Juvenile stand responses and potential outcomes of conifer release efforts on Alberta's spruce–aspen mixedwood sites

2004 ◽  
Vol 80 (5) ◽  
pp. 583-597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas G Pitt ◽  
Milo Mihajlovich ◽  
Leslie M Proudfoot
Keyword(s):  
Growth Model ◽  
Populus Tremuloides ◽  
Picea Glauca ◽  
Stand Structure ◽  
Landscape Management ◽  
Basal Area ◽  
White Spruce ◽  
Trembling Aspen ◽  
Management Objectives ◽  
Boreal Mixedwoods

Twelve Alberta forest regeneration blocks, situated on representative white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) - trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) boreal mixedwood sites, planted to white spruce, and operationally released with glyphosate herbicide, were surveyed in the fall of 2002. Stand structure and composition were quantified and compared for treated and untreated portions of each block. The Mixedwood Growth Model (MGM, Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta) was used to project these stands over a 100-year horizon and to model the outcomes of several additional silvicultural treatments that could be applied to these blocks. A single release treatment provided 17% and 43% gains in planted white spruce height and stem diameter, respectively, an average of five years after treatment. Treatment shifted stands from being deciduous-dominated, with only 12% conifer basal area, to more than 75% conifer basal area, increasing conifer volumes per hectare nearly three-fold, but retaining conifer-deciduous mixture. Model projections suggest that these stands will produce similar total volumes over an 80-year rotation and that conifer release essentially trades deciduous volume for conifer volume, the degree of release dictating the extent to which this trade-off takes place. A single conifer release treatment led to an average simulated mature stand that contains 21% deciduous basal area, likely meeting mixedwood rather than conifer regeneration criteria. Model simulations of additional silvicultural interventions in these stands suggested that a variety of options exist to satisfy a range of stand or landscape management objectives for spruce-aspen mixedwoods, all within a relatively fixed volume production envelope. A clearer understanding of how early stand conditions translate into stand and landscape management objectives seems prerequisite to solving management conflicts on boreal mixedwood sites. Key words: boreal mixedwoods, vegetation management, conifer release, Mixedwood Growth Model, white spruce, trembling aspen

Juvenile response to conifer release alternatives on aspen-white spruce boreal mixedwood sites.Part I: Stand structure and composition

2005 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. 538-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas G Pitt ◽  
F. Wayne Bell
Keyword(s):  
Populus Tremuloides ◽  
Picea Glauca ◽  
Stand Structure ◽  
Foliar Application ◽  
White Spruce ◽  
Fibre Production ◽  
Stem Volume ◽  
Stem Quality ◽  
Commercial Species ◽  
Boreal Mixedwoods

Stand structure and composition for planted white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) and other naturally regenerating commercial species were compared seven years after the testing of five conifer release alternatives on three boreal mixedwood sites. No release resulted in aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) -dominated stands with 89% stocking and the highest basal areas (BAs, 5.1 m2/ha) and stem volume indices (SVIs, 10.7 m3/ha) observed. Release by manual or machine cutting increased planted spruce BA and SVI by 67 and 38%, respectively. However, this treatment also caused significant root and stump suckering of aspen, more than doubling stem densities and increasing stocking by 12% over untreated areas. Although cutting reduced the height of aspen from 6 m (untreated) to 2–3 m, equal to or just taller than planted spruce, it is likely that future growth will result in deciduous-dominated mixedwoods. Broadcast foliar application with Release® herbicide temporarily reduced the size of aspen, without causing the increased regeneration observed following cutting. This produced a more varied stand structure that promoted the stature of planted spruce, doubling dominant spruce stocking, BAs, and SVIs, and leading to a more balanced mixedwood. Broadcast release with Vision® herbicide produced conifer-dominated stands with few deciduous stems; these areas contained the lowest observed BAs (1.7 m2/ha) and SVIs (1.9 m3/ha). Relatively low planting densities (1350 sph), coupled with near complete deciduous removal in these plots, created very open-grown conditions that threaten overall productivity and stem quality of the spruce. The five approaches tested are capable of producing a range of stand conditions found in a healthy boreal mixedwood landscape. Key words: boreal mixedwoods, white spruce, trembling aspen, vegetation management, fibre production

scholarly journals Creating boreal mixedwoods by planting spruce under aspen: successful establishment in uncertain future climates

2016 ◽  
Vol 46 (10) ◽  
pp. 1217-1223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Kabzems ◽  
Philip G. Comeau ◽  
Cosmin N. Filipescu ◽  
Bruce Rogers ◽  
Amanda F. Linnell Nemec
Keyword(s):  
Populus Tremuloides ◽  
Picea Glauca ◽  
Basal Area ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
White Spruce ◽  
Understory Vegetation ◽  
Severe Drought ◽  
Boreal Mixedwoods ◽  
Uncertain Future ◽  
Canadian Boreal Forest

Planting white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) under established aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) stands has substantial potential for regenerating mixedwood ecosystems in the western Canadian boreal forest. The presence of an aspen overstory serves to ameliorate frost and winter injury problems and suppresses understory vegetation that may compete with white spruce. Under future climatic regimes with more frequent and severe drought episodes, underplanting may be a cost-effective strategy for lowering the risk of mortality in mixedwood regeneration. We examine the growth of white spruce during the first 18 years after being planted beneath a 39-year-old stand of trembling aspen. Treatments included thinning from over 6000 stems·ha−1 to 3000, 2000, and 1000 stems·ha−1 and fertilization. Initial stimulation of understory vegetation by fertilization had no measureable effect on spruce heights or diameters at year 18. Aspen thinning treatments did not have a significant effect on spruce height growth rates after spruce crowns had emerged above the understory shrub layer due to rapid aspen basal area increases after thinning. Small, but significant, increases for spruce height and diameter were present in the 1000 and 2000 stem·ha−1 aspen thinnings. A much wider range of aspen stand conditions may be suitable for planting spruce to create mixedwood ecosystems than has been previously considered.

Structure and dynamics of trembling aspen – white spruce mixed stands near Fort Nelson, B.C.

2004 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 384-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Kabzems ◽  
Oscar García
Keyword(s):  
Populus Tremuloides ◽  
Picea Glauca ◽  
Stand Structure ◽  
White Spruce ◽  
Structure Type ◽  
Growth Patterns ◽  
Site Quality ◽  
Diameter Growth ◽  
Trembling Aspen ◽  
Mixed Stands

The trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) – white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) mixed woods near Fort Nelson are distinguished by the large size of individual trees, longevity, and the low occurrence of internal decay in trembling aspen. The development of these forest ecosystems has had limited documentation and may be significantly different than those described in other portions of the boreal forest. At five study stands, stem analysis techniques were used to examine the patterns of height and radial growth over time according to species and structure type. There were two patterns of species establishment that were consistent with the stand structure. In codominant stands, recruitment periods for trembling aspen and white spruce overlapped. The stratified stands were consistently associated with a 29- to 58-year lag in white spruce recruitment. Spruce that were codominant with aspen at the time of sampling had sustained periods of rapid height and diameter growth. White spruce that were later to establish on site had slower rates of height and diameter growth. White spruce ages indicated that a dominant recruitment episode was more common than continuous recruitment. Height and diameter growth of trembling aspen were similar in both stand types. The differences in trembling aspen growth patterns between stands were due to site quality. The white spruce in codominant stands did not appear to go through a period of suppression and then release associated with stand-level trembling aspen mortality, as commonly described for other boreal mixedwoods. The vigor and longevity of trembling aspen in Fort Nelson appear to prolong the period of trembling aspen domination of mixed stands well beyond the time periods observed in other boreal ecosystems.

scholarly journals Taper Equations for Five Major Commercial Tree Species in Manitoba, Canada

2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 163-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan J. Klos ◽  
G. Geoff Wang ◽  
Qing-Lai Dang ◽  
Ed W. East
Keyword(s):  
Populus Tremuloides ◽  
Picea Glauca ◽  
Pinus Banksiana ◽  
White Spruce ◽  
Jack Pine ◽  
Volume Estimation ◽  
Trembling Aspen ◽  
Stem Form ◽  
Taper Equation ◽  
Taper Equations

Abstract Kozak's variable exponent taper equation was fitted for balsam poplar (Populus balsamifera L.), trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.), white spruce (Picea glauca [Moench] Voss), black spruce (Picea mariana [Mill.] B.S.P.), and jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb.) in Manitoba. Stem taper variability between two ecozones (i.e., Boreal Shield and Boreal Plains) were tested using the F-test. Regional differences were observed for trembling aspen, white spruce, and jack pine, and for those species, separate ecozone-specific taper equations were developed. However, the gross total volume estimates using the ecozone-specific equations were different from those of the provincial equations by only 2 percent. Although the regional difference in stem form was marginal within a province, a difference of approximately 7 percent of gross total volume estimation was found when our provincial taper equations were compared with those developed in Alberta and Saskatchewan. These results suggest that stem form variation increases with spatial scale and that a single taper equation for each species may be sufficient for each province.

Within-tree patterns of wood stiffness for white spruce (Picea glauca) and trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides)

2014 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 162-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek F. Sattler ◽  
Philip G. Comeau ◽  
Alexis Achim
Keyword(s):  
Populus Tremuloides ◽  
Picea Glauca ◽  
Radial Growth ◽  
Tree Height ◽  
White Spruce ◽  
Vertical Position ◽  
Trembling Aspen ◽  
Mixed Effect ◽  
Cambial Age ◽  
Rate Of Increase

Radial patterns of modulus of elasticity (MOE) were examined for white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) and trembling aspen (Populus tremuoides Michx.) from 19 mature, uneven-aged stands in the boreal mixedwood region of northern Alberta, Canada. The main objectives were to (1) evaluate the relationship between pith-to-bark changes in MOE and cambial age or distance from pith; (2) develop species-specific models to predict pith-to-bark changes in MOE; and (3) to test the influences of radial growth, relative vertical height, and tree slenderness (tree height/DBH) on MOE. For both species, cambial age was selected as the best explanatory variable with which to build pith-to-bark models of MOE. For white spruce and trembling aspen, the final nonlinear mixed-effect models indicated that an augmented rate of increase in MOE occurred with increasing vertical position within the tree. For white spruce trees, radial growth and slenderness were found to positively influence maximum estimated MOE. For trembling aspen, there was no apparent effect of vertical position or radial growth on maximum MOE. The results shed light on potential drivers of radial patterns of MOE and will be useful in guiding silvicultural prescriptions.

Are mixtures of aspen and white spruce more productive than single species stands?

1999 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 505-513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rongzhou Man ◽  
Victor J. Lieffers
Keyword(s):  
Populus Tremuloides ◽  
Picea Glauca ◽  
White Spruce ◽  
Single Species ◽  
Physical Separation ◽  
Soil Resource ◽  
Mixedwood Forests ◽  
Environmental Extremes ◽  
Spruce Stands ◽  
Boreal Mixedwoods

In boreal mixedwood forests, aspen (Populus tremuloides) and white spruce (Picea glauca) commonly grow in mixture. These species may avoid competition through differential shade tolerance, physical separation of canopies, phenological differences, successional separation, and differences in soil resource utilization. Aspen may also be able to positively affect the growth of white spruce by improving litter decomposition and nutrient cycling rates, controlling grass and shrub competition, ameliorating environmental extremes, and reducing pest attack. These positive relationships likely make mixed-species stands more productive than pure stands of the same species. The evidence regarding the productivity of pure versus mixed aspen/white spruce stands in natural unmanaged forests is examined in this paper. Key words: Tree mixture; productivity; boreal mixedwoods; aspen; white spruce

Dynamics of regeneration gaps following harvest of aspen stands

2006 ◽  
Vol 36 (7) ◽  
pp. 1818-1833 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel A MacIsaac ◽  
Philip G Comeau ◽  
S Ellen Macdonald
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Heterogeneity ◽  
Populus Tremuloides ◽  
Picea Glauca ◽  
Natural Disturbance ◽  
White Spruce ◽  
Deciduous Trees ◽  
Trembling Aspen ◽  
Calamagrostis Canadensis ◽  
Edaphic Conditions ◽  
Over Time

This study assessed the dynamics of gap development in postharvest regeneration in five stands in northwestern Alberta dominated by trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.). The pattern of gap development over time was determined from analysis of air photographs taken preharvest and 1, 4, 10, and 12 years postharvest. The area of each stand covered by gaps increased after harvest because of the addition of harvest-related gaps over and above those that had been present prior to harvest. The blocks we studied had a combined gap area of up to 29% of stand area 12 years postharvest. We measured regeneration characteristics, microsite, soil, light, and browse conditions in 30 aspen regeneration gaps (gaps in regeneration that were not gaps preharvest and were not due to obvious harvest-related disturbance) 14 years following harvest. Although deciduous trees within postharvest regeneration gaps were the same age as those outside (i.e., in a fully stocked matrix of newly established even-aged aspen stems), they were often suppressed, with significantly lower density and growth. Within the 14-year-old postharvest regenerating aspen stands, aspen height varied from 1 to 11 m; this substantial variability appeared to be largely due to the influence of browsing. There was little evidence of ongoing regeneration within postharvest regeneration gaps, indicating that these gaps will probably persist over time. This may impact future deciduous stocking and volume. It is unknown what may have initiated the formation of these gaps, although results suggest that they are not due to edaphic conditions or disease in the preharvest stands. There is evidence that bluejoint (Calamagrostis canadensis (Michx.) Beauv.) cover and browsing are important factors in the maintenance of postharvest regeneration gaps. The spatial heterogeneity resulting from gaps could be advantageous, however, either as part of ecosystem-based management emulating natural disturbance or as a template for mixedwood management, where white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) are established in gaps.

scholarly journals Implications of selected approaches for regenerating and managing western boreal mixedwoods

2005 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. 559-574 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip G Comeau ◽  
Richard Kabzems ◽  
John McClarnon ◽  
Jean L Heineman
Keyword(s):  
Populus Tremuloides ◽  
Picea Glauca ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Structural Diversity ◽  
White Spruce ◽  
Forest Types ◽  
Successful Management ◽  
Flexible Planning ◽  
Boreal Mixedwoods ◽  
Stand Conditions

We describe a range of approaches for managing boreal mixedwood stands composed of trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) and white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) in British Columbia and Alberta. Successful management of these complex forests requires a combination of well-defined objectives at the landscape level and flexible planning at the stand level. A variety of management strategies must be applied concurrently across the landscape to ensure that the natural mix of forest types and structural diversity is maintained. Selected approaches are discussed with regard to their suitability to particular stand conditions and sets of objectives, the types of tending and harvesting activities required, expected outcomes, and costs. The three approaches discussed are: 1) creation and management of two-storied intimate mixtures; 2) creation of a single-storied mixture of aspen and white spruce; and, 3) creation of a mosaic of discrete patches of each species. Key words: boreal mixedwood management, mixedwood silvicultural systems, aspen, white spruce, planning

Climate-sensitive height–age models for top height trees in natural and reclaimed oil sands stands in Alberta, Canada

2019 ◽  
pp. 297-307
Author(s):  
Yuqing Yang ◽  
Shongming Huang ◽  
Robert Vassov ◽  
Brad Pinno ◽  
Sophan Chhin
Keyword(s):  
Populus Tremuloides ◽  
Picea Glauca ◽  
Oil Sands ◽  
Pinus Banksiana ◽  
White Spruce ◽  
Analysis Data ◽  
Jack Pine ◽  
Trembling Aspen ◽  
Climate Data ◽  
Positive Effects

Climate-sensitive height–age models were developed for top height trees of trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.), jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb.), and white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) in natural and reclaimed oil sands stands. We used stem analysis data collected from the Athabasca oil sands region in northern Alberta, Canada, and climate data generated by the ClimateWNA model. Height–age trajectories differed between top height trees in natural and reclaimed stands for jack pine and white spruce, but not for trembling aspen. At a given age, white spruce top height trees were taller and jack pine top height trees were shorter in reclaimed stands than those in natural stands, suggesting that it is easier to achieve similar forest productivity for oil sands sites reclaimed with white spruce stands than for sites reclaimed with jack pine stands. The principal climate variables were growing season (May to September) precipitation averaged over the previous 10 years for trembling aspen and jack pine and summer (June to August) precipitation averaged over the previous 10 years for white spruce. These variables had positive effects on the height–age trajectories.

scholarly journals Regeneration of aspen following partial and strip understory protection harvest in boreal mixedwood forests

2009 ◽  
Vol 85 (4) ◽  
pp. 631-638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison D Lennie ◽  
Simon M Landhäusser ◽  
Victor J Lieffers ◽  
Derek Sidders
Keyword(s):  
Forest Management ◽  
Key Words ◽  
Populus Tremuloides ◽  
Picea Glauca ◽  
Basal Area ◽  
White Spruce ◽  
Mixedwood Forests ◽  
Partial Harvest ◽  
Second Year

Trembling aspen regeneration was studied in 2 types of partial harvest systems designed to harvest mature aspen but protect immature spruce and encourage natural aspen regeneration. Two partial harvest systems, where the residual aspen was either left in strips or was dispersed uniformly, were compared to traditional clearcuts. After the first and second year since harvest, aspen sucker density and growth was similar between the 2 partial harvests, but was much lower than in the clearcuts. However, in the partial cuts the regeneration density was very much dependent on the location relative to residual trees. The density of regeneration was inversely related to the basal area of residual aspen; however, sucker height was inversely related to the basal area of the residual spruce. Although there were adequate numbers of suckers after partial harvest, their viability and contribution to the long-term productivity of these mixedwood stands is not clear. Key words: silvicultural systems, forest management, residual canopy, white spruce, Populus tremuloides, Picea glauca, traffic

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document