Psychosocial Risk Factors and Work-Related Stress: State-of-the-Art and Issues for Future Research

Author(s):  
Michiel A.J. Kompier ◽  
Toon W. Taris
2020 ◽  
Vol 305 ◽  
pp. 00058
Author(s):  
Raluca Maria Iordache ◽  
Viorica Petreanu ◽  
Delia Cristina Mihăilă

A pilot study concerning psychosocial risk factors that could determine work related stress and effects on work behaviour and health state was developed involving five fields of activity with high exposure on work related stress (education, health, transport, banking, financial consultancy). The study aimed to identify the main specific psychosocial risk factors in every of the five fields, in order to substantiate a method for assessing the risk factors for work related stress. The study used a complex ergonomic methodology, and one of the main instruments used to identify psychosocial factors was the Romanian version of The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ).


2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (14) ◽  
pp. 121
Author(s):  
Blanca Estela Aarun Lopez ◽  
Ana Maria Alejandra Herrera Espinosa

This investigation had the objective to identify the perception of women holding PhD degrees awarded by the National Researchers System (SNI) regarding five work environment psychosocial risk factors, stress, burnout, mobbing, work-family integration and gender. A qualitative research was performed involving six female researchers working in either public or private institutions. A content analysis technique was used to process the information procured through a semi-structured interview. Work-related stress was found to be part of their lives determined by excess of work with subsequent physical and emotional manifestations; burnout and mobbing were not a constant as not all had experienced them; work-family integration had not been achieved, often resulting in conflict particularly at a certain stage of life when children were young; and, finally, with regard to gender, there were negative stereotypes concerning the role in their field of research.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. e0233472
Author(s):  
Astrid M. Chevance ◽  
Oumou S. Daouda ◽  
Alexandre Salvador ◽  
Patrick Légeron ◽  
Yannick Morvan ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Valerio Ghezzi ◽  
Tahira M. Probst ◽  
Laura Petitta ◽  
Valeria Ciampa ◽  
Matteo Ronchetti ◽  
...  

While the role of individual differences in shaping primary appraisals of psychosocial working conditions has been well investigated, less is known about how objective characteristics of the employee profile (e.g., age) are associated with different perceptions of psychosocial risk factors. Moreover, previous research on the link between employment status (i.e., work contract) and such perceptions has provided mixed results, leading to contradictory conclusions. The present study was conducted on a nationally representative sample of theItalian employed workforce surveyed with computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) methodology. The principal aim of the study is to bridge this gap in the extant literature by investigating the interplay between two key characteristics of the employee profile (i.e., age and work contract) in shaping employees’ perceptions of psychosocial risk factors. Given the disparate literature scenario on the interplay between age and employment status in shaping primary appraisals of psychosocial stressors, we formulated and compared multiple competitive informative hypotheses. Consistent with the principles of the conservation of resources (COR) theory, we found that older contingent employees reported a higher level of psychosocial risk than their permanent peers who, in turn, were more vulnerable than middle-aged and younger workers (regardless of their employment status). These results highlight the importance of simultaneously assessing multipleobjective variables of the employee profile (i.e., age and employment status) which may act to shape subjective perceptions of psychosocial risk factors for work-related stress. Given our findings, employers and policy makers should consider older contingent employees as one of the workforce sub-populationsmost vulnerable to negative work environments.


Author(s):  
Sandra D. M. Bot ◽  
Caroline B. Terwee ◽  
Daniëlle A. W. M. van der Windt ◽  
Allard J. van der Beek ◽  
Lex M. Bouter ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document