scholarly journals The impact of planetary waves on the latitudinal displacement of sudden stratospheric warmings

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 1397-1415 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Matthias ◽  
P. Hoffmann ◽  
A. Manson ◽  
C. Meek ◽  
G. Stober ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Wind Band ◽  
Middle Atmosphere ◽  
Stationary Wave ◽  
Planetary Waves ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
Mesospheric Temperature ◽  
Simultaneous Decrease ◽  
Wave Flux ◽  
The Impact

Abstract. The Northern Hemispheric winter is disturbed by large scale variability mainly caused by Planetary Waves (PWs), which interact with the mean flow and thus result in Sudden Stratospheric Warmings (SSWs). The effects of a SSW on the middle atmosphere are an increase of stratospheric and a simultaneous decrease of mesospheric temperature as well as a wind reversal to westward wind from the mesosphere to the stratosphere. In most cases these disturbances are strongest at polar latitudes, get weaker toward the south and vanish at mid-latitudes around 50° to 60° N as for example during the winter 2005/06. However, other events like in 2009, 2010 and 2012 show a similar or even stronger westward wind at mid- than at polar latitudes either in the mesosphere or in the stratosphere during the SSW. This study uses local meteor and MF-radar measurements, global satellite observations from the Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) and assimilated model data from MERRA (Modern-ERA Retrospective analysis for research and Applications). We compare differences in the latitudinal structure of the zonal wind, temperature and PW activity between a "normal" event, where the event in 2006 was chosen representatively, and the latitudinal displaced events in 2009, 2010 and 2012. A continuous westward wind band between the pole and 20° N is observed during the displaced events. Furthermore, distinctive temperature differences at mid-latitudes occur before the displaced warmings compared to 2006 as well as a southward extended stratospheric warming afterwards. These differences between the normal SSW in 2006 and the displaced events in 2009, 2010 and 2012 are linked to an increased PW activity between 30° N and 50° N and the changed stationary wave flux in the stratosphere around the displaced events compared to 2006.

 Generation of planetary waves by gravity-wave drag in the middle atmosphere

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hye-Yeong Chun ◽  
Byeong-Gwon Song ◽  
In-Sun Song
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Middle Atmosphere ◽  
Weather Forecasting ◽  
Wave Theory ◽  
Wave Drag ◽  
Planetary Waves ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
Long Time ◽  
The Mean

<p>Large-scale atmospheric circulation has been represented mostly by interaction between the mean flow and planetary waves (PWs). Although the importance of gravity waves (GWs) has been recognized for long time, contribution of GWs to the large-scale circulation is receiving more attention recently, with conjunction to GW drag (GWD) parameterizations for climate and global weather forecasting models that extend to the middle atmosphere. As magnitude of GWD increases with height significantly, circulations in the middle atmosphere are determined largely by interactions among the mean flow, PWs and GWs. Classical wave theory in the middle atmosphere has been represented mostly by the Transformed Eulerian Mean (TEM) equation, which include PW and GW forcing separately to the mean flow. Recently, increasing number of studies revealed that forcing by combined PWs and GWs is the same, regardless of different PW and GW forcings, implying a compensation between PWs and GWs forcing. There are two ways for GWs to influence on PWs: (i) changing the mean flow that either influences on waveguide of PWs or induces baroclinic/brotropic instabilities to generate in situ PWs, and (ii) generating PWs as a source of potential vorticity (PV) equation when asymmetric components of GWD exist. The fist mechanism has been studies extensively recently associated with stratospheric sudden warmings (SSWs) that are involved large amplitude PWs and GWD. The second mechanism represents more directly the relationship between PWs and GWs, which is essential to understand the dynamics in the middle atmosphere completely (among the mean flow, PWs and GWs). In this talk, a recently reported result of the generation of PWs by GWs associated with the strongest vortex split-type SSW event occurred in January 2009 (Song et al. 2020, JAS) is presented focusing on the second mechanism.  </p>

Self-Acceleration in the Parameterization of Orographic Gravity Wave Drag

2010 ◽  
Vol 67 (8) ◽  
pp. 2537-2546 ◽  
Author(s):  
John F. Scinocca ◽  
Bruce R. Sutherland
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Wave ◽  
Middle Atmosphere ◽  
Wave Train ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Wave Theory ◽  
Wave Drag ◽  
Tuning Parameter ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
Propagating Waves ◽  
The Impact

Abstract A new effect related to the evaluation of momentum deposition in conventional parameterizations of orographic gravity wave drag (GWD) is considered. The effect takes the form of an adjustment to the basic-state wind about which steady-state wave solutions are constructed. The adjustment is conservative and follows from wave–mean flow theory associated with wave transience at the leading edge of the wave train, which sets up the steady solution assumed in such parameterizations. This has been referred to as “self-acceleration” and it is shown to induce a systematic lowering of the elevation of momentum deposition, which depends quadratically on the amplitude of the wave. An expression for the leading-order impact of self-acceleration is derived in terms of a reduction of the critical inverse Froude number Fc, which determines the onset of wave breaking for upwardly propagating waves in orographic GWD schemes. In such schemes Fc is a central tuning parameter and typical values are generally smaller than anticipated from conventional wave theory. Here it is suggested that self-acceleration may provide some of the explanation for why such small values of Fc are required. The impact of Fc on present-day climate is illustrated by simulations of the Canadian Middle Atmosphere Model.

scholarly journals The Role of the Divergent Circulation for Large-Scale Eddy Momentum Transport in the Tropics. Part I: Observations

2019 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. 1125-1144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo Zurita-Gotor
Keyword(s):  
Momentum Flux ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Zonal Flow ◽  
Stationary Wave ◽  
Hadley Cell ◽  
Momentum Transport ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
Meridional Transport ◽  
The Tropics

Abstract This work investigates the role played by the divergent circulation for meridional eddy momentum transport in the tropical atmosphere. It is shown that the eddy momentum flux in the deep tropics arises primarily from correlations between the divergent eddy meridional velocity and the rotational eddy zonal velocity. Consistent with previous studies, this transport is dominated by the stationary wave component, associated with correlations between the zonal structure of the Hadley cell (zonal anomalies in the meridional overturning) and the climatological-mean Rossby gyres. This eddy momentum flux decomposition implies a different mechanism of eddy momentum convergence from the extratropics, associated with upper-level mass convergence (divergence) over sectors with anomalous westerlies (easterlies). By itself, this meridional transport would only increase (decrease) isentropic thickness over regions with anomalous westerly (easterly) zonal flow. The actual momentum mixing is due to vertical (cross isentropic) advection, pointing to the key role of diabatic processes for eddy–mean flow interaction in the tropics.

scholarly journals Mutual Interference of Local Gravity Wave Forcings in the Stratosphere

Atmosphere ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1249
Author(s):  
Nadja Samtleben ◽  
Aleš Kuchař ◽  
Petr Šácha ◽  
Petr Pišoft ◽  
Christoph Jacobi
Keyword(s):  
Gravity Wave ◽  
Rocky Mountains ◽  
Middle Atmosphere ◽  
East Asian ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Circulation Model ◽  
Global Circulation Model ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
Destructive Effect ◽  
The Impact

Gravity wave (GW) breaking and associated GW drag is not uniformly distributed among latitudes and longitudes. In particular, regions of enhanced GW breaking, so-called GW hotspots, have been identified, major Northern Hemisphere examples being located above the Rocky Mountains, the Himalayas and the East Asian region. These hotspots influence the middle atmosphere circulation both individually and in combination. Their interference is here examined by performing simulations including (i) the respective single GW hotspots, (ii) two GW hotspots, and (iii) all three GW hotspots with a simplified global circulation model. The combined GW hotspots lead to a modification of the polar vortex in connection with a zonal mean flow decrease and an increase of the temperature at higher latitudes. The different combinations of GW hotspots mainly prevent the stationary planetary wave (SPW) 1 from propagating upward at midlatitudes leading to a decrease in energy and momentum transfer in the middle atmosphere caused by breaking SPW 1, and in turn to an acceleration of the zonal mean flow at lower latitudes. In contrast, the GW hotspot above the Rocky Mountains alone causes an increase in SPW 1 amplitude and Eliassen–Palm flux (EP flux), inducing enhanced negative EP divergence, decelerating the zonal mean flow at higher latitudes. Consequently, none of the combinations of different GW hotspots is comparable to the impact of the Rocky Mountains GW hotspot alone. The reason is that the GW hotspots mostly interfere nonlinearly. Depending on the longitudinal distance between two GW hotspots, the interference between the combined Rocky Mountains and East Asian GW hotspots is more additive than the interference between the combined Rocky Mountains and Himalaya GW hotspots. While the Rocky Mountains and the East Asian GW hotspots are longitudinally displaced by 105°, the Rocky Mountains are shifted by 170° to the Himalayas. Moreover, while the East Asian and the Himalayas are located side by side, the interference between these GW hotspots is the most nonlinear because they are latitudinally displaced by 20°. In general, the SPW activity, e.g., represented in SPW amplitudes, EP flux or Plumb flux, is strongly reduced, when the GW hotspots are interacting with each other. Thus, the interfering GW hotspots mostly have a destructive effect on SPW propagation and generation.

Wave propagation and transport in the middle atmosphere

1980 ◽  
Vol 296 (1418) ◽  
pp. 73-85 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Wave Propagation ◽  
Middle Atmosphere ◽  
Transport Processes ◽  
Planetary Waves ◽  
Wave Radiation ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
Flow Interaction ◽  
Wave Transport ◽  
Equatorial Wave ◽  
The Mean

The dynamics of wave propagation and wave transport are reviewed for vertically propagating, forced, planetary scale waves in the middle atmosphere. Such waves can be divided into two major classes: extratropical planetary waves and equatorial waves. The most important waves of the former class are quasi-stationary Rossby modes of zonal wave numbers 1 and 2 (1 or 2 waves around a latitude circle), which propagate vertically only during the w inter season when the m ean winds are westerly. These modes transport heat and ozone towards the poles, thus maintaining the mean temperature above its radiative equilibrium value in high latitudes and producing the high latitude ozone maximum . It is shown that these wave transport processes depend on wave transience and wave dam ping. The precise form of this dependency is illustrated for transport of a strongly stratified tracer by small amplitude planetary waves. The observed equatorial wave modes are of two types: an eastward propagating Kelvin m ode and a westward propagating mixed Rossby—gravity mode. These modes are therm ally damped in the stratosphere where they interact with the mean flow to produce eastward and westward accelerations, respectively. It is shown tha t in the absence of mechanical dissipation this wave—mean flow interaction is caused by the vertical divergence of a wave ‘radiation stress’. This wave—mean flow interaction process is responsible for producing the well known equatorial quasi-biennial oscillation.

scholarly journals On the impact of swirl on the growth of coherent structures

2014 ◽  
Vol 741 ◽  
pp. 156-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Oberleithner ◽  
C. O. Paschereit ◽  
I. Wygnanski
Keyword(s):  
Stability Analysis ◽  
Coherent Structures ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Vortex Breakdown ◽  
Shear Mode ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
Swirling Jet ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Helical Mode

AbstractSpatial linear stability analysis is applied to the mean flow of a turbulent swirling jet at swirl intensities below the onset of vortex breakdown. The aim of this work is to predict the dominant coherent flow structure, their driving instabilities and how they are affected by swirl. At the nozzle exit, the swirling jet promotes shear instabilities and, less unstable, centrifugal instabilities. The latter stabilize shortly downstream of the nozzle, contributing very little to the formation of coherent structures. The shear mode remains unstable throughout generating coherent structures that scale with the axial shear-layer thickness. The most amplified mode in the nearfield is a co-winding double-helical mode rotating slowly in counter-direction to the swirl. This gives rise to the formation of slowly rotating and stationary large-scale coherent structures, which explains the asymmetries in the mean flows often encountered in swirling jet experiments. The co-winding single-helical mode at high rotation rate dominates the farfield of the swirling jet in replacement of the co- and counter-winding bending modes dominating the non-swirling jet. Moreover, swirl is found to significantly affect the streamwise phase velocity of the helical modes rendering this flow as highly dispersive and insensitive to intermodal interactions, which explains the absence of vortex pairing observed in previous investigations. The stability analysis is validated through hot-wire measurements of the flow excited at a single helical mode and of the flow perturbed by a time- and space-discrete pulse. The experimental results confirm the predicted mode selection and corresponding streamwise growth rates and phase velocities.

scholarly journals Eastward-propagating planetary waves in the polar middle atmosphere

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (23) ◽  
pp. 17495-17512
Author(s):  
Liang Tang ◽  
Sheng-Yang Gu ◽  
Xian-Kang Dou
Keyword(s):  
Middle Atmosphere ◽  
Flow Instability ◽  
Planetary Waves ◽  
Background Wind ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
Zonal Wavenumber ◽  
Critical Layers ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Modern Era ◽  
Research Analysis

Abstract. According to Modern-Era Retrospective Research Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA-2) temperature and wind datasets in 2019, this study presents the global variations in the eastward-propagating wavenumber 1 (E1), 2 (E2), 3 (E3) and 4 (E4) planetary waves (PWs) and their diagnostic results in the polar middle atmosphere. We clearly demonstrate the eastward wave modes exist during winter periods with westward background wind in both hemispheres. The maximum wave amplitudes in the Southern Hemisphere (SH) are slightly larger and lie lower than those in the Northern Hemisphere (NH). Moreover, the wave perturbations peak at lower latitudes with smaller amplitudes as the wavenumber increases. The period of the E1 mode varies between 3–5 d in both hemispheres, while the period of the E2 mode is slightly longer in the NH (∼ 48 h) than in the SH (∼ 40 h). The periods of the E3 are ∼ 30 h in both the SH and the NH, and the period of E4 is ∼ 24 h. Despite the shortening of wave periods with the increase in wavenumber, their mean phase speeds are relatively stable, ∼ 53, ∼ 58, ∼ 55 and ∼ 52 m/s at 70∘ latitudes for E1, E2, E3 and E4, respectively. The eastward PWs occur earlier with increasing zonal wavenumber, which agrees well with the seasonal variations in the critical layers generated by the background wind. Our diagnostic analysis also indicates that the mean flow instability in the upper stratosphere and upper mesosphere might contribute to the amplification of the eastward PWs.

scholarly journals Orographically-Induced Spontaneous Imbalance within the Jet Causing a Large Scale Gravity Wave Event

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Geldenhuys ◽  
Peter Preusse ◽  
Isabell Krisch ◽  
Christoph Zülicke ◽  
Jörn Ungermann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Group Velocity ◽  
Gravity Wave ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Middle Atmosphere ◽  
Large Temperature ◽  
Large Area ◽  
Mountain Waves ◽  
Geostrophic Balance ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Impact

Abstract. To better understand the impact of gravity waves (GWs) on the middle atmosphere in the current and future climate, it is essential to understand their excitation mechanisms and to quantify their basic properties. Here a new process for GW excitation by orography-jet interaction is discussed. In a case study, we identify the source of a GW observed over Greenland on 10 March 2016 during the POLSTRACC (POLar STRAtosphere in a Changing Climate) aircraft campaign. Measurements were taken with the Gimballed Limb Observer for Radiance Imaging of the Atmosphere (GLORIA) instrument deployed on the High Altitude Long Range (HALO) German research aircraft. The measured infrared limb radiances are converted into a 3D observational temperature field through the use of inverse modelling and limited angle tomography. We observe GWs along a transect through Greenland where the GW packet covers ≈ 1/3 of the Greenland mainland. GLORIA observations indicate GWs between 10 and 13 km altitude with a horizontal wavelength of 330 km, a vertical wavelength of 2 km and a large temperature amplitude of 4.5 K. Slanted phase fronts indicate intrinsic propagation against the wind, while the the ground-based propagation is with the wind. The GWs are arrested below a critical layer above the tropospheric jet. Compared to its intrinsic horizontal group velocity (25–72 ms−1) the GW packet has a slow vertical group velocity of 0.05–0.2 ms−1. This causes the GW packet to propagate long distances while spreading over a large area while remaining constrained to a narrow vertical layer. Not only orography is a plausible source, but also out of balanced winds in a jet exit region and wind shear. To identify the GW source, 3D GLORIA observations are combined with a gravity wave raytracer, ERA5 reanalysis, and high-resolution numerical experiments. In a numerical experiment with a smoothed orography, GW activity is quite weak indicating that the GWs in the realistic orography experiment are due to orography. However, analysis shows that these GWs are not mountain waves. A favourable area for spontaneous GW emission is identified in the jet by the cross-stream ageostrophic wind, which indicates when the flow is out of geostrophic balance. Backwards raytracing experiments trace into the jet and regions where the Coriolis and the pressure gradient forces are out of balance. The difference between the full and a smooth-orography experiment is investigated to reveal the missing connection between orography and the out of balance jet. We find that this is flow over a broad area of elevated terrain which causes compression of air above Greenland. The orography modifies the wind flow over large horizontal and vertical scales, resulting in out of balance geostrophic components. The out of balance jet then excites GWs in order to bring the flow back into balance. This is the first observational evidence of GW generation by such an orography-jet mechanism.

scholarly journals Stratospheric sudden warming effects on winds and temperature in the middle atmosphere at middle and low latitudes: a study using WACCM

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 859-874 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Chandran ◽  
R. L. Collins
Keyword(s):  
Climate Model ◽  
Middle Atmosphere ◽  
Planetary Waves ◽  
Lower Latitude ◽  
High Latitudes ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
Low Latitude ◽  
Quasi Biennial Oscillation ◽  
Stratospheric Sudden Warming ◽  
Low Latitudes

Abstract. A stratospheric sudden warming (SSW) is a dynamical phenomenon of the wintertime stratosphere caused by the interaction between planetary Rossby waves propagating from the troposphere and the stratospheric zonal-mean flow. While the effects of SSW events are seen predominantly in high latitudes, they can also produce significant changes in middle and low latitude temperature and winds. In this study we quantify the middle and low latitude effects of SSW events on temperature and zonal-mean winds using a composite of SSW events between 1988 and 2010 simulated with the specified dynamics version of the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model (WACCM). The temperature and wind responses seen in the tropics also extend into the low latitudes in the other hemisphere. There is variability in observed zonal-mean winds and temperature depending on the observing location within the displaced or split polar vortex and propagation direction of the planetary waves. The propagation of planetary waves show that they originate in mid–high latitudes and propagate upward and equatorward into the mid-latitude middle atmosphere where they produce westward forcing reaching peak values of ~ 60–70 m s−1 day−1. These propagation paths in the lower latitude stratosphere appear to depend on the phase of the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO). During the easterly phase of the QBO, waves originating at high latitudes propagate across the equator, while in the westerly phase of the QBO, the planetary waves break at ~ 20–25° N and there is no propagation across the equator. The propagation of planetary waves across the equator during the easterly phase of the QBO reduces the tropical upwelling and poleward flow in the upper stratosphere.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document