PROBLEMS OF IMPLEMENTING WAREHOUSE AUTOMATION SYSTEMS IN RUSSIAN ENTERPRISES

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oleg Dmitrievich Benyamin ◽  
◽  
Anna Nikolaevna Sivaks ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Staff Training ◽  
Electronic Systems ◽  
System Software ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Automation Systems

This article analyzes the problems of implementing the “WMS” system - software designed to automate the management of warehouse processes and the operation of the warehouse complex as a whole, problems such as: low level of warehouse logistics development in Russia, lack of experience in implementing electronic systems, poor staff training, lack of risk assessment

scholarly journals PRESTO-II: a low-level waste environmental transport and risk assessment code

1986 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.E. Fields ◽  
C.J. Emerson ◽  
R.O. Chester ◽  
C.A. Little ◽  
G. Hiromoto
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Risk Assessment Code ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Environmental Transport

RISK ASSESSMENT OF LOW LEVEL LEAD EXPOSURE

Epidemiology ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S67
Author(s):  
S TONG
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Lead Exposure ◽  
Low Level

Instrumentation and Automation Grounding

2022 ◽  
pp. 636-644
Author(s):  
Shreem Ghosh ◽  
Arijit Ghosh
Keyword(s):  
Comprehensive Analysis ◽  
Signal Quality ◽  
Electronic Systems ◽  
Automation Systems ◽  
Different Order ◽  
True Signal

In any electrical or electronic systems, unwanted signals known as noise signals are encountered which interact with the true signal and thus affecting signal quality. Noise may enter into a device or system in many forms and have a different order of impacts. Prevention and elimination of noise had attained paramount importance to ensure signal fidelity. This chapter presents a comprehensive analysis on elimination of noise by electronic grounding of instrumentation and automation systems as well as various engineering considerations for the same.

scholarly journals Environmental Risk Assessment for rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP, a Genetically Modified Live Vaccine for Ebola Virus Disease

Vaccines ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 779
Author(s):  
Joan G. Tell ◽  
Beth-Ann G. Coller ◽  
Sheri A. Dubey ◽  
Ursula Jenal ◽  
William Lapps ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Environmental Risk ◽  
Environmental Risk Assessment ◽  
Ebola Virus ◽  
Virus Disease ◽  
Genetically Modified ◽  
Ebola Virus Disease ◽  
European Medicines Agency ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Animal Populations

rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP is a live, attenuated, recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (rVSV)-based vaccine for the prevention of Ebola virus disease caused by Zaire ebolavirus. As a replication-competent genetically modified organism, rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP underwent various environmental evaluations prior to approval, the most in-depth being the environmental risk assessment (ERA) required by the European Medicines Agency. This ERA, as well as the underlying methodology used to arrive at a sound conclusion about the environmental risks of rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP, are described in this review. Clinical data from vaccinated adults demonstrated only infrequent, low-level shedding and transient, low-level viremia, indicating a low person-to-person infection risk. Animal data suggest that it is highly unlikely that vaccinated individuals would infect animals with recombinant virus vaccine or that rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP would spread within animal populations. Preclinical studies in various hematophagous insect vectors showed that these species were unable to transmit rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP. Pathogenicity risk in humans and animals was found to be low, based on clinical and preclinical data. The overall risk for non-vaccinated individuals and the environment is thus negligible and can be minimized further through defined mitigation strategies. This ERA and the experience gained are relevant to developing other rVSV-based vaccines, including candidates under investigation for prevention of COVID-19.

E-Voting Risk Assessment

2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 19-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harold Pardue ◽  
Jeffrey P. Landry ◽  
Alec Yasinsac
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Electronic Systems ◽  
Voting Systems ◽  
Operational Environment ◽  
Election Law ◽  
Systematic Treatment ◽  
Governmental Agencies ◽  
System Vulnerability ◽  
Direct Recording ◽  
Equipment Testing

Approximately 25% (according to http://verifiedvoting.com/) of voting jurisdictions use direct recording electronic systems to record votes. Accurate tabulation of voter intent is critical to safeguard this fundamental act of democracy: voting. Electronic voting systems are known to be vulnerable to attack. Assessing risk to these systems requires a systematic treatment and cataloging of threats, vulnerabilities, technologies, controls, and operational environments. This paper presents a threat tree for direct recording electronic (DRE) voting systems. The threat tree is organized as a hierarchy of threat actions, the goal of which is to exploit a system vulnerability in the context of specific technologies, controls, and operational environment. As an abstraction, the threat tree allows the analyst to reason comparatively about threats. A panel of elections officials, security experts, academics, election law attorneys, representatives from governmental agencies, voting equipment vendors, and voting equipment testing labs vetted the DRE threat tree. The authors submit that the DRE threat tree supports both individual and group risk assessment processes and techniques.

Third Party HIL Testing of Safety Critical Control System Software on Ships and Rigs

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Øyvind Smogeli ◽  
Trond Augustson
Keyword(s):  
Control System ◽  
Control Systems ◽  
Technology Development ◽  
Emergency Situation ◽  
Third Party ◽  
System Software ◽  
Safety Critical ◽  
Test Methodology ◽  
Automation Systems ◽  
And Performance

The drilling industry is characterized by a rapid and up front technology development to conquer larger water and drilling depths. The level of automation has been steadily increasing over several decades, growing from manually operated sledge-hammer technology to space-age computer-based integrated systems. Most of the automation systems on today’s vessels are put into operation without independent testing. This is a paradox considering that a single control system may be more complex than all the mechanical systems onboard. It is also a paradox that the automation systems often contain safety-critical failure handling functionality that may be difficult or dangerous to test onboard the real vessel, and therefore is not properly tested until it is activated during an emergency situation. These automation systems are essential for the safety, reliability, and performance of the vessels. Examples are the Dynamic Positioning (DP) systems, Power Management systems, Drilling Control Systems, BOP control systems, Managed Pressure Drilling (MPD) systems, and crane control systems. Hardware-In-the-Loop (HIL) testing is a well proven test methodology from automotive, avionics, and space industries, and is now also gaining recognition in the marine and offshore industries. The aim of this paper is to clarify what HIL testing is, how third party HIL testing can be applied to safety critical control system software on drilling ships and rigs, and why this is an important contribution to technical safety, reliability and profitability of offshore operations.

REALIZATION OF LOGISTICAL VENTURE IN CONDITIONS OF RISKS

2011 ◽  
Vol 159 (1) ◽  
pp. 239-252
Author(s):  
Dariusz SKORUPKA ◽  
Artur DUCHACZEK
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Potential Risk ◽  
Original Method ◽  
Ahp Method ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Military Bridge ◽  
Potential Applications

The material presents an analysis of a potential risk assessment of operating military bridge facilities. Three types of steel military bridges were analysed: assembled bridges, vehicle-launched bridges and low-level bridges. The material presents an original method of a fatigue risk factor analysis. Furthermore, the author presents potential applications of the AHP method to determine weights for risk factors under analysis. It is assumed that at the further stage of research a thorough identification and quantification of other risk factors will be conducted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document