Comparison of NSAIDS Versus NSAIDS Plus Duloxetine in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 2865-2868
Author(s):  
Muhammad Muddasser Khan Panezai ◽  
Shahzad Gul ◽  
Zia Ehsan Kakar ◽  
Uzma Rasheed ◽  
Shazia Zammurad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Knee Pain ◽  
Womac Score ◽  
P Value ◽  
Reduction Of Pain ◽  
Group A ◽  
Keywords Chronic Pain ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Study Setting

Objective: To compare the efficacy of Duloxetine with NSAIDS versus NSAIDS alone for the treatment of knee pain secondary to osteoarthritis. Study Design: Randomized clinical trial study. Setting and Duration: Department of Rheumatology, PIMS Hospital, Islamabad, from April to August 2021. Methodology: One hundred and twenty eight patients with knee osteoarthritis were included in the study and were divided in two equal groups; one group was subjected to Duloxetine plus NSAIDs and other to just NSAIDs. The response was assessed at end of 3 months. Reduction in pain more than or equal to 50% from the baseline was considered as efficacy. Results: The mean VAS score was 3.56±1.15 in group A (Duloexetine plus NSAIDS) A while in group B (NSAID alone), 4.45±1.22 and significantly (p-value > 0.05). Similarly, the comparison of WOMAC score for pain showed that the mean WOMAC score was significantly (P-value > 0.05) less 5.68±1.56 in group A in contrast to 6.39 ± 1.69 in group B. Comparison of efficacy between two groups showed that the rate of efficacy was significantly (P-value >0.05) higher in group A 48.4% as compared to 31.3% in group B. Conclusion: Addition of Duloxetine to NSAIDs resulted in more reduction of pain in terms of VAS and WOMAC score with acceptable adverse effects. Keywords: Chronic pain, Duloxetine, Knee pain, NSAIDs, Osteoarthritis

scholarly journals Is Nasogastric Tube essential in abdominal surgeries? Randomized controlled trail.

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 1397-1400
Author(s):  
Muhammad Bilal ◽  
Viqar Aslam ◽  
Zaheeruddin ◽  
Waqas Jan
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Nasogastric Tube ◽  
P Value ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Group A ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trail ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Study Setting ◽  
Tube Study

Objective: Objective was to compare mean hospital stay in patients with abdominal surgeries with and without Nasogastric tube. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trail study. Setting: DHQ Charsadda. Period: Jan to Nov 2018. Material & Methods: One hundred and thirty two patients who underwent abdominal surgeries according to a preset inclusion criteria were in this study. These Patients were randomly assigned using sealed opaque envelopes containing computer‐generated random numbers into with and without NG tube. Mean hospital stay was noted in both groups. Student ‘t’ test was used to compare the mean hospital stay of both groups. Results: Mean age of patients in group A was 28.50 ± 9.28 years and for group B was 30.12+_9.09 years. Mean hospital stay for group A was 5.64+_2.32days and for group B was 8.73+_3.43 days with a p-value of < 0.000. Conclusion: Patient with nasogastric tube stay longer in hospital than without tube.

scholarly journals INTRAVENOUS REGIONAL ANESTHESIA (BIERS BLOCK);

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (05) ◽  
pp. 710-714
Author(s):  
Muhammad ASGHER ◽  
ASIM GHAURI ◽  
MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH ◽  
Tariq Abassi
Keyword(s):  
Regional Anaesthesia ◽  
Military Hospital ◽  
P Value ◽  
Complete Evaluation ◽  
Intravenous Regional Anesthesia ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Intravenous Regional Anaesthesia

Objective: To compare the analgesic effects of combination of 0.5% Lidocaine plus Ketorolac in intravenous regionalanaesthesia technique with those of Lidocaine (0.5%) alone to prevent post operative pain after intravenous regional anaesthesia (Biersblock). Study design: Randomized Control Trial. Place and duration of study: The study was carried out at Department of Anaesthesiology,Intensive Care and pain management, Combined Military hospital, Rawalpindi from July 2008 to February 2009. Patients and Methods: Thestudy was conducted after complete evaluation of risk / benefit ratio to the patients. On the basis of random number method the patients weredivided into two equal groups (group A and group B). The number of patients in each group was 75. Group A was assigned Lidocaine in a dose of200mg 40ml of 0.5% solution and group B was assigned injection Ketorolac 30mg added to Lidocaine in a dose of 200mg 40ml of 0.5% solution.The patients were kept in post anaesthesia care unit for two hours and pain intensity was measured by visual analogue scale(VAS) on 15,30minutes,1hour, 1.5 and at 2 hours after the cuff deflation. The analgesic efficacy recorded on the basis of visual analog scale of two groups, wascompared using student’s t - test. p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: In group A 33 males and 42 femaleswere enrolled for the study while in group B there were 38 males and 37 females. The mean age of the patients in group A was 34.31 ± 6.03years while in group B was 32.99 ± 6.08 years. Patients were also classified according to ASA classification in which 87 patients were classifiedas ASA – I and 63 patients as ASA – II. Group B which received Ketorolac in addition to Lidocaine for Bier’s block had low visual analogue scoresas compared to group A which received only Lidocaine for Bier’s block. P values obtained after the comparison of the mean VAS of two groupsat 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 1.5 hours and 2 hours were all less than 0.05 (0.002 for 15 minutes, 0.004 for 30 minutes, 0.001 for 1 hour,0.004 for 1.5 hours and 0.001 for 2 hours). Conclusions: Ketorolac improves the postoperative analgesia markedly when used with Lidocainein intravenous regional anaesthesia.

Comparison of letrozole and clomiphene citrate efficacy in terms of ovulation induction and pregnancy rate.

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (05) ◽  
pp. 749-754
Author(s):  
Nadia Sharif ◽  
Uzma Manzoor ◽  
Saadia Bano ◽  
Uzma Shahzaad
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Ovulation Induction ◽  
Endometrial Thickness ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Clomiphene Citrate ◽  
Epidemiological Data ◽  
P Value ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Objective: To compare the efficacy of Letrozole and clomiphene citrate in Patients of Anovulation polycystic ovarian syndrome with Infertility. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial Setting: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Independent Medical College Faisalabad. Period: 30-09-2019 to 29-6-2020. Material & Methods: This study included 100 patients with 50 patients in each group. Group A received 2.5 to 5mg letrozole in each cycle from day 3 to 7. Group B received clomiphene citrate 50 to 100 mg incremental dose depending on ovarian response. Both Drugs were given for consecutive 3 to 6 cycles to see response. Main outcome Measure included optimal follicle size (> 18mm), endometrial thickness, and pregnancy rate. Epidemiological data and efficacy outcome measures were recorded on a Performa. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 13. Chi-square test applied and p-value <o.o5 was considered significant. Both group included primary infertility patients. Results: The mean age of patients was 28.03+ 3.02 years. Mean age of group A patients was 29.04+3.44 and 28.47+3.90 group B patients. Mono ovulation in group A patients (88.9%) and 27 in group b patients (60.0%). The mean endometrial thickness was 9.6mm + 1.6 in letrozole group and 6.9mm + 1.2 in clomiphene citrate group A. In group A 18% got pregnant from Letrozole group and 1.1% from the group B. Conclusion: Efficacy was significantly higher in group A Patients received letrozole as compared to patients echo received clomiphene citrate. The effects of Letrozole showed better outcome in terms of Ovulation Induction Endometrial Thickness and Pregnancy rate.

Comparison of harmonic scalpel versus Milligan Morgan technique in haemorrhoidectomy patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ahmad ◽  
Syed Tatheer Abbas ◽  
Amna Javaid ◽  
Naveed Arshad ◽  
Falak Shair
Keyword(s):  
Wound Healing ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Harmonic Scalpel ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
P Value ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Complete Wound Healing ◽  
Group B

Objectives: To assess the comparison of harmonic scalpel versus Milligan Morgan technique in patients undergoing haemorrhoidectomy. Methodology: This randomized controlled trial study was conducted at General Hospital, Lahore, from March 2019 to September 2019. Informed consent was obtained from eligible 60 patients. Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. In group-A, haemorrhoidectomy was conducted according to the harmonic scalpel method. In group-B, open haemorrhoidectomy was performed by the Milligan Morgan procedure. Data was assembled through a designed questionnaire and investigated via SPSS version 25. Data were stratified for descriptive statistics, level of haemorrhoids and period of haemorrhoids. Post-stratification, independent sample t-test was used. Results: Mean age of both groups patients were 44.6±7.6 and 43.8±8.2 years, respectively. In group-A, mean operative time was 20.8±2.8 minutes, while 26.5±2.8 minutes in group-B, which was statistically significant with p-value of 0.001. In group-A, mean convalescence period was 9.7±2.9 days, while 13.4±3.7 days in group-B, which was statistically significant with p-value of 0.001. The mean convalescence period with harmonic scalpel method was 7.4 days (range 5–14, SD 3.6) versus 18.6 days (range 7–30, SD 5.4) with Milligan Morgan technique (P?0.001). This research observed that harmonic scalpel method required almost six weeks for complete wound healing, whereas in  Milligan Morgan technique, complete wound healing was achieved after three months (P<0.05). Conclusion: Harmonic scalpel haemorrhoidectomy found an advantageous method when assessing the operative time and convalescence period. Hence, Harmonic scalpel haemorrhoidectomy can be adapted as a safe and effective alternative method for treating symptomatic haemorrhoids. Continuous...

scholarly journals P129 Adolescent knee pain and risk of knee osteoarthritis 50 years later

Rheumatology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A Clynes ◽  
Faidra Laskou ◽  
Mark H Edwards ◽  
Cyrus Cooper ◽  
Angela Taylor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Knee Pain ◽  
Meniscal Tear ◽  
Later Life ◽  
Self Report ◽  
P Value ◽  
Knee Oa ◽  
American College Of Rheumatology ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background Adolescent knee pain is a common complaint which may be due to patellar dislocation, meniscal tear, Osgood-Schlatter’s disease or patellofemoral maltracking. We studied the association of such pain with knee osteoarthritis (OA) 50 years later using a retrospective cohort design. Methods This study was based in the Hertfordshire Cohort Study, a cohort of men and women born in 1931 - 9. Participants completed a questionnaire detailing recall of adolescent knee pain, self-reported OA, demographics, lifestyle and The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC). Clinical OA was defined based on the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria and assessed at a clinical visit where knee radiographs were also taken and graded according to the methods of Kellgren and Lawrence. Results Completed data were available for 135 men and 139 women. The mean age was 78.8 (SD 2.6) years and the mean (SD) BMI was 26.3 (4.0). Two percent of men (n = 3) and 5% of women (n = 7) reported adolescent knee pain, of which 2 men and 3 women sought medical advice for their knee pain. 1 man and 2 women reported that their pain had been constant since teenage years while 2 men and 4 women reported that it was intermittent in nature. A report of adolescent knee pain was associated with an increased risk of clinical (odds ratio (OR) 5.45, p-value 0.015, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.39 - 21.36); radiological (OR 2.33, p-value 0.228, 95% CI 0.60 - 9.24) and self-report (OR 2.71, p-value 0.134, 95% CI 0.74 - 10.0) of knee OA in later life. After adjustments for age, sex and BMI, adolescent knee pain was associated with an increased risk of clinical (OR 4.80, p-value 0.047, 95% CI 1.02 - 22.53); radiological (OR 1.85, p-value 0.404, 95% CI 0.44 - 7.78); self-report (OR 3.23, p-value 0.10, 95% CI 0.80 - 12.94) although relationships were only significant for clinical knee OA. Conclusion Recalled adolescent knee pain was associated with a clinical diagnosis of knee OA in later life. The lack of association with self-report of OA suggests that this is not simply a consequence of recall bias and exploration in other data sets is now indicated. Disclosures M.A. Clynes: None. F. Laskou: None. M.H. Edwards: None. C. Cooper: None. A. Taylor: None. M. Stokes: None. E.M. Dennison: None.

scholarly journals COMPARISON OF TRIGGER POINT PRESSURE RELEASE WITH ULTRASOUND THERAPY TO DECREASE RHOMBOIDS TRIGGER POINTS PAIN

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 32-36
Author(s):  
Azam Mahmood ◽  
Saad Saleem ◽  
Muhammad Usman Khan
Keyword(s):  
Pain Score ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Trigger Point ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
P Value ◽  
Ultrasound Therapy ◽  
Pressure Release ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

OBJECTIVE To compare the effects of trigger point (TrP) pressure release with ultrasound therapy to reduce rhomboid pain due to TrP. STUDY DESIGN Experimental study STUDY SETTINGS Outpatient department of Ziauddin Hospital, Clifton campus, Karachi, Pakistan. SAMPLE SIZE 50 patients SAMPLING TECHNIQUE Simple random sampling. The patients were divided into two groups of 25. Group A were given TrP pressure release treatment with exercise and group B were given ultrasound (u/s) treatment with exercise. OUTCOME MEASURES The outcome measures were visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and functional rating index (FRI) for functional performance RESULTS In group A, mean pain score on VAS before the treatment were 5.88±1.130 and after treatment were 1.80±1.041 with a p-value of <0.006. Group B, mean pain score on VAS before treatment were 6.56±1.446, after treatment were 2.72±1.208, with a p-value of <0.006. The mean FRI in group A before treatment was 39.92 ± 2.691 and after treatment was 29.60 ± 5.454, with a p-value of 0.002. The mean FRI in Group B before treatment was 41.12 ± 2.505 and after treatment was 35.92 ± 4.183, with a p-value of 0.002.

scholarly journals GESTATIONAL DIABETES

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. 1298-1303
Author(s):  
Tayyaba Majeed ◽  
Rabia Adnan ◽  
Irum Mubshar ◽  
Hamis Mahmood ◽  
Kanwal Saba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oral Route ◽  
Outcome Study ◽  
Neonatal Hypoglycemia ◽  
Consecutive Sampling ◽  
Pregnant Females ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Group B ◽  
Study Setting

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of Metformin with insulin in gestationaldiabetes mellitus in terms of fetomaternal outcome. Study Deign: Randomized clinicaltrial study. Setting: Lady Aitchison Hospital Lahore. Period: January 2014 to March 2015.Methodology: Total 500 pregnant females with GDM were included in the study through nonprobability,consecutive sampling. Patients were divided into 2 equal groups (A: B). Patientsin group A were given tablet metformin 500 mg by oral route and group B was administratedregular injection Insulin by subcutaneous route. Results: The mean age of females was32.14±6.13 years. The mean gestational age was 31.07±3.8 weeks. There were 78 (15.6%)females who had 0 parity, 107 (21.4%) females had parity 1, 175 (35%) females had parity2, 95 (19%) females had parity 3, 33 (6.6%) females had parity 4 and 12 (2.4%) femaleshad parity 5.There were 54 (10.8%) cases had PTB, out of which 12 (4.8%) had PTB withmetformin while 42 (16.8%) had PTB with insulin. There were 115 (23%) neonates requiredNICU admission, out of which 37 (14.8%) neonates with metforminand78 (31.2%) neonateswith insulin. There were 87 (17%) neonates who had neonatal hypoglycemia, out of which23 (9.2%) neonates with metformin and64 (25.6%) neonates with insulin. The difference wassignificant between both groups for all fetal outcomes (P<0.05). Conclusion: The metforminis more effective in preventing adverse fetal and maternal outcome as compared to insulin.

scholarly journals Comparison of septoplasty with and without packing and splints.

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (04) ◽  
pp. 459-463
Author(s):  
Amrat Kumar ◽  
Ashok Kumar ◽  
Shabir Mehar ◽  
Dileep Kumar ◽  
Muhammad Wasi Ullah Khan
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Nasal Packing ◽  
Treatment Results ◽  
New Techniques ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Group A ◽  
Vas Scores ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Study Setting

Objective: During septoplasty, nasal packing is routinely used by surgeons for hemostasis and balancing the cartilage and bony skeleton of the nose. However, these new techniques are not totally mild and therefore new ways are adopted to check their efficiency and reason their value. The study was performed to compare the use of plastic intranasal splints with or without anterior nasal packing to determine the need of nasal packing after septoplasty. Study Design: Comparative Study. Setting: ISRA University Hyderabad. Period: March 2018 to April 2019. Material & Methods: A total of 50 patients presenting with nasal septum in this period were prospectively examined. For the purpose of comparative study, we divided the patients into two groups: Group A –Patients who underwent septoplasty with packing and Group-B –Patients who underwent septoplasty without packing. We recorded the pain felt using Visual analogue scale before and after the surgery and also noted the Mean Age gender wise and recorded treatment results for statistical analysis using SPSS Version-20. Results: In our data, a total fifty (50) patients comprising 28 Males (68%) and 22 Females (32%) were listed in the study. The mean± standard deviation VAS scores of Group-A was at 5.2 ±0.9 and Group-B is 2.9±0.61 showing less pain in Group B-without splints and packing. However the complication rate in patients without Splints and packing was only 18%. Conclusion: Thus we find septoplasty without nasal splints and packing is more effective and cause lesser bleeding and pain to patients.

scholarly journals LOWER URETERIC STONES EXPULSION;

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (09) ◽  
pp. 1331-1335
Author(s):  
Khalid Hussain ◽  
Maria Tarique ◽  
Attiq ur Rehman Khan ◽  
Asim Bukhari ◽  
Bilal Akhter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Oral Treatment ◽  
P Value ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Group A ◽  
Insignificant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Trial Setting

Objectives: To compare Tamsulosin versus ESWL for lower ureteric stonesexpulsion. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Outpatient Department ofUrology at Services Hospital, Lahore. Period: January 2015 to December 2015. Material& Methods: Total 50 patients were enrolled in study. Patients were divided into 2 groups.In group A, 25 patients received daily oral treatment of 0.4mg Tamsulosin for 28 days, andin group B, 25 patients were treated with ESWL. A stone-free condition, was defined as thecomplete absence of any stone based on plain abdominal X-rays observed and during followupvisits at the time of treatment of stone was noted. Results: The mean age of the patientswere recorded as 33.20±9.23 years. There were 40(80%) males and 10(20%) females with maleto female ratio of 4:1. Out of 50 patients, 16(32%) presented with hematuria, 3(6%) had feverwhile 31(62%) appeared with no complication status. Out of 50 patients, 21(42%) presentedwith expulsion time 08-14 days in which 14(28%) were from tamsulosin group and 07(14%)were from ESWL group, similarly 19(38%) patients appeared with expulsion time of 15-28 daysin which 10(20%) were from tamsulosin group and 09(18%) were from ESWL group. Statisticallythere is insignificant difference between the groups i.e. p-value=0.28 Ns. Conclusion: Thisstudy suggests that the tamsulosin helps in the earlier clearance of stone fragments andreduces the complications as compared to ESWL.

scholarly journals Comparison Of Diacerein-Ginger With Diacerein Alone In Treating Knee Osteoarthritis

2019 ◽  
Vol 09 (04) ◽  
pp. 308-311
Author(s):  
Mehtab Munir ◽  
Shahid Mustafa Memon ◽  
Sajid Abbas Jaffri ◽  
Khalid Mustafa Memon
Keyword(s):  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
P Value ◽  
Womac Pain ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Knee Oa ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Insignificant Difference ◽  
Group B ◽  
Pain At Rest

Objective: To compare clinical efficacy of diacerein-ginger with diacerein alone in treating knee osteoarthritis. Duration and place of study: It was a randomized clinical trial conducted from 21st September 2018 to 31stMarch 2019, in medical OPD of a private hospital in Karachi. Methodology: 60 diagnosed patients of knee osteoarthritis were included in this study. Male and female patients 50 years of age, fulfilling the inclusion criteria and after written informed consent experienced a wash-out period of 72 hours. These patients were systematically randomized into 2 groups each having 30 members. Group A received capsule Diacerein 50mg + capsule Ginger 550 mg twice daily and group B received capsule Diacerein 50mg twice daily, for 12 weeks. Parameters checked at 0, 6 and 12 weeks were: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) index, pain at rest and movement (Visual Analogue Scale). Comparison of the two groups was done by independent t-test. Results: Among 60 patients; 20 (33.33 %) were males and 40 (66.66%) were females. 4 patients in group A and 4 in B, dropped out during the study. Comparison of group A with group B in WOMAC and pain (at rest and movement) scores showed insignificant difference at day 0 before prescription of the drugs. However comparison showed highly significant difference (P-value < 0.001) between the two groups in WOMAC, pain at rest and movement scores at the end of 6th and 12th weeks of intervention. Conclusion: Diacerein-Ginger is clinically more efficacious for management of knee OA than Diacerein alone

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document