Kidney Cancer/Renal Cell Carcinoma

Author(s):  
Mirza Baig
Genes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick T. Gomella ◽  
W. Linehan ◽  
Mark W. Ball

Renal cell carcinoma is a term that represents multiple different disease processes, each driven by different genetic alterations, with distinct histology, and biological potential which necessitates divergent management strategies. This review discusses the genetic alterations seen in several forms of hereditary kidney cancer and how that knowledge can dictate when and how to intervene with a focus on the surgical management of these tumors.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fei Meng ◽  
Luojin Zhang ◽  
Mingjun Zhang ◽  
Kaiqin Ye ◽  
Wei Guo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background BCL2L13 belongs to the BCL2 super family, with its protein product exhibits capacity of apoptosis-mediating in diversified cell lines. Previous studies have shown that BCL2L13 has functional consequence in several tumor types, including ALL and GBM, however, its function in kidney cancer remains as yet unclearly. Methods Multiple web-based portals were employed to analyze the effect of BCL2L13 in kidney cancer using the data from TCGA database. Functional enrichment analysis and hubs of BCL2L13 co-expressed genes in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) were carried out on Cytoscape. Evaluation of BCL2L13 protein level was accomplished through immunohistochemistry on paraffin embedded renal cancer tissue sections. Western blotting and flow cytometry were implemented to further analyze the pro-apoptotic function of BCL2L13 in ccRCC cell line 786-0. Results BCL2L13 expression is significantly decreased in ccRCC and pRCC patients, however, mutations and copy number alterations are rarely observed. The poor prognosis of ccRCC that derived from down-regulated BCL2L13 is independent of patients’ gender or tumor grade. Furthermore, BCL2L13 only weakly correlates with the genes that mutated in kidney cancer or the genes that associated with inherited kidney cancer predisposing syndrome, while actively correlates with SLC25A4. As a downstream effector of BCL2L13 in its pro-apoptotic pathway, SLC25A4 is found as one of the hub genes that involved in the physiological function of BCL2L13 in kidney cancer tissues. Conclusions Down-regulation of BCL2L13 renders poor prognosis in ccRCC and pRCC. This disadvantageous factor is independent of any well-known kidney cancer related genes, so BCL2L13 can be used as an effective indicator for prognostic evaluation of renal cell carcinoma.


Author(s):  
Jeffrey Graham ◽  
Daniel Y. C. Heng ◽  
James Brugarolas ◽  
Ulka Vaishampayan

The treatment of renal cell carcinoma represents one of the great success stories in translational cancer research, with the development of novel therapies targeting key oncogenic pathways. These include drugs that target the VEGF and mTOR pathways, as well as novel immuno-oncology agents. Despite the therapeutic advancements, there is a paucity of well-validated prognostic and predictive biomarkers in advanced kidney cancer. With a number of highly effective therapies available across multiple lines, it will become increasingly important to develop a more tailored approach to treatment selection. Prognostic clinical models, such the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) model, are routinely used for prognostication in clinical practice. The IMDC model has demonstrated a predictive capability in the context of these treatments including immune checkpoint inhibition. A number of promising molecular markers and gene expression signatures are being explored as prognostic and predictive biomarkers, but none are ready to be widely used for treatment selection. In this review, we will explore the current landscape of personalized care in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. This will include a focus on both prognostic and predictive factors as well as clinical applications of biology in kidney cancer.


2006 ◽  
Vol 4 (10) ◽  
pp. 1072 ◽  
Author(s):  
_ _

An estimated 38,890 Americans will be diagnosed with kidney cancer and 12,840 will die of this disease in the United States in 2006. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) constitutes approximately 2% of all malignancies, with a median age at diagnosis of 65 years. Smoking and obesity are among the risk factors for RCC development, and tumor grade, local extent of the tumor, presence of regional nodal metastases, and evidence of metastatic disease at presentation are the most important prognostic determinants of 5-year survival. These guidelines discuss evaluation, staging, treatment, and management after treatment. For the most recent version of the guidelines, please visit NCCN.org


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5109-5109 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Royston ◽  
J. Bacik ◽  
P. Elson ◽  
J. B. Manola ◽  
M. Mazumdar

5109 Background: Numerous well-designed retrospective studies of prognostic factors (pf) for survival (S) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients (pts) have been conducted since 1986. However, no single model for describing S in this population has been universally accepted. Methods: Authors of several existing prognostic indices, and others, formed the IKCWG to develop a single validated S model. The IKCWG has established a comprehensive database of previously reported clinical pf from 3748 previously untreated mRCC pts entered on institution review board approved clinical trials conducted by 11 centers in Europe and the United States from 1975–2002. Results: Median age at study entry was 58, 70% of pts were male, 89% had ECOG performance status (PS) 0 or 1; 75% had prior nephrectomy. 72%, 30%, and 19% of pts had lung, bone, and liver metastases (mets), respectively. 72% received interferon-a and/or interleukin-2 based treatments (tx); 25% were txd with chemotherapy/hormones only; 3% received other tx. 88% of pts have died; median S was 11.1 months (m). All examined factors except sex, age, and histology impacted S at p<.001 in univariable analysis. Multivariable analysis using a log-logistic model stratified by center and multivariable fractional polynomials was performed to identify independent predictors of S. Missing data were handled using multiple imputation methods. Using p=.0044 as the criterion for variable selection to avoid overly complex models, a model comprising tx, PS, number of met sites, interval from diagnosis to tx, and pre-tx hemoglobin, WBC, LDH, alkaline phosphatase and calcium was identified. The 25th and 75th percentiles of the prognostic index formed by multiplying each factor by its regression coefficient were used as cutpoints to form three risk (r) groups with median S times (SE) of: favorable r (n=937; 27.8 (0.4) m), intermediate r (n=1874; 11.4 (0.2) m), and poor r (n=937; 4.1 (0.1) m). Conclusions: 9 clinical factors can be used to model S in mRCC and form 3 distinct prognostic groups. Additional model building to determine if model complexity can be reduced further, validation in independent data and comparison to existing prognostic models are underway. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document