scholarly journals Comparison Of The Efficacy Of Saps Ii And Mpm Ii Scoring Systems In Intensive Care Unit Mortality

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fusun Eroglu ◽  
Ulku Aslan ◽  
Lutfi Yavuz ◽  
Berit Ceylan ◽  
Erol Eroglu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Intensive Care Unit Mortality ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Saps Ii

scholarly journals Performance of Prognostic Scoring Systems in Trauma Patients in the Intensive Care Unit of a Trauma Center

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (19) ◽  
pp. 7226
Author(s):  
Shao-Chun Wu ◽  
Sheng-En Chou ◽  
Hang-Tsung Liu ◽  
Ting-Min Hsieh ◽  
Wei-Ti Su ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Organ Dysfunction ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Predictive Performance ◽  
Apache Ii ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Saps Ii ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Prognostic Scoring Systems

Background: Prediction of mortality outcomes in trauma patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) is important for patient care and quality improvement. We aimed to measure the performance of 11 prognostic scoring systems for predicting mortality outcomes in trauma patients in the ICU. Methods: Prospectively registered data in the Trauma Registry System from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2018 were used to extract scores from prognostic scoring systems for 1554 trauma patients in the ICU. The following systems were used: the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS); the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II); the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II); mortality prediction models (MPM II) at admission, 24, 48, and 72 h; the Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score (MODS); the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA); the Logistic Organ Dysfunction Score (LODS); and the Three Days Recalibrated ICU Outcome Score (TRIOS). Predictive performance was determined according to the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC). Results: MPM II at 24 h had the highest AUC (0.9213), followed by MPM II at 48 h (AUC: 0.9105). MPM II at 24, 48, and 72 h (0.8956) had a significantly higher AUC than the TRISS (AUC: 0.8814), APACHE II (AUC: 0.8923), SAPS II (AUC: 0.9044), MPM II at admission (AUC: 0.9063), MODS (AUC: 0.8179), SOFA (AUC: 0.7073), LODS (AUC: 0.9013), and TRIOS (AUC: 0.8701). There was no significant difference in the predictive performance of MPM II at 24 and 48 h (p = 0.37) or at 72 h (p = 0.10). Conclusions: We compared 11 prognostic scoring systems and demonstrated that MPM II at 24 h had the best predictive performance for 1554 trauma patients in the ICU.

Scoring Systems for Outcome Prediction in a Cardiac Surgical Intensive Care Unit: A Comparative Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 327-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Themistocles Exarchopoulos ◽  
Efstratia Charitidou ◽  
Panagiotis Dedeilias ◽  
Christos Charitos ◽  
Christina Routsi
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Area Under Curve ◽  
Outcome Prediction ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care ◽  
Saps Ii

Background Most scoring systems used to predict clinical outcome in critical care were not designed for application in cardiac surgery patients. Objectives To compare the predictive ability of the most widely used scoring systems (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation [APACHE] II, Simplified Acute Physiology Score [SAPS] II, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [SOFA]) and of 2 specialized systems (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation [EuroSCORE] II and the cardiac surgery score [CASUS]) for clinical outcome in patients after cardiac surgery. Methods Consecutive patients admitted to a cardiac surgical intensive care unit (CSICU) were prospectively studied. Data on the preoperative condition, intraoperative parameters, and postoperative course were collected. EuroSCORE II, CASUS, and scores from 3 general severity-scoring systems (APACHE II, SAPS II, and SOFA) were calculated on the first postoperative day. Clinical outcome was defined as 30-day mortality and in-hospital morbidity. Results A total of 150 patients were included. Thirty-day mortality was 6%. CASUS was superior in outcome prediction, both in relation to discrimination (area under curve, 0.89) and calibration (Brier score = 0.043, χ2 = 2.2, P = .89), followed by EuroSCORE II for 30-day mortality (area under curve, 0.87) and SOFA for morbidity (Spearman ρ= 0.37 and 0.35 for the CSICU length of stay and duration of mechanical ventilation, respectively; Wilcoxon W = 367.5, P = .03 for probability of readmission to CSICU). Conclusions CASUS can be recommended as the most reliable and beneficial option for benchmarking and risk stratification in cardiac surgery patients.

scholarly journals Comparing APACHE II, APACHE IV, SAPS II, and SOFA Predictive Power in Poisoned Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Samaneh Silakhori ◽  
Bita Dadpour ◽  
Majid Khadem-Rezaiyan ◽  
Alireza Sedaghat ◽  
Farzad Mirzakhani
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Mortality Prediction ◽  
Apache Ii ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Saps Ii ◽  
Hospitalization Period ◽  
Apache Iv

Background: This study aimed to assess the performance of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, APACHE IV, Simplified Acute Physiologic Score (SAPS) II, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores in predicting mortality rate in poisoning patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU).Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on all admitted patients in the poisoning ICU of Imam Reza Hospital, Mashhad City, Iran. All patients were evaluated for three consecutive days since admission time and then every two days until discharge from ICU or death. The scoring systems mentioned above were calculated and analyzed by MedCalc statistical software version 18.9.1 and SPSS version 16.Results: Overall, 150 patients were studied, out of whom 67% (101) were male. Their mean±SD age was 41.6±18.9 years. In their whole hospitalization period, APACHE II (79.5%), SAPS II (78.7%), APACHE IV (78.4%), and SOFA (72.9%) were the most precise measures. On the first day of admission APACHE II (77.4%), on the second day, APACHE II (83.1%), on the third day, APACHE II (90.7%), and on the fifth day, SOFA (81.6%) were the most precise measures.Conclusion: All four systems have acceptable discriminatory power for poisoned patients. However, it seems that APACHE II can be used for mortality prediction, especially in the early days of admission. 

scholarly journals The use of score for neonatal acute physiology perinatal extention II (SNAPPE II) in predicting neonatal outcome in neonatal intensive care unit

2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 241
Author(s):  
Mia R A ◽  
Risa Etika ◽  
Agus Harianto ◽  
Fatimah Indarso ◽  
Sylviati M Damanik
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Newborn Care ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Laboratory Observation ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Overall Mortality

Background Scoring systems which quantify initial risks have animportant role in aiding execution of optimum health services by pre-dicting morbidity and mortality. One of these is the score for neonatalacute physiology perinatal extention (SNAPPE), developed byRichardson in 1993 and simplified in 2001. It is derived of 6 variablesfrom the physical and laboratory observation within the first 12 hoursof admission, and 3 variables of perinatal risks of mortality.Objectives To assess the validity of SNAPPE II in predicting mor-tality at neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), Soetomo Hospital,Surabaya. The study was also undertaken to evolve the best cut-offscore for predicting mortality.Methods Eighty newborns were admitted during a four-month periodand were evaluated with the investigations as required for the specifi-cations of SNAPPE II. Neonates admitted >48 hours of age or afterhaving been discharged, who were moved to lower newborn care <24hours and those who were discharged on request were excluded. Re-ceiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) were constructed to derivethe best cut-off score with Kappa and McNemar Test.Results Twenty eight (35%) neonates died during the study, 22(82%) of them died within the first six days. The mean SNAPPE IIscore was 26.3+19.84 (range 0-81). SNAPPE II score of thenonsurvivors was significantly higher than the survivors(42.75+18.59 vs 17.4+14.05; P=0.0001). SNAPPE II had a goodperformance in predicting overall mortality and the first-6-daysmortality, with area under the ROC 0.863 and 0.889. The best cut-off score for predicting mortality was 30 with sensitivity 81.8%,specificity 76.9%, positive predictive value 60.0% and negativepredictive value 90.0%.Conclusions SNAPPE II is a measurement of illness severity whichcorrelates well with neonatal mortality at NICU, Soetomo Hospital.The score of more than 30 is associated with higher mortality

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document