scholarly journals Initial Canadian experience with robotic simple prostatectomy: Case series and literature review

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Y. Hoy ◽  
Stephan Van Zyl ◽  
Blair A. St. Martin
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Transfusion Rate ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Transfusion Requirements ◽  
Simple Prostatectomy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

Introduction: Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP) has been touted as an alternative to open simple prostatectomy (OSP) to treat large gland benign prostatic hyperplasia. Our study assesses our institution’s experience with RASP and reviews the literature.Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review from January 2011 to November 2013 of all patients undergoing RASP and OSP. Operative and 90-day outcomes, including operation time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay (LOS), transfusion requirements, and complication rates, were assessed.Results: Thirty-two patients were identified: 4 undergoing RASP and 28 undergoing OSP. There was no difference in mean age at surgery (69.3 vs. 75.2 years; p = 0.17), mean Charlson Comorbidity Index (2.5 vs. 3.5; p = 0.19), and mean prostate volume on TRUS (239 vs. 180 mL; p = 0.09) in the robotic and open groups, respectively. There was a significant difference in the mean length of operation, with RASP exceeding OSP (161 vs. 79 min; p = 0.008). The mean intraoperative blood loss was significantly higher in the open group (835.7 vs. 218.8 mL; p = 0.0001). Mean LOS was shorter in the RASP group (2.3 vs. 5.5 days; p = 0.0001). No significant differences were noted in the 90-day transfusion rate (p = 0.13), or overall complication rate at 0% with RASP vs. 57.1% with OSP (p = 0.10).Conclusions: Our data suggest RASP has a shorter LOS and lower intraoperative volume of blood loss, with the disadvantage of a longer operating time, compared to OSP. It is a feasible technique and deserves further investigation and consideration at Canadian centres performing robotic prostatectomies.

scholarly journals Microendoscope-Assisted Decompression Surgery With Resection of Bony Fragment for Treating a Separation of Lumbar Posterior Ring Apophysis in Young Athletes

2020 ◽  
pp. 219256822092929 ◽  
Author(s):  
Motohiro Okada ◽  
Munehito Yoshida ◽  
Akihito Minamide ◽  
Kazunori Nomura ◽  
Kazuhiro Maio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Decompression Surgery ◽  
Return To Sports ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Young Athletes ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Posterior Ring

Study Design: Case series. Objectives: To report the clinical outcomes of the decompression procedure using the microendoscopic discectomy system for the treatment of a separation of lumbar posterior ring apophysis in young active athletes. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 17 cases that underwent the microendoscopic surgery to treat a symptomatic separated lumbar ring apophysis between 2001 and 2014 at our institute or our associated hospital. The cases consisted of 15 males and 2 females, with their ages ranging from 12 to 19 years. The surgeries were performed at total of 18 lumbar levels, including 15 L4/5 and 3 L5/S1 levels. All patients were young athletes. We evaluated the following: (1) the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score for low back pain, (2) recovery rates using Hirabayashi’s method, (3) operating time, (4) intraoperative blood loss, (5) perioperative complications, (6) the status of comeback to sports, and (7) the period taken to return to sports. Results: The JOA score was improved after the surgery in all cases. Recovery rate was 92.0% ± 8.1%. The mean operating time per level was 89.2 ± 33.3 minutes. The mean intraoperative blood loss per level was 95.3 ± 93.1 mL. A pinhole size dural tear occurred in one case as a perioperative complication. All cases returned to sports. The mean period taken to return to sports was 10.9 ± 3.5 weeks. Conclusion: Microendoscopic decompression surgery is useful for treating a separation of lumbar posterior ring apophysis.

Open cystectomy is still alive and well: Outcomes from a single-centre 6-year review

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-245
Author(s):  
Alexios Dosis ◽  
Blessing Dhliwayo ◽  
Patrick Jones ◽  
Iva Kovacevic ◽  
Jonathan Yee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Radical Cystectomy ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Surgery

Objectives: To compare perioperative and oncological outcomes between open and laparoscopic radical cystectomy in a single-centre setting. Materials and methods: This study was a retrospective cohort (level 2b evidence) non-randomised review of 228 radical cystectomies that were performed between January 2010 and February 2016. Primary outcome measures were operative time, complications, blood loss and length of hospital stay. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS v21.0. Quantitative values were compared with Student’s t-test; categorical variables with the chi-square test. Statistical significance was considered a result of an alpha value less than 0.05. A Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was also conducted. Results: Intraoperative blood loss was lower in laparoscopic surgery (855±673 vs. 716±570 mL, P=0.15), which had a significant impact on transfusion rates ( P=0.02). Operative times were lower in open surgery (339±52.9 vs. 353.1±67.1 minutes, P=0.10), while hospital stay was lower in the laparoscopic group (14.2±11.2 vs. 16.0±13.6 days, P=0.28). Five-year survival rates were superior for patients who underwent an open procedure but were not statistically significant ( P=0.10). Conclusion: This is, so far, the largest cohort to compare laparoscopic and open radical cystectomy. The laparoscopic approach can reduce the need for transfusion; however, there was no statistically significant difference in complication rates, duration of surgery, length of hospital stay or intraoperative blood loss, survival and margin positivity. Level of evidence: Not applicable for this multicentre audit.

scholarly journals Conventional Dissection and Bipolar Electrocauterization Methods of Tonsillectomy: A Comparative Study

2022 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-80
Author(s):  
Anshu Sharma ◽  
Shama Bhandari ◽  
Dhundi Raj Paudel
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Postoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Dissection Method

Introduction: Tonsillectomy is frequently performed surgical procedure. There are several different methods with varied advantages and disadvantages. In spite of the different techniques available there is no consensus and definite evidence for best method. The most commonly performed are conventional dissection and bipolar electrocauterization methods. Aims: The aim of the study was to compare time required for the completion of surgery, intraoperative and postoperative blood loss along with post operative pain between conventional dissection and bipolar electrocauterization methods. Methods: This comparative study was conducted from August 2019 to March 2021 in total of 30 patients planned for tonsillectomy in department of Otorhinolaryngology, Nepalgunj Medical College Teaching Hospital.In every patient right side tonsillectomy was done with conventional dissection method and left side tonsillectomy was done with bipolar electrocauterization method. Results: The mean age was 27.2±13.08 years. The mean duration of surgery was 16.53 ± 2.43 min and 11.10 ± 1.93 min in conventional dissection method and bipolar electrocauterization method respectively. The difference was statistically significant. Intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in bipolar electrocauterization method with mean intraoperative blood loss of 19 ±4.62 ml in bipolar electrocauterization group and 81.83 ±36.54 ml in conventional dissection method. The pain intensity was statistically similar in both methods at all-time intervals post operatively. Conclusion: In tonsillectomy, bipolar electrocauterization method has advantage over conventional dissection method in regards to reduced surgical time and intra operative blood loss, without any significant difference in post-operative pain intensity and post-operative hemorrhage.

scholarly journals Laparoendoscopic Two-Site Myomectomy (LETS-M) Using Conventional Laparoscopic Instruments and The Glove-Port Technique

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pei-Chi Wu ◽  
Bor-Ching Sheu ◽  
Kuan-Ju Huang ◽  
Su-Cheng Huang ◽  
Wen-Chun Chang
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Tertiary Referral Center ◽  
Experienced Surgeon ◽  
Minimally Invasive Surgical ◽  
Postoperative Hematoma ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Glove Port

Abstract We aim to evaluate the surgical outcome of laparoendoscopic two-site myomectomy (LETS-M). The medical records of 204 women receiving LETS-M in a tertiary referral center, including 183 surgeries performed by the experienced surgeon and 21 surgeries performed by 3 well-supervised trainees were retrospectively reviewed. The age of the participants was 39.3±6.4 years. The mean diameter of the largest myoma was 8.5±2.2 cm. The mean weight of the myomas was 281.1±183.1 g. The operation time was 97.6±40.2 min, and the intraoperative blood loss was 99.3±115.2 mL. There were 3 (1%) cases of excessive blood loss (more than 500 mL) and 2 (1%) of postoperative hematoma. The only significant difference between the experienced surgeon and trainees was the operation time (92.3±32.2 min vs. 141.2±54 min, p<.001), while the myoma number, myoma diameter, myoma weight, and intraoperative blood loss were not significantly different. The operation time did not differ among different myoma locations. In multivariate analysis, virginity, myoma number, more than 2 large myomas, and myoma size were independent variables for longer operation times. No patient experienced any major complications. The result revealed that LETS-M is a minimally invasive surgical method that is safe, effective, and easy to learn for managing uterine myoma.

scholarly journals Advantages of Tonsillectomy done under Local Anesthesia compared to General Anesthesia in Adults

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sudhir Naik ◽  
Sarika S Naik ◽  
S Ravishankara ◽  
Mohan K Appaji ◽  
MK Goutham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Local Anesthesia ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Limited Resources ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Head Neck

ABSTRACT Background/Objectives Tonsillectomy using local anesthesia (local tonsillectomy) is a safe and effective alternative to general anesthesia in the healthy cooperative teenage or adult patients. Blood loss, morbidity, complications and patient satisfaction were better in some studies with tonsillectomies done under general anesthesia. Design Comparative case series analysis study of two groups of patients who underwent tonsillectomies under local and general anesthesia during the study period of 57 months from March 2007 to December 2011. Materials and methods Overall 1,349 cases of tonsillectomies done for chronic tonsillitis were included under the study. Three hundred and sixty-seven cases operated under general anesthesia and 982 cases operated under local anesthesia were compared. The parameters compared were duration of surgery, blood loss and the mean pain visual analog score. Results Significant difference in duration of surgery, blood loss during surgery and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores were seen in the two groups with local anesthesia scoring over general anesthesia. Conclusion Tonsillectomy under local anesthesia is a good alternate for the procedure under general anesthesia with limited resources and in cooperative adults. How to cite this article Naik SM, Naik SS, Ravishankara S, Appaji MK, Goutham MK, Devi NP, Mushannavar AS. Advantages of Tonsillectomy done under Local Anesthesia compared to General Anesthesia in Adults. Int J Head Neck Surg 2013;4(1):13-18.

Safety of a ‘swing room’ surgery model at a high-volume hip and knee arthroplasty centre

2020 ◽  
Vol 102-B (7_Supple_B) ◽  
pp. 112-115
Author(s):  
Feras J. Waly ◽  
Donald S. Garbuz ◽  
Nelson V. Greidanus ◽  
Clive P. Duncan ◽  
Bassam A. Masri
Keyword(s):  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Quality Care ◽  
Hospital Readmissions ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Chi Squared ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Room Model

Aims The practice of overlapping surgery has been increasing in the delivery of orthopaedic surgery, aiming to provide efficient, high-quality care. However, there are concerns about the safety of this practice. The purpose of this study was to examine the safety and efficacy of a model of partially overlapping surgery that we termed ‘swing room’ in the practice of primary total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was carried out on patients who underwent primary THA and TKA between 2006 and 2017 in two academic centres. Cases were stratified as partially overlapping (swing room), in which the surgeon is in one operating room (OR) while the next patient is being prepared in another, or nonoverlapping surgery. The demographic details of the patients which were collected included operating time, length of stay (LOS), postoperative complications within six weeks of the procedure, unplanned hospital readmissions, and unplanned reoperations. Fisher's exact, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, chi-squared tests, and logistic regression analysis were used for statistical analysis. Results A total of 12,225 cases performed at our institution were included in the study, of which 10,596 (86.6%) were partially overlapping (swing room) and 1,629 (13.3%) were nonoverlapping. There was no significant difference in the mean age, sex, body mass index (BMI), side, and LOS between the two groups. The mean operating time was significantly shorter in the swing room group (58.2 minutes) compared with the nonoverlapping group (62.8 minutes; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the rates of complications, readmission and reoperations (p = 0.801 and p = 0.300, respectively) after adjusting for baseline American Society of Anesthesiologists scores. Conclusion The new ‘swing room’ model yields similar short-term outcomes without an increase in complication rates compared with routine single OR surgery in patients undergoing primary THA or TKA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(7 Supple B):112–115.

scholarly journals Comparison of conservative and radical surgery in the management of placenta previa percreta

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-53
Author(s):  
Burak Sezgin ◽  
Burcu Kasap ◽  
Eda Adeviye Şahin ◽  
Aysun Camuzcuoğlu ◽  
Hakan Camuzcuoğlu
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Radical Surgery ◽  
Placenta Previa ◽  
Transfusion Rate ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Placental Invasion ◽  
Caesarean Hysterectomy ◽  
Hemoglobin Drop ◽  
Type Of Surgery

Objective We aimed to compare the uterine sparing (US) surgery and hysterectomy for placenta previa percreta (PPP) management. Methods Data from PPP patients with anterior invasion who underwent US surgery and caesarean hysterectomy were retrospectively analyzed. The clinical and surgical outcomes of patients with PPP were compared according to the type of surgery. Results The mean intraoperative blood loss was lower in US surgery group than in caesarean hysterectomy group (1227.78±204.80 ml vs 1442.22±125.68 ml; p=0.017). The hemoglobin drop was also significantly lower in the patients with US surgery (1.87±0.68 g/dl vs 2.88±1.04 g/dl; p=0.026). Moreover, the mean total transfusion rate was also significantly lower in the patients with US surgery (1.33±0.87 U vs 2.33±0.71 U; p=0.016). Conclusion Uterine sparing surgery reduces intraoperative blood loss and transfusion rate in PPP patients with anterior placental invasion compared to hysterectomy. The temporary blockage of bilateral uterine and uteroovarian arteries with Satinsky clamps may potentially contribute to the success of US surgery.

441 Intravenous Tranexamic Acid Given at Femoral Fragility Fracture Surgery Reduces Blood Transfusion Requirements Four-Fold

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Powell-Bowns ◽  
R Olley ◽  
C McCann ◽  
J Balfour ◽  
C Brennan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Transfusion ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Tranexamic Acid ◽  
Fragility Fracture ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Postoperative Blood Transfusion ◽  
Transfusion Requirements ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Fracture Surgery

Abstract Introduction Tranexamic acid (TXA) is proven to reduce blood loss in several surgical fields, but its use in femoral fragility fracture (FFF) management is ill defined. This study examined the effect of intraoperative TXA on the rate of postoperative blood transfusion following FFF. Method A prospective non-randomized case-control study of 361 consecutive patients admitted to the study centre with FFFs over a 4-month period was performed. Intravenous TXA 1g was administered intraoperatively at the discretion of the operating team: 178 patients received TXA and 183 did not. Results Patients given TXA required fewer blood transfusions: 15/178 (8.4%) vs controls 58/183 (31.7%), (p &lt; 0.001). Calculated blood loss (mean difference -222ml (-337 to -106, 95%CI), p &lt; 0.001) and percentage drop in Hb (mean difference -4.3% (-6.3 to -2.3, 95%CI), p &lt; 0.001) were significantly lower in the TXA group. The difference in CBL was greatest following intramedullary nail (n = 49: mean difference -394ml, p = 0.030) and DHS (n = 101, mean difference -216ml, p = 0.032). There was no significant difference in complication rates: venous thromboembolism TXA 2/178 vs control 1/182 (p = 0.620); MI/stroke/TIA 2/178 vs 0/182 (p = 0.244) Conclusions Intraoperative intravenous TXA significantly reduced calculated blood loss and blood transfusion requirements following femoral fragility fracture surgery without increasing the rate of complications.

Bivalirudin anticoagulation during cardiac surgery: a single-center experience in 141 patients

Perfusion ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Koster ◽  
S Buz ◽  
T Krabatsch ◽  
R Yeter ◽  
R Hetzer
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Transfusion Rate ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Off Pump ◽  
Single Center Experience ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Procedural Success

The feasibility of bivalirudin for anticoagulation during cardiac surgery has been confirmed in four multicenter clinical trials. Here, we report our single-center experience with bivalirudin anticoagulation in “on-pump” and “off-pump” cardiac surgery in a large number of patients with and without heparin antibodies. Data of patients who underwent cardiac surgery with bivalirudin anticoagulation between 06/2003 and 12/2007 at our institution were reviewed. Assessment included procedural success, blood loss, transfusion requirements, re-exploration rates and drug-related complications during the procedures. There were 141 patients treated with bivalirudin, of whom 40 had heparin antibodies. In 26 patients, “off-pump” coronary artery bypass grafting was performed and the remaining 115 patients had surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The procedural success rate after 7 days and after 30 days was 99.4%. The mean blood loss after “off-pump” surgery was 833 ± 310 ml, with a transfusion rate of 30%. The mean blood loss after “on-pump” surgery was 750 ± 494 ml, with a transfusion rate of 56%. Two patients needed re-exploration due to persistent hemorrhage. Overall transfusion rates were increased in patients with heparin antibodies. The current investigation demonstrates that, in experienced hands, bivalirudin anticoagulation can be performed with excellent procedural success and low complication rates during “on-pump” and “off-pump” cardiac surgery. Recent problems associated with the production of heparin have emphasized the urgent need for an alternative for use beyond the limited indication of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

scholarly journals Open vs. Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Insertion for Thoracolumbar Traumatic A3 and A4 AO Fractures - 18-Months Follow-Up

2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (04) ◽  
pp. 207-212
Author(s):  
Flávio Romero ◽  
Rodolfo Vieira ◽  
Bruno Ancheschi
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Pedicle Screw ◽  
Screw Fixation ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Column Height ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Percutaneous Screw Fixation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

Purpose To compare the efficacy and safety of the percutaneous screw fixation (PSF) and the open pedicle screw fixation (OPSF) on thoracolumbar (TL) fracture. Methods Sixty-four adult patients with TL vertebral fractures who underwent open or percutaneous posterior short-segment transpedicular screw fixation between January of 2013 and September of 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent clinical, radiological and quality of life follow-up for at least 18 months. Results There was no significant difference in age, gender, time between injury and surgery, and preoperative percentage of anterior column height, preoperative sagittal regional Cobb angle, or kyphotic angle of fractured vertebra between these two groups (p > 0.05). There was significantly less intraoperative blood loss in the PSF (87.6 ± 24.6 mL) than in the OPSF group (271.4 ± 142.6 mL) (p < 0.05). The mean surgery time was 62 minutes (range 42–130 minutes) for open and 58 minutes (range 35 to 128 minutes) for percutaneous screw fixation. The surgery time was shorter in the PSF group, but with no statistical significance (p > 0.05). The mean Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores after 18-months were 23.12 ± 8.2 for the PSF and 24.12 ± 9.2 for the OPSF group, without any statistical significance (p > 0.05). Conclusion Both open and percutaneous screw fixations are safe and effective. The percutaneous techniques significantly reduced the intraoperative blood loss compared with the open techniques.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document