scholarly journals Comparison of different standardised bond strength tests and the influence of glycine powder treatment in composite resin repairs

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 36-43
Author(s):  
Gregor Herrmann ◽  
Susanne Reimann ◽  
Nikolaos Daratsianos ◽  
Anna Weber ◽  
Ludger Keilig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phosphoric Acid ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Hybrid Composites ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Tensile Bond Strength ◽  
Mechanical Preparation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Strength Tests ◽  
Native Speakers Of English

Aim: The repair of restorations is an eligible method to extend the survival rates of intraoral restorations. There is a consensus that the old surface has to be removed before repair by the use of a sandblaster or rotating instruments. This study aimed to investigate whether a glycine powder can be used successfully in composite repair by measurement of shear and tensile bond strength according to dental standards. Methodology: The influence of mechanical preparation by no powder, 25 µm glycine powder or 50 µm aluminium-oxide powder and chemical conditioning by the use of bonding, phosphoric acid and bonding or bonding, phosphoric acid and a silane on the repair bond strength of an artificially aged nano-hybrid composite was tested according to the guidelines of DIN 13990 (2017), ISO 29022 (2013) and ISO/TS 11405 (2015). The fracture modes were evaluated by adhesive, cohesive or mixed failures. Results: There was no significant difference in the performance of the different mechanical and chemical treatments. The shear bond test according to DIN 13990 (2017) produces higher repair bond strengths (26.0±8.9 MPa) than the test described in ISO 29022 (17.9±6.3 MPa). The tensile bond strength according to ISO/TS 11405 (6.9±1.8 MPa) was the lowest. Most adhesive failures occurred with the shear test according to ISO 29022 (41%), followed by DIN 13990 (18%) and the tensile test (4%). Conclusion: For evaluating the bond strength of composites the test described in ISO 29022 is recommended, because it produces the highest percentage of adhesive failures. Nano-hybrid-composites are robust to different repair protocols.   How to cite this article: Herrmann GP, Reimann S, Daratsianos N, Weber A, Keilig L, Nadal J, Bourauel C. Comparison of different standardized bond strength tests and the influence of glycine powder treatment in composite resin repairs. Int Dent Res 2020;10(1):36-43. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no2.2    Linguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.

scholarly journals Effect of air abrasion on tensile bond strength of a single-bottle adhesive/indirect composite system to enamel

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulo César G. Silva ◽  
Mariane Gonçalves ◽  
Telma N. do Nascimento ◽  
André Luiz B. Centola
Keyword(s):  
Phosphoric Acid ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Tensile Bond Strength ◽  
Air Abrasion ◽  
Human Enamel ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Strength Tests ◽  
Indirect Composite ◽  
Phosphoric Acid Etching

This study evaluated the efficiency of air abrasion alone and associated with phosphoric acid etching on tensile bond strength of a single-bottle adhesive/indirect composite restorative system (Bond 1/Alert) to human enamel. Forty enamel surfaces from extracted human third molars were assigned to 4 groups (n= 10). Mach 4.1 (Kreativ Inc.) air abrasion equipment was used for 20 s. A special system of rod pairs aligned in a specific apparatus was used for tensile strength tests, according to ISO/TR 11405 standard (1994) with some modifications. Bond strength means were: G1 (air abrasion + rinsing + condensable composite resin Alert) = 3.46 ± 0.83 MPa; G2 (air abrasion + rinsing + Bond 1 adhesive system + Alert) = 4.00 ± 1.60 MPa; G3 (air abrasion + rinsing + 37% phosphoric acid + rinsing + Bond 1 + Alert) = 20.80 ± 3.95 MPa; and G4 (37% phosphoric acid + rinsing + Bond 1 + Alert) = 17.00 ± 2.74 MPa. The statistical analysis by Kruskal-Wallis test revealed that G1 and G2 presented statistically significant difference (p< 0.05) from G3 and G4 (p<0.01) and G1 and G3 did not differ significantly (p> 0.05) from G2 and G4, respectively.

scholarly journals Impact of Intracoronal Dentin Treatment Prior to Bleaching on Bond Strength of Restorative Materials

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 519-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica Moreno Zanconato-Carvalho ◽  
João Felipe Bruniera ◽  
Natália Spadini de Faria ◽  
Vivian Colucci ◽  
Danielle Cristine Messias
Keyword(s):  
Phosphoric Acid ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Er:Yag Laser ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Bleaching Procedure ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Restorative Materials

Surface treatment of dentin before the bleaching procedure may affect its permeability and influence the bond strength of restorative materials. This study evaluated the influence of surface treatment before the bleaching on shear bond strength (SBT) of restorative materials to intracoronal dentin. Dentin slabs were subjected to surface treatment: no bleaching (control - CON), no surface treatment + bleaching (HP), 37% phosphoric acid + bleaching (PA) and Er:YAG laser + bleaching (L). After the bleaching procedure, specimens (n=10) were restored with: microhybrid composite resin (MH), flowable composite resin (F), and resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC). The shear test was carried out. ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05) showed significant difference for surface treatment and restorative materials (p<0.05). CON presented higher STB and was statistically different from HP (p<0.05). PA and L showed intermediate values and were statistically similar to CON and HP (p>0.05). STB for MH and F were higher than RMGIC (p<0.05), and did not differ from each other (p>0.05). The surface treatments with phosphoric acid and Er:YAG laser before the bleaching procedure provided shear bond strength at the same level of unbleached dentin and the composite resins presented superior bond strength to the intracoronal dentin.

scholarly journals Effect of adhesive mode and chlorhexidine on microtensile strength of universal bonding agent to sound and caries-affected dentins

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (04) ◽  
pp. 553-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joyce Figueiredo Macedo de Lima ◽  
Danielle Wajngarten ◽  
Fariya Islam ◽  
Johanna Clifford ◽  
Ana Carolina Botta
Keyword(s):  
Phosphoric Acid ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
High Viscosity ◽  
Bonding Agent ◽  
Third Molars ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Self Etch

ABSTRACT Objective: The main objective of this study is to assess the effect of the adhesive mode and chlorhexidine (CHX) on the microtensile strength of a universal bonding agent to sound and caries-affected dentins. Materials and Methods: Six intact third molars and six decayed third molars were sectioned to obtain two middle dentin specimens per tooth. Prime and Bond Elect Universal (Dentsply) was applied to specimens in two different modes: Etch-and-rinse (ER, phosphoric acid for 15s) and self-etch (SE, no phosphoric acid). 2% CHX (Cavity Cleanser, Bisco) was applied to both dentins for 30 s. Specimens were randomly assigned into eight groups (n = 3) according to the treatments applied to sound and caries-affected dentins: SE; ER; SE + CHX; and ER + CHX. All specimens were restored with TPH Spectra High Viscosity (Dentsply) composite resin and sectioned to obtain specimens of 0.8 ± 0.1 mm2. The microtensile bond strength test was conducted at 1 mm/min. The data were statistically analyzed by ANOVA and multiple comparisons' test (α = 0.05). Results: There was no significant difference between sound dentin and caries-affected dentin (P = 0.132). The highest bond strength was obtained with the application of the ER (31.81MPa). SE + CHX promoted the lowest bond strength with no statistical difference to ER + CHX (P > 0.05). Conclusions: ER mode for the universal bonding agent yielded the highest bond strength to sound and caries-affected dentins. CHX reduced the bond strength to both dentins regardless the application of phosphoric acid. Clinical Significance: The universal bonding agent increased the bond strength to sound and caries-affected dentins when applied by the ER mode.

scholarly journals Cleaning and Conditioning of Contaminated Core Build-Up Material before Adhesive Bonding

Materials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 2880
Author(s):  
Karsten Klosa ◽  
Walid Shahid ◽  
Milda Aleknonytė-Resch ◽  
Matthias Kern
Keyword(s):  
Phosphoric Acid ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Adhesive Bonding ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Tensile Bond Strength ◽  
Air Abrasion ◽  
Powder Surface ◽  
Surface Conditioning ◽  
Alumina Particles ◽  
Dentin Adhesive

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of different cleaning and conditioning procedures after contamination on the tensile bond strength (TBS) of a luting resin to a core build-up composite resin. Specimens (n = 384) made of a core build-up material were stored for 3 weeks in 37 °C water. Half of the specimens were contaminated with saliva and a disclosing silicone and then cleaned either using phosphoric acid, a pumice suspension, air-abrasion with alumina or polishing powder. Surface conditioning was performed by either using a dentin adhesive, a silane containing primer or a composite resin primer, which resulted in 24 unique combinations of 16 specimens per group. Before measuring TBS, half of the specimens of each group were stored in 37 °C water for 3d or were artificially aged for 150 days. Results show that cleaning with pumice or air-abrasion are superior methods compared to using a polishing powder or phosphoric acid. Silane is an inferior conditioning agent compared to composite or dentin primers. Ideally, after contamination, bonding surfaces should be cleaned with a pumice suspension and conditioned with a dentin adhesive. Those surfaces could also be cleaned and conditioned with air-abrasion with alumina particles and a composite resin primer.

The effect of enamel moisture on tensile bond strength of composite resin using Single bond in total etch technique

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-68
Author(s):  
H Afshar ◽  
M Ghandehari ◽  
S Amiri ◽  
Z Mirzayi ◽  
M Pourali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Tensile Bond Strength ◽  
Single Bond

scholarly journals The Influence of Lime Solution in Kneading Water Substitution on Cement Roughcast and Mortar Coating

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (15) ◽  
pp. 4174
Author(s):  
André M. Santos ◽  
Ângelo J. Costa e Silva ◽  
João M. F. Mota ◽  
João M. P. Q. Delgado ◽  
Fernando A. N. Silva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Concrete Block ◽  
Tensile Bond Strength ◽  
Water Penetration ◽  
Strength Tests ◽  
Lime Solution ◽  
Concrete Blocks ◽  
Materials Used ◽  
Bonding Systems ◽  
Direct Tensile

The understanding of the mechanical fixation behavior of coatings is crucial for a better comprehension of the bonding systems, especially at the interface between the mortar and the substrate. Physical adherence is related, among other things, to the contents of the materials used in the roughcast and mortar coatings, due to the colloidal water penetration into the pores of the substrate. This work evaluated the influence of different lime solution additions replacing the kneading water in the preparation of roughcast and mortar coatings. Two types of substrates were investigated:ceramic bricks and concrete blocks. Three wall masonry panels were constructed, with dimensions of 220 × 180 cm2, one of concrete block and two of ceramic bricks, followed by the application of roughcast and mortar coating with an average thickness of 5 mm and 20 mm, respectively. Direct tensile bond strength tests were performed and the results, with a 95% confidence level, showed that substrate ceramic and treatment in the roughcast exhibited a better behavior regarding the distribution of the tensile bond strength of the tested specimens. However, no significant differences of the amount of addition used (0%, 5%, 10% and 15%) on the tensile bond strength were observed.

scholarly journals Bond Strength of Repaired Acrylic Denture Teeth Using Visible Light Cure Composite Resin

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saja Ali Muhsin
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Visible Light ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
P Value ◽  
Chemical Agents ◽  
Denture Teeth ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
One Way Anova ◽  
Shear Tester

Background: Although bonding to denture teeth after surface treatment with chemical agents is desirable, there is little information on the use of Visible Light Cure composite resin (VLC) as bonding denture materials. Objectives: To determine the effect of various surface treatments on shear bond strength between Visible Light Cure composite resin and the acrylic denture teeth interface. Methods: Forty cylindrical sticks of acrylic resin with denture teeth mounted atop were prepared. Various treatments were implemented upon the acrylic resin teeth surfaces. The samples were divided into four groups (n = 10). Light-cured composite resin (LC) was applied over all treated and untreated surfaces of tested groups. The shear bond was tested using a universal tensile testing apparatus with the knife-edge of a 0.8mm shear tester. Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA performed at a confidence level of 95% and significant P-value of (P ≤ 0.05). Results: Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) between treated and untreated teeth surfaces. The treated surfaces exhibited various levels of bond strength depending on the type of treatment. Conclusion: Application of VLC bonding agent with prior treatment of methylmethacrylate (MMA) on the acrylic resin denture teeth resulted in maximum bond strength with composite resin.

scholarly journals Microtensile Bond Strength of Methacrylate and Silorane Resins to Enamel and Dentin

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 327-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gisele Rodrigues da Silva ◽  
Isabela Sousa Araújo ◽  
Rodrigo Dantas Pereira ◽  
Bruno de Castro Ferreira Barreto ◽  
Célio Jesus do Prado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Aging Time ◽  
Storage Time ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Glass Plate ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Bonding Interaction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
And Storage

The aim of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of two substrates (enamel and dentin) considering two study factors: type of composite resin [methacrylate-based (Filtek Supreme) or silorane-based (Filtek LS)] and aging time (24 h or 3 months). Twenty human molars were selected and divided into 2 groups (n=10) considering two dental substrates, enamel or dentin. The enamel and dentin of each tooth was divided into two halves separated by a glass plate. Each tooth was restored using both tested composite resins following the manufacturer's instructions. The samples were sectioned, producing 4 sticks for each composite resin. Half of them were tested after 24 h and half after 3 months. µTBS testing was carried out at 0.05 mm/s. Data were analyzed by three-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD tests at α=0.05. Significant differences between composite resins and substrates were found (p<0.05), but no statistically significant difference was found for aging time and interactions among study factors. The methacrylate-based resin showed higher µTBS than the silorane-based resin. The µTBS for enamel was significantly higher than for dentin, irrespective of the composite resin and storage time. Three months of storage was not sufficient time to cause degradation of the bonding interaction of either of the composite resins to enamel and dentin.

scholarly journals Co-Blend Application Mode of Bulk Fill Composite Resin

Materials ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (16) ◽  
pp. 2504
Author(s):  
Mohammad Al-Nabulsi ◽  
Alaa Daud ◽  
Cynthia Yiu ◽  
Hanan Omar ◽  
Salvatore Sauro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Degree Of Conversion ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Bonding Agents ◽  
Force Microscopy ◽  
Flowable Composite ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Nanoindentation Hardness

Objective: To evaluate the effect of a new application method of bulk-fill flowable composite resin material on bond-strength, nanoleakage, and mechanical properties of dentine bonding agents. Materials and methods: Sound extracted human molars were randomly divided into: manufacturer’s instructions (MI), manual blend 2 mm (MB2), and manual blend 4 mm (MB4). Occlusal enamel was removed and flattened, dentin surfaces were bonded by Prime & Bond universal (Dentsply and Optibond FL, Kerr). For the MI group, adhesives were applied following the manufacturer’s instructions then light-cured. For MB groups, SDR flow+ bulk-fill flowable composite resin was applied in 2- or 4-mm increment then manually rubbed by a micro brush for 15 s with uncured dentine bonding agents and the mixture was light-cured. Composite buildup was fabricated incrementally using Ceram.X One, Dentsply nanohybrid composite resin restorative material. After 24-h water storage, the teeth were sectioned to obtain beams of about 0.8 mm2 for 24-h and thermocycled micro-tensile bond strength at 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed. Degree of conversion was evaluated with micro-Raman spectroscopy. Contraction gaps at 24 h after polymerization were evaluated and atomic force microscopy (AFM) nano-indentation processes were undertaken for measuring the hardness across the interface. Depth of resin penetration was studied using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Bond strength data was expressed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test. Nanoindentation hardness was separately analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Results: Factors “storage F = 6.3” and “application F = 30.11” significantly affected the bond strength to dentine. For Optibond FL, no significant difference in nanoleakage was found in MI/MB4 groups between baseline and aged specimens; significant difference in nanoleakage score was observed in MB2 groups. Confocal microscopy analysis showed MB2 Optibond FL and Prime & Bond universal specimens diffusing within the dentine. Contraction gap was significantly reduced in MB2 specimens in both adhesive systems. Degree of conversion (DC) of the MB2 specimens were numerically more compared to MS1 in both adhesive systems. Conclusion: Present study suggests that the new co-blend technique might have a positive effect on bond strengths of etch-and-rinse adhesives to dentine.

scholarly journals A comparative study of the microtensile bond strength and microstructural differences between sclerotic and Normal dentine after surface pretreatment

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinhua Wang ◽  
Weijian Song ◽  
Lei Zhu ◽  
Xin Wei
Keyword(s):  
Phosphoric Acid ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Sodium Hypochlorite ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
The Other ◽  
Tensile Bond Strength ◽  
Strength Analysis ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Surface Pretreatment ◽  
Dentine Surface

Abstract Background The resin bond strength of sclerotic dentine is significantly lower than that of the normal dentine, which paused a challenge for bonding procedures clinically. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of different surface pretreatments on the micro-tensile bond strength and microstructure between sclerotic dentine and normal dentine. Methods Eighty teeth that were collected, forty premolars with typical wedge-shaped defects visually graded as class III were assigned as the sclerotic dentine group (SD), the other forty normal premolars with artificial wedge-shaped defects were assigned as the normal dentine group (ND). Each group was randomly subdivided into eight subgroups according to the solution used: 35% phosphoric acid, 15% EDTA, 5% or 10% NaClO. Then the dentine surface was examined using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The lesions were restored using self-etching adhesive and the subsequent resin composite. The teeth were sectioned into sticks for the micro-tensile bond strength analysis, and the data were analysed using the SPSS17.0 software package (α = 0.05). Results First, for the ND groups, after pretreatment using 35% phosphoric acid, and 35% phosphoric acid + 5% or 10% sodium hypochlorite, the bonding strengths of the normal dentine were higher than that of the other groups (P < 0.05). Second, for the SD groups, after pretreatment using 35% phosphoric acid, 15% EDTA, and 35% phosphoric acid + 5% or 10% sodium hypochlorite, the bonding strengths of the sclerotic dentine were higher than that of the other groups (P < 0.05). Third, the bond strengths of the sclerotic dentine were lower than that of the normal dentine without any pretreatment (P < 0.05). After pretreatment using 35% phosphoric acid + 5% or 10% sodium hypochlorite, the bonding strengths of the sclerotic dentine were higher than that of the normal dentine (P < 0.05). SEM observation showed that the appearances of dentine surface were changed after pretreatment using the above solutions, with the reduced smear layer, opened small groove and increased dentinal tubules. Conclusion Pretreatment of dentine using 35% phosphoric acid+ 5% or + 10% sodium hypochlorite changed the microstructure of the sclerotic dentine surface and subsequently increased the micro-tensile bond strength.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document