scholarly journals MM5 v3.6.1 and WRF v3.5.1 model comparison of standard and surface energy variables in the development of the planetary boundary layer

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 2693-2707 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.-S. M. Wilmot ◽  
B. Rappenglück ◽  
X. Li ◽  
G. Cuchiara
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Surface Energy ◽  
Latent Heat ◽  
Planetary Boundary Layer ◽  
Energy Budget ◽  
Model Comparison ◽  
Mesoscale Model ◽  
Wrf Model ◽  
Coastal Region ◽  
Frontal Passage

Abstract. Air quality forecasting requires atmospheric weather models to generate accurate meteorological conditions, one of which is the development of the planetary boundary layer (PBL). An important contributor to the development of the PBL is the land–air exchange captured in the energy budget as well as turbulence parameters. Standard and surface energy variables were modeled using the fifth-generation Penn State/National Center for Atmospheric Research mesoscale model (MM5), version 3.6.1, and the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, version 3.5.1, and compared to measurements for a southeastern Texas coastal region. The study period was 28 August–1 September 2006. It also included a frontal passage. The results of the study are ambiguous. Although WRF does not perform as well as MM5 in predicting PBL heights, it better simulates energy budget and most of the general variables. Both models overestimate incoming solar radiation, which implies a surplus of energy that could be redistributed in either the partitioning of the surface energy variables or in some other aspect of the meteorological modeling not examined here. The MM5 model consistently had much drier conditions than the WRF model, which could lead to more energy available to other parts of the meteorological system. On the clearest day of the study period, MM5 had increased latent heat flux, which could lead to higher evaporation rates and lower moisture in the model. However, this latent heat disparity between the two models is not visible during any other part of the study. The observed frontal passage affected the performance of most of the variables, including the radiation, flux, and turbulence variables, at times creating dramatic differences in the r2 values.

scholarly journals MM5 v3.6.1 and WRF v3.2.1 model comparison of standard and surface energy variables in the development of the planetary boundary layer

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 2705-2743 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.-S. M. Wilmot ◽  
B. Rappenglück ◽  
X. Li
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Surface Energy ◽  
Latent Heat ◽  
Planetary Boundary Layer ◽  
Energy Budget ◽  
Model Comparison ◽  
Mesoscale Model ◽  
Wrf Model ◽  
Coastal Region ◽  
Frontal Passage

Abstract. Air quality forecasting requires atmospheric weather models to generate accurate meteorological conditions, one of which is the development of the planetary boundary layer (PBL). An important contributor to the development of the PBL is the land-air exchange captured in the energy budget as well as turbulence parameters. Standard and surface energy variables were modeled using the fifth-generation Penn State/National Center for Atmospheric Research mesoscale model (MM5), version 3.6.1, and the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, version 3.2.1, and compared to measurements for a southeastern Texas coastal region. The study period was 28 August–1 September 2006. It also included a frontal passage. The results of the study are ambiguous. Although WRF does not perform as well as MM5 in predicting PBL heights, it better simulates most of the general and energy budget variables. Both models overestimate incoming solar radiation, which implies a surplus of energy that could be redistributed in either the partitioning of the surface energy variables or in some other aspect of the meteorological modeling not examined here. The MM5 model consistently had much drier conditions than the WRF model, which could lead to more energy available to other parts of the meteorological system. On the clearest day of the study period MM5 had increased latent heat flux, which could lead to higher evaporation rates and lower moisture in the model. However, this latent heat disparity between the two models is not visible during any other part of the study. The observed frontal passage affected the performance of most of the variables, including the radiation, flux, and turbulence variables, at times creating dramatic differences in the r2 values.

scholarly journals Different effects of latent heat in planetary boundary layer and cloud microphysical processes on Typhoon Sarika (2016)

Geofizika ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiangnan Li ◽  
Youlong Chen ◽  
Wenshi Lin ◽  
Fangzhou Li ◽  
Chenghui Ding
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Latent Heat ◽  
Planetary Boundary Layer ◽  
Wrf Model ◽  
Critical Factor ◽  
Cloud Microphysics ◽  
Mature Stage ◽  
Microphysical Process ◽  
Cloud Microphysical Processes ◽  
Microphysical Processes

Three simulation experiments were conducted on Typhoon (TC) “Sarika” (2016) using the WRF model, different effects of the latent heat in planetary boundary layer and cloud microphysical process on the TC were investigated. The control experiment well simulated the changes in TC track and intensity. The latent heat in planetary boundary layer or cloud microphysics process can affect the TC track and moving speed. Latent heat affects the TC strength by affecting the TC structure. Compared with the CTL experiment, both the NBL experiment and the NMP experiment show weakening in dynamics and thermodynamics characteristics of TC. Without the effect of latent heat, the TC cannot develop upwards and thus weakens in its intensity and reduces in precipitation; this weakening effect appears to be more obvious in the case of closing the latent heat in planetary boundary layer. The latent heat in planetary boundary layer mainly influences the generation and development of TC during the beginning stage, whereas the latent heat in cloud microphysical process is conducive to the strengthen and maintenance of TC in the mature stage. The latent heat energy of the cloud microphysical process in the TC core region is an order of magnitude larger than the surface enthalpy. But the latent heat release of cloud microphysical processes is not the most critical factor for TC enhancement, while the energy transfer of boundary layer processes is more important.

scholarly journals Verification of Convection-Allowing WRF Model Forecasts of the Planetary Boundary Layer Using Sounding Observations

2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 842-862 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael C. Coniglio ◽  
James Correia ◽  
Patrick T. Marsh ◽  
Fanyou Kong
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Planetary Boundary Layer ◽  
Mixed Layer ◽  
Mesoscale Model ◽  
Cloud Model ◽  
Potential Temperature ◽  
Wrf Model ◽  
Thermodynamic Characteristics ◽  
Convective Boundary ◽  
Local Schemes

Abstract This study evaluates forecasts of thermodynamic variables from five convection-allowing configurations of the Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF) with the Advanced Research core (WRF-ARW). The forecasts vary only in their planetary boundary layer (PBL) scheme, including three “local” schemes [Mellor–Yamada–Janjić (MYJ), quasi-normal scale elimination (QNSE), and Mellor–Yamada–Nakanishi–Niino (MYNN)] and two schemes that include “nonlocal” mixing [the asymmetric cloud model version 2 (ACM2) and the Yonei University (YSU) scheme]. The forecasts are compared to springtime radiosonde observations upstream from deep convection to gain a better understanding of the thermodynamic characteristics of these PBL schemes in this regime. The morning PBLs are all too cool and dry despite having little bias in PBL depth (except for YSU). In the evening, the local schemes produce shallower PBLs that are often too shallow and too moist compared to nonlocal schemes. However, MYNN is nearly unbiased in PBL depth, moisture, and potential temperature, which is comparable to the background North American Mesoscale model (NAM) forecasts. This result gives confidence in the use of the MYNN scheme in convection-allowing configurations of WRF-ARW to alleviate the typical cool, moist bias of the MYJ scheme in convective boundary layers upstream from convection. The morning cool and dry biases lead to an underprediction of mixed-layer CAPE (MLCAPE) and an overprediction of mixed-layer convective inhibition (MLCIN) at that time in all schemes. MLCAPE and MLCIN forecasts improve in the evening, with MYJ, QNSE, and MYNN having small mean errors, but ACM2 and YSU having a somewhat low bias. Strong observed capping inversions tend to be associated with an underprediction of MLCIN in the evening, as the model profiles are too smooth. MLCAPE tends to be overpredicted (underpredicted) by MYJ and QNSE (MYNN, ACM2, and YSU) when the observed MLCAPE is relatively small (large).

scholarly journals Estimating Daytime Planetary Boundary Layer Heights over a Valley from Rawinsonde Observations at a Nearby Airport: An Application to the Page Valley in Virginia, United States

2016 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 791-809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Temple R. Lee ◽  
Stephan F. J. De Wekker
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Planetary Boundary Layer ◽  
Weather Forecasting ◽  
Wrf Model ◽  
Heat Fluxes ◽  
Weather Research And Forecasting ◽  
Dispersion Modeling ◽  
Blue Ridge Mountains ◽  
Terrain Following ◽  
Regional Reanalysis

AbstractThe planetary boundary layer (PBL) height is an essential parameter required for many applications, including weather forecasting and dispersion modeling for air quality. Estimates of PBL height are not easily available and often come from twice-daily rawinsonde observations at airports, typically at 0000 and 1200 UTC. Questions often arise regarding the applicability of PBL heights retrieved from these twice-daily observations to surrounding locations. Obtaining this information requires knowledge of the spatial variability of PBL heights. This knowledge is particularly limited in regions with mountainous terrain. The goal of this study is to develop a method for estimating daytime PBL heights in the Page Valley, located in the Blue Ridge Mountains of Virginia. The approach includes using 1) rawinsonde observations from the nearest sounding station [Dulles Airport (IAD)], which is located 90 km northeast of the Page Valley, 2) North American Regional Reanalysis (NARR) output, and 3) simulations with the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model. When selecting days on which PBL heights from NARR compare well to PBL heights determined from the IAD soundings, it is found that PBL heights are higher (on the order of 200–400 m) over the Page Valley than at IAD and that these differences are typically larger in summer than in winter. WRF simulations indicate that larger sensible heat fluxes and terrain-following characteristics of PBL height both contribute to PBL heights being higher over the Page Valley than at IAD.

scholarly journals An investigation of ozone and planetary boundary layer dynamics over the complex topography of Grenoble combining measurements and modeling

2003 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 797-825 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Couach ◽  
I Balin ◽  
R. Jiménez ◽  
P. Ristori ◽  
S. Perego ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Planetary Boundary Layer ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Mesoscale Model ◽  
Ozone Production ◽  
Horizontal Wind ◽  
Maximum Height ◽  
Complex Topography ◽  
Atmospheric Measurements ◽  
Model Calculations

Abstract. This paper concerns an evaluation of ozone (O3) and planetary boundary layer (PBL) dynamics over the complex topography of the Grenoble region through a combination of measurements and mesoscale model (METPHOMOD) predictions for three days, during July 1999. The measurements of O3 and PBL structure were obtained with a Differential Absorption Lidar (DIAL) system, situated 20 km south of Grenoble at Vif (310 m a.s.l.). The combined lidar observations and model calculations are in good agreement with atmospheric measurements obtained with an instrumented aircraft (METAIR). Ozone fluxes were calculated using lidar measurements of ozone vertical profiles concentrations and the horizontal wind speeds measured with a Radar Doppler wind profiler (DEGREANE). The ozone flux patterns indicate that the diurnal cycle of ozone production is controlled by local thermal winds. The convective PBL maximum height was some 2700 m above the land surface while the nighttime residual ozone layer was generally found between 1200 and 2200 m. Finally we evaluate the magnitude of the ozone processes at different altitudes in order to estimate the photochemical ozone production due to the primary pollutants emissions of Grenoble city and the regional network of automobile traffic.

scholarly journals WRF Model Experiments on the Antarctic Atmosphere in Winter

2011 ◽  
Vol 139 (4) ◽  
pp. 1279-1291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esa-Matti Tastula ◽  
Timo Vihma
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Surface Layer ◽  
Wind Speed ◽  
Surface Pressure ◽  
Mesoscale Model ◽  
Wrf Model ◽  
Radiative Transfer Model ◽  
Transfer Model ◽  
Temperature Bias ◽  
Radiation Parameterizations

Abstract The standard and polar versions 3.1.1 of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model, both initialized by the 40-yr ECMWF Re-Analysis (ERA-40), were run in Antarctica for July 1998. Four different boundary layer–surface layer–radiation scheme combinations were used in the standard WRF. The model results were validated against observations of the 2-m temperature, surface pressure, and 10-m wind speed at 9 coastal and 2 inland stations. The best choice for boundary layer and radiation parameterizations of the standard WRF turned out to be the Yonsei University boundary layer scheme in conjunction with the fifth-generation Pennsylvania State University–National Center for Atmospheric Research Mesoscale Model (MM5) surface layer scheme and the Rapid Radiative Transfer Model for longwave radiation. The respective temperature bias was on the order of 3°C less than the biases obtained with the other combinations. Increasing the minimum value for eddy diffusivity did, however, improve the performance of the asymmetric convective scheme by 0.8°C. Averaged over the 11 stations, the error growths in 24-h forecasts were almost identical for the standard and Polar WRF, but in 9-day forecasts Polar WRF gave a smaller 2-m temperature bias. For the Vostok station, however, the standard WRF gave a less positively biased 24-h temperature forecast. On average, the polar version gave the least biased surface pressure simulation. The wind speed simulation was characterized by low correlation values, especially under weak winds and for stations surrounded by complex topography.

Sensitivity of MM5 and WRF mesoscale model predictions of surface winds in a typhoon to planetary boundary layer parameterizations

2009 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Hye Kwun ◽  
You-Keun Kim ◽  
Jang-Won Seo ◽  
Ju Hee Jeong ◽  
Sung Hyup You
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Planetary Boundary Layer ◽  
Mesoscale Model ◽  
Surface Winds ◽  
Model Predictions
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document