Clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving everolimus or temsirolimus after sunitinib.

Introduction: There are little data on the clinical activity of temsirolimus (TM) and everolimus (EV) when used as second-line therapy after sunitinib (SU) in patients with metastatic renal cellcarcinoma (mRCC).Methods: Patients with mRCC treated with EV or TM after SU were included in this retrospective analysis. Progression-free survival (PFS), time to sequence failure (TTSF) from the start of SU to disease progression with EV/TM and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and compared across groups using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards models were applied to investigate predictors of TTSF and OS.Results: In total, 89 patients (median age 60.0 years) were included. At baseline 43% were classified as MSKCC good-risk, 43% as intermediate-risk and 14% as poor-risk. Median OS was 36.3 months and median TTSF was 17.2 months. Sixty-five patients received SU-EV and 24 patients SU-TM. Median PFS after the second-line treatment was 4.3 months in the EV group and 3.5 months in the TM group (p = 0.63). Median TTSF was 17.0 and 18.9 months (p = 0.32) and the OS was 35.8 and 38.3 months (p = 0.73) with SU-EV and SU-TM, respectively. The prognostic role of initial MSKCC was confirmed by multivariable analysis (hazard ratio 1.76, 95% confidence interval 1.08-2.85. p = 0.023).Conclusions: This study did not show significant differences in terms of disease control and OS between EV and TM in the second-line setting. EV remains the preferred mTOR inhibitor for the treatment of mRCC patients resistant to prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment.

Download Full-text

Outcomes of patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with pazopanib after progression on other targeted therapies (TT): Updated results.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2013.31.6_suppl.367 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽

pp. 367-367

Author(s):

Marc Ryan Matrana ◽

Cihan Duran ◽

Aditya Shetty ◽

Lianchun Xiao ◽

Bradley J. Atkinson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Proportional Hazards ◽

Kinase Inhibitor ◽

Clear Cell ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Median Number ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards ◽

Clinical Activity ◽

Pancreatic Metastases ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards Models ◽

Treatment Naïve

367 Background: Pazopanib is an multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor shown to prolong progression-free survival (PFS) compared to placebo in treatment-naive and cytokine-refractory mRCC. Outcomes and safety on its use after TT are limited. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed records of consecutive pts with mRCC who were treated with pazopanib between November 2009-November 2011 after having progressive disease (PD) with other TT. Radiographic response was assessed by a blinded radiologist using RECIST v1.1 criteria. PFS and overall survival (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated by fitting univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate the association of PFS with patient co-variates. Results: 112 pts (median age 63 years, 67% male, 83% clear cell) met inclusion criteria. Median number of previous TT was 2 (range 1-5). 85 events (PD or death) occurred. 14 pts (12.5%) had a partial response. Median PFS was 5.7 months (95% CI: 4.3-8.9 months). PFS was significantly associated with male gender (HR=0.55; 95% CI: 0.34-0.87; p=0.011), clear-cell histology (HR=0.42; 95% CI: 0.24-0.74; p=0.0031), number of metastatic sites (HR= 1.26; 95% CI: 1.05-1.52; p=0.0123), pancreatic metastases (HR=0.40; 95% CI: 0.18-0.85;p=0.0185), Karnofsky PS< 80 (HR=2.07; 95% CI: 1.22-3.48; p=0.0062), and elevated LDH (HR=1.63; 95% CI: 1.03-2.573; p=0.035). Median OS was 16.9 months (95% CI: 10.3–21.9). 26% of pts were still receiving pazopanib at the time of analysis. 51% discontinued pazopanib due to PD and 12% died of PD on treatment. 11% discontinued pazopanib due to adverse events (AEs). There were no treatment related deaths. Common AEs included fatigue (43%), increase LFTs (34%), diarrhea (28%), nausea/vomiting (14%), anorexia (14%), hypertension exacerbation (12%), and hypothyroidism (11%). 89% of AEs were grade 1/2. Conclusions: Pazopanib demonstrated meaningful clinical activity in heavily pretreated pts with mRCC following PD with other TT. AEs were mild/moderate and manageable.

Download Full-text

Outcomes of patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with pazopanib after progression on other targeted therapies (TT): A single-institution experience.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.4615 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 4615-4615

Author(s):

Marc Ryan Matrana ◽

Aditya V. Shetty ◽

Bradley J. Atkinson ◽

Lianchun Xiao ◽

Paul G. Corn ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Proportional Hazards ◽

Kinase Inhibitor ◽

Multivariable Analysis ◽

Safety Data ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards ◽

Kaplan Meier ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards Models ◽

Treatment Naïve ◽

Metastatic Sites

4615 Background: Pazopanib is an approved multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor that prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) compared to placebo in treatment-naive and cytokine-refractory mRCC. Outcomes and safety data on its use after TT are limited. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed pts with mRCC who received salvage pazopanib between 11/09-11/11. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival outcomes. PFS was calculated from start of pazopanib until progressive disease (PD) or death. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to evaluate associations of PFS with covariables. Results: 114 consecutive pts met inclusion criteria (median age 62.6 years, 66% males, 83% clear cell). All pts had PD after other TT (median # of prior TT 2, range 1-5; median time on prior TT 23.3 mos). 79% of pts had PD on sunitinib, 39% on sorafenib, 19% on temsirolimus, 59% on everolimus, and 23% on bevacizumab. 25% received prior chemotherapy and 16% received prior cytokines in addition to TT. 87% had prior nephrectomy. 11% had favorable-risk, 68% intermediate-risk, and 21% poor-risk per MSKCC criteria. 85 events (PD or death) occurred. Median OS was 17 mos (95% CI: 10.3-NA). Median PFS was 6.4 mos (95% CI: 4.5-9.5). By multivariable analysis, PFS was associated with male gender (HR=0.433, 95%CI: 0.269-0.696; p=0.0006), # of metastatic sites (HR=1.252; 95%CI: 1.04-1.503; p=0.016), hypertension exacerbation (HR=0.378; CI: 0.175-0.813; p=0.0128) and PS 2+ vs.0-1 (HR=2.067; CI: 1.243-3.437; p=0.0052). 58% discontinued pazopanib due to PD, 12% died of PD on treatment, and 11% discontinued pazopanib due to adverse events (AEs), mostly GI complaints or fatigue. There were no treatment related deaths. Common AEs included: fatigue (44%), diarrhea (29%), nausea/vomiting (15%), anorexia (14%), hypertension exacerbation (11%), hypothyroidism (11%), hand-foot skin reaction (9%), and increase LFTs (4%). 86% of AEs were grade 1/2. Conclusions: In this retrospective study, pazopanib demonstrated efficacy in mRCC following PD with other TT. AEs were mild/moderate and manageable.

Download Full-text

Pharmacogenetic analysis in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts) treated with second-line irinotecan (IR)+/− cetuximab (CB): The EPIC experience

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.4022 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 4022-4022

Author(s):

D. Yang ◽

A. Pohl ◽

W. Zhang ◽

G. Lurje ◽

Y. Ning ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Proportional Hazards ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Rank Test ◽

Second Line ◽

Ca Repeat ◽

Ras Mutation ◽

Mutation Status ◽

Log Rank Test

4022 Background: EPIC, a multinational phase III clinical trial with IR + CB vs IR alone in mCRC pts in the second-line setting after failure of FOLFOX demonstrated a benefit for IR+CB in progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate (RR). We evaluated functional germline polymorphisms involved in the EGFR- (EGF, EGFR), angiogenesis- (VEGF, IL-8, CXCR-2) - and drug- metabolism related genes (UGT1A1, MTHFR) for their potential role as molecular predictors for clinical outcome in pts treated with CB/IR vs. IR alone. Methods: DNA was extracted from all available formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples from the phase III EPIC trial (US sites only). Genotyping was performed using PCR-RFLP assays and 5’ -end [g-33P] ATP’ labeled PCR-protocols. Results: 186 pts were treated either with IR/CB (arm A, 84 pts) or IR (arm B, 102 pts) only. In arm A, 11/84 pts (13%) showed CR or PR, whereas 73/84 (87%) pts had SD or PD. For arm B, 6/102 pts (6%) showed CR or PR, whereas 96/102 pts (94%) had SD or PD. Median PFS in arm A was 3.0 months (95%CI: 2.4- 4.1 months) vs 2.7 months (95%CI: 2.2–2.9 months) in arm B; median overall survival (OS) was 9.3 months (95%CI: 7.1–12.1 months) in arm A vs. 12.3 months (95%CI: 10.4- 17.9 months) in arm B. K-ras mutation status was not significantly associated with PFS or response to CB/IR in the subgroup of 186 patients. We found an EGFR-CA- repeat in intron 1 in arm A to be associated with PFS (p=0.031, log-rank test). In arm B, we found a significant association with RR (p=0.0103, Fisher's exact test) for MTHFR1298. Furthermore, MTHFR 677 (p =0.0048, log-rank test) and MTHFR 1298 (p=0.038, log-rank test) were also found to be associated with OS in arm B. In multivariate analysis, EGFR-CA-repeat was significantly associated with PFS (adjusted p= 0.023). Furthermore, MTHFR 677 and MTHFR 1298 was associated with OS (adjusted p=0.028 and 0.026, respectively, Cox-proportional hazards models), independent from K-ras mutation status, race and number of disease sites. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates the potential predictive value of polymorphisms in the EGFR- and MTHFR- gene in mCRC pts treated with IR+ CB. Further validation in additional clinical trials is necessary. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Biomarker analysis from a phase III trial (GOLD) of dovitinib (Dov) versus sorafenib (Sor) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma after one prior VEGF pathway–targeted therapy and one prior mTOR inhibitor therapy.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2014.32.4_suppl.473 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽

pp. 473-473 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Bernard J. Escudier ◽

Camillo Porta ◽

Matthew Squires ◽

Cezary Szczylik ◽

Christian K. Kollmannsberger ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Proportional Hazards ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Plasma Samples ◽

Plasma Biomarkers ◽

Kaplan Meier ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards Models ◽

Biomarker Analysis ◽

Line Setting

473 Background: In the GOLD trial, Dov did not improve progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) over Sor. An exploratory objective of the study was to investigate plasma and tumor biomarkers to predict outcome. Methods: Plasma samples were obtained longitudinally throughout the study, and biomarkers were assessed by immunoassay. Primary archival tumor samples were assessed by immunohistochemistry. Log-rank tests, stratified by baseline MSKCC risk group, for difference in Kaplan-Meier curves between biomarker category (low/high based on </≥ median baseline values) within treatment arm were performed. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated from Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Plasma samples were available from 561 patients (Dov, n = 281; Sor, n = 280), and tumor samples were available from 341 patients (Dov, n = 181; Sor, n = 160). Baseline plasma biomarker levels were not predictive of Dov or Sor PFS or OS. However, strong prognostic effects, particularly for OS, were observed. High baseline cKIT and low baseline FGF2, HGF, PlGF, sVEGFR1, VEGFA, and VEGFD were associated with better OS for both Dov and Sor (Table). Changes from baseline in a number of plasma biomarkers were observed following treatment with Dov and Sor, consistent with VEGFR/FGFR inhibitory effects. Prognostic effects were also observed for low FGFR2 (PFS) and low FGF2 (OS) expression in archival tumors. Conclusions: Baseline plasma biomarkers are prognostic but not predictive in the third-line setting. Clinical trial information: NCT01223027. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Association between post-treatment (tx) alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) reduction and outcomes in real-world (rw) U.S. patients (pts) with advanced HCC (aHCC).

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.3_suppl.341 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽

pp. 341-341

Author(s):

Xiaoliang Wang ◽

Kelly Magee ◽

Anala Gossai ◽

Christina M. Parrinello ◽

Rebecca A. Miksad ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Risk Factor ◽

Alcohol Use ◽

Proportional Hazards ◽

No Reduction ◽

Kinase Inhibitor ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards ◽

Baseline Serum ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards Models ◽

The Impact

341 Background: A decrease in post-tx AFP may be associated with improved outcomes in clinical trials. However, the impact of AFP reduction after initiation of a first-line (1L) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy on outcomes is unclear among pts with aHCC treated in routine clinical practice. Methods: This analysis utilized data from the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record (EHR)-derived de-identified database and included pts with aHCC with ≥2 visits between 1/1/2011-7/31/2019 who received 1L TKI. Pts with a baseline serum AFP value (closest to 1L initiation within -30 to +7 days) and a post-tx AFP value (closest to 8 weeks after 1L initiation within ±2 weeks) were included. Post-tx AFP reduction was defined as a ≥20% decrease from baseline AFP, and no reduction as a <20% decrease or any increase. Rw overall survival (rwOS) was defined as time from post-tx AFP measurement to death (censored at last EHR activity). Rw progression-free survival (rwPFS) was based on clinician documentation and defined as the first progression event or death after post-tx AFP measurement (censored at last clinic note date). Adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) for reduction vs no reduction (reference) were estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for potential confounders and baseline AFP. Effect modification was assessed by conducting tests for interactions with analyses stratified by HCC risk factors. Results: 441 pts were included in the study. 8% had documented history (hx) of hepatitis B (HBV), 52% hepatitis C (HCV), 47% obesity/diabetes (DM), 42% heavy alcohol use, and 11% no documented risk factor. Median baseline AFP was 210 ng/mL (IQR 237 - 2981) and 150 ng/mL (IQR 17 - 1311) among pts with reduction (N = 150) and no reduction (N = 291). There was a 35% decrease in hazard of death for pts with reduction vs no reduction (median rwOS 10.3 vs 6.7 months; Table). Similarly, a 35% decrease in hazard of rw progression or death was observed for pts with reduction vs no reduction (aHR=0.65; 95% CI: 0.52-0.81; median rwPFS 4.4 vs 2.4 months). Reduction (vs no) was associated with better rwOS among pts with hx of HCV, obesity/DM or alcohol use vs without the respective risk factor, however, no statistically significant interactions were observed (Table). Conclusions: Results show post-tx AFP reduction may be prognostic for rwPFS and rwOS in pts with aHCC treated with 1L TKI. Further research may clarify if prognostic value differs by HCC risk factor profile. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

The Efficacy of Etoposide-Based Therapy in Adult Secondary Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis

Acta Haematologica ◽

10.1159/000514920 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-9

Author(s):

Leonard Naymagon ◽

Douglas Tremblay ◽

John Mascarenhas

Keyword(s):

Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis ◽

Proportional Hazards ◽

Multivariable Analysis ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards ◽

Rank Test ◽

Kaplan Meier ◽

Hazard Ratios ◽

Significant Difference ◽

The Impact

Data supporting the use of etoposide-based therapy in hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) arise largely from pediatric studies. There is a lack of comparable data among adult patients with secondary HLH. We conducted a retrospective study to assess the impact of etoposide-based therapy on outcomes in adult secondary HLH. The primary outcome was overall survival. The log-rank test was used to compare Kaplan-Meier distributions of time-to-event outcomes. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Ninety adults with secondary HLH seen between January 1, 2009, and January 6, 2020, were included. Forty-two patients (47%) received etoposide-based therapy, while 48 (53%) received treatment only for their inciting proinflammatory condition. Thirty-three patients in the etoposide group (72%) and 32 in the no-etoposide group (67%) died during follow-up. Median survival in the etoposide and no-etoposide groups was 1.04 and 1.39 months, respectively. There was no significant difference in survival between the etoposide and no-etoposide groups (log-rank <i>p</i> = 0.4146). On multivariable analysis, there was no association between treatment with etoposide and survival (HR for death with etoposide = 1.067, 95% CI: 0.633–1.799, <i>p</i> = 0.8084). Use of etoposide-based therapy was not associated with improvement in outcomes in this large cohort of adult secondary HLH patients.

Download Full-text

Treatment Outcomes and Relative Dose Intensity of Chemotherapy in Slovene Patients With Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma

10.21203/rs.3.rs-1209902/v1 ◽

2022 ◽

Author(s):

Samo Rozman ◽

Nina Ružić Gorenjec ◽

Barbara Jezeršek Novaković

Keyword(s):

Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽

Proportional Hazards ◽

Stage Iv ◽

Dose Intensity ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards ◽

Relative Dose Intensity ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards Models ◽

Stage Disease ◽

Stage Iv Disease

Abstract This retrospective study was undertaken to investigate the association of relative dose intensity (RDI) with the outcome of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients with advanced stage disease receiving ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) and escalated BEACOPP regimen (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone). A total of 114 HL patients treated between 2004 and 2013 were enrolled for evaluation. RDI calculations were based on a Hryniuk's model. The association of variables with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was analysed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. The median age of patients was 39 years, majority of patients were males and had stage IV disease. Fifty-four patients received ABVD and 60 received BEACOPP chemotherapy with 24 and 4 deaths, respectively. Patients in BEACOPP group were significantly younger with lower Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) in comparison with ABVD group, making the comparison of groups impossible. In ABVD group, RDI was not significantly associated with OS (p=0.590) or PFS (p=0.354) in a multivariate model where age was controlled. The low number of events prevented the analysis in the BEACOPP group. Patients' age was strongly associated with both OS and PFS: all statistically significant predictors for OS and PFS from univariate analyses (chemotherapy regimen, CCI, RDI) lost its effect in multivariate analyses where age was controlled. Based on our observations, we can conclude that RDI is not associated with the OS or PFS after the age is controlled, neither in all patients combined nor in individual chemotherapy groups.

Download Full-text

Efficacy outcomes of nivolumab + cabozantinib versus pembrolizumab + axitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC): Matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC).

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.4578 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 4578-4578

Author(s):

Bradley Alexander McGregor ◽

Daniel M. Geynisman ◽

Mauricio Burotto ◽

Camillo Porta ◽

Cristina Suarez Rodriguez ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Proportional Hazards ◽

Objective Response ◽

Indirect Comparison ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Wald Test ◽

Patient Characteristics ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards ◽

Published Data ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards Models

4578 Background: Nivolumab in combination with cabozantinib (N+C) has demonstrated significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS), compared with sunitinib as a first-line (1L) treatment for aRCC in the phase 3 CheckMate (CM) 9ER trial. As there are no head-to-head trials comparing N+C with pembrolizumab in combination with axitinib (P+A), this study compared the efficacy of N+C with P+A as 1L treatment in aRCC. Methods: An MAIC was conducted using individual patient data on N+C (N = 323) from the CM 9ER trial (median follow-up: 23.5 months) and published data on P+A (N = 432) from the KEYNOTE (KN)-426 trialof P+A (median follow-up: 30.6 months). Individual patients within the CM 9ER trial population were reweighted to match the key patient characteristics published in KN-426 trial, including age, gender, previous nephrectomy, International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk score, and sites of metastasis. After weighting, hazards ratios (HR) of PFS, duration of response (DoR), and OS comparing N+C vs. P+A were estimated using weighted Cox proportional hazards models, and ORR was compared using a weighted Wald test. All comparisons were conducted using the corresponding sunitinib arms as an anchor. Results: After weighting, patient characteristics in the CM 9ER trial were comparable to those in the KN-426 trial. In the weighted population, N+C had a median PFS of 19.3 months (95% CI: 15.2, 22.4) compared to a median PFS of 15.7 months (95% CI: 13.7, 20.6) for P+A. Using sunitinib as an anchor arm, N+C was associated with a 30% reduction in risk of progression or death compared to P+A, (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.53, 0.93; P = 0.015; table). In addition, N+C was associated with numerically, although not statistically, higher improvement in ORR vs sunitinib (difference: 8.4%, 95% CI: -1.7%, 18.4%; P = 0.105) and improved DoR (HR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.47, 1.31; P = 0.359). Similar OS outcomes were observed for N+C and P+A (HR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.67, 1.44; P = 0.940). Conclusions: After adjusting for cross-trial differences, N+C had a more favorable efficacy profile compared to P+A, including statistically significant PFS benefits, numerically improved ORR and DoR, and similar OS.[Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Association of circulating tumor cells (CTC) with survival outcomes in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) in a real-world cohort.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.6_suppl.59 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽

pp. 59-59

Author(s):

Umang Swami ◽

Taylor Ryan McFarland ◽

Benjamin Haaland ◽

Adam Kessel ◽

Roberto Nussenzveig ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Real World ◽

Proportional Hazards ◽

De Novo ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards ◽

Eligibility Criteria ◽

Free Survival ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards Models ◽

Risk Of Progression ◽

The Relationship

59 Background: In mCSPC, baseline CTC counts have been shown to correlate with PSA responses and progression free survival (PFS) in small studies in the context of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) without modern intensification with docetaxel or novel hormonal therapy. Similar correlation of CTC count with PSA responses and PFS was recently reported from an ongoing phase 3 trial in mCSPC setting (SWOG1216) without reporting the association in the context of ADT intensification. Furthermore, none of these studies correlated CTCs with overall survival (OS). Herein we evaluated whether CTCs were associated with outcomes including OS in a real world mCPSC population treated with intensified as well as non-intensified ADT. Methods: Eligibility criteria: new mCSPC receiving ADT with or without intensification and enumeration of baseline CTCs by FDA cleared Cell Search CTC assay. The relationship between CTC counts (categorized as: 0, 1-4, and ≥5/7.5 ml) and both PFS and OS was assessed in the context of Cox proportional hazards models, both unadjusted and adjusted for age, Gleason, PSA at ADT initiation, de novo vs. non-de novo status, and ADT intensification vs. non-intensification therapy. Results: Overall 99 pts were identified. Baseline characteristics are summarized in Table. In unadjusted analyses, CTC counts of ≥5 as compared to 0 were strongly associated with inferior PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 3.38, 95% CI 1.85-6.18; p < 0.001) and OS (HR 4.44 95% CI 1.63-12.10; p = 0.004). In multivariate analyses, CTC counts of ≥5 as compared to 0 continued to be associated with inferior PFS (HR 5.49, 95% CI 2.64-11.43; p < 0.001) and OS (HR 4.00, 95% CI 1.31-12.23; p = 0.015). Within the ADT intensification subgroup also, high CTC counts were associated with poor PFS and OS. For PFS, the univariate HR for CTC ≥5 vs. 0 was 4.87 (95% CI 1.66-14.30; p = 0.004) and multivariate HR for CTC ≥5 vs. 0 was 7.43 (95% CI 1.92-28.82; p = 0.004). For OS, the univariate HR for CTC ≥5 vs. 0 was 15.88 (95% CI 1.93-130.58; p = 0.010) and multivariate HR for CTC ≥5 vs. 0 was 24.86 (95% CI 2.03-304.45; p = 0.012). Conclusions: To best of our knowledge this is the first study to show that high baseline CTC counts are strongly associated with inferior PFS as well as OS in pts with newly diagnosed mCSPC, even in those who received intensified ADT therapy. Identifying these pts at highest risk of progression and death can help with counselling and prognostication in clinics as well as design and enrollment in future clinical trials. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Is more aggressive lymph node assessment associated with improved survival in stage II-III colorectal cancer? Evidence from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) cancer registry

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2007.25.18_suppl.4048 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽

pp. 4048-4048

Author(s):

Y. Yeh ◽

Q. Cai ◽

J. Chao ◽

M. Russell

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Risk Factors ◽

Proportional Hazards ◽

Survival Rates ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards ◽

Stage Ii ◽

Rank Test ◽

Stage Iiia ◽

Nccn Guidelines ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards Models

4048 Background: NCCN guidelines recommend assessment of =12 lymph nodes (LN) to improve accuracy in colorectal cancer (CRC) staging. Previous studies have used various cut-points to assess the relationship between the number of LN sampled and survival. The association between NCCN guideline-compliant nodal sampling and survival is assessed, while controlling for other risk factors. Methods: We selected 145,485 adult patients newly diagnosed with stage II or III from SEER during 1990–2003. Kaplan-Meier curves were compared using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to determine the effect of sampling ≥ 12 LN on survival. Results: Median patient follow-up was 5.7 years. The table shows overall survival rates in CRC patients with < 12 versus =12 LN assessed: After adjusting for age, sex, tumor size and grade, sampling ≥ 12 LN was independently associated with improved survival. For patients with =12 versus <12 LN assessed, survival increased by 13% for stage IIa [HR=0.75; 95%CI 0.72–0.78; p< .001], 16% for stage IIb [HR=0.69; 95%CI 0.67- 0.71; p< .001], 12% for stage IIIb [HR=0.75; 95%CI 0.72–0.77], and 10% for stage IIIc [HR=0.85, 95%CI 0.81–0.89]. The association was not statistically significant for stage IIIa patients. Conclusion: Consistent with previous reports, this analysis found that optimal nodal sampling increased survival across stage II and III, specifically when ≥ 12 LN are sampled and when controlling for other risk factors. Furthermore, the results underscore the need for adhering to the NCCN guidelines. The lack of a statistically significant association in stage IIIa patients may be due to small cohort size. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Download Full-text