IMPACT OF HERBICIDES AND MECHANICAL WEED CONTROL ON THE WEED FLORA IN VINEYARD

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Besarta Kabashi ◽  
Rozafa Fetahaj ◽  
Arben Mehmeti
Keyword(s):  
Weed Control ◽  
Weed Flora ◽  
Mechanical Weed Control

scholarly journals Biological spectrum of the weed flora in the Vrsac vineyards (Serbia)

2020 ◽  
pp. 101-113
Author(s):  
Ana Andjelkovic ◽  
Dragana Marisavljevic ◽  
Dusanka Cvijanovic ◽  
Snezana Radulovic ◽  
Danijela Pavlovic
Keyword(s):  
Weed Control ◽  
Flowering Phenology ◽  
Life Forms ◽  
Biological Properties ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Weed Flora ◽  
Weed Diversity ◽  
Biological Spectrum ◽  
Mechanical Weed Control

Agrotechnical measures are the main factor defining the vineyard weed flora structure and composition, while adequate weed control measures simultaneously ensure that vineyards are being well-managed, thus securing good grapevine health and high quality of wine. Given that the biological spectrum of weeds affects the choice of weed control measures, the aim of this study was to determine the biological properties of the weed flora in Vrsac vineyards, by assessing dominant life forms and phenology of the identified weeds. The floristic analysis was conducted during the 2016 vegetation season (March-November) at 60 plots (1 m2), at three field sites. The presence of 97 plant taxa, belonging to 26 families, was determined. The biological spectrum of the vineyards weed flora has shown a thero?phyto-hemicryptophyte character (therophytes: 57.73% and hemicryptophytes: 34.02%). The scapose herbaceous plants with summer-flowering phenology were dominant within the therophytes and hemicryptophytes. The obtained results have shown a higher weed diversity in vineyards, when compared to previous research of the weed flora in the study area, but similar to more recent studies conducted in the neighbouring countries. Furthermore, the dominant presence of therophytes in the vineyard weed flora was expected, bearing in mind the primarily mechanical weed control measures traditionally applied in vineyards.

Chemical weed control in potatoes

1966 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-242
Author(s):  
Maurice Eddowes
Keyword(s):  
Weed Control ◽  
Soil Type ◽  
Effective Control ◽  
Herbicide Treatment ◽  
Weed Flora ◽  
Annual Weeds

Dinoseb and TCA were successfully used to control weeds in potatoes by Robertson (1960), and Wood, Sutherland & Stephens (1960). Since then many investigations have been carried out on the use of newer herbicides including the bipyridils, triazines and substituted ureas. The results of a number of these studies, presented at the Seventh British Weed Control Conference (1964), suggested that herbicides might give effective control of annual weeds in potatoes under a range of British conditions. Yields of marketable ware following herbicide treatment were similar, in general, to those obtained following standard post-planting cultivations, but occasionally the yields after herbicide treatment were either as much as 20% higher or lower than the controls. The performance of the herbicides was related mainly to weed flora, soil type and amount and distribution of rainfall.

scholarly journals Economic and Horticultural Evaluation of Chemical and Mechanical Weed Control Strategies for Cowpea

1992 ◽  
Vol 117 (2) ◽  
pp. 255-259
Author(s):  
Brian A. Kahn ◽  
Raymond Joe Schatzer
Keyword(s):  
Weed Control ◽  
Seed Yield ◽  
Control Strategies ◽  
Dry Weight ◽  
Farm Income ◽  
Control Chemical ◽  
Biological Yield ◽  
Cowpea Seed ◽  
Main Effects ◽  
Mechanical Weed Control

The herbicides paraquat, trifluralin, and metolachlor were compared for efficacy of weed control in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] with and without cultivation as a supplemental strategy. Herbicides also were compared against a no cultivation-no herbicide treatment (control) and against cultivation without an herbicide. Cultivation had no significant effect on seed yield, biological yield, or harvest index of cowpea. Paraquat, applied before seeding but after emergence of weeds, was ineffective for weed control and usually did not change cowpea yield from that obtained without an herbicide. Trifluralin and metolachlor more than tripled cowpea seed yield compared with that obtained without an herbicide in 1988, when potential weed pressure was 886 g·m-2 (dry weight). The main effects of trifluralin and metolachlor were not significant for cowpea seed yield in 1989, when potential weed pressure was 319 g·m-2 (dry weight). However, in 1989, these two herbicides still increased cowpea seed yield compared with that of the control and increased net farm income by more than $300/ha compared with the income obtained from the control. Chemical names used 1,1'-dimethyl-4,4' -bipyridlnium salts (paraquat); 2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-4-(trifluoromethyl) benzenamine (trifluralin); 2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6 -methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-l-methylethyl) acetamide (metolachlor).

scholarly journals Sensor-based mechanical weed control: Present state and prospects

2020 ◽  
Vol 176 ◽  
pp. 105638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jannis Machleb ◽  
Gerassimos G. Peteinatos ◽  
Benjamin L. Kollenda ◽  
Dionisio Andújar ◽  
Roland Gerhards
Keyword(s):  
Weed Control ◽  
Present State ◽  
Mechanical Weed Control

Increased seeding rate and multiple methods of mechanical weed control reduce weed biomass in a poorly competitive organic crop

2020 ◽  
Vol 245 ◽  
pp. 107648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oleksandr S. Alba ◽  
Lena D. Syrovy ◽  
Hema S.N. Duddu ◽  
Steven J. Shirtliffe
Keyword(s):  
Weed Control ◽  
Seeding Rate ◽  
Multiple Methods ◽  
Weed Biomass ◽  
Mechanical Weed Control

Experiments on mechanical weed control in saffron crops in Spain

2014 ◽  
Vol 121 (5) ◽  
pp. 223-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alicia Cirujeda ◽  
Ana Isabel Marí ◽  
Joaquín Aibar ◽  
Sonsoles Fenández-Cavada ◽  
Gabriel Pardo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weed Control ◽  
Mechanical Weed Control

Field Pea and Lentil Tolerance to Interrow Cultivation

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine A. Stanley ◽  
Steven J. Shirtliffe ◽  
Dilshan Benaragama ◽  
Lena D. Syrovy ◽  
Hema S. N. Duddu
Keyword(s):  
Weed Control ◽  
Field Experiments ◽  
Yield Loss ◽  
Growing Season ◽  
Field Pea ◽  
Crop Damage ◽  
Growth Stages ◽  
Row Crops ◽  
Narrow Row ◽  
Mechanical Weed Control

AbstractInterrow cultivation is a selective, in-crop mechanical weed control tool that has the potential to control weeds later in the growing season with less crop damage compared with other in-crop mechanical weed control tools. To our knowledge, no previous research has been conducted on the tolerance of narrow-row crops to interrow cultivation. The objective of this experiment was to determine the tolerance of field pea and lentil to interrow cultivation. Replicated field experiments were conducted in Saskatchewan, Canada, in 2014 and 2015. Weekly cultivation treatments began at the 4-node stage of each crop, continuing for 6 wk. Field pea and lentil yield linearly declined with later crop stages of cultivation. Cultivating multiple times throughout the growing season reduced yield by 15% to 30% in both crops. Minimal yield loss occurred when interrow cultivation was conducted once at early growth stages of field pea and lentil; however, yield loss increased with delayed and more frequent cultivation events.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document