Evaluation of high resolution WRF forecasts for Extreme Rainfall Events over Karnataka against high density in-situ observations 

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajay Bankar ◽  
Rakesh Vasudevan
Keyword(s):  
Prediction Models ◽  
Initial Conditions ◽  
Weather Prediction ◽  
Wrf Model ◽  
Extreme Rainfall ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Distinct Advantage ◽  
Extreme Rainfall Events ◽  
Rainfall Events ◽  
Synoptic Conditions

<p><span>Extreme Rainfall Events (EREs) in India has increased many folds in recent decades. These severe weather events are generally destructive in nature causing flash floods, catastrophic loss of life and property over densely populated urban cities. Various cities in Karnataka, a southern state in India, witnessed many EREs recently. Appropriate advanced warning systems to predict these events are crucial for preparedness of mitigation strategy to reduce human casualty and socio economic loss. Mesoscale models are essential tools for developing an integrated platform for disaster warning and management. From a stakeholder/user pint of view, primary requirement to tackle ERE related damages is accurate prediction of the observed rainfall location, coverage and intensity in advance. Weather prediction models have inherent limitations imposed primarily by approximations in the model and inadequacies in data. Hence, it is important to evaluate the skill of these models for many cases under different synoptic conditions to quantify model skill before using them for operational applications. The objective of the study is to evaluate performance of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model for several ERE cases in Karnataka at different model initial conditions. The EREs were identified from the distribution of rainfall events over different regions in Karnataka and those events comes under 1% probability were considered. We examined 38 ERE’s distributed over Karnataka for the period June to November for the years 2015-2019. WRF model is configured with 3 nested domains with outer, inner and innermost domains having resolution of 12 km, 9 km and 3 km respectively. Two sets of simulations are conducted in this study, i) staring at 12 hours prior to the ERE day (i.e. -1200 UTC) & ii) starting at 0000 UTC of the ERE day. Performance of the WRF model forecast is validated against 15 minutes rainfall observations from ~6000 rain gauge stations over Karnataka. During initial hours forecasts initiated at 1200 UTC has distinct advantage in terms of accuracy compared to those initiated at 0000 UTC for most of the cases. In general, model underpredict EREs and underprediction is relatively low for forecasts initiated at 12 00 UTC.</span></p>

scholarly journals Validation of Satellite Rainfall Estimates over Equatorial East Africa

2021 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
East Africa ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Extreme Event ◽  
Weather Prediction ◽  
Extreme Rainfall ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Annual Rainfall ◽  
Extreme Rainfall Events ◽  
Satellite Rainfall ◽  
Rainfall Estimates

Abstract Rain gauge data sparsity over Africa is known to impede the assessments of hydrometeorological risks and of the skill of numerical weather prediction models. Satellite rainfall estimates (SREs) have been used as surrogate fields for a long time and are continuously replaced by more advanced algorithms and new sensors. Using a unique daily rainfall dataset from 36 stations across equatorial East Africa for the period 2001–2018, this study performs a multi-scale evaluation of gauge-calibrated SREs, namely, IMERG, TMPA, CHIRPS and MSWEP (v2.2 and v2.8). Skills were assessed from daily to annual timescales, for extreme daily precipitation, and for TMPA and IMERG near real-time (NRT) products. Results show that: 1) the SREs reproduce the annual rainfall pattern and seasonal rainfall cycle well, despite exhibiting biases of up to 9%; 2) IMERG is the best for shorter temporal scales while MSWEPv2.2 and CHIRPS perform best at the monthly and annual timesteps, respectively; 3) the performance of all the SREs varies spatially, likely due to an inhomogeneous degree of gauge calibration, with the largest variation seen in MSWEPv2.2; 4) all the SREs miss between 79% (IMERG-NRT) and 98% (CHIRPS) of daily extreme rainfall events recorded by the rain gauges; 5) IMERG-NRT is the best regarding extreme event detection and accuracy; and 6) for return values of extreme rainfall, IMERG and MSWEPv2.2 have the least errors while CHIRPS and MSWEPv2.8 cannot be recommended. The study also highlights; improvements of IMERG over TMPA, the decline in performance of MSWEPv2.8 compared to MSWEPv2.2, and the potential of SREs for flood risk assessment over East Africa.

scholarly journals Extreme Rainfall in the Mediterranean: What Can We Learn from Observations?

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 906-922 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Rebora ◽  
L. Molini ◽  
E. Casella ◽  
A. Comellas ◽  
E. Fiori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Extreme Rainfall ◽  
Flash Floods ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Extreme Rainfall Events ◽  
Rainfall Events ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
The Mediterranean ◽  
Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer ◽  
Ground Effects

Abstract Flash floods induced by extreme rainfall events represent one of the most life-threatening phenomena in the Mediterranean. While their catastrophic ground effects are well documented by postevent surveys, the extreme rainfall events that generate them are still difficult to observe properly. Being able to collect observations of such events will help scientists to better understand and model these phenomena. The recent flash floods that hit the Liguria region (Italy) between the end of October and beginning of November 2011 give us the opportunity to use the measurements available from a large number of sensors, both ground based and spaceborne, to characterize these events. In this paper, the authors analyze the role of the key ingredients (e.g., unstable air masses, moist low-level jets, steep orography, and a slow-evolving synoptic pattern) for severe rainfall processes over complex orography. For the two Ligurian events, this role has been analyzed through the available observations (e.g., Meteosat Second Generation, Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer, the Italian Radar Network mosaic, and the Italian rain gauge network observations). The authors then address the possible role of sea–atmosphere interactions and propose a characterization of these events in terms of their predictability.

On the effective resolution of WRF simulations at microscale grid resolution.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro Bolgiani ◽  
Javier Díaz-Fernández ◽  
Lara Quitián-Hernández ◽  
Mariano Sastre ◽  
Daniel Santos-Muñoz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prediction Models ◽  
Weather Prediction ◽  
Wrf Model ◽  
Research Community ◽  
Weather Research And Forecasting ◽  
Large Uncertainty ◽  
Partial Explanation ◽  
Synoptic Conditions ◽  
Large Effort ◽  
Numerical Weather Prediction Models

<p>As the computational capacity has been largely improved in the last decades, the grid configuration of numerical weather prediction models has stepped into microscale resolutions. Even if mesoscale models are not originally designed to reproduce fine scale phenomena, a large effort is being made by the research community to improve and adapt these systems. However, reasonable doubts exist regarding the ability of the models to forecast this type of events, due to the unfit parametrizations and the appearance of instabilities and lack of sensitivity in the variables. Here, the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model effective resolution is evaluated for several situations and grid resolutions. This is achieved by assessing the curve of dissipation for the wind kinetic energy. Results show that the simulated energy spectrum responds to different synoptic conditions. Nevertheless, when the model is forced into microscale grid resolutions the dissipation curves present an unrealistic atmospheric energy. This may be a partial explanation to the aforementioned issues and imposes a large uncertainty to forecasting at these resolutions.</p>

scholarly journals Improving an Extreme Rainfall Detection System with GPM IMERG data

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paola Mazzoglio ◽  
Francesco Laio ◽  
Simone Balbo ◽  
Piero Boccardo ◽  
Franca Disabato
Keyword(s):  
Detection System ◽  
Extreme Rainfall ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Mean Annual Precipitation ◽  
Extreme Rainfall Events ◽  
Rainfall Events ◽  
Time Aggregation ◽  
Spatial Coverage ◽  
Rainfall Detection

Many studies have shown a growing trend in terms of frequency and severity of extreme events. As never before, having tools capable to monitor the amount of rain that reaches the Earth’s surface has become a key point for the identification of areas potentially affected by floods. In order to guarantee an almost global spatial coverage, NASA Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) IMERG products proved to be the most appropriate source of information for precipitation retrievement by satellite. This study is aimed at defining the IMERG accuracy in representing extreme rainfall events for varying time aggregation intervals. This is performed by comparing the IMERG data with the rain gauge ones. The outcomes demonstrate that precipitation satellite data guarantee good results when the rainfall aggregation interval is equal to or greater than 12 h. More specifically, a 24-h aggregation interval ensures a probability of detection (defined as the number of hits divided by the total number of observed events) greater than 80%. The outcomes of this analysis supported the development of the updated version of the ITHACA Extreme Rainfall Detection System (ERDS: erds.ithacaweb.org). This system is now able to provide near real-time alerts about extreme rainfall events using a threshold methodology based on the mean annual precipitation.

scholarly journals Assessment of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model for simulation of extreme rainfall events in the upper Ganga Basin

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 1095-1117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ila Chawla ◽  
Krishna K. Osuri ◽  
Pradeep P. Mujumdar ◽  
Dev Niyogi
Keyword(s):  
Land Surface ◽  
Heavy Rainfall ◽  
Wrf Model ◽  
Extreme Rainfall ◽  
Weather Research And Forecasting ◽  
Grid Spacing ◽  
Ganga Basin ◽  
Extreme Rainfall Events ◽  
Rainfall Events ◽  
Heavy Rainfall Events

Abstract. Reliable estimates of extreme rainfall events are necessary for an accurate prediction of floods. Most of the global rainfall products are available at a coarse resolution, rendering them less desirable for extreme rainfall analysis. Therefore, regional mesoscale models such as the advanced research version of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model are often used to provide rainfall estimates at fine grid spacing. Modelling heavy rainfall events is an enduring challenge, as such events depend on multi-scale interactions, and the model configurations such as grid spacing, physical parameterization and initialization. With this background, the WRF model is implemented in this study to investigate the impact of different processes on extreme rainfall simulation, by considering a representative event that occurred during 15–18 June 2013 over the Ganga Basin in India, which is located at the foothills of the Himalayas. This event is simulated with ensembles involving four different microphysics (MP), two cumulus (CU) parameterizations, two planetary boundary layers (PBLs) and two land surface physics options, as well as different resolutions (grid spacing) within the WRF model. The simulated rainfall is evaluated against the observations from 18 rain gauges and the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission Multi-Satellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA) 3B42RT version 7 data. From the analysis, it should be noted that the choice of MP scheme influences the spatial pattern of rainfall, while the choice of PBL and CU parameterizations influences the magnitude of rainfall in the model simulations. Further, the WRF run with Goddard MP, Mellor–Yamada–Janjic PBL and Betts–Miller–Janjic CU scheme is found to perform best in simulating this heavy rain event. The selected configuration is evaluated for several heavy to extremely heavy rainfall events that occurred across different months of the monsoon season in the region. The model performance improved through incorporation of detailed land surface processes involving prognostic soil moisture evolution in Noah scheme compared to the simple Slab model. To analyse the effect of model grid spacing, two sets of downscaling ratios – (i) 1 : 3, global to regional (G2R) scale and (ii) 1 : 9, global to convection-permitting scale (G2C) – are employed. Results indicate that a higher downscaling ratio (G2C) causes higher variability and consequently large errors in the simulations. Therefore, G2R is adopted as a suitable choice for simulating heavy rainfall event in the present case study. Further, the WRF-simulated rainfall is found to exhibit less bias when compared with the NCEP FiNaL (FNL) reanalysis data.

scholarly journals Ensemble Mean Storm-Scale Performance in the Presence of Nonlinearity

2015 ◽  
Vol 143 (12) ◽  
pp. 5115-5133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Hollan ◽  
Brian C. Ancell
Keyword(s):  
Prediction Models ◽  
Initial Conditions ◽  
Weather Prediction ◽  
Wrf Model ◽  
Forecast Errors ◽  
Ensemble Mean ◽  
Deterministic Solution ◽  
Significant Divergence ◽  
The Mean ◽  
And Control

Abstract The use of ensembles in numerical weather prediction models is becoming an increasingly effective method of forecasting. Many studies have shown that using the mean of an ensemble as a deterministic solution produces the most accurate forecasts. However, the mean will eventually lose its usefulness as a deterministic forecast in the presence of nonlinearity. At synoptic scales, this appears to occur between 12- and 24-h forecast time, and on storm scales it may occur significantly faster due to stronger nonlinearity. When this does occur, the question then becomes the following: Should the mean still be adhered to, or would a different approach produce better results? This paper will investigate the usefulness of the mean within a WRF Model utilizing an ensemble Kalman filter for severe convective events. To determine when the mean becomes unrealistic, the divergence of the mean of the ensemble (“mean”) and a deterministic forecast initialized from a set of mean initial conditions (“control”) are examined. It is found that significant divergence between the mean and control emerges no later than 6 h into a convective event. The mean and control are each compared to observations, with the control being more accurate for nearly all forecasts studied. For the case where the mean provides a better forecast than the control, an approach is offered to identify the member or group of members that is closest to the mean. Such a forecast will contain similar forecast errors as the mean, but unlike the mean, will be on an actual forecast trajectory.

scholarly journals On the Epochal Strengthening in the Relationship between Rainfall of East Africa and IOD

2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (15) ◽  
pp. 5655-5673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Desmond Manatsa ◽  
Swadhin K. Behera
Keyword(s):  
East Africa ◽  
Rainfall Variability ◽  
Spatial Coherence ◽  
Principal Component ◽  
Extreme Rainfall ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Monthly Precipitation ◽  
Extreme Rainfall Events ◽  
Rainfall Events ◽  
Global Precipitation Climatology Centre

Abstract Variability of the equatorial East Africa “short rains” (EASR) has intensified significantly since the turn of the twentieth century. This increase toward more extreme rainfall events has not been gradual but is strongly characterized by epochs. The rain gauge–based Global Precipitation Climatology Centre (GPCC) monthly precipitation dataset for the period 1901–2009 is used to demonstrate that the epochal changes were dictated by shifts in the Indian Ocean dipole (IOD) mode. These shifts occurred during 1961 and 1997. In the pre-1961 period, there was virtually no significant linear link between the IOD and the EASR. But a relatively strong coupling between the two occurred abruptly in 1961 and was generally maintained at that level until 1997, when another sudden shift to even a greater level occurred. The first principal component (PC1) extracted from the EASR spatial domain initially merely explained about 50% of the rainfall variability before 1961, and then catapulted to about 73% for the period from 1961 to 1997, before eventually shifting to exceed 82% after 1997. The PC1 for each successive epoch also displayed loadings with notably improved spatial coherence. This systematic pattern of increase was accompanied by both a sharp increase in the frequency of rainfall extremes and spatial coherence of the rainfall events over the region. Therefore, it is most likely that the 1961 and 1997 IOD shifts are responsible for the epochal modulation of the EASR in both the spatial and temporal domain.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document