scholarly journals Prognostic and Predictive Factors in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients with Early Mortality with Prediction Matrix and Three and Five-Year Overall Survival

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard R. Terebelo ◽  
Leo Reap
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Early Death ◽  
Mortality Prediction ◽  
Early Mortality ◽  
Standards Of Care ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Disease Biology

Survival rates for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma have increased to a remarkable 8–12 years. Novel agents, autologous stem cell transplantation, monoclonal antibodies, improvements in supportive care and attention to minimal residual disease negative all have aided this remarkable journey. With these treatments we are identifying tools to achieve complete remissions. Prognostic factors have an important role in selecting proper patient approaches for trial designs. Prognostic and predictive clinical biomarkers have shaped staging and treatment selections for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Here we review the Early Mortality Prediction Matrix to identify those at risk of an early death (<6 months) incorporating both disease biology with patient fitness. We also review current standards of care for multiple myeloma and provide a three and five-year overall survival prediction matrix. We review benefits for MRD negativity and Next-Gen Sequencing. These tools will help clinicians improve upon reducing early mortality in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients and provide further framework for improving survival by assessing clinical, biologic and individual multiple myeloma patients.

Induction Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

2019 ◽  
pp. e176-e186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry Paul ◽  
Brea Lipe ◽  
Enrique M. Ocio ◽  
Saad Z. Usmani
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Depth Of Response ◽  
Drug Access ◽  
Current Review ◽  
Disease Biology ◽  
Frontline Therapy ◽  
Minimal Residual

The frontline therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) has continued to evolve over the last 10 years. There has been a growing emphasis on achieving the best depth of response in the context of minimal residual disease negativity, given its prognostic correlation with superior overall survival. Another important area of emphasis has been to improve prognostication and staging by including information on disease biology. There also a growing appreciation of global differences in drug access and patterns of care. The current review explores each of these areas and how best to incorporate the emerging induction regimens in to schema of MM therapy.

Maintenance Therapy With Bortezomib and Dexamethasone for Transplant-ineligible Patients With Multiple Myeloma

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 35-42
Author(s):  
YURIKA NOGUCHI ◽  
NORIYOSHI IRIYAMA ◽  
HIROMICHI TAKAHASHI ◽  
YOSHIHITO UCHINO ◽  
MASARU NAKAGAWA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rates ◽  
Overall Survival Rates ◽  
Maintenance Group

Background/Aim: Here, we investigated whether bortezomib as a maintenance therapy affected outcomes in transplant-ineligible patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Patients and Methods: Following induction therapy with bortezomib, maintenance therapy with bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2) and dexamethasone (20 mg) was administered once or twice every 4 weeks until disease progression. The endpoints of this study were time to next treatment and overall survival. Results: Seventy-six newly diagnosed, transplant-ineligible patients were treated with a bortezomib-based regimen; 28 discontinued induction therapy, 27 did not receive maintenance therapy after induction therapy (the non-maintenance group), and 21 did (the maintenance group). In the three groups, the median times to the next required treatment were 3, 14, and 37 months, respectively. The 3-year overall survival rates were 55%, 69%, and 85%, respectively. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between the non-maintenance and maintenance groups, except for poorer estimated glomerular filtration rates in the maintenance group. Conclusion: Bortezomib maintenance therapy may be a useful option for transplant-ineligible patients with MM.

Efficacy of Melphalan and Prednisone Plus Thalidomide in Patients Older Than 75 Years With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: IFM 01/01 Trial

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (22) ◽  
pp. 3664-3670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cyrille Hulin ◽  
Thierry Facon ◽  
Philippe Rodon ◽  
Brigitte Pegourie ◽  
Lotfi Benboubker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Standards Of Care ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive

Purpose Until recently, melphalan and prednisone were the standards of care in elderly patients with multiple myeloma. The addition of thalidomide to this combination demonstrated a survival benefit for patients age 65 to 75 years. This randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III trial investigated the efficacy of melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide in patients older than 75 years with newly diagnosed myeloma. Patients and Methods Between April 2002 and December 2006, 232 previously untreated patients with myeloma, age 75 years or older, were enrolled and 229 were randomly assigned to treatment. All patients received melphalan (0.2 mg/kg/d) plus prednisone (2 mg/kg/d) for 12 courses (day 1 to 4) every 6 weeks. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 100 mg/d of oral thalidomide (n = 113) or placebo (n = 116), continuously for 72 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival. Results After a median follow-up of 47.5 months, overall survival was significantly longer in patients who received melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide compared with those who received melphalan and prednisone plus placebo (median, 44.0 v 29.1 months; P = .028). Progression-free survival was significantly prolonged in the melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide group (median, 24.1 v 18.5 months; P = .001). Two adverse events were significantly increased in the melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide group: grade 2 to 4 peripheral neuropathy (20% v 5% in the melphalan and prednisone plus placebo group; P < .001) and grade 3 to 4 neutropenia (23% v 9%; P = .003). Conclusion This trial confirms the superiority of the combination melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide over melphalan and prednisone alone for prolonging survival in very elderly patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. Toxicity was acceptable.

What Is the Frequency of Transplant-Eligible Multiple Myeloma Patients Being Cured? the Impact of an MGUS-like Signature at Diagnosis and MRD-Negativity

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 725-725 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Paiva ◽  
Maria Belen Vidriales ◽  
Noemi Puig ◽  
Teresa Cedena ◽  
Lourdes Cordon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Limit Of Detection ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Classification Model ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction: Although multiple myeloma (MM) is typically described as an incurable disease, it has been shown in recent years that a small fraction of patients may reach more than 10-years progression-free survival (PFS), which is considered as the minimum threshold to identify patients in "operational cure". However, because of the scarcity of available data there is significant lack of knowledge in MM regarding the frequency of cases attaining operational cure, nor the existence of biomarkers that could prospectively predict such curability. Methods: Herein, we sought to define the frequency as well as the biomarkers predictive of operational cure in a large series of uniformly-treated transplant-eligible patients enrolled in the PETHEMA/GEM2000 protocol (VBMCP/VBAD followed by HDT/ASCT and 2 years of maintenance with interferon and prednisone). Patients' follow-up was updated at the time of abstract submission, and the median follow-up of the series is now of 12-years. We used an automated multiparameter flow cytometric (MFC) classification model focused on the analysis of the bone marrow plasma-cell compartment to identify among newly diagnosed symptomatic MM those with MGUS-like vs. MM-like phenotypic signatures. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was monitored using a first-generation 4-color MFC assay (CD38-FITC / CD56-PE / CD19-PerCPCy5.5 / CD45-APC) with a limit of detection of 10-4. PFS and overall survival (OS) were measured from the time of diagnosis. Results: From a total of 1075 patients enrolled in the GEM2000 protocol, 763 were eligible for this analysis because they either relapsed or died during the first 10-years from diagnosis (n=666; 87%), or remained progression-free and alive for more than 10-yers (n=97; 13%); accordingly, all patients remaining progression-free and alive but for which the follow-up was inferior to 10-years were excluded from the analysis. We then investigated the biomarkers that could help to identify patients reaching operational cure after HDT/ASCT. As compared to the vast majority of cases, patients reaching >10-years PFS (13%) had significantly less frequent anemia (76% vs. 60%, respectively; P=.002), as well as more frequent Durie-Salmon stage IA (14% vs. 6%; P=.004), MGUS-like signature as determined by the automated MFC algorithm (28% vs. 6%; P<.001), complete response (CR) after HDT/ASCT (51% vs. 35%; P=.003), and MRD-negativity by MFC (72% vs. 31%; P<.001). Other biomarkers such as ISS, LDH, ploidy and proliferation were not significantly different among patients reaching >10-years PFS vs. those who relapsed earlier. On multivariate analysis, only the presence of an MGUS-like signature at baseline (P=.04; HR: 3.9) and MRD-negativity at day+100 after HDT/ASCT (P=.006; HR: 6.3) emerged as independent predictive markers for >10-years PFS; anemia, Durie-Salmon and CR status were not retained in the logistic regression model. Accordingly, patients with an MFC-defined baseline MGUS-like signature reaching MRD-negativity after HDT/ASCT (n=14) had a median PFS of 10-years and a 10-year OS rate of 79%, which were significantly superior to those observed among cases with MM-like signatures being MRD-negative (n=54) or positive (n=99) after therapy [median PFS of 6 and 3 years (P<.001); 10-year overall survival rates of 55% and 19% (P<.001)]. Conclusions: We demonstrated that operational cure (i.e.: >10-years PFS) was possible for 13% of transplant-eligible MM patients before the era of novel agents. Curability rates were particularly frequent among patients with a benign phenotypic signature at diagnosis and MRD negativity after HDT/ASCT, suggesting a remarkable clinical benefit of attaining deep remissions after intensive treatment for patients with early MM. Disclosures Paiva: Sanofi: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; BD Bioscience: Consultancy; EngMab AG: Research Funding; Binding Site: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Puig:The Binding Site: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Mateos:Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria. San Miguel:Celgene: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Onyx: Honoraria; Sanofi-Aventis: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Millennium: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Daratumumab, lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: the GRIFFIN trial

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (8) ◽  
pp. 936-945 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter M. Voorhees ◽  
Jonathan L. Kaufman ◽  
Jacob Laubach ◽  
Douglas W. Sborov ◽  
Brandi Reeves ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Depth Of Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Intent To Treat

Abstract Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is standard frontline therapy for transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). The addition of daratumumab (D) to RVd (D-RVd) in transplant-eligible NDMM patients was evaluated. Patients (N = 207) were randomized 1:1 to D-RVd or RVd induction (4 cycles), ASCT, D-RVd or RVd consolidation (2 cycles), and lenalidomide or lenalidomide plus D maintenance (26 cycles). The primary end point, stringent complete response (sCR) rate by the end of post-ASCT consolidation, favored D-RVd vs RVd (42.4% vs 32.0%; odds ratio, 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-2.82; 1-sided P = .068) and met the prespecified 1-sided α of 0.10. With longer follow-up (median, 22.1 months), responses deepened; sCR rates improved for D-RVd vs RVd (62.6% vs 45.4%; P = .0177), as did minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity (10−5 threshold) rates in the intent-to-treat population (51.0% vs 20.4%; P &lt; .0001). Four patients (3.8%) in the D-RVd group and 7 patients (6.8%) in the RVd group progressed; respective 24-month progression-free survival rates were 95.8% and 89.8%. Grade 3/4 hematologic adverse events were more common with D-RVd. More infections occurred with D-RVd, but grade 3/4 infection rates were similar. Median CD34+ cell yield was 8.2 × 106/kg for D-RVd and 9.4 × 106/kg for RVd, although plerixafor use was more common with D-RVd. Median times to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were comparable. Daratumumab with RVd induction and consolidation improved depth of response in patients with transplant-eligible NDMM, with no new safety concerns. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02874742.

scholarly journals Daratumumab plus RVd for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: final analysis of the safety run-in cohort of GRIFFIN

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 1092-1096
Author(s):  
Peter M. Voorhees ◽  
Cesar Rodriguez ◽  
Brandi Reeves ◽  
Nitya Nathwani ◽  
Luciano J. Costa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Best Response

Abstract The phase 2 GRIFFIN study of daratumumab plus lenalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone (D-RVd) for transplant-eligible, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma included a safety run-in phase followed by a randomized phase. The ongoing randomized phase has met its prespecified primary end point of an improved stringent complete response (sCR) rate after consolidation for D-RVd (reported elsewhere). Final analysis of the safety run-in cohort is reported herein and provides longer follow-up (median, 40.8 months) encompassing daratumumab plus lenalidomide (D-R) maintenance therapy. Patients in the safety run-in cohort (N = 16) received 4 induction cycles (D-RVd), high-dose melphalan supported by autologous stem cell transplant, 2 consolidation cycles (D-RVd), and 24 months of maintenance (D-R). By the end of consolidation, all patients had responded, with a best response of sCR in 9 (56.3%) patients; 8 (50.0%) patients were minimal residual disease (MRD) negative (10‒5 threshold). After maintenance, 15 (93.8%) patients had achieved a best response of sCR, and 13 (81.3%) patients were MRD (10‒5) negative. Estimated 36-month progression-free and overall survival rates were 78.1% and 93.8%, respectively. One death from progressive disease occurred in the patient who did not achieve sCR. Observed safety profiles were consistent with daratumumab and RVd. With &gt;3 years of median follow-up, D-RVd achieved durable responses that deepened with D-R maintenance. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02874742.

Analysis of minimal residual disease in bone marrow by NGF and in peripheral blood by mass spectrometry in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients enrolled in the GEM2012MENOS65 clinical trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8010-8010
Author(s):  
Noemi Puig ◽  
Bruno Paiva ◽  
Teresa Contreras ◽  
M. Teresa Cedena ◽  
Laura Rosiñol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Minimal Residual

8010 Background: Analysis of minimal residual disease (MRD) in the bone marrow (BM) of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) is accepted by the IMWG to evaluate treatment efficacy and is a well-established prognostic factor. However, there is an unmet need to explore the clinical value of MRD in peripheral blood (PB). Methods: Newly diagnosed MM patients enrolled in the GEM2012MENOS65 trial received six induction (Ind) cycles of bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRD) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and 2 further cycles of consolidation (Cons) with VRD. MRD was analyzed in BM using Next Generation Flow (NGF) and in serum by Mass Spectrometry (MS) using IgG/A/M, κ, λ, free κ and free λ specific beads, both after Ind, at day 100 after ASCT, and after Cons. Sequential samples from the first 184 patients were analyzed. Results: Results of both methods were in agreement (NGF+/MS+ and NGF-/MS-) in 83% of cases post-Ind (152/184), 80% post-ASCT (139/174) and 76% post-Cons (128/169). Stratifying by the log range of MRD by NGF, discordances (NGF+/MS- and NGF-/MS+) seemed to increase at the lower MRD ranges, being 22%, 21% and 19% from ≥10−5 to <10−4 and 21%, 21%, 23% at ≥x10−6(post-Ind, ASCT and Cons, respectively). Analysis of discordances showed that they could be partly explained by the higher percentages of cases found to be positive by MS as compared by NGF at part of the time-points analyzed and at each log range of MRD. From ≥10−5 to <10−4, MRD was detected by NGF in 36%, 28%, 20% of cases post-Ind, ASCT and Cons, respectively vs MS in 37%, 29%, 21% of them; at ≥x10−6, NGF was positive in 11%, 14%, 19% of cases vs MS in 23%, 19% and 16% of them. Considering NGF as a reference, the negative predictive value (NPV) of MS per MRD range (≥10−5 to <10−4 and ≥x10−6, respectively) was: post-Ind: 83% (p<0,0001), 94% (p=0,034); post-ASCT 86% (p<0,0001), 90% (p=0,022); post-Cons 89% (p<0,0001), 85% (p=0,0469). Despite these discordances, the prognostic value of each technique in terms of undetectable MRD and progression-free survival (PFS) was consistent at all time-points (Table) and further, discordant cases (NGF+/MS- and NGF-/MS+) did not display a significantly different PFS as compared to NGF-/MS- cases. Conclusions: The results of MRD assessed by NGF in BM and by MS in PB show a significant concordance and are associated with a similar prognostic value analyzed in terms of PFS. Given its high NPV, MRD in peripheral blood by MS provides a gateway for BM aspiration/biopsy and MRD assessment by NGF.[Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document