatisfactory milk. Of the tests used, the combination of the thermoduric count (500/ml) and the coliform count (100/ml) was the most effective in the detection of unsatisfactory milk samples.

Collaborative Study of the Impedance Method for Examining Raw Milk Samples

1984 ◽  
Vol 47 (9) ◽  
pp. 707-712 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. FIRSTENBERG-EDEN
Keyword(s):  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Raw Milk ◽  
Plate Count ◽  
Impedance Method ◽  
Standard Plate Count ◽  
Milk Samples ◽  
Automated Method ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Standard Plate ◽  
Contamination Levels

The impedance method is a rapid automated method for determining bacteriological contamination levels. A collaborative study was done to establish the reproducibility of the impedance method in predicting counts of raw milk. Frozen and unfrozen raw milk samples, with counts in the range of 9 × 104 to 4 × 107 CFU/ml, were sent to six laboratories to be examined by the standard plate count method (SPC) and by the impedance method which produced Bactometer-predicted counts (BPC). The impedance results showed less variability than SPC among laboratories in all three trials. The variance between split samples was also smaller for the impedance method than for SPC. However, the variance between duplicate plates of the same sample was significantly smaller for SPC than for BPC. In one trial, the means of BPC and SPC were not significantly different, whereas in another trial there was a significant difference of ca. log10 0.27 between the means of the two methods. However, in this trial the extreme differences between laboratories counting the same sample were log10 0.42.

Impedance Measurements in Raw Milk as an Alternative to the Standard Plate Count1

1982 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. GNAN ◽  
L. O. LUEDECKE
Keyword(s):  
Yeast Extract ◽  
Geometric Mean ◽  
Raw Milk ◽  
Plate Count ◽  
Impedance Method ◽  
Microbial Count ◽  
Specific Detection ◽  
Standard Plate Count ◽  
Milk Samples ◽  
Standard Plate

Electrical impedance, using the Bactometer 32, was evaluated as an alternative method to the Standard Plate Count (SPC) to determine the initial microbial count of raw milk samples. The raw milk samples were obtained from farm bulk tanks on commercial dairy farms. Analyses were started within 24–36 h after collection. The impedance method was used to evaluate the samples as raw milk, raw milk plus yeast extract, raw milk given preliminary incubation (18 h at 13 C) or raw milk given preliminary incubation plus yeast extract. The yeast extract (1% final concentration) was added after the milk was placed in the module wells. The geometric mean SPC of each of these four groups was 4.51, 4.37, 4.96 and 5.14, and the corresponding mean detection times with Bactometer 32 were 10.13, 8.80, 8.28 and 6.11 h, respectively. The correlation coefficient of detection time to SPC was −0.77, −0.88, −0.78 and −0.79, respectively, for the four sample groups. When specific detection cut-off times (approximately 7 h) were selected and a maximum SPC of 100,000 CFU/ml was selected, 85.2%, 97.2%, 81.0% and 83.6%ofthe samples in the above four groups were correctly classified.

scholarly journals Microbiological Profile of the Traditionally Collected Industrial Raw Milk from the Milk Pocket Zones of Bangladesh

1970 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gouranga C Chanda ◽  
Gazi M Noor Uddin ◽  
Aparna Deb ◽  
Tahmina Bilkis ◽  
Sharmin Chowdhury ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bacterial Count ◽  
Raw Milk ◽  
Total Coliform ◽  
Plate Count ◽  
Coliform Count ◽  
Standard Plate Count ◽  
Milk Samples ◽  
Bacteriological Profile ◽  
Standard Plate ◽  
Viable Bacteria

The study was aimed to evaluate the bacteriological profile of the traditionally collected industrial raw milk from the milk pocket zones of Bangladesh. About 365 raw milk samples were collected from the milk tanker, who brought raw milk from the mother chilling centre where raw milk was chilled at 4°C following traditional method. All milk samples were subjected to perform standard plate count and total coliform count. The average standard plate count was found to be 4.37 x 106 cfu/ml and the highest occurrence of standard plate count was found to be 6.70 x 106 cfu/ml in October and the lowest (3.28 x 106 cfu/ml) in March. The highest occurrence of total viable bacteria was found to be 5.64 x 106 cfu/ml in autumn and the lowest was found to be 3.78 x 106 cfu/ml in summer. On the other hand, the average of the coliform bacterial count was found to be 3.88 x 105 cfu/ml with the highest (5.70 x 105 cfu/ml) occurrence in May and the lowest (1.90 x 105 cfu/ml) in January. Moreover, the highest occurrence of coliform count was found to be 4.84 x 105 cfu/ml in rainy season and the lowest was 2.75 x 105 cfu/ml found in winter.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjm.v25i1.4849 Bangladesh J Microbiol, Volume 25, Number 1, June 2008, pp 17-20

COMPARISON OF PLATE LOOP AND AGAR PLATE METHODS FOR BACTERIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION OF MANUFACTURING GRADE RAW MILK1,2

1967 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 112-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sita Ramayya Tatini ◽  
Roger Dabbah ◽  
J. C. Olson
Keyword(s):  
Agar Plate ◽  
Bacterial Count ◽  
Raw Milk ◽  
Substantial Improvement ◽  
Plate Count ◽  
Bacteriological Examination ◽  
Standard Plate Count ◽  
Milk Samples ◽  
Standard Plate ◽  
Bulk Tank

Summary Plate loop counts and standard plate counts on each of several manufacturing grade raw milk samples (handled in cans or in farm bulk tanks) have been compared. On the average, the plate loop count (PLC) was lower than the standard plate count (SPC) regardless of the type of handling of milk on the farm, can or bulk tank. Agreement between the SPC and PLC seemed to depend upon the bacterial-count levels present in milk. Statistical analyses indicated significant differences, at 1% level of probability, between the average bacterial count by SPC and PLC methods regardless of count level (≤100,000/ml or >100,000/ml) in case of can milk samples. On the other hand, in case of farm bulk tank milk samples, no significant differences, at the 1% level of probability, between the average bacterial count by SPC and PLC methods were obtained, when the counts were equal to or less than 100,000 per ml; when the counts exceeded 100,000 per ml, significant differences were present. Since the bacterial counts of manufacturing grade raw milk samples are likely to exceed 100,000/ml, the data presented in this investigation indicate that, until the bacteriological quality of manufacturing grade milk supplies undergoes substantial improvement, the PLC method does not appear to be a suitable substitute for the SPC method for routine bacteriological examination of such milk supplies.

Temperature Equilibration Times of Plate Count Agar and a Comparison of 50 Versus 45 C for Recovery of Raw-Milk Bacteria1

1975 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 319-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. N. HUHTANEN ◽  
A. R. BRAZIS ◽  
W. L. ARLEDGE ◽  
C. B. DONNELLY ◽  
R. E. GINN ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Raw Milk ◽  
Plate Count ◽  
Equilibration Time ◽  
Standard Methods ◽  
Standard Plate Count ◽  
Milk Samples ◽  
Plate Count Agar ◽  
Standard Plate ◽  
Time Required ◽  
Tempering Time

Sixty raw milk samples were plated using “Standard Methods” agar tempered to 45 or 50 ± 1 C. The standard plate count was significantly lower with the agar at 50 C. Tempering time (to 44–46 C) of a flask of agar in a water bath was about 5–10 min longer than that of a comparable flask of water. Time required to reach the desired temperature depended upon the volume of agar in the flasks, the number of flasks, and the volume of the water in the bath. Up to an hour of equilibration time may be necessary for newly autoclaved agar to reach the recommended temperature (44–46 C). Insufficient tempering time might cause an excessively high plating agar temperature which might cause a reduction in bacterial counts, especially of a heat sensitive psychrotrophic bacterium.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document