scholarly journals AMINO ACID PROFILE AND IN VITRO PROTEIN DIGESTIBILITY-CORRECTED AMINO ACID SCORE (PDCAAS) OF READY-TO-EAT BREAKFAST CEREALS: AN ASSESSMENT OF PROTEIN QUALITY

2021 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 203-210
Author(s):  
Mustafa Yaman ◽  
Hafsa Sena Sargın ◽  
Ömer Faruk Mızrak ◽  
Halime Uğur ◽  
Jale Çatak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acid ◽  
Protein Quality ◽  
Amino Acid Content ◽  
Protein Digestibility ◽  
In Vitro Protein Digestibility ◽  
Breakfast Cereal ◽  
Breakfast Cereals ◽  
Amino Acid Score ◽  
Vitro Protein

The aim of this study was to determine the amino acid content and in vitro protein digestibility of breakfast cereals and evaluate their protein quality using in vitro protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score (PDCAAS) methods. Statistically big differences were found in the proportions of essential amino acids between breakfast cereals. Higher protein digestibility was found in samples containing rice and corn than those containing oats. The first limiting amino acid score (AAS) in 6 out of 12 samples was methionine + cysteine, in 4 out of 12 samples was lysine, and in 2 out of 12 samples was tryptophan. According to the first limiting AAS, the in vitro PDCAAS ranged from 0.19±0.01 to 0.86±0.02 in breakfast cereals. When we evaluated the first limiting AAS, lysine, methionine+cysteine and tryptophan predominantly determined PDCAAS. As a result, the PDCAAS, which is an indicator of protein quality, was generally low in breakfast cereal products.

scholarly journals A Rat Study to Evaluate the Protein Quality of Three Green Microalgal Species and the Impact of Mechanical Cell Wall Disruption

Foods ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 1531
Author(s):  
Yanwen Wang ◽  
Sean M. Tibbetts ◽  
Fabrice Berrue ◽  
Patrick J. McGinn ◽  
Scott P. MacQuarrie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Wall ◽  
Amino Acid ◽  
Protein Quality ◽  
Protein Digestibility ◽  
In Vitro Protein Digestibility ◽  
Cell Wall Disruption ◽  
Amino Acid Score ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Vitro Protein

The present study was conducted to evaluate the protein quality of microalgae species Chlorella vulgaris (CV), Chlorella sorokiniana (CS), and Acutodesmus obliquus (AO) and assess the impact of mechanical cell wall disruption. Male Sprague–Dawley rats, around 156 g after adaptation, were placed in metabolic cages and fed experimental diets that were either protein-free or contained 10% protein solely from one of the undisrupted or disrupted CV, CS, and AO. After 3 days, feces were collected for a period of 5 days and analyzed together with diet samples for crude protein contents. Apparent protein digestibility, true protein digestibility, amino acid score, and protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score were calculated. In vitro protein digestibility was measured using the pepsin–pancreatin method and the in vitro protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score was calculated. The crude protein contents of CV, CS, and AO were 53.5, 50.2, and 40.3%, respectively. The amino acid score of the first limiting amino acid was 1.10, 1.27, and 0.86, true protein digestibility was 64.7, 59.3, and 37.9% and protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score was 0.63, 0.64, and 0.29, respectively, for CV, CS, and AO. Mechanical cell disruption significantly improved protein digestibility without a substantial impact on the amino acid profile and score, resulting in the increase of protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score to 0.77, 0.81, and 0.46, respectively, for disrupted CV, CS, and AO. There was a strong correlation between in vitro protein digestibility and apparent protein digestibility (r = 0.986), and also between in vitro protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score and in vivo protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score (r = 0.994). The results suggest that the CV and CS are acceptable sources of protein for humans and animals and quality can be markedly improved by mechanical cell wall disruption. Additionally, in vitro protein digestibility measured using the pepsin–pancreatin method may be used to screen protein product candidates, save animals, reduce cost, and accelerate product development.

scholarly journals Effect of Blanching Treatments against Protein Content and Amino Acid Drumstick Leaves (Moringa oleifera)

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Titi Mutiara Kirana ◽  
Harijono Harijono ◽  
Teti Estiasih ◽  
Endang Sriwahyuni
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acids ◽  
Amino Acid ◽  
Sodium Bicarbonate ◽  
Moringa Oleifera ◽  
Amino Acid Content ◽  
Protein Digestibility ◽  
Lysine Content ◽  
In Vitro Protein Digestibility ◽  
Vitro Protein

Three blanching methods, namely boiling, steaming, and boiling+sodium bicarbonate, were used to evaluate amino acids contens and score of Moringa leaves under different blanching. Results showed that blanching had a great effect on amino acids and scores of Moringa leaves and their digestibility increased. Different methods of blanching had variable effects on Moringa leaves’ amino acids and digestibility<ins datetime="2012-12-12T14:13" cite="mailto:printer"> </ins>significantly (p&lt;=0.05). Steam blanching Moringa leaves had the highest amino acid content by 31.49%. Results also revealed that under different blanching Moringa leaves at levels of leucine of steam and boil+sodium bicarbonate samples, lysine content of boil and steam blanching are higher than those of<ins datetime="2012-12-12T14:17" cite="mailto:printer"> </ins>FAO/WHO requirement pattern. The in vitro protein digestibility under study ranged from 49.6 to 52.3%.

Effect of barrel temperature and feed moisture on protein quality in pre-cooked Kabuli chickpea, sorghum, and maize flours

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 265-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuyang Wang ◽  
Matthew G Nosworthy ◽  
James D House ◽  
Shannon-Hood Niefer ◽  
Michael T Nickerson
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acid ◽  
Protein Quality ◽  
Protein Digestibility ◽  
Amino Acid Profile ◽  
Extrusion Temperature ◽  
In Vitro Protein Digestibility ◽  
Feed Moisture ◽  
Vitro Protein

The effect of barrel temperature (120 and 150 ℃, held constant in zones 4–6) and feed moisture (20 and 24%) on the protein quality of Kabuli chickpea, sorghum, and maize flours were examined, which included amino acid profile, in vitro protein digestibility and in vitro protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score (IV-PDCAAS). It was found that the limiting amino acid of chickpea changed from threonine to valine after extrusion, whereas both sorghum and maize were limiting in lysine before and after extrusion. The in vitro protein digestibility increased from 77 to 81% for chickpea and 73 to 76% for maize; values for sorghum remained at 74% after extrusion. However, the IV-PDCAAS for the extruded flours generally remained at the same level, 69% for chickpea, 22% for sorghum, and ∼35% for maize. The effect of extrusion temperature, moisture and their interaction was significant on protein quality of sorghum and maize, but in the case of chickpea, only the extrusion temperature was significant. Only chickpea extruded at 150 ℃ (regardless of the moisture) met the protein quality (PDCAAS > 70%) requirement to be used in food assistance products.

Amino Acid Content and In Vitro Protein Quality of Different Corn Varieties

1985 ◽  
pp. 421-437
Author(s):  
Samy Fangus Sharobeem ◽  
Radomir Lásztity ◽  
Máté Hidvégi ◽  
András Salgó ◽  
Livia Simon-Sarkadi
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acid ◽  
Acid Content ◽  
Protein Quality ◽  
Amino Acid Content ◽  
Vitro Protein

scholarly journals Amino Acid Profile/Score and In-vitro Protein Digestibility of Biscuits Produced from Wheat Flour, African Breadfruit Flour and Moringa Seed Flour Blends

2020 ◽  
pp. 34-42
Author(s):  
V. C. Wabali ◽  
S. Y. Giami ◽  
D. B. Kiin- Kabari ◽  
O. M. Akusu
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acid ◽  
Wheat Flour ◽  
Protein Digestibility ◽  
Amino Acid Profile ◽  
In Vitro Protein Digestibility ◽  
Seed Flour ◽  
African Breadfruit ◽  
Profile Score ◽  
Vitro Protein

The objective of this work was to evaluate the Amino Acid profile/score and In-vitro protein digestibility of composite biscuits produced from blends of Wheat flour (WHF), African breadfruit flour (ABF)and Moringa seed flour(MSF) at the following ratios (Sample A: WHF 100%: ABF 0; MSF 0, B= WHF 77.5%:ABF 20%: MSF 2.5%, C=WHF 75%: ABF 20%: MSF 5.0%, D= WHF 72.5%: ABF 20%: MSF 7.5%. E = WHF 70%: ABF 20%: MSF 10%, F = WHF 90%: ABF 0: MSF 10%, G = WHF 80%: ABF 20%: MSF 0). The most predominant Amino Acid in ABF was glutamic (12.27 g/100 g) followed by Aspartic and lysine, with values of 8.96 g/100 g and 6.55 g/100 g, respectively. Glutamic Acid content of the biscuits ranged from 10.96 g/100 g – 12.96 g/100 g, with sample B giving significantly higher value. Substitution with MSF resulted in decreasing glutamic acid content levels in the formulated biscuits, while lysine, phenylalanine and Isoleucine improved with the addition of 10% Moringa seed flour. Amino acid Scores of the biscuits using Hen egg as standard showed that whole egg had a higher amino acid score except glycine (1.04 – 1.25). Percentage In-vitro protein digestibility ranged from 10.64% - 47.33%, showing that addition of moringa seed flour and African breadfruit flour improved digestibility values from 10.64% to 47.33% for sample E with the control sample (wheat flour biscuit) being significantly lower. Substitution with ABF and MSF improved protein digestibility of the produced biscuits. Also, the Amino acid scores of the formulated biscuits were higher than the FAO recommended daily dietary requirements for Amino acids.

scholarly journals The Protein Digestibility-Corrected Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS)—A Concept for Describing Protein Quality in Foods and Food Ingredients: A Critical Review

2005 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
pp. 988-994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gertjan Schaafsma
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acid ◽  
Essential Amino Acid ◽  
Protein Quality ◽  
Amino Acid Content ◽  
Biological Response ◽  
Protein Digestibility ◽  
Antinutritional Factors ◽  
Food Ingredients ◽  
Routine Assay

Abstract Protein Digestibility-Corrected Amino Score (PDCAAS) is discussed. PDCAAS is now widely used as a routine assay for protein quality evaluation, replacing the more traditional biological methods [e.g., measurement of the Protein Efficiency Ratio (PER) in rats]. PDCAAS is based on comparison of the essential amino acid content of a test protein with that of a reference essential amino acid pattern and a correction for differences in protein digestibility as determined using a rat assay. Although PDCAAS is a rapid and useful method, it often shows discrepancies when compared to PER values. These discrepancies relate to the following issues: uncertainty about the validity of reference patterns, invalidity of correction for fecal (versus ileal) digestibility, truncation of PDCAAS values to 100%, failure to obtain full biological response after supplementation of the limiting essential amino acid, discrepancies between protein and amino acid digestibility, effects of processing on protein quality, and effects of the presence of antinutritional factors in the matrix containing the protein. Part of the discrepancy between PDCAAS and PER can be overcome by modifications of PDCAAS. This article describes some proposed modifications and puts forward the suggestion that the rat protein fecal digestibility assay be replaced by an in vitro ileal amino acid digestibility assay based on a computer-controlled gastrointestinal model.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document