scholarly journals Assimilation of atmospheric methane products in the MACC-II system: from SCIAMACHY to TANSO and IASI

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 2553-2599
Author(s):  
S. Massart ◽  
A. Agusti-Panareda ◽  
I. Aben ◽  
A. Butz ◽  
F. Chevallier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Near Infrared ◽  
Total Carbon ◽  
Atmospheric Composition ◽  
Winter Period ◽  
Tropical Region ◽  
Atmospheric Methane ◽  
Atmospheric Sounding ◽  
Scanning Imaging ◽  
Global Bias ◽  
The Impact

Abstract. The Monitoring Atmospheric Composition and Climate Interim Implementation (MACC-II) delayed-mode (DM) system has been producing an atmospheric methane (CH4) analysis 6 months behind real time since June 2009. This analysis used to rely on the assimilation of the CH4 product from the SCanning Imaging Absorption spectroMeter for Atmospheric CHartographY (SCIAMACHY) instrument on board Envisat. Recently the \\textit{Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique} (LMD) CH4 products from the Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) and the SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research CH4 products from the Thermal And Near-infrared Sensor for carbon Observation (TANSO) were added to the DM system. With the loss of Envisat in April 2012, the DM system has to now rely on the assimilation of methane data from TANSO and IASI. This paper documents the impact of this change in the observing system on the methane tropospheric analysis. It is based on four experiments: one free run and three analyses from respectively the assimilation of SCIAMACHY, TANSO and a combination of TANSO and IASI CH4 products in the MACC-II system. The period between December 2010 and April 2012 is studied. This corresponds to a period during which the performance of SCIAMACHY was deteriorating. The SCIAMACHY experiment globally underestimates the tropospheric methane by 35 part per billion (ppb) compared to the HIAPER Pole-to-Pole Observations (HIPPO) data and the methane column by 23 ppb compared the Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON) data, when the global bias of the free run against the same HIPPO and TCCON data is respectively −5 ppb and 4 ppb. The assimilated TANSO product changed in October 2011 from version v.1 to version v.2.0. The analysis of version v.1 globally underestimates the tropospheric methane by 18 ppb compared to the HIPPO data and the column by 11 ppb compared to the TCCON data. In contrast, the analysis of version v.2.0 globally overestimates the column by 10 ppb. When the high density IASI data are added in the tropical region between 30° N and 30° S, the resulting analysis is slightly less biased in the troposphere than the TANSO analysis when compared to the HIPPO data. In the meantime, this IASI plus TANSO analysis presents the worst correlation with the HIPPO data. In terms of column, the addition of the IASI data to the version v.2.0 of the TANSO data has a significant impact, mainly over extratropical regions, reducing the global bias to 6 ppb. The analysis based on the assimilation of the combination of TANSO and IASI products as well as the SCIAMACHY analysis should nevertheless be used with caution when looking at the seasonal cycle or inter-hemispheric gradient because of the unavailability of the measurements over large regions during the local winter period.

scholarly journals Assimilation of atmospheric methane products into the MACC-II system: from SCIAMACHY to TANSO and IASI

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 6139-6158 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Massart ◽  
A. Agusti-Panareda ◽  
I. Aben ◽  
A. Butz ◽  
F. Chevallier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Near Infrared ◽  
Total Carbon ◽  
Atmospheric Composition ◽  
Tropical Region ◽  
Atmospheric Methane ◽  
Infrared Sensor ◽  
Atmospheric Sounding ◽  
Scanning Imaging ◽  
The Tropics ◽  
The Impact

Abstract. The Monitoring Atmospheric Composition and Climate Interim Implementation (MACC-II) delayed-mode (DM) system has been producing an atmospheric methane (CH4) analysis 6 months behind real time since June 2009. This analysis used to rely on the assimilation of the CH4 product from the SCanning Imaging Absorption spectroMeter for Atmospheric CHartographY (SCIAMACHY) instrument onboard Envisat. Recently the Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique (LMD) CH4 products from the Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) and the SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research CH4 products from the Thermal And Near-infrared Sensor for carbon Observation (TANSO) were added to the DM system. With the loss of Envisat in April 2012, the DM system now has to rely on the assimilation of methane data from TANSO and IASI. This paper documents the impact of this change in the observing system on the methane tropospheric analysis. It is based on four experiments: one free run and three analyses from respectively the assimilation of SCIAMACHY, TANSO and a combination of TANSO and IASI CH4 products in the MACC-II system. The period between December 2010 and April 2012 is studied. The SCIAMACHY experiment globally underestimates the tropospheric methane by 35 part per billion (ppb) compared to the HIAPER Pole-to-Pole Observations (HIPPO) data and by 28 ppb compared the Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON) data, while the free run presents an underestimation of 5 ppb and 1 ppb against the same HIPPO and TCCON data, respectively. The assimilated TANSO product changed in October 2011 from version v.1 to version v.2.0. The analysis of version v.1 globally underestimates the tropospheric methane by 18 ppb compared to the HIPPO data and by 15 ppb compared to the TCCON data. In contrast, the analysis of version v.2.0 globally overestimates the column by 3 ppb. When the high density IASI data are added in the tropical region between 30° N and 30° S, their impact is mainly positive but more pronounced and effective when combined with version v.2.0 of the TANSO products. The resulting analysis globally underestimates the column-averaged dry-air mole fractions of methane (xCH4) just under 1 ppb on average compared to the TCCON data, whereas in the tropics it overestimates xCH4 by about 3 ppb. The random error is estimated to be less than 7 ppb when compared to TCCON data.

scholarly journals Inverse modeling of CH<sub>4</sub> emissions for 2010–2011 using different satellite retrieval products from GOSAT and SCIAMACHY

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. 11493-11539 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Alexe ◽  
P. Bergamaschi ◽  
A. Segers ◽  
R. Detmers ◽  
A. Butz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inverse Modeling ◽  
Near Infrared ◽  
Total Carbon ◽  
Atmospheric Methane ◽  
Equatorial Africa ◽  
New Space ◽  
Institute Of Technology ◽  
Scanning Imaging ◽  
The University ◽  
Air Column

Abstract. Beginning in 2009 new space-borne observations of dry-air column-averaged mole fractions of atmospheric methane (XCH4) became available from the Thermal And Near infrared Sensor for carbon Observations–Fourier Transform Spectrometer (TANSO-FTS) instrument onboard the Greenhouse Gases Observing SATellite (GOSAT). Until April 2012 concurrent CH4 measurements were provided by the SCanning Imaging Absorption spectroMeter for Atmospheric CartograpHY (SCIAMACHY) instrument onboard ENVISAT. The GOSAT and SCIAMACHY XCH4 retrievals can be compared during their circa 32 month period of overlap. We estimate monthly average CH4 emissions between January 2010 and December 2011, using the TM5-4DVAR inverse modeling system. Additionally, high-accuracy measurements from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Earth System Research Laboratory (NOAA ESRL) global air sampling network are used, providing strong constraints of the remote surface atmosphere. We discuss five inversion scenarios that make use of different GOSAT and SCIAMACHY XCH4 retrieval products, including two sets of GOSAT proxy retrievals processed independently by the Netherlands Institute for Space Research (SRON)/Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), and the University of Leicester (UL), and the RemoTeC "Full-Physics" (FP) XCH4 retrievals available from SRON/KIT. 2 year average emission maps show a~good overall agreement among all GOSAT-based inversions, and compared to the SCIAMACHY-based inversion, with consistent flux adjustment patterns, particularly across Equatorial Africa and North America. The inversions are validated against independent shipboard and aircraft observations, and XCH4 measurements available from the Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON). All GOSAT and SCIAMACHY inversions show very similar validation performance.

scholarly journals Methane profiles from GOSAT thermal infrared spectra

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 3815-3828 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arno de Lange ◽  
Jochen Landgraf
Keyword(s):  
Lower Troposphere ◽  
Principal Component ◽  
Thermal Infrared ◽  
Total Carbon ◽  
Atmospheric Composition ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Atmospheric Methane ◽  
Infrared Band ◽  
Correction Scheme ◽  
Infrared Measurements

Abstract. This paper discusses the retrieval of atmospheric methane profiles from the thermal infrared band of the Japanese Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT) between 1210 and 1310 cm−1, using the RemoTeC analysis software. Approximately one degree of information on the vertical methane distribution is inferred from the measurements, with the main sensitivity at about 9 km altitude but little sensitivity to methane in the lower troposphere. For verification, we compare the GOSAT-TIR methane profile retrieval results with profiles from model fields provided by the Monitoring Atmospheric Composition and Climate (MACC) project, scaled to the total column measurements of the Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON) at ground-based measurement sites. Without any radiometric corrections of GOSAT observations, differences between both data sets can be as large as 10 %. To mitigate these differences, we developed a correction scheme using a principal component analysis of spectral fit residuals and airborne observations of methane during the HIAPER pole-to-pole observations (HIPPO) campaign II and III. When the correction scheme is applied, the bias in the methane profile can be reduced to less than 2 % over the whole altitude range with respect to MACC model methane fields. Furthermore, we show that, with this correction, the retrievals result in smooth methane fields over land and ocean crossings and no differences can be discerned between daytime and nighttime measurements. Finally, a cloud filter is developed for the nighttime and ocean measurements. This filter is rooted in the GOSAT-TIR (thermal infrared) measurements and its performance, in terms of biases, is consistent with the cloud filter based on the GOSAT-SWIR (shortwave infrared) measurements. The TIR filter shows a higher acceptance rate of observations than the SWIR filter, at the cost of a higher uncertainty in the retrieved methane profiles.

scholarly journals First intercalibration of column-averaged methane from the Total Carbon Column Observing Network and the Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1355-1379
Author(s):  
F. Forster ◽  
R. Sussmann ◽  
M. Rettinger ◽  
N. M. Deutscher ◽  
D. W. T. Griffith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Time Series ◽  
Near Infrared ◽  
Calibration Factor ◽  
Time Dependent ◽  
Total Carbon ◽  
Atmospheric Composition ◽  
Composition Change ◽  
Data Set ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Difference Time

Abstract. We present the intercalibration of dry-air column-averaged mole fractions of methane (XCH4) retrieved from solar FTIR measurements of the Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC) in the mid-infrared (MIR) versus near-infrared (NIR) soundings from the Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON). The study uses multi-annual quasi-coincident MIR and NIR measurements from the stations Garmisch, Germany (47.48° N, 11.06° E, 743 m a.s.l.) and Wollongong, Australia (34.41° S, 150.88° E, 30 m a.s.l.). Direct comparison of the retrieved MIR and NIR time series shows a phase shift in XCH4 seasonality, i.e. a significant time-dependent bias leading to a standard deviation (stdv) of the difference time series (NIR-MIR) of 8.4 ppb. After eliminating differences in a prioris by using ACTM-simulated profiles as a common prior, the seasonalities of the (corrected) MIR and NIR time series agree within the noise (stdv = 5.2 ppb for the difference time series). The difference time series (NIR-MIR) do not show a significant trend. Therefore it is possible to use a simple scaling factor for the intercalibration without a time-dependent linear or seasonal component. Using the Garmisch and Wollongong data together, we obtain an overall calibration factor MIR/NIR = 0.9926(18). The individual calibration factors per station are 0.9940(14) for Garmisch and 0.9893(40) for Wollongong. They agree within their error bars with the overall calibration factor which can therefore be used for both stations. Our results suggest that after applying the proposed intercalibration concept to all stations performing both NIR and MIR measurements, it should be possible to obtain one refined overall intercalibration factor for the two networks. This would allow to set up a harmonized NDACC and TCCON XCH4 data set which can be exploited for joint trend studies, satellite validation, or the inverse modeling of sources and sinks.

scholarly journals Validation of SCIAMACHY HDO/H<sub>2</sub>O measurements using the TCCON and NDACC-MUSICA networks

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 1799-1818 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. Scheepmaker ◽  
C. Frankenberg ◽  
N. M. Deutscher ◽  
M. Schneider ◽  
S. Barthlott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Hydrological Cycle ◽  
Source Region ◽  
Total Carbon ◽  
Atmospheric Composition ◽  
The Tibetan Plateau ◽  
Wet Season ◽  
Data Set ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Impact

Abstract. Measurements of the atmospheric HDO/H2O ratio help us to better understand the hydrological cycle and improve models to correctly simulate tropospheric humidity and therefore climate change. We present an updated version of the column-averaged HDO/H2O ratio data set from the SCanning Imaging Absorption spectroMeter for Atmospheric CHartographY (SCIAMACHY). The data set is extended with 2 additional years, now covering 2003–2007, and is validated against co-located ground-based total column δD measurements from Fourier transform spectrometers (FTS) of the Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON) and the Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC, produced within the framework of the MUSICA project). Even though the time overlap among the available data is not yet ideal, we determined a mean negative bias in SCIAMACHY δD of −35 ± 30‰ compared to TCCON and −69 ± 15‰ compared to MUSICA (the uncertainty indicating the station-to-station standard deviation). The bias shows a latitudinal dependency, being largest (∼ −60 to −80‰) at the highest latitudes and smallest (∼ −20 to −30‰) at the lowest latitudes. We have tested the impact of an offset correction to the SCIAMACHY HDO and H2O columns. This correction leads to a humidity- and latitude-dependent shift in δD and an improvement of the bias by 27‰, although it does not lead to an improved correlation with the FTS measurements nor to a strong reduction of the latitudinal dependency of the bias. The correction might be an improvement for dry, high-altitude areas, such as the Tibetan Plateau and the Andes region. For these areas, however, validation is currently impossible due to a lack of ground stations. The mean standard deviation of single-sounding SCIAMACHY–FTS differences is ∼ 115‰, which is reduced by a factor ∼ 2 when we consider monthly means. When we relax the strict matching of individual measurements and focus on the mean seasonalities using all available FTS data, we find that the correlation coefficients between SCIAMACHY and the FTS networks improve from 0.2 to 0.7–0.8. Certain ground stations show a clear asymmetry in δD during the transition from the dry to the wet season and back, which is also detected by SCIAMACHY. This asymmetry points to a transition in the source region temperature or location of the water vapour and shows the added information that HDO/H2O measurements provide when used in combination with variations in humidity.

scholarly journals Intercomparison of Arctic ground-based XH<sub>2</sub>O observations from COCCON, TCCON and NDACC, and application of COCCON XH<sub>2</sub>O for IASI and TROPOMI validation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiansi Tu ◽  
Frank Hase ◽  
Thomas Blumenstock ◽  
Matthias Schneider ◽  
Andreas Schneider ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
A Priori ◽  
Total Carbon ◽  
Atmospheric Composition ◽  
Satellite Validation ◽  
Atmospheric Sounding ◽  
Ftir Spectrometer ◽  
Atmospheric State ◽  
Validation Tool ◽  
Good Agreement

Abstract. In this paper, we compare column-averaged dry-air mole fractions of water vapor (XH2O) retrievals from COCCON (COllaborative Carbon Column Observing Network) with retrievals from two co-located high-resolution FTIR (Fourier transform infrared) spectrometers as references at two boreal sites, Kiruna, Swedenand Sodankylä, Finland. In the framework of the NDACC (Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change) an FTIR spectrometer is operated in Kiruna. The H2O product derived from these observations has been generated with the MUSICA (MUlti-platform remote Sensing of Isotopologues for investigating the Cycle of Atmospheric water) processor. In Sodankylä, a TCCON (Total Carbon Column Observing Network) spectrometer is operated, and the official XH2O data as provided by TCCON are used for this study. The datasets are in good overall agreement, with COCCON data showing a wet bias of (49.20 ± 58.61) ppm ((3.33 ± 3.37) %, R2 = 0.9992) compared to MUSICA NDACC and (56.32 ± 45.63) ppm ((3.44 ± 1.77) %, R2 = 0.9997) compared to TCCON. Furthermore, the a priori H2O VMR (volume mixing ratio) profiles (MAP) used as a priori in the TCCON retrievals (also adopted for COCCON retrievals) are evaluated with respect to radiosonde (Vaisala RS41) profiles at Sodankylä. The MAP and radiosonde profiles show similar shapes and good correlation of integrated XH2O, indicating that MAP is a reasonable approximation for the true atmospheric state and an appropriate choice for the scaling retrieval methods as applied by COCCON and TCCON. COCCON shows a reduced dry bias (−1.66 %) in comparison to TCCON (−5.63 %) with respect to radiosonde XH2O and this small bias indicates that besides XCO2 and XCH4 COCCON is also able to serve as validation tool for space-borne XH2O measurements. Finally, we investigate the quality of satellite data at high latitudes. For this purpose, the COCCON XH2O is compared with retrievals from the Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) generated with the MUSICA processor (MUSICA IASI) and with retrievals from the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI). Both paired datasets show generally good agreement and similar correlations at the two sites. COCCON measures 4.64 % less XH2O at Kiruna and 3.36 % at Sodankylä with respect to MUSICA IASI, while COCCON measures 9.71 % more XH2O at Kiruna and 7.75 % at Sodankylä compared with TROPOMI. Our study supports the assumption that COCCON also delivers a well-characterized XH2O data product. This emphasizes the approach of supplementing the TCCON network for satellite validation efforts. This is the first published study where COCCON XH2O is compared with MUSICA NDACC and TCCON retrievals, and for MUSICA IASI and TROPOMI validation.

scholarly journals Cross-validation of IASI/MetOp derived tropospheric δD with TES and ground-based FTIR observations

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 11087-11135
Author(s):  
J.-L. Lacour ◽  
L. Clarisse ◽  
J. Worden ◽  
M. Schneider ◽  
S. Barthlott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Near Infrared ◽  
Cross Validation ◽  
Atmospheric Composition ◽  
Free Troposphere ◽  
Temporal Sampling ◽  
Atmospheric Sounding ◽  
Spatio Temporal ◽  
Isotopic Variations ◽  
Level Of Agreement ◽  
Good Agreement

Abstract. The Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) flying on-board MetOpA and MetOpB is able to capture fine isotopic variations of the HDO to H2O ratio (δD) in the troposphere. Such observations at the high spatio temporal resolution of the sounder are of great interest to improve our understanding of the mechanisms controlling humidity in the troposphere. In this study we aim to empirically assess the validity of our error estimation previously evaluated theoretically. To achieve this, we compare IASI δD retrieved profiles with other available profiles of δD, from the TES infrared sounder onboard AURA and from three ground-based FTIR stations produced within the MUSICA project: the NDACC (Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change) sites Kiruna and Izana, and the TCCON site Karlsruhe, which in addition to near-infrared TCCON spectra also records mid-infrared spectra. We describe the achievable level of agreement between the different retrievals and show that these theoretical errors are in good agreement with empirical differences. The comparisons are made at different locations from tropical to Arctic latitudes, above sea and above land. Generally IASI and TES are similarly sensitive to δD in the free troposphere which allows to compare their measurements directly. At tropical latitudes where IASI's sensitivity is lower than that of TES, we show that the agreement improves when taking into account the sensitivity of IASI in the TES retrieval. For the comparison IASI-FTIR only direct comparisons are performed because of similar sensitivities. We identify a quasi negligible bias in the free troposphere (−3‰) between IASI retrieved δD with the TES one, which are bias corrected, but an important with the ground-based FTIR reaching −47‰. We also suggest that model-satellite observations comparisons could be optimized with IASI thanks to its high spatial and temporal sampling.

scholarly journals The Impact of Improved Aerosol Priors on Near-Infrared Measurements of Carbon Dioxide

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert R. Nelson ◽  
Christopher W. O'Dell
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Dioxide ◽  
Near Infrared ◽  
Carbon Sources ◽  
Total Carbon ◽  
Primary Sources ◽  
Retrieval Algorithm ◽  
Sources And Sinks ◽  
Earth Observing System ◽  
Infrared Measurements ◽  
The Impact

Abstract. The Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) was launched in 2014 with the goal of measuring the column-averaged dry-air mole fraction of carbon dioxide (XCO2) with sufficient precision and accuracy to infer regional carbon sources and sinks. One of the primary sources of error in near-infrared measurements of XCO2 is the scattering effects of cloud and aerosol layers. In this work, we study the impact of ingesting intelligent aerosol priors from the Goddard Earth Observing System Model, Version 5 (GEOS-5) into the OCO-2 ACOS V8 retrieval algorithm with the objective of reducing the error in XCO2 from real measurements. Multiple levels of both aerosol setup complexity and uncertainty on the aerosol priors were tested, ranging from a mostly unconstrained aerosol optical depth (AOD) setup to ingesting full aerosol profiles with high confidence. We find that using co-located GEOS-5 aerosol types and AODs with low uncertainty results in a small improvement in the retrieved XCO2 against the Total Carbon Column Observing Network relative to V8. In contrast, attempting to use modeled vertical information in the aerosol prior to improve the XCO2 retrieval generally gives poor results, as aerosol models struggle with the vertical placement of aerosol layers. To assess regional differences in XCO2, we compare our results to a global CO2 model validation suite. We find that the GEOS-5 setup performs better than V8 over Northern Africa and Central Asia, with the standard deviation of the XCO2 error reduced from 2.12 ppm to 1.83 ppm, due to a combination of smaller prior AODs and lower prior uncertainty. In general, the use of more intelligent aerosol priors shows promise but is currently restricted by the accuracy of aerosol models.

scholarly journals Consistent evaluation of ACOS-GOSAT, BESD-SCIAMACHY, CarbonTracker, and MACC through comparisons to TCCON

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 683-709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Kulawik ◽  
Debra Wunch ◽  
Christopher O'Dell ◽  
Christian Frankenberg ◽  
Maximilian Reuter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mole Fraction ◽  
Seasonal Cycle ◽  
Atmospheric Co2 ◽  
Total Carbon ◽  
Atmospheric Composition ◽  
Cycle Phase ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Single Observation ◽  
Cycle Amplitude ◽  
The Impact

Abstract. Consistent validation of satellite CO2 estimates is a prerequisite for using multiple satellite CO2 measurements for joint flux inversion, and for establishing an accurate long-term atmospheric CO2 data record. Harmonizing satellite CO2 measurements is particularly important since the differences in instruments, observing geometries, sampling strategies, etc. imbue different measurement characteristics in the various satellite CO2 data products. We focus on validating model and satellite observation attributes that impact flux estimates and CO2 assimilation, including accurate error estimates, correlated and random errors, overall biases, biases by season and latitude, the impact of coincidence criteria, validation of seasonal cycle phase and amplitude, yearly growth, and daily variability. We evaluate dry-air mole fraction (XCO2) for Greenhouse gases Observing SATellite (GOSAT) (Atmospheric CO2 Observations from Space, ACOS b3.5) and SCanning Imaging Absorption spectroMeter for Atmospheric CHartographY (SCIAMACHY) (Bremen Optimal Estimation DOAS, BESD v2.00.08) as well as the CarbonTracker (CT2013b) simulated CO2 mole fraction fields and the Monitoring Atmospheric Composition and Climate (MACC) CO2 inversion system (v13.1) and compare these to Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON) observations (GGG2012/2014). We find standard deviations of 0.9, 0.9, 1.7, and 2.1 ppm vs. TCCON for CT2013b, MACC, GOSAT, and SCIAMACHY, respectively, with the single observation errors 1.9 and 0.9 times the predicted errors for GOSAT and SCIAMACHY, respectively. We quantify how satellite error drops with data averaging by interpreting according to error2 = a2 + b2/n (with n being the number of observations averaged, a the systematic (correlated) errors, and b the random (uncorrelated) errors). a and b are estimated by satellites, coincidence criteria, and hemisphere. Biases at individual stations have year-to-year variability of  ∼  0.3 ppm, with biases larger than the TCCON-predicted bias uncertainty of 0.4 ppm at many stations. We find that GOSAT and CT2013b underpredict the seasonal cycle amplitude in the Northern Hemisphere (NH) between 46 and 53° N, MACC overpredicts between 26 and 37° N, and CT2013b underpredicts the seasonal cycle amplitude in the Southern Hemisphere (SH). The seasonal cycle phase indicates whether a data set or model lags another data set in time. We find that the GOSAT measurements improve the seasonal cycle phase substantially over the prior while SCIAMACHY measurements improve the phase significantly for just two of seven sites. The models reproduce the measured seasonal cycle phase well except for at Lauder_125HR (CT2013b) and Darwin (MACC). We compare the variability within 1 day between TCCON and models in JJA; there is correlation between 0.2 and 0.8 in the NH, with models showing 10–50 % the variability of TCCON at different stations and CT2013b showing more variability than MACC. This paper highlights findings that provide inputs to estimate flux errors in model assimilations, and places where models and satellites need further investigation, e.g., the SH for models and 45–67° N for GOSAT and CT2013b.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document