scholarly journals Global-scale analysis of satellite-derived time series of naturally inundated areas as a basis for floodplain modeling

2010 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 45-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Adam ◽  
P. Döll ◽  
C. Prigent ◽  
F. Papa
Keyword(s):  
Time Series ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Water Cycle ◽  
Open Water ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Irrigated Rice ◽  
Surface Models ◽  
Terrestrial Water ◽  
Inundation Extent ◽  
And Storage

Abstract. Floodplains play an important role in the terrestrial water cycle and are very important for biodiversity. Therefore, an improved representation of the dynamics of floodplain water flows and storage in global hydrological and land surface models is required. To support model validation, we combined monthly time series of satellite-derived inundation areas (Papa et al., 2010) with data on irrigated rice areas (Portmann et al., 2010). In this way, we obtained global-scale time series of naturally inundated areas (NIA), with monthly values of inundation extent during 1993–2004 and a spatial resolution of 0.5°. For most grid cells (0.5°×0.5°), the mean annual maximum of NIA agrees well with the static open water extent of the Global Lakes and Wetlands database (GLWD) (Lehner and Döll, 2004), but in 16% of the cells NIA is larger than GLWD. In some regions, like Northwestern Europe, NIA clearly overestimates inundated areas, probably because of confounding very wet soils with inundated areas. In other areas, such as South Asia, it is likely that NIA can help to enhance GLWD. NIA data will be very useful for developing and validating a floodplain modeling algorithm for the global hydrological model WGHM. For example, we found that monthly NIAs correlate with observed river discharges.

Closing the water budget at the global scale using observations, remote sensing, and reanalyses

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fanny Lehmann ◽  
Brahma Dutt Vishwakarma ◽  
Jonathan Bamber
Keyword(s):  
Land Surface ◽  
Water Budget ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Terrestrial Water Storage ◽  
Land Surface Models ◽  
Cold Regions ◽  
Climate Zones ◽  
Surface Models ◽  
Terrestrial Water

<p>Despite the accuracy of GRACE terrestrial water storage estimates and the variety of global hydrological datasets providing precipitations, evapotranspiration, and runoff data, it remains challenging to find datasets satisfying the water budget equation at the global scale.</p><p>We select commonly used and widely-assessed datasets. We use several precipitations (CPC, CRU, GPCC, GPCP, GPM, MSWEP, TRMM, ERA5 Land, MERRA2), evapotranspiration (land surface models CLSM, Noah, VIC from GLDAS 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2; GLEAM, MOD16, SSEBop, ERA5 Land, MERRA2), and runoff (land surface models CLSM, Noah, VIC from GLDAS 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2; GRUN, ERA5 Land, MERRA2) datasets to assess the water storage change over more than 150 hydrological basins. Both mascons and spherical harmonics coefficients are used as the reference terrestrial water storage from different centres processing GRACE data. The analysis covers a wide range of climate zones over the globe and is conducted over 2003-2014.</p><p>The water budget closure is evaluated with Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD), Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), and seasonal decomposition. Each dataset is assessed individually across all basins and dataset combinations are also ranked according to their performances. We obtain a total of 1080 combinations, among which several are suitable to close the water budget. Although none of the combinations performs consistently well over all basins, GPCP precipitations provide generally good results, together with GPCC and GPM. A better water budget closure is generally obtained when using evapotranspiration from Catchment Land Surface Models (GLDAS CLSM), while reanalyses ERA5 Land and MERRA2 are especially suitable in cold regions. Concerning runoff, the machine learning GRUN dataset performs remarkably well across climate zones, followed by ERA5 Land and MERRA2 in cold regions. We also highlight highly unrealistic values in evapotranspiration computed with version 2.2 of GLDAS (using data assimilation from GRACE) in most of the cold basins. Our results are robust as changing the GRACE product from one centre to the other does not affect our conclusions.</p>

scholarly journals A global Budyko model to partition evaporation into interception and transpiration

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ameneh Mianabadi ◽  
Miriam Coenders-Gerrits ◽  
Pooya Shirazi ◽  
Bijan Ghahraman ◽  
Amin Alizadeh
Keyword(s):  
Land Surface ◽  
Hydrological Cycle ◽  
Remotely Sensed ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Order Estimate ◽  
Remotely Sensed Data ◽  
Climate Conditions ◽  
Total Evaporation ◽  
Surface Models ◽  
And Storage

Abstract. Evaporation is a very important flux in the hydrological cycle and links the water and energy balance of a catchment. The Budyko framework is often used to provide a first order estimate of evaporation, since it is a simple model where only rainfall and potential evaporation is required as input. Many researchers have tried to improve the Budyko framework by including more physics and catchment characteristics into the original equation. However, this often resulted in additional parameters, which are unknown or difficult to determine. In this paper we present an improvement of the previously presented Gerrits' model (Analytical derivation of the Budyko curve based on rainfall characteristics and a simple evaporation model in Gerrits et al., 2009 WRR), whereby total evaporation is calculated on the basis of simple interception and transpiration thresholds in combination with measurable parameters like rainfall dynamics and storage availability from remotely sensed data sources. While Gerrits' model was investigated for 10 catchments with different climate conditions and some parameters were assumed to be constant, in this study we applied the model on the global scale and fed with remotely sensed input data. The output of the model has been compared to two complex land–surface models STEAM and GLEAM, as well as the database of Landflux-EVAL. Our results show that total evaporation estimated by Gerrits' model is in good agreement with Landflux-EVAL, STEAM and GLEAM. Results also show that Gerrits' model underestimates interception in comparison to STEAM and overestimates it in comparison to GLEAM, while for transpiration the opposite is found. Errors in interception can partly be explained by differences in the interception definition that successively introduce errors in the calculation of transpiration. Comparing to the Budyko framework, the model showed a good performance for total evaporation estimation.

scholarly journals A simple global Budyko model to partition evaporation into interception and transpiration

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ameneh Mianabadi ◽  
Miriam Coenders-Gerrits ◽  
Pooya Shirazi ◽  
Bijan Ghahraman ◽  
Amin Alizadeh
Keyword(s):  
Land Surface ◽  
Hydrological Cycle ◽  
Remotely Sensed ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Order Estimate ◽  
Remotely Sensed Data ◽  
Climate Conditions ◽  
Total Evaporation ◽  
Surface Models ◽  
And Storage

Abstract. Evaporation is a very important flux in the hydrological cycle and links the water and energy balance of a catchment. The Budyko framework is often used to provide a first order estimate of evaporation, since it is a simple model where only rainfall and potential evaporation is required as input. Many researchers have tried to improve the Budyko framework by including more physics and catchment characteristics into the original equation. However, this often resulted in additional parameters, which are unknown or difficult to determine. In this paper we present an improvement of the previously presented Gerrits' model (Analytical derivation of the Budyko curve based on rainfall characteristics and a simple evaporation model in Gerrits et al., 2009 WRR), whereby total evaporation is calculated on the basis of simple interception and transpiration thresholds in combination with measurable parameters like rainfall dynamics and storage availability from remotely sensed data sources. While Gerrits' model was investigated for 10 catchments with different climate conditions and also some parameters were assumed to be constant, in this study we applied the model on the global scale and it was fed with remotely sensed input data. The output of the model is compared to two complex land–surface models STEAM and GLEAM, as well as the database of Landflux-EVAL. Our results showed that total evaporation estimated by Gerrits' model is in good agreement with Landflux-EVAL, STEAM and GLEAM. Results also show that Gerrits’ model underestimated interception in comparison to STEAM and overestimated in comparison to GLEAM, while for transpiration the opposite was found. Errors in interception can partly be explained by differences in the interception definition that successively introduce errors in the calculation of transpiration. Comparing to the Budyko framework, the model showed a good performance for total evaporation estimation and the results are closer to Ol'dekop than Schreiber, Pike and Budyko curves.

scholarly journals Discontinuous Daily Temperatures in the WATCH Forcing Datasets

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 465-472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henning W. Rust ◽  
Tim Kruschke ◽  
Andreas Dobler ◽  
Madlen Fischer ◽  
Uwe Ulbrich
Keyword(s):  
Land Surface ◽  
Water Cycle ◽  
Research Unit ◽  
Climatic Research Unit ◽  
Daily Maximum ◽  
Monthly Means ◽  
Tropical Africa ◽  
Average Temperature ◽  
Surface Models ◽  
The Tropics

Abstract The Water and Global Change (WATCH) forcing datasets have been created to support the use of hydrological and land surface models for the assessment of the water cycle within climate change studies. They are based on 40-yr ECMWF Re-Analysis (ERA-40) or ECMWF interim reanalysis (ERA-Interim) with temperatures (among other variables) adjusted such that their monthly means match the monthly temperature dataset from the Climatic Research Unit. To this end, daily minimum, maximum, and mean temperatures within one calendar month have been subjected to a correction involving monthly means of the respective month. As these corrections can be largely different for adjacent months, this procedure potentially leads to implausible differences in daily temperatures across the boundaries of calendar months. We analyze day-to-day temperature fluctuations within and across months and find that across-months differences are significantly larger, mostly in the tropics and frigid zones. Average across-months differences in daily mean temperature are typically between 10% and 40% larger than their corresponding within-months average temperature differences. However, regions with differences up to 200% can be found in tropical Africa. Particularly in regions where snowmelt is a relevant player for hydrology, a few degrees Celsius difference can be decisive for triggering this process. Daily maximum and minimum temperatures are affected in the same regions, but in a less severe way.

scholarly journals Diagnosing hydrological limitations of a land surface model: application of JULES to a deep-groundwater chalk basin

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 143-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Le Vine ◽  
A. Butler ◽  
N. McIntyre ◽  
C. Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Land Surface ◽  
Expert Knowledge ◽  
Water Cycle ◽  
Land Surface Model ◽  
Surface Model ◽  
Deep Groundwater ◽  
Resolution Model ◽  
Terrestrial Water ◽  
Water Redistribution ◽  
Types Of Information

Abstract. Land surface models (LSMs) are prospective starting points to develop a global hyper-resolution model of the terrestrial water, energy, and biogeochemical cycles. However, there are some fundamental limitations of LSMs related to how meaningfully hydrological fluxes and stores are represented. A diagnostic approach to model evaluation and improvement is taken here that exploits hydrological expert knowledge to detect LSM inadequacies through consideration of the major behavioural functions of a hydrological system: overall water balance, vertical water redistribution in the unsaturated zone, temporal water redistribution, and spatial water redistribution over the catchment's groundwater and surface-water systems. Three types of information are utilized to improve the model's hydrology: (a) observations, (b) information about expected response from regionalized data, and (c) information from an independent physics-based model. The study considers the JULES (Joint UK Land Environmental Simulator) LSM applied to a deep-groundwater chalk catchment in the UK. The diagnosed hydrological limitations and the proposed ways to address them are indicative of the challenges faced while transitioning to a global high resolution model of the water cycle.

Evaluation of key parameters controlling phenology-induced variability of surface fluxes in land surface models

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan De Pue ◽  
José Miguel Barrios ◽  
Liyang Liu ◽  
Philippe Ciais ◽  
Alirio Arboleda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Land Surface ◽  
Gross Primary Production ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Plant Phenology ◽  
Surface Fluxes ◽  
Terrestrial Vegetation ◽  
Land Surface Models ◽  
Area Index ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Surface Models

<p>Over the past decades, land surface models have evolved into advanced tools which comprise detailed process descriptions and interactions at a broad range of scales. One of the challenges in these models is the accurate simulation of plant phenology. It is a key element at the nexus of the simulated hydrological and carbon cycle, where the leaf area index (LAI) plays a major role in flux partitioning, water balance and gross primary production.<br>In this study, three well-established models are used to simulate the intrinsically coupled fluxes of water, energy and carbon from terrestrial vegetation. ORCHIDEE, ISBA-CC and the LSA-SAF algorithm each have a different approach to represent plant phenology. Whereas ISBA-CC has a fairly simple biomass allocation scheme to represent the phenological cycle, ORCHIDEE relies on a dedicated phenology module, and LSA-SAF is driven by remote-sensed forcing variables, such as LAI. Simulations were performed for a wide range of hydro-climatic biomes and plant functional types at field scale. The simulated fluxes were validated using eddy-covariance measurements, and the simulated phenology was compared to remote-sensed observations.<br>These models are tools to extrapolate leaf-level processes to global scale climate predictions. The origin of the parameters controlling phenology-induced variability in these models ranges from plant-scale lab experiments to global-scale calibration. The aim of this study is to investigate the key parameters controlling phenology-induced variability in these models.</p>

scholarly journals Imprint of Climate Change on Pan-Arctic Marine Vegetation

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorte Krause-Jensen ◽  
Philippe Archambault ◽  
Jorge Assis ◽  
Inka Bartsch ◽  
Kai Bischof ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Time Series ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Open Water ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Distribution Area ◽  
Arctic Ecosystems ◽  
Migration Rates ◽  
Lack Of Information ◽  
Distribution Limits ◽  
And Storage

The Arctic climate is changing rapidly. The warming and resultant longer open water periods suggest a potential for expansion of marine vegetation along the vast Arctic coastline. We compiled and reviewed the scattered time series on Arctic marine vegetation and explored trends for macroalgae and eelgrass (Zostera marina). We identified a total of 38 sites, distributed between Arctic coastal regions in Alaska, Canada, Greenland, Iceland, Norway/Svalbard, and Russia, having time series extending into the 21st Century. The majority of these exhibited increase in abundance, productivity or species richness, and/or expansion of geographical distribution limits, several time series showed no significant trend. Only four time series displayed a negative trend, largely due to urchin grazing or increased turbidity. Overall, the observations support with medium confidence (i.e., 5–8 in 10 chance of being correct, adopting the IPCC confidence scale) the prediction that macrophytes are expanding in the Arctic. Species distribution modeling was challenged by limited observations and lack of information on substrate, but suggested a current (2000–2017) potential pan-Arctic macroalgal distribution area of 820.000 km2 (145.000 km2 intertidal, 675.000 km2 subtidal), representing an increase of about 30% for subtidal- and 6% for intertidal macroalgae since 1940–1950, and associated polar migration rates averaging 18–23 km decade–1. Adjusting the potential macroalgal distribution area by the fraction of shores represented by cliffs halves the estimate (412,634 km2). Warming and reduced sea ice cover along the Arctic coastlines are expected to stimulate further expansion of marine vegetation from boreal latitudes. The changes likely affect the functioning of coastal Arctic ecosystems because of the vegetation’s roles as habitat, and for carbon and nutrient cycling and storage. We encourage a pan-Arctic science- and management agenda to incorporate marine vegetation into a coherent understanding of Arctic changes by quantifying distribution and status beyond the scattered studies now available to develop sustainable management strategies for these important ecosystems.

scholarly journals Multimodel Estimate of the Global Terrestrial Water Balance: Setup and First Results

2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 869-884 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingjerd Haddeland ◽  
Douglas B. Clark ◽  
Wietse Franssen ◽  
Fulco Ludwig ◽  
Frank Voß ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Balance ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Water Model ◽  
Hydrological Models ◽  
Model Intercomparison ◽  
Land Surface Models ◽  
Surface Models ◽  
Terrestrial Water ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Energy Balance Approach

Abstract Six land surface models and five global hydrological models participate in a model intercomparison project [Water Model Intercomparison Project (WaterMIP)], which for the first time compares simulation results of these different classes of models in a consistent way. In this paper, the simulation setup is described and aspects of the multimodel global terrestrial water balance are presented. All models were run at 0.5° spatial resolution for the global land areas for a 15-yr period (1985–99) using a newly developed global meteorological dataset. Simulated global terrestrial evapotranspiration, excluding Greenland and Antarctica, ranges from 415 to 586 mm yr−1 (from 60 000 to 85 000 km3 yr−1), and simulated runoff ranges from 290 to 457 mm yr−1 (from 42 000 to 66 000 km3 yr−1). Both the mean and median runoff fractions for the land surface models are lower than those of the global hydrological models, although the range is wider. Significant simulation differences between land surface and global hydrological models are found to be caused by the snow scheme employed. The physically based energy balance approach used by land surface models generally results in lower snow water equivalent values than the conceptual degree-day approach used by global hydrological models. Some differences in simulated runoff and evapotranspiration are explained by model parameterizations, although the processes included and parameterizations used are not distinct to either land surface models or global hydrological models. The results show that differences between models are a major source of uncertainty. Climate change impact studies thus need to use not only multiple climate models but also some other measure of uncertainty (e.g., multiple impact models).

scholarly journals Identification of catchment functional units by time series of thermal remote sensing images

2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 5345-5359 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Müller ◽  
M. Bernhardt ◽  
K. Schulz
Keyword(s):  
Remote Sensing ◽  
Principal Component Analysis ◽  
Time Series ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Temporal Dynamics ◽  
Principal Component ◽  
Component Analysis ◽  
Land Surface Models ◽  
Surface Models ◽  
Functional Units

Abstract. The identification of catchment functional behavior with regards to water and energy balance is an important step during the parameterization of land surface models. An approach based on time series of thermal infrared (TIR) data from remote sensing is developed and investigated to identify land surface functioning as is represented in the temporal dynamics of land surface temperature (LST). For the mesoscale Attert catchment in midwestern Luxembourg, a time series of 28 TIR images from ASTER (Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer) was extracted and analyzed, applying a novel process chain. First, the application of mathematical–statistical pattern analysis techniques demonstrated a strong degree of pattern persistency in the data. Dominant LST patterns over a period of 12 years were then extracted by a principal component analysis. Component values of the two most dominant components could be related for each land surface pixel to land use data and geology, respectively. The application of a data condensation technique ("binary words") extracting distinct differences in the LST dynamics allowed the separation into landscape units that show similar behavior under radiation-driven conditions. It is further outlined that both information component values from principal component analysis (PCA), as well as the functional units from the binary words classification, will highly improve the conceptualization and parameterization of land surface models and the planning of observational networks within a catchment.

scholarly journals WATCH: Current Knowledge of the Terrestrial Global Water Cycle

2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 1149-1156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Harding ◽  
Martin Best ◽  
Eleanor Blyth ◽  
Stefan Hagemann ◽  
Pavel Kabat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Land Surface ◽  
Water Cycle ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Water Model ◽  
Grand Challenge ◽  
Global Water Cycle ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Surface Models ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Global Water

Abstract Water-related impacts are among the most important consequences of increasing greenhouse gas concentrations. Changes in the global water cycle will also impact the carbon and nutrient cycles and vegetation patterns. There is already some evidence of increasing severity of floods and droughts and increasing water scarcity linked to increasing greenhouse gases. So far, however, the most important impacts on water resources are the direct interventions by humans, such as dams, water extractions, and river channel modifications. The Water and Global Change (WATCH) project is a major international initiative to bring together climate and water scientists to better understand the current and future water cycle. This paper summarizes the underlying motivation for the WATCH project and the major results from a series of papers published or soon to be published in the Journal of Hydrometeorology WATCH special collection. At its core is the Water Model Intercomparison Project (WaterMIP), which brings together a wide range of global hydrological and land surface models run with consistent driving data. It is clear that we still have considerable uncertainties in the future climate drivers and in how the river systems will respond to these changes. There is a grand challenge to the hydrological and climate communities to both reduce these uncertainties and communicate them to a wider society.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document