scholarly journals Risk Factors for the Severity of Complications in Minimally Invasive Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: a Retrospective Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chul Kyu Roh ◽  
Soomin Lee ◽  
Sang-Yong Son ◽  
Hoon Hur ◽  
Sang-Uk Han
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Total Gastrectomy ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort

scholarly journals Retrospective cohort study of an enhanced recovery programme in oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery

2015 ◽  
Vol 97 (7) ◽  
pp. 502-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
PAC Gatenby ◽  
C Shaw ◽  
C Hine ◽  
S Scholtes ◽  
M Koutra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Total Gastrectomy ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Cancer Surgery ◽  
Gastric Cancer Surgery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery Programme

Introduction Enhanced recovery programmes have been established in some areas of elective surgery. This study applied enhanced recovery principles to elective oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery. Methods An enhanced recovery programme for patients undergoing open oesophagogastrectomy, total and subtotal gastrectomy for oesophageal and gastric malignancy was designed. A retrospective cohort study compared length of stay on the critical care unit (CCU), total length of inpatient stay, rates of complications and in-hospital mortality prior to (35 patients) and following (27 patients) implementation. Results In the cohort study, the median total length of stay was reduced by 3 days following oesophagogastrectomy and total gastrectomy. The median length of stay on the CCU remained the same for all patients. The rates of complications and mortality were the same. Conclusions The standardised protocol reduced the median overall length of stay but did not reduce CCU stay. Enhanced recovery principles can be applied to patients undergoing major oesophagogastrectomy and total gastrectomy as long as they have minimal or reversible co-morbidity.

An Analysis of Dental Implants Survival and Success

2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (9) ◽  
pp. 2465-2466
Author(s):  
Iustin Olariu ◽  
Roxana Radu ◽  
Teodora Olariu ◽  
Andrada Christine Serafim ◽  
Ramona Amina Popovici ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Medical History ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Health Related

Osseointegration of a dental implant may encounter a variety of problems caused by various factors, as prior health-related problems, patients� habits and the technique of the implant inserting. Retrospective cohort study of 70 patients who received implants between January 2011- April 2016 in one dental unit, with Kaplan-Meier method to calculate the probability of implants�s survival at 60 months. The analysis included demographic data, age, gender, medical history, behavior risk factors, type and location of the implant. For this cohort the implants�survival for the first 6 months was 92.86% compared to the number of patients and 97.56% compared to the number of total implants performed, with a cumulative failure rate of 2.43% after 60 months. Failures were focused exclusively on posterior mandible implants, on the percentage of 6.17%, odds ratio (OR) for these failures being 16.76 (P = 0.05) compared with other localisations of implants, exclusively in men with median age of 42 years.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document