scholarly journals Propuesta metodológica para implantar el aprendizaje cooperativo en las clases de educación física en base a los dominios de acción motriz (Methodological proposal to implement cooperative learning in physical education classes based on motor action doma

Retos ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. 524-534
Author(s):  
Guillermo Martín Martín ◽  
Pedro Jesús Jiménez
Keyword(s):  
Physical Education ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Secondary School ◽  
Group Dynamics ◽  
Motor Action ◽  
Trabajo En Equipo ◽  
Sport Activities ◽  
Learning Principles ◽  
Primary And Secondary School ◽  
Aprendizaje Cooperativo

  Aunque existen en España diferentes propuestas para aplicar el aprendizaje cooperativo en la educación física estas se centran en actividades físico-deportivas específicas o en estructuras cooperativas muy concretas. Faltan en nuestro país propuestas integrales destinadas a facilitar la implantación de este modelo pedagógico de forma extensiva abarcando todos los dominios de acción motriz que impone la normativa educativa. En este artículo se aporta un modelo para aplicar el aprendizaje cooperativo en el área de la educación física dentro de las etapas educativas de primaria y secundaria que engloba todos los enfoques existentes hasta el momento. Un programa estructurado en cuatro fases: 1) confianza–cohesión grupal, 2) familiarización 3) consolidación y 4) rendimiento, que abarca los cinco dominios de acción motriz que se establecen para la E.F. y las variables a tener en cuenta en el diseño de la actividad: Temporalización, número de sesiones y actividades, reglas, dinámica de las agrupaciones, roles, espacios de práctica, principios de aprendizaje cooperativo, destrezas de trabajo en equipo, técnicas y estructuras cooperativas. Abstract. Although there are different proposals in Spain to apply cooperative learning in physical education, they are focused on specific physical-sport activities or on very specific cooperative structures. In our country, there is a lack of comprehensive proposals aimed at facilitating the implementation of this pedagogical model in an extensive way, including all the motor action domains imposed by the education regulations. This article provides a model to apply cooperative learning in the area of physical education within the educational stages of primary and secondary school including all existing approaches up to now. The program is structured in four phases: 1) trust – group cohesion, 2) familiarization 3) consolidation and 4) performance, which embraces the five motor action domains that are established for the P.E. and the variables to take into account in the design of the activity: timing, number of lessons and activities, rules, group dynamics, roles, practice spaces, cooperative learning principles, teamwork skills, cooperative structures and techniques.

scholarly journals Aprendizaje cooperativo en Educación Física: estado de la cuestión y propuesta de intervención (Cooperative learning in Physical Education: the state of the question and intervention proposal)

Retos ◽  
2015 ◽  
pp. 234-239
Author(s):  
Carlos Velázquez Callado
Keyword(s):  
Physical Education ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Secondary School ◽  
Exploratory Study ◽  
Physical Education Teachers ◽  
Pedagogical Approach ◽  
Intervention Process ◽  
Primary And Secondary School ◽  
Aprendizaje Cooperativo ◽  
Modelo Pedagógico

En los últimos años varias investigaciones han subrayado las ventajas del aprendizaje cooperativo para promover el aprendizaje motor y social en Educación Física. Sin embargo, rara vez se describe lo que los docentes hacen cuando aplican este modelo pedagógico en sus clases de Educación Física. Este artículo presenta un estudio exploratorio orientado a dar respuesta a esta pregunta. Ciento noventa y ocho profesores de Educación Física españoles respondieron a un cuestionario dirigido a conocer cómo conciben el aprendizaje cooperativo y el modo en que lo implementan en sus clases con alumnado de Primaria y Secundaria. Los resultados del estudio muestran que el aprendizaje cooperativo es todavía una metodología poco implementada en Educación Física. Los profesores la conciben desde una perspectiva cercana al juego cooperativo. Se propone entonces un nuevo enfoque pedagógico, denominado coopedagogía, orientado a facilitar que los docentes puedan desarrollar un proceso de intervención que permita, por una parte, que el alumnado aprenda a cooperar y, por otra, que utilice la cooperación como recurso para aprender en las clases de Educación Física.Abstract. Over the last few years several studies have emphasized the advantages of cooperative learning to promote motor and social learning in Physical Education. However, what teachers do when they implement this pedagogical model in their Physical Education classes is rarely described. This paper presents an exploratory study aimed at answering this question. One hundred and ninety-eight Spanish Physical Education teachers completed a questionnaire designed to find out how cooperative learning is conceived and applied practically in Primary and Secondary school classes. The results of the study reveal that cooperative learning is still underutilized in Physical Education. Teachers conceive cooperative learning from a perspective close to cooperative play. A new pedagogical approach, called coopedagogy, is then proposed to facilitate teachers in developing an intervention process that allows students to learn how to cooperate and how to use the cooperation as a resource of learning in Physical Education classes.

Including students with physical disabilities in physical education in Singapore: Perspectives of peers without disabilities

2021 ◽  
pp. 1356336X2110258
Author(s):  
Chunxiao Li ◽  
Justin A. Haegele ◽  
Cathy McKay ◽  
Lijuan Wang
Keyword(s):  
Physical Education ◽  
Secondary School ◽  
Secondary School Students ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Physical Disabilities ◽  
School Students ◽  
Peer Attitudes ◽  
Quantitative Results ◽  
Shed Light ◽  
Primary And Secondary School

Perspectives of peers without disabilities are considered a significant determinant of successful integrated physical education. The purpose of this study was to explore students' perspectives of including students with physical disabilities in physical education in Singapore. Primary and secondary school students ( n = 219) provided their perspectives related to the inclusion of students with physical disabilities through an online survey platform. The quantitative results showed that 86.3% of the participants expressed a “yes” opinion toward having the perspective that peers with physical disabilities should be included, while 13.7% of them expressed either a “no” or “maybe” opinion related to peers with physical disabilities being included. Further, girls were more likely to respond “yes” than boys, and a larger proportion of secondary school students responded “yes” than primary school students. Content analysis was used to code students’ 277 open-ended perspectives for supporting their expressed opinions. The different perspectives were coded and subsequently grouped into 15 categories for supporting the “yes,” “no,” and “maybe” responses. Equality was the most commonly listed category for supporting a “yes” response. For supporting a “no” response, negative outcomes, such as bullying and injury, were most commonly reported. Finally, dependence and incompatibility were equally listed for justifying a “maybe” response. These findings highlight a variety of perspectives related to peer attitudes and shed light on the value of enhancing students’ perspectives toward the integration of peers with disabilities.

scholarly journals El Aprendizaje Cooperativo: Modelo Pedagógico para Educación Física (Cooperative learning: Pedagogical Model for Physical Education)

Retos ◽  
2015 ◽  
pp. 201-206
Author(s):  
Javier Manuel Fernández-Rio ◽  
Antonio Méndez-Giménez
Keyword(s):  
Physical Education ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Cooperative Games ◽  
Pedagogical Model ◽  
Whole Process ◽  
Teachers And Students ◽  
Standard Response ◽  
Personal And Social Responsibility ◽  
Aprendizaje Cooperativo ◽  
Modelo Pedagógico

La cooperación ha formado parte del ideario de todas las leyes educativas de los últimos 25 años y la respuesta habitual de la mayoría de los docentes ha sido la inclusión de simples juegos cooperativos en jornadas u ocasiones puntuales. La tendencia actual en educación física es la denominada Práctica basada en Modelos, uno de los cuales es el Aprendizaje Cooperativo. Más aún, este ha pasado de ser un modelo de enseñanza a un Modelo Pedagógico en el que se tiene en cuenta la interdependencia del aprendizaje, la enseñanza, el contenido y el contexto. En este planteamiento, docente y discentes actúan como co-aprendices para fortalecer el proceso. Un paso adelante planteado en los últimos años ha sido la hibridación de modelos para maximizar sus efectos en base a las sinergias que se pueden crear entre ellos. En este marco, el Aprendizaje Cooperativo emerge como un representante destacado, ya que sus características le hacen encajar a la perfección con otros modelos. En este artículo repasamos el Aprendizaje Cooperativo como modelo pedagógico y presentamos cómo puede hibridarse con los modelos de Educación Deportiva, Comprensivo de iniciación deportiva (TGfU), Responsabilidad Personal y Social y Educación-Aventura. La hibridación de modelos pedagógicos permite a los docentes adaptar sus clases a las características cambiantes del contexto escolar, acercando la asignatura de educación física a las verdaderas necesidades e intereses de los estudiantes del siglo XXI. Es la hora de pasar de los juegos cooperativos puntuales al Aprendizaje Cooperativo como modelo pedagógico de referencia. Abstract. Cooperation has been one of the key elements of all the educational laws over the last 25 years, and the standard response of the majority of teachers has been the inclusion of cooperative games on special occasions. Models-based Practice is the current tendency in physical education, and Cooperative Learning is one of those models. Furthermore, it has evolved from an instructional model to a Pedagogical Model, which considers the interdependence of learning, teaching, subject matter and context. Within this framework, teachers and students act as co-learners to strengthen the whole process. A step ahead has been the hybridization of models to maximize their effects based on their synergies. In this context, Cooperative Learning emerges as a strong example because its traits fit perfectly with other models. In this article we review the idea of Cooperative Learning as a pedagogical model, and we show how it can be hybridized with other models: Sport Education, Teaching Games for Understanding, Teaching for Personal and Social Responsibility and Adventure Education. The hybridization of models allow teachers to adapt their classes to the shifting school contexts, bringing physical education closer to the real needs and interests of XXI century students. It is the time to move from cooperative games to Cooperative learning as the benchmark pedagogical model.

scholarly journals The Gender and Education of Parents as Factors That Influence Their Views on Physical Education

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (24) ◽  
pp. 13708
Author(s):  
Beáta Ružbarská ◽  
Branislav Antala ◽  
Miroslav Gombár ◽  
Lenka Tlučáková
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Secondary Education ◽  
Physical Education ◽  
Secondary School ◽  
Physical Fitness ◽  
Level Of Education ◽  
Gender And Education ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Children’S Physical Activity ◽  
Primary And Secondary School

(1) The aim of this paper was to explore the views of primary and secondary school children’s parents on physical education (PE) and to subsequently analyse the differences in their views. The gender of the parent and child was taken into consideration as well as the parents’ levels of education. (2) The research sample consisted of 821 participants 668 of which were female (81.4%) and 153 of which were male (18.6%). The views of the children’s parents were collected through a non-standardized questionnaire. The questionnaire was divided into four areas (1—attitudes towards the physical education teaching process, 2—physical activity as part of lifestyle, 3—physical education during the COVID-19 pandemic, 4—social capital), with a total of 18 items in the questionnaire. The reliability of the questionnaire was analysed using Cronbach’s coefficient reached 0.835. Confirmatory factor analysis was also used to test the predicted factor structure. (3) In general, this research found that parents were more likely to express dissatisfaction if their child was only provided with 2 PE classes per week and would accept an increase in this number. Those parents whose children do not participate in organized physical activities were shown to be unsatisfied with their children’s physical fitness. A more significant limitation of children’s physical activity (PA) was observed among parents with secondary education. Parents with secondary education also feel that their child partaking in PA when they have free time is not so important, whereas parents with a higher level of education feel that it is. (4) Parents expressed positive evaluations of PE and recognized the importance it has in their child’s education. In the questionnaire, questions were related to physical fitness and PA specifically during the COVID-19 pandemic and this research observes the differences in opinions of parents depending on the level of education they attained and the gender of their child.

scholarly journals Serving PE Teachers’ Views on the Interface of Primary and Secondary School PE in Hong Kong

2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 14-23
Author(s):  
Chung LI ◽  
Alberto CRUZ ◽  
Kevin Wai Keung KAM
Keyword(s):  
Hong Kong ◽  
Physical Education ◽  
Secondary School ◽  
Interpretive Research ◽  
Research Perspective ◽  
Learning And Teaching ◽  
Telephone Interviews ◽  
Standardized Curriculum ◽  
Primary And Secondary School

LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in English; abstract also in Chinese. This study explored the views of 296 serving physical education (PE) teachers concerning the interface of secondary and primary school PE in Hong Kong. Attached to the interpretive research perspective, questionnaire and follow-up telephone interviews were adopted for soliciting their views on the importance, measures taken and suggestions for improvement. The findings indicated that over 91% of serving PE teachers acknowledged the importance of interface for facilitating pupils’ learning. Similar articulations with the functions and content of school PE that facilitated the interface were found. Although 21% of them claimed that they had taken some measures for enhancing curricular interface, most of them were not systematic and well-planned. Thus, most PE teachers looked forward to a standardized curriculum stipulated by the Education Bureau as to ensure the effectiveness of the interface. The study suggests reinforcing teachers’ awareness of the interface of PE; considering the inclusion of PE in the internal school assessment for the Secondary School Places Allocation System and strengthening the interface from system, school and classroom levels. Consequently, it would enhance the learning and teaching in physical education. 本文旨在探討296位在職體育教師對中小學體育課程銜接的意見。研究以詮釋理念為依據，透過問卷及跟進電話訪談以顯證他們對體育課程銜接的重要性、實施措施和改善建議的意見。結果顯示九成一在職體育教師認同銜接對促進學生學習的重要性，認定學校體育功能和所教授內容相近，有利相關課程的銜接。雖然有百分之二十一在職體育教師表示已推展一些課程銜接措施，但有關銜接措施未見系統及計劃推行。大多數體育教師期望教育局能訂定一系列標準課程以確保其成效。本研究建議提升體育教師對課程銜接的醒覺性，考慮將體育納入為小學升中呈分試科目之一，並從系統、學校及課室等層面上優化中小學體育課程的銜接，促進學與教。

scholarly journals ¿Y si toda la innovación no es positiva en Educación Física? Reflexiones y consideraciones prácticas (Is innovation always positive in Physical Education? Reflections and practical considerations)

Retos ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 579-587
Author(s):  
Ángel Pérez Pueyo ◽  
David Hortigüela Alcalá
Keyword(s):  
Physical Education ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
The Body ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Current Trends ◽  
True Purpose ◽  
The Cross ◽  
Aprendizaje Cooperativo

En la actualidad la innovación parece querer inundarlo todo, pero que algo sea nuevo no implica que tenga efectos positivos en el aula. Este artículo surge de la necesidad de pararse a pensar y reflexionar sobre las tendencias actuales de Educación Física que no parece estar permitiéndole avanzar e, incluso, ir en contra de sus verdaderos fines y esencia. A partir de las evidencias científicas que los sustentan, se han planteado cinco aspectos de práctica habitual en nuestra área sobre los que reflexionar: (1) La gamificación mal entendida; (2) la utilización indiscriminada de las APPs: (3) el aprendizaje cooperativo mal enfocado; (4) la verdadera motivación; (5) las evidencias en el aprendizaje del alumnado. Ante esto, se dan diferentes soluciones prácticas basadas en el uso de la evaluación formativa y compartida y el uso transversal de lo corporal. Finalmente se plantean consideraciones a modo de conclusión, no con la intención de ofrecer recetas, sino reflexiones con base científica con el fin de contribuir a una mejor Educación Física. Abstract. Currently, innovation seems to be spreading uncontrollably everywhere; however, just because something is new it does not necessarily imply that it also has positive effects in the classroom. This article arises from the need to stop, think, and reflect on current trends in Physical Education, which at times seem to be more an obstacle to its progress to the extent that they may even work against its true purpose and essence. Based on scientific evidence, five common practice aspects to reflect upon in our field have been proposed: (1) Misunderstood gamification; (2) indiscriminate use of APPs: (3) poorly focused cooperative learning; (4) true motivation; and (5) evidences of students’ learnings. Different practical solutions based on the use of formative and shared evaluation and the cross-sectional use of the body were proposed. Finally, considerations were presented as a conclusion; however, they are intended to offer any formulae, but rather scientifically supported reflections aiming at contributing to the enhancement of Physical Education.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document