scholarly journals Measures of Encouragement and Penalties Applied to Convicts Registered with Probation Inspectorates

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (13) ◽  
pp. 28-33
Author(s):  
S. L. BABAYAN ◽  

The article discusses the results of a study conducted in May 2021 by the Research Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia on the application of incentive and penalty measures against individuals sentenced to non-custodial punishments. In order to streamline the measures of disciplinary responsibility in relation to those sentenced to compulsory labor we suggest that the Penal Enforcement Code of the Russian Federation should contain a measure of punishment in the form of a warning, and for positive stimulation of lawabiding conduct – measures of encouragement in the form of gratitude and early removal of a previously imposed penalty in the form of a warning. In relation to those sentenced to restriction of liberty we propose to establish a provision in the law that they are maliciously evading from serving a sentence if they have committed a violation of the order and conditions of serving a sentence within one year after the application of a penalty in the form of an official warning, repeated punishment in the form of an official warning. Only after that, it is advisable to submit to the court a presentation about replacing the unserved term with a punishment in the form of imprisonment. It is proposed to provide for the use of release on parole as the main type of encouragement.

Author(s):  
Vasilii V. Trofimov

The work raises an issue of development and implementation of the Russian regional law-making policy in the direction of ensuring innovative activity. The Tambov Region is regarded as a region for scientific and practical generalizations, conclusions, and recommendations. Some lagging of the regional levels behind similar policies at the federal level, where a significant number of legislative acts regulating innovation relations have been adopted, is stated. The legislative prescriptions that determine the task of developing innovative relations for the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, including through purposeful lawmaking in this direction, are indicated. It is proved that, according to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation have a sufficient number of powers to pursue a law-making and power-adminis-trative policy in the field of science, technology, innovation. The steps taken in the Tambov Region in this direction are assessed. Critical remarks and recommendations are expressed regarding the improvement of the law-making policy in the field of innovations in the territory of the Tambov Re-gion.


2021 ◽  
Vol 144 (5) ◽  
pp. 110-115
Author(s):  
Sergej I. Lutsenko ◽  
◽  

The author considers the initiative from the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation about restriction of payments with cash from citizens. The argument of imposition of restrictions from the Ministry of Finance is stimulation of non-cash payments and also the method of fight against doubtful transactions. The similar initiative is contrary to peremptory rules of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the civil law of the Russian Federation, also to the consumer protection law.


Author(s):  
E.V. Klovach ◽  
◽  
A.S. Pecherkin ◽  
V.K. Shalaev ◽  
V.I. Sidorov ◽  
...  

In Russia, the reform of the regulatory guillotine is being implemented in the field of control and supervisory activity. It should result in a new regulatory system formed according to the principles specified in the key federal laws: «On state control (supervision) and municipal control in the Russian Federation» (Law on Control) and «On mandatory requirements in the Russian Federation» (Law on Mandatory Requirements) adopted in August 2020. In the field of industrial safety, this process was launched by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation № 1192, which will come into force on January 1, 2021. The main provisions are discussed in the article, which are related to the Law on Control and the Law on Mandatory Requirements. The Law on Control establishes the priority of preventive measures aimed at reducing the risk of causing harm in relation to the control activities, the grounds for carrying out control (supervisory) activities, the types of these activities in the forms of interaction with the controlled person and without such, the procedure for presentation of the results of control (supervisory) activity. The Law on Mandatory Requirements establishes that the provisions of regulatory legal acts should enter into force either from March 1 or September 1, but not earlier than 90 days after their official publication, and their validity period should not exceed 6 years. The drafts of regulatory legal acts developed by the federal executive bodies are subject to regulatory impact assessment. With a view to ensuring systematization of mandatory require ments, their register is kept. The federal executive body prepares a report on the achievement of the goals of mandatory requirements introduction. By January 1, 2021, 10 resolutions of the Government of the Russian Federation, 48 federal norms and rules in the field of industrial safety and 9 other regulatory legal acts of Rostechnadzor should be adopted. The drafts of all the documents are already prepared, some of the acts are completing the process of discussion and approval.


2019 ◽  
pp. 38-46
Author(s):  
I.P. Abramenko ◽  
L.A. Novoselskaya ◽  
R.V. Revunov ◽  
Yanchenko

The article considers the reclamation park, which is an instrument of state stimulation of the development of economic entities of the agro-industrial complex on irrigated lands. On the example of the Rostov region, the authors analyzed the organizational, economic and regulatory mechanisms for the functioning of reclamation parks, as well as the socio-economic effects that arise in connection with the implementation of the specified tools. The results obtained can be used by state authorities of the Russian Federation, a constituent entity of the Russian Federation when drawing up plans for socio-economic development, developing strategies and programs, as well as by economic entities in managing agricultural activities.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 88-93
Author(s):  
K.N. Golikov ◽  

The subject of this article is the problems of the nature, essence and purpose of prosecutorial activity. The purpose of the article is to study and justify the role of the human rights function in prosecutorial activities in the concept of a modern legal state. At the heart of prosecutorial activity is the implementation of the main function of the Prosecutor’s office – its rights and freedoms, their protection. This means that any type (branch) of Prosecutor's supervision is permeated with human rights content in relation to a citizen, society, or the state. This is confirmed by the fact that the Federal law “On the Prosecutor's office of the Russian Federation” establishes an independent type of Prosecutor's supervision-supervision over the observance of human and civil rights and freedoms. It is argued that the legislation enshrines the human rights activities of the Prosecutor's office as its most important function. It is proposed to add this to the Law “On the Prosecutor's office of the Russian Federation”.


2021 ◽  
pp. 42-49
Author(s):  
V.P. Soloviev ◽  
◽  
T.A. Pereskokova ◽  

Discussed is the problem of upbringing activities in the system of vocational education. In recent years this problem has not received much attention. To correct this situation, in July 2020 amendments were made to the law “On Education in the Russian Federation” about the problem of upbringing of students. Approved that it is necessary to include a working program of upbringing of students in educational programs. It is proposed that at the beginning the educational organization should develop a generalized program of upbringing of students and a calendar plan of upbringing activities. A variant of the program of upbringing of students at the university is given.


Author(s):  
Alexandr V. Izmalkov ◽  
Alexander A. Kuznetsov ◽  
Pavel A. Kuznetsov ◽  
Ella Y. Kuzmenko

We analyze the law enforcement practice of judicial authorities on taxes and fees, since the Tax Code of the Russian Federation is a rather controversial regulatory legal act. Tax disputes arise both at the initiative of tax authorities and at the initiative of taxpayers. Purpose: to determine the main directions of law enforcement practice of courts in tax disputes. We use general scientific and specially legal methods as research methods. The focus is on the method of analysis. In the course of the research, we analyze the con-sideration of cases by judicial authorities on tax disputes, their quantitative and qualitative characteristics. We conclude that the emergence of disagree-ments between taxpayers and the state body when resolving the issue of the legality of their actions (inaction), as well as the legality of a non-normative legal act is the main reason for the formation of law enforcement practice in tax disputes. During the passage of all stages of the application of the law, it is also necessary to establish the existence of a cause-and-effect relationship between the actions of the taxpayer and the resulting consequences. The main points of this process go through several stages. We define the main directions of the law enforcement practice of courts in tax disputes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document