scholarly journals Prostate cancer detection by prostate-specific antigen-based screening in Japanese Hiroshima area shows early stage, low-grade, and low rate of cancer-specific death compared with clinical detection

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Teishima ◽  
Satoshi Maruyama ◽  
Hideki Mochizuki ◽  
Kiyotaka Oka ◽  
Kenichiro Ikeda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Lower Grade ◽  
Independent Predictive Factor ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Psa Screening

Introduction: We investigate the effectiveness of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for prostate cancer. We compare the characteristics of 2 sets of patients: (1) those in whom prostate cancer was detected via PSA screening (the PS group) and (2) those in whom prostate cancer was detected at the outpatient office (the non-PS group).Methods: Between 2002 and 2010, prostate cancer was detected in 315 patients by PSA screening. Their age, initial PSA level, pathological findings in biopsy specimens, clinical stage, and prognosis were compared with those of 497 prostate cancer patients diagnosed at the outpatient office of the Department of Urology, Hiroshima University, in the same period.Results: The rates of patients with initial PSA higher than 50 ng/mL, with a Gleason score of 8 or higher, and with clinical stage D were significantly lower in the PS group than those in the non-PS group. The 5-year overall survival and cancer-specific survival in the PS group was 91.3% and 98.2%, respectively; these results were significantly better than those in the non-PS group (86.4%, p = 0.0178, and 94.9%, p = 0.0112, respectively). A Cox hazard analysis showed that PSA screening was an independent predictive factor for cancer-specific survival.Conclusions: Although our study is limited by its retrospective nature and small size, the present data indicate that prostate cancer detected in the PS group showed earlier stage, lower grade, and better prognosis than in the non-PS group.

scholarly journals PSA screening for prostate cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 63 (8) ◽  
pp. 722-725 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcus V. Sadi
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Early Diagnosis ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Psa Screening ◽  
Psa Testing ◽  
Baseline Values

Summary Screening of prostate cancer with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a highly controversial issue. One part of the controversy is due to the confusion between population screening and early diagnosis, another derives from problems related to the quality of existing screening studies, the results of radical curative treatment for low grade tumors and the complications resulting from treatments that affect the patient’s quality of life. Our review aimed to critically analyze the current recommendations for PSA testing, based on new data provided by the re-evaluation of the ongoing studies and the updated USPSTF recommendation statement, and to propose a more rational and selective use of PSA compared with baseline values obtained at an approximate age of 40 to 50 years.

Prostate Cancer: Biology, Incidence, Detection Methods, Treatment Methods, and Vaccines

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 847-854
Author(s):  
Ronald Bartzatt
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Cancer Biology ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Detection Methods ◽  
Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer ◽  
High Risk Prostate Cancer ◽  
Hormone Refractory

Cancer of the prostate are cancers in which most incidences are slow-growing, and in the U.S., a record of 1.2 million new cases of prostate cancer occurred in 2018. The rates of this type of cancer have been increasing in developing nations. The risk factors for prostate cancer include age, family history, and obesity. It is believed that the rate of prostate cancer is correlated with the Western diet. Various advances in methods of radiotherapy have contributed to lowering morbidity. Therapy for hormone- refractory prostate cancer is making progress, for almost all men with metastases will proceed to hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Smoking cigarettes along with the presence of prostate cancer has been shown to cause a higher risk of mortality in prostate cancer. The serious outcome of incontinence and erectile dysfunction result from the cancer treatment of surgery and radiation, particularly for prostate- specific antigen detected cancers that will not cause morbidity or mortality. Families of patients, as well as patients, are profoundly affected following the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Poor communication between spouses during prostate cancer increases the risk for poor adjustment to prostate cancer. The use of serum prostate-specific antigen to screen for prostate cancer has led to a greater detection, in its early stage, of this cancer. Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in American men, accounting for more than 29% of all diagnosed cancers and about 13% of all cancer deaths. A shortened course of hormonal therapy with docetaxel following radical prostatectomy (or radiation therapy) for high-risk prostate cancer has been shown to be both safe and feasible. Patients treated with docetaxel-estramustine had a prostate-specific antigen response decline of at least 50%. Cancer vaccines are an immune-based cancer treatment that may provide the promise of a non-toxic but efficacious therapeutic alternative for cancer patients. Further studies will elucidate improved methods of detection and treatment.

scholarly journals Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Imaging as a Prognostic Tool in Early Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: Correlation with PSA and Clinical Stage

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xingchen Wu ◽  
Petri Reinikainen ◽  
Mika Kapanen ◽  
Tuula Vierikko ◽  
Pertti Ryymin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Early Diagnosis ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Transfer Constant ◽  
Dce Mri ◽  
Dynamic Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Contrast Enhanced

Background and Purpose. Although several methods have been developed to predict the outcome of patients with prostate cancer, early diagnosis of individual patient remains challenging. The aim of the present study was to correlate tumor perfusion parameters derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and clinical prognostic factors and further to explore the diagnostic value of DCE-MRI parameters in early stage prostate cancer. Patients and Methods. Sixty-two newly diagnosed patients with histologically proven prostate adenocarcinoma were enrolled in our prospective study. Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (12 cores, 6 on each lobe) was performed in each patient. Pathology was reviewed and graded according to the Gleason system. DCE-MRI was performed and analyzed using a two-compartmental model; quantitative parameters including volume transfer constant (Ktrans), reflux constant (Kep), and initial area under curve (iAUC) were calculated from the tumors and correlated with prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, and clinical stage. Results. Ktrans (0.11 ± 0.02 min−1 versus 0.16 ± 0.06 min−1; p<0.05), Kep (0.38 ± 0.08 min−1 versus 0.60 ± 0.23 min−1; p<0.01), and iAUC (14.33 ± 2.66 mmoL/L/min versus 17.40 ± 5.97 mmoL/L/min; p<0.05) were all lower in the clinical stage T1c tumors (tumor number, n=11) than that of tumors in clinical stage T2 (n=58). Serum PSA correlated with both tumor Ktrans (r=0.304, p<0.05) and iAUC (r=0.258, p<0.05). Conclusions. Our study has confirmed that DCE-MRI is a promising biomarker that reflects the microcirculation of prostate cancer. DCE-MRI in combination with clinical prognostic factors may provide an effective new tool for the basis of early diagnosis and treatment decisions.

Rise in Prostate-Specific Antigen in Men with Untreated Low-Grade Prostate Cancer Is Slower During Spring-Summer

2006 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 394-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Vieth ◽  
R Choo ◽  
L Deboer ◽  
C Danjoux ◽  
GC Morton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Low Grade

Prostate cancer and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening in Austria

2005 ◽  
Vol 117 (13-14) ◽  
pp. 457-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Vutuc ◽  
Eva S. Schernhammer ◽  
Gerald Haidinger ◽  
Thomas Waldhör
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Psa Screening

Prostate Specific Antigen Detected Prostate Cancer (Clinical Stage T1C): An Interim Analysis

1996 ◽  
Vol 155 (3) ◽  
pp. 821-826 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seth E. Lerner ◽  
Thomas M. Seay ◽  
Michael L. Blute ◽  
Erik J. Bergstralh ◽  
David Barrett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Specific Antigen

A decision analytic model of prostate cancer screening using prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal exam

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5155-5155
Author(s):  
J. H. Hayes ◽  
M. J. Barry ◽  
P. W. Kantoff ◽  
J. E. Stahl
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Life Expectancy ◽  
Prostate Specific Antigen ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Base Case ◽  
Decision Analytic Model ◽  
Digital Rectal Exam ◽  
Psa Screening ◽  
The Impact

5155 Background: PSA-based screening has been widely adopted in the US although a mortality benefit has yet to be demonstrated. The disutility of screening and quality of life of men diagnosed and treated after screening are critical issues in assessing its benefit and harm. The purpose of this model is to estimate the effect of one-time screening for prostate cancer using Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) and DRE (digital rectal exam) on life expectancy (LE) and Quality Adjusted Life Expectancy (QALE) in the context of current diagnostic and treatment practice. Methods: A semi-Markov state transition simulation describes the relevant health states. Two strategies were compared: 1) Screening - single screening PSA and DRE; 2) No Screening - patients diagnosed after developing symptoms. Markov cycle length was 1 year. Transition probabilities and utility weights were developed from review of the literature and expert opinion. Sensitivity analyses were performed on all parameters. A PSA threshold of 4 ng/mL and age 65 were used for the base case. The model was created using TreeAge software. Results: For our base case, a single screening conferred a LE benefit of 0.37 y (15.86 vs 15.49 y) and a QALE benefit of 0.20 QALYs (15.62 vs 15.42 QALYs). Predicted 10 y cancer specific survival for screen-diagnosed men was 95.7% vs SEER 97.7%. The model predicted 9.5% of screened patients would have metastatic disease at diagnosis vs 5% in SEER (4% unknown stage); in unscreened men, this rate was 18/100,000 vs 15/100,000 in SEER. Sensitivity Analyses of Utilities (SA): The single screen model was relatively insensitive to SA of utilities: a 20% single cycle toll on one-time PSA screening disutility was required to eliminate the benefit of screening. The disutility of positive PSA with negative biopsy slightly affected QALE: a toll of 0.25 QALYs decreased QALE from 15.62 to 15.61 QALYs. Conclusions: Our model reveals a modest benefit to one-time screening for prostate cancer. This one-time screening model is relatively insensitive to utility SA; however, the importance of incorporating psychological effects of PSA screening in recurrent screening is to be determined. The impact of serial screening, lead time, PSA threshold, and cost effectiveness on LE and QALE is being analyzed. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document