High-Pressure Destruction Kinetics of Listeria monocytogenes on Pork

1999 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. M. MUSSA ◽  
H. S. RAMASWAMY ◽  
J. P. SMITH

Packaged fresh pork chops (30-g samples) containing an indigenous bacterial population of ∼107 CFU/g were inoculated with 107 CFU of Listeria monocytogenes Scott A per g, heat sealed, and subjected to high-pressure processing at 200 to 400 MPa for up to 90 min. Total counts and the number of surviving L. monocytogenes cells were determined by a spread plate technique on tryptic soy agar and modified Oxford medium, respectively. The pressure destruction was characterized by a dual-behavior, consisting of a step change in the number of survivors (Pko) with the application of a pressure pulse and a first-order rate drop in the number of survivors during the pressure hold period. Higher pressures resulted in higher rates of microbial inactivation, as indicated by their associated lower D values (and higher k values). The pressure sensitivities of the kinetic parameters were evaluated on the basis of Arrhenius and pressure death time (PDT)-type models. The results suggested that L. monocytogenes was more resistant to pressure inactivation than the indigenous microflora (the volume change of activation, ΔV≠ [Arrhenius model]), and zp values (PDT model) were −4.17 × 10−5 m3 mole−1 and 134 MPa for indigenous microflora and −3.43 × 10−5 m3 mole−1 and 163 MPa for L. monocytogenes respectively.

2003 ◽  
Vol 66 (11) ◽  
pp. 2057-2061 ◽  
Author(s):  
ABDULLATIF TAY ◽  
THOMAS H. SHELLHAMMER ◽  
AHMED E. YOUSEF ◽  
GRADY W. CHISM

The objectives of this study were to investigate the variability among Listeria monocytogenes strains in response to high-pressure processing, identify the most resistant strain as a potential target of pressure processing, and compare the inactivation kinetics of pressure-resistant and pressure-sensitive strains under a wide range (350 to 800 MPa) of pressure treatments. The pressure resistance of Listeria innocua and nine strains of L. monocytogenes was compared at 400 or 500 MPa and 30°C. Significant variability among strains was observed. The decrease in log CFU/ml during the pressure treatment was from 1.4 to 4.3 at 400 MPa and from 3.9 to >8 at 500 MPa. L. monocytogenes OSY-8578 exhibited the greatest pressure resistance, Scott A showed the greatest pressure sensitivity, and L. innocua had intermediate resistance. On the basis of these findings, L. monocytogenes OSY-8578 is a potential target strain for high-pressure processing efficacy studies. The death kinetics of L. monocytogenes Scott A and OSY-8578 were investigated at 350 and 800 MPa. Survivors at 350 MPa were enumerated by direct plating, and survivors at 800 MPa were enumerated by the most-probable-number technique. Both pressure-resistant and pressure-sensitive strains exhibited non–first-order death behavior, and excessive pressure treatment did not eliminate the tailing phenomenon.


2019 ◽  
Vol 82 (8) ◽  
pp. 1320-1325 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOELLE K. SALAZAR ◽  
VIDYA NATARAJAN ◽  
DIANA STEWART ◽  
JOSH WARREN ◽  
LAUREN J. GONSALVES ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Various outbreaks and recalls have been associated with Listeria monocytogenes contamination of ready-to-eat (RTE) food products, including dips. High pressure processing (HPP) is useful for reducing levels of bacteria in many RTE food products, but its efficacy for reduction of pathogens in RTE dips is not well understood. In this study, laboratory-prepared hummus, tahini, baba ghanoush, guacamole, and pesto were initially treated with HPP at 350 MPa for up to 240 s to assess L. monocytogenes inactivation and determine D-values. D350 MPa-values in hummus, guacamole, and baba ghanoush were 105.3, 71.3, and 34.0 s, respectively. No significant reduction in L. monocytogenes levels was observed in tahini or pesto at 350 MPa for 240 s or after additional treatment for up to 600 s at 600 MPa (P > 0.05). Overall, the results of this study highlight the efficacy of HPP for reducing L. monocytogenes levels in certain RTE dips and but not in others.


2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Antonio Maldonado ◽  
Donald W. Schaffner ◽  
Alberto M. Cuitiño ◽  
Mukund V. Karwe

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document