The Effect of the Surface Roughness of Porcelain on the Adhesion of Oral Streptococcus mutans

2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 17-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maan Ibrahim Al-Marzok ◽  
Haitham J. Al-Azzawi
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Streptococcus Mutans ◽  
Bacterial Adhesion ◽  
Selective Medium ◽  
Surface Finishing ◽  
Bacterial Suspension ◽  
Sterile Saline ◽  
Glazed Surface ◽  
Glazed Porcelain

Abstract Aim Dental plaque has a harmful influence on periodontal tissue. When a porcelain restoration is fabricated and refinishing of the glazed surface is inevitable, the increase in surface roughness facilitates the adhesion of plaque and its components. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of surface roughness of glazed or polished porcelain on the adhesion of oral Streptococcus mutans. Methods and Materials A total of 80 metalceramic specimens were prepared in the form of disks from two porcelain materials and divided into four groups according to the method of surface finishing. Surface roughness values (Ra-μm) for all specimens were recorded using a profilometer. S. mutans bacteria were isolated from saliva and all specimens were inoculated in test tubes containing a bacterial suspension allowing adhesion of the microorganisms to the specimens to occur. After incubation for 24 hours at 37°C, the specimens were transferred to a sterile saline solution and an inoculum of 0.1 ml from each selected dilution was spread on the selective medium, mitis salivarius bacitracin agar (MSB). Bacterial counts, expressed in colony forming unit (CFU) taking into consideration the dilution factor, were recorded. Results There was significant correlation (p<0.05) between surface roughness values (Ra-μm) and the amount of bacterial adhesion (CFU×103). The glazed surface was the smoothest and exhibited the least amount of bacterial adhesion. Conclusions A positive correlation between surface roughness and the amount of S. mutans adhesion was observed. The glazed porcelain surface was considered more biocompatible than other methods of porcelain surface finishing. Clinical Significance Chairside adjustments of the cervical contour or occlusal surface of porcelain restorations are sometimes necessary before or after cementation. Ideally, an uncemented restoration should be returned to the laboratory for reglazing after all adjustments have been completed. It is important to evaluate various polishing procedures used for these adjusted surfaces to achieve a finished surface that as closely as possible approximates the quality of glazed porcelain. Citation Al-Marzok MI, Al-Azzawi HJ. The Effect of the Surface Roughness of Porcelain on the Adhesion of Oral Streptococcus mutans. J Contemp Dent Pract [Internet]. 2009 Nov; 10(6):017-024. Available from: http://www.thejcdp. com/journal/view/volume10-issue6-al-marzok.

scholarly journals Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to Nanoceramic and Nanohybrid Resin Composites: An In vitro Study

2020 ◽  
pp. 128-133
Author(s):  
Krishnakanth Jaju ◽  
Iffat Nasim
Keyword(s):  
Streptococcus Mutans ◽  
Bacterial Adhesion ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Bacterial Suspension ◽  
Resin Composites ◽  
Colony Forming Units ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Test Control

Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) is one of the cariogenic microorganisms. The restorative materials which harbor a biofilm with high number of S. mutans can accelerate the occurrence of dental caries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the adherence of S. mutans to nanoceramic and nanohybrid resin composites. Fifteen discs of each material (Nanohybrid resin composite, Nanoceramic resin composite) were prepared, polished, and sterilized in a gamma radiation chamber. Specimens were exposed to the S. mutans bacterial suspension (0.5 McFarland) and were incubated for 4 hours. Specimens were rinsed and sonicated in normal saline, 10 μl of the obtained suspension was cultured in a sterile blood agar medium. After 24 hours, the number of colony forming units of S. mutans was counted. A sterility test control was considered for each group of materials. The data was analyzed by Independent t test. The means and standard deviations of the logarithmic counts of the colonies on the surfaces of nanohybrid resin composites and nanoceramic resin composite were equal to 3.2±0.87 and 2.8±0.324 respectively. Ceram X Universal did not show any significant difference in the bacterial adhesion compared to Filtek Z350XT. Both composites showed similar behaviour in terms of S. mutans colonization in a simple biofilm formation model.

scholarly journals Streptococcus mutans adherence to conventional and self-ligating brackets: an in vitro study

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Murilo Fernando Neuppmann FERES ◽  
Fernanda VICIONI-MARQUES ◽  
Fábio Lourenço ROMANO ◽  
Marina Guimarães ROSCOE ◽  
Vinícius Matsuzaki de SOUZA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Streptococcus Mutans ◽  
Bacterial Adhesion ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
Bacterial Suspension ◽  
Colony Forming Units ◽  
Conventional Brackets ◽  
Adhesion Rate ◽  
Post Hoc

ABSTRACT Introduction: Although self-ligating brackets presumably provide better hygiene conditions, no consensus has been reached so far. Objective: Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate, in an in vitro experimental design, the adherence of Streptococcus mutans (SM) in self-ligating and conventional brackets of different manufacturers and ligature types. Methods: Four commercial brands of maxillary premolar metal brackets were tested (Abzil®; Morelli®; 3M Unitek®; and GAC®). Each one was subdivided into three groups, which varied according to the type of ligature and bracket model (metallic, elastic, and self-ligating), totalizing twelve groups, composed of six brackets each. Previously sterilized brackets were initially immersed in saliva for one hour, and subsequently washed and added in a bacterial suspension, maintained in aerobiosis for 72 hours. The adhered bacteria were then separated and quantified by colony forming units (CFU/mL) counting after 48 hours of growth. The groups were compared by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn post-hoc tests (p< 0.05). Results: Regardless of the commercial brand, self-ligating brackets had significantly less CFU/mL. However, according to comparisons performed within each commercial brand, only Abzil® self-ligating brackets had significantly lower biofilm adhesion. Among all of the self-ligating models, GAC® brackets presented the highest bacterial adhesion rate. Conclusions: Self-ligating brackets are likely to present lower rates of biofilm adhesion. Particularly, Abzil® and GAC® self-ligating brackets are less likely to accumulate biofilm. Although such results are derived from an in vitro study, practitioners might acknowledge findings concerning bacterial adhesion as one of the relevant features to be considered during bracket selection.

Adhesion of Streptococcus Mutans to Different Restorative Materials

2009 ◽  
Vol 32 (9) ◽  
pp. 671-677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudio Poggio ◽  
Carla R. Arciola ◽  
Federico Rosti ◽  
Andrea Scribante ◽  
Enrica Saino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Streptococcus Mutans ◽  
Bacterial Adhesion ◽  
Oral Bacteria ◽  
Bacterial Suspension ◽  
Colony Forming Units ◽  
Restorative Materials ◽  
Roughness Analysis ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Flowable Composites ◽  
Dental Restorative

Adherence of oral bacteria to the surface of dental restorative materials is considered an important step in the development of secondary caries and periodontal disease. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the adherence of different restorative materials to Streptococcus mutans strain (CCUG35176) in order to ascertain possible differences. The materials tested ranged across different classes including: flowable composites (Gradia Direct LoFlo; Filtek Supreme XT Flowable), anterior composites (Gradia Direct Anterior), universal composites (Filtek Supreme XT), packable composites (Filtek Silorane; Filtek P60), glass-ionomers (Fuji IX Gp Extra; Equia) and a control reference material (Thermanox plastic coverlips). Bacterial suspension was deposited onto each material and the adhesion was evaluated trough the colony forming units (CFUs) determination. Packable silorane-based composite was found to be less adhesive than posterior packable composite P60, flowable composites and glass ionomers. The fluoride of glass ionomers did not prevent the attachment of S. mutans; furthermore, after roughness analysis and SEM investigations, the hypothesis that the difference in bacterial adhesion can be determined by the particular surface chemistry of the material itself as well as by different electrostatic forces between bacteria and restorative surfaces must be given serious consideration.

scholarly journals EFFECT OF SILICA COATING IN ACRYLIC ARTIFICIAL TEETH ON SURFACE ROUGHNESS, CONTACT ANGLE, AND GROWTH OF STREPTOCOCCUS MUTANS

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 106
Author(s):  
Adella Syvia Maharani ◽  
Pramudya Aditama ◽  
Murti Indrastuti ◽  
Suparyono Saleh
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Contact Angle ◽  
Streptococcus Mutans ◽  
Bacterial Adhesion ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
Silica Coating ◽  
Contact Angle Measurement ◽  
Angle Measurement ◽  
Group I ◽  
Artificial Teeth

ABSTRACTBackground: Acrylic resin artificial teeth is easily to have bacterial adhesion. It is necessary to perform a treatment on that surface, in order to reduce bacterial adhesion. This study aimed to reveal the effect of silica coating in acrylic resin artificial teeth on surface roughness, contact angle measurement, and the growth of Streptococcus mutans.Method: The study was conducted on two groups (n=16) of disk-shaped acrylic resin artificial teeth with a diameter of 10 mm and thickness of 2 mm. A 2% silica coating material was obtained by diluting 2 g silica nanoparticles on 100 ml of ethanol. Surface roughness, contact angle measurement, and the growth of Streptococcus mutans was measured using surface roughness measuring instrument, camera digital, and colony counter. The data obtained were then analyzed using T-test (p<0.05).Result: The results showed that the surface roughness and contact angle measurement in group I (0.29±0.08 μm); (79,49º ± 10,88º) was higher than group II (0.17±0.05 μm); (34,77º±0,05º). The growth of Streptococcus mutans in group I was also higher (32.28±3.75 CFU/ml) than group II (24.83±3.47 CFU/ml). Conclusion: The study concluded that there is an effect of silica coating on surface roughness, contact angle measurement, and the growth of Streptococcus mutans in acrylic resin artificial teeth.

scholarly journals In Vitro Evaluation of Bacterial Adhesion and Bacterial Viability of Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguinis, and Porphyromonas gingivalis on the Abutment Surface of Titanium and Zirconium Dental Implants

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Stefany Meza-Siccha ◽  
Miguel Angel Aguilar-Luis ◽  
Wilmer Silva-Caso ◽  
Fernando Mazulis ◽  
Carolina Barragan-Salazar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dental Implants ◽  
Streptococcus Mutans ◽  
Porphyromonas Gingivalis ◽  
Bacterial Adhesion ◽  
Bacterial Species ◽  
Bacterial Adherence ◽  
Bacterial Viability ◽  
Streptococcus Sanguinis ◽  
Group 2

Objective. To evaluate the in vitro adherence and viability of 3 bacterial species Streptococcus mutans (ATCC 25175), Streptococcus sanguinis (ATCC 10556), and Porphyromonas gingivalis (ATCC 33277) on the surfaces of dental implants of titanium, zirconium, and their respective fixing screws. Methods. Two analysis groups were formed: group 1 with 3 titanium pillars and group 2 with 3 zirconium pillars, each with their respective fixing screws. Each of these groups was included in tubes with bacterial cultures of Streptococcus mutans (ATCC 25175), Streptococcus sanguinis (ATCC 10556), and Porphyromonas gingivalis (ATCC 33277). These samples were incubated at 37°C under anaerobic conditions. Bacterial adherence was assessed by measurement of the change in colony-forming units (CFU), and bacterial viability was evaluated with the colorimetric test of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2)-2,5 diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT). Results. The bacterial adhesion in the titanium abutments was higher for Streptococcus mutans (190.90 CFU/mL), and the viability was greater in Porphyromonas gingivalis (73.22%). The zirconium abutment group showed the highest adherence with Streptococcus mutans (331.82 CFU/mL) and the highest bacterial viability with the S. sanguinis strain (38.42%). The titanium fixation screws showed the highest adhesion with S. sanguinis (132.5 CFU/mL) compared to the zirconium fixation screws where S. mutans had the highest adhesion (145.5 CFU/mL). The bacterial viability of S. mutans was greater both in the titanium fixation screws and in the zirconium fixation screws 78.04% and 57.38%, respectively. Conclusions. Our results indicate that there is in vitro bacterial adherence and viability in both titanium abutments and zirconium abutments and fixation screws for both. Streptococcus mutans is the microorganism that shows the greatest adherence to the surfaces of both titanium and zirconium and the fixing screws of the latter. On the contrary, bacterial viability is greater on the titanium abutments with P. gingivalis than on the zirconium abutments with S. sanguinis. With respect to the fixation screws, in both cases, the viability of S. mutans was greater with respect to the other bacteria. In general, the titanium abutments showed less adherence but greater bacterial viability.

scholarly journals Bacterial Adhesion and Surface Roughness for Different Clinical Techniques for Acrylic Polymethyl Methacrylate

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas Costa de Medeiros Dantas ◽  
João Paulo da Silva-Neto ◽  
Talita Souza Dantas ◽  
Lucas Zago Naves ◽  
Flávio Domingues das Neves ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscopy ◽  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Bacterial Adhesion ◽  
Surface Finishing ◽  
Fabrication Method ◽  
The Mean ◽  
One Way Anova ◽  
Roughness Measurements ◽  
Scanning Electron

This study sought to assess the effect of different surface finishing and polishing protocols on the surface roughness and bacterial adhesion (S. sanguinis) to polymethyl methacrylates (PMMA). Fifty specimens were divided into 5 groups (n=10) according to their fabrication method and surface finishing protocol: LP (3 : 1 ratio and laboratory polishing), NF (Nealon technique and finishing), NP (Nealon technique and manual polishing), MF (3 : 1 ratio and manual finishing), and MP (3 : 1 ratio and manual polishing). For each group, five specimens were submitted to bacterial adhesion tests and analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Two additional specimens were subjected to surface topography analysis by SEM and the remaining three specimens were subjected to surface roughness measurements. Data were compared by one-way ANOVA. The mean bacterial counts were as follows: NF,19.6±3.05; MP,5.36±2.08; NP,4.96±1.93; MF,7.36±2.45; and LP,1.56±0.62(CFU). The mean surface roughness values were as follows: NF,3.23±0.15; MP,0.52±0.05; NP,0.60±0.08; MF,2.69±0.12; and LP,0.07±0.02(μm). A reduction in the surface roughness was observed to be directly related to a decrease in bacterial adhesion. It was verified that the laboratory processing of PMMA might decrease the surface roughness and consequently the adhesion ofS. sanguinisto this material.

scholarly journals Surface Roughness and Streptococcus mutans Adhesion on Metallic and Ceramic Fixed Prosthodontic Materials after Scaling

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 1027
Author(s):  
Jenni Hjerppe ◽  
Sampo Rodas ◽  
Johanna Korvala ◽  
Paula Pesonen ◽  
Anna Kaisanlahti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Streptococcus Mutans ◽  
Bacterial Adhesion ◽  
Lithium Disilicate ◽  
Human Saliva ◽  
Contact Angles ◽  
Cobalt Chromium ◽  
Ultrasonic Scaler

The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface roughness of fixed prosthodontic materials after polishing or roughening with a stainless steel curette or ultrasonic scaler and to examine the effect of these on Streptococcus mutans adhesion and biofilm accumulation. Thirty specimens (10 × 10 × 3 mm3) of zirconia (Zr), pressed lithium disilicate (LDS-Press), milled lithium disilicate glazed (LDS-Glaze), titanium grade V (Ti) and cobalt-chromium (CoCr) were divided into three groups (n = 10) according to surface treatment: polished (C), roughened with stainless steel curette (SC), roughened with ultrasonic scaler (US). Surface roughness values (Sa, Sq) were measured with a spinning disc confocal microscope, and contact angles and surface free energy (SFE) were measured with a contact angle meter. The specimens were covered with sterilized human saliva and immersed into Streptococcus mutans suspensions for bacterial adhesion. The biofilm was allowed to form for 24 h. Sa values were in the range of 0.008–0.139 µm depending on the material and surface treatment. Curette and ultrasonic scaling increased the surface roughness in LDS-Glaze (p < 0.05), Ti (p < 0.01) and CoCr (p < 0.001), however, surface roughness did not affect bacterial adhesion. Zr C and US had a higher bacterial adhesion percentage compared to LDS-Glaze C and US (p = 0.03). There were no differences between study materials in terms of biofilm accumulation.

scholarly journals Surface topography and bacterial adhesion of CAD/CAM resin based materials after application of different surface finishing techniques

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Raphael Meneghetti Hamerschmitt ◽  
Paulo Henrique Tomazinho ◽  
Kaíke Lessa Camporês ◽  
Carla Castiglia Gonzaga ◽  
Leonardo Fernandes da Cunha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Surface Topography ◽  
Surface Finish ◽  
Bacterial Adhesion ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
The Other ◽  
Surface Finishing ◽  
Roughness Parameters ◽  
Surface Finishes ◽  
Hybrid Ceramic

Aim: This study evaluated the surface topography and bacterial adhesion of a hybrid ceramic and a nano ceramic resin composite after different surface finishes. Methods: Hybrid ceramic (Vita Enamic, VITA - EN) and nano ceramic resin composite (Lava Ultimate, 3M/ESPE - LV) blocks of 12 x 14 x 18 mm were cut into 1 mm slices. Each slice was divided into four specimens (6 x 7 mm) that were randomly allocated into 4 groups (n=8) according to the surface finishing: CTL - without surface finish (control); DB - wear with a diamond bur; VT - polishing system for hybrid ceramic (VITA); and DD - polishing system for ceramics (Dedeco). The specimens were analyzed regarding surface roughness parameters (Ra, Rz, Rq), sterilized and subjected to bacterial adhesion. Representative specimens from each group were observed by SEM and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy. Data were submitted to two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05). Results: EN had lower surface roughness and bacterial adhesion than LV (p<0.05), regardless of the surface finish. The highest values for all roughness parameters was observed in LVDB group, differing from the other groups, which were not significantly different. Smaller bacterial adhesion values (CFU/mL) were observed for ENDD and ENVT, which differed significantly from the other groups, except ENCTL. For LV groups there was no significant difference between the different surface finishes (p>0.05). The type of material and surface finish system significantly interfered with surface roughness parameters and bacterial adhesion. The hybrid ceramic performed better after polishing than the nano-ceramic resin. Conclusion: An adequate finishing/polishing technique should always be performed after any kind of adjustment to indirect restorations made with these materials tested.

scholarly journals Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Effect of Dental Luting Cements on Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus: An in vitro Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 973-977 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Khan ◽  
SMA Feroz ◽  
A Bhoyar
Keyword(s):  
Antibacterial Activity ◽  
Streptococcus Mutans ◽  
Lactobacillus Acidophilus ◽  
Antibacterial Effect ◽  
Bacterial Suspension ◽  
Zone Of Inhibition ◽  
Diffusion Test ◽  
Luting Cements ◽  
Agar Diffusion Test

ABSTRACT Introduction This study aimed at evaluating and comparing the antibacterial activity of six types of dental luting cements on Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus using the agar diffusion test (ADT) and the direct-contact test (DCT). The antibacterial activity in ADT was measured based on the diameter of the zone of inhibition formed, whereas in DCT the density of the bacterial suspension was measured. The lower the density of the suspension, the more antibacterial activity the cement possesses. Materials and methods Agar diffusion test was carried out on the bacteria. After an incubation period of 24 hours, the plates were checked for the presence of zone of inhibition. In DCT the cement was mixed and applied. Once the cement was set, bacterial suspension and brain–heart infusion medium was poured and incubated for 24 hours. After 24 hours, the plate was placed in the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay plate reader, which measured the optical density of the fluid. The first set of data was recorded approximately 1 hour after incubation. Overall, three sets of data were recorded. Additional experiments were performed on set test materials that were allowed to age for 24 hours, 1 week, 1, 3, and 6 months. Results When using ADT only two cements zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE) and zinc polycarboxylate (ZPC) cement showed antibacterial activity against the test organisms. When using DCT, all cements showed some amount of antibacterial activity. Zinc oxide eugenol and ZPC cement showed highest amount of antibacterial activity against S. mutans and L. acidophilus respectively. Conclusion Within the limitations of study, ZOE cement and ZPC cement were most effective against the tested microorganisms followed by the newer resin cement. The glass ionomer cement was the weakest of all. Clinical significance Patients with high caries index can be treated more effectively using the abovementioned cements. How to cite this article Feroz SMA, Bhoyar A, Khan S. Comparative Evaluation of Antibacterial Effect of Dental Luting Cements on Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016;17(12):973-977.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document