Spigolature pseudodidimiane

Augustinianum ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-102
Author(s):  
Angelo Segneri ◽  
Keyword(s):  
The Other ◽  
Lexical Analysis ◽  
De Trinitate ◽  
Cyril Of Alexandria ◽  
Cappadocian Fathers

The present study, after a quick codicological investigation of the two surviving manuscripts of the De trinitate by pseudo-Didymus, in which it is concluded that one is a copy of the other, focuses on the lexical analysis of the first book of the mutilated trinitarian treatise. By showing divergences from the authentic works of Didymus, alongside parallels with the writings of the Cappadocian Fathers, Cyril of Alexandria, Theodoret, of other late patristic authors, as well as with those of the Neoplatonic philosophers, in particular Proclus, the author concludes that the chronological position of De trinitate should not be before the end of the 5th century, and suggests a possible origin from an environment of Antiochene influence.

scholarly journals The Topic of Penetration of Fire into Iron in Byzantine Christology

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 409-423
Author(s):  
Dmitry Biriukov
Keyword(s):  
The Other ◽  
Cyril Of Alexandria ◽  
Theological Discourse ◽  
John Of Damascus ◽  
Theodoret Of Cyrus

Abstract In this article I seek to show in what manner the Stoic principle of total blending, illustrated by the example of the penetration of fire into iron, finds its refraction in Byzantine Christological teachings. According to the Stoics, total blending occurs when one body accepts certain qualities of the other, while remaining itself, or when both mixed bodies acquire qualities of each other while preserving their natures. I argue that Origen’s use of the example of incandescent iron had an effect on the later theological discourse. There it appears in two contexts, Christology and deification. In this article the focus is on Christology. I claim that the example was introduced into the Christological discourse by Apollinarius of Laodicea. Then, I investigate how it was transformed in later theological writings by (Ps.-) Basil of Caesarea, Theodoret of Cyrus, Cyril of Alexandria, Sever of Antioch, John of Damascus, and the Corpus Leontianum. In this context, I pay special attention to the discrepancy between John of Damascus and Leontius of Jerusalem as regards the issue of the complexity of Christ’s hypostasis. I clarify the causes of this discrepancy.

scholarly journals A Lexical Analysis of בָּרֹד and מֵֽהִתְיַצֵּ֖ב of In Zechariah 6:3-5

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Philip Suciadi Chia ◽  
Juanda Juanda
Keyword(s):  
Old Testament ◽  
The Other ◽  
Analysis Approach ◽  
Lexical Analysis ◽  
The Earth ◽  
God's Mission ◽  
Metaphorical Extension

In the Zechariah, there are various visions and prophecies that are so difficult to be understood today. And this can be biased if every Bible’s learner interprets it as he pleases. In this research, which uses the Lexical Analysis approach, will discuss about the meaning of the words בָּרֹד and מֵֽהִתְיַצֵּ֖ב of In Zechariah 6:3-5. With in-depth observation and also making language comparisons, it can be concluded that: בָּרֹדin Zechariah 6:3 should be translated as dappled, a literal or concrete definition. Old Testament does not give any specific color with regard to the dappled. However, it seems that the color of horses in Zechariah 6:1-8 has a function to distinguish one chariot from the other chariots. יצבin Zechariah 6:5 should be interpreted in the sense of readiness to serve God, a metaphorical extension of the concrete definition, ‘to stand’. The four spirits are going forth after serving the Lord of all the earth in the heavens. It implies that the four spirits are belonged to God. In the heavens, they are serving God and when going to the earth, they carry God’s mission.

Suggestopedie Frans

1982 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 127-143
Author(s):  
M.F. Maleville
Keyword(s):  
Discourse Analysis ◽  
Analytical Model ◽  
Affective Domain ◽  
The Other ◽  
Lexical Analysis ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Syllabus Design

Within a suggestopedic experiment in teaching French to adults at Nijmegen University, material has been developed to meet the suggesto-pedic requirements. These long dialogues, already presented in Levende Talen 366 are now placed within the context of the latest trends in syllabus design. They are cate-gorized as "analytical" as described by Wilkins. Ordening of language takes place on the basis of the criterium marked/unmarked. This criterium takes into account authenticity as described by Breen & Candlin but proves to be ambigous. Another criterium is affect: the language used is systematically chosen in the affective domain. A quantitative lexical analysis of the material proves that it is not very different from commercial material of the same level. The functional/notional model proved not to be adequate for analysis of the material because of the complexity of discourse analysis. Exploitation of the material takes place within a communicative model with much emphasis on affect. The material appears to be satisfactory to the learners. On the other hand, some teachers appear to have difficulties with the analytical model and the length of the dialogues.

Alla ricerca delle fonti patristiche del De Trinitate pseudodidimiano

Augustinianum ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 525-549
Author(s):  
Angelo Segneri ◽  
Keyword(s):  
De Trinitate ◽  
Cyril Of Alexandria ◽  
Didymus The Blind ◽  
The Trinity

Traditionally attributed to Didymus the Blind, this anonymous work on the Trinity found in the Cod. Rom. Angel. gr. 116, has no certain authorship. The article throws light on the numerous parallels among the so-called De Trinitate and passages from Basil, the two Gregorys, Athanasius, the pseudo-Basilian books IV and V of the Adversus Eunomium, as well as from some writings of Cyril of Alexandria. Even though the question of the paternity of De Trinitate is still destined to remain clouded, the parallels pointed out by the Author tend definitely to exclude Didymus as the author of this anonymous theological tract.

scholarly journals The way to analyse ‘way’: A case study in word-specific local grammar

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 247-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Hanks ◽  
Sara Može
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
20Th Century ◽  
Empirical Analysis ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
The Other ◽  
Lexical Analysis ◽  
Syntactic Theory ◽  
Local Grammar ◽  
Made In

Abstract Traditionally, dictionaries are meaning-driven—that is, they list different senses (or supposed senses) of each word, but do not say much about the phraseology that distinguishes one sense from another. Grammars, on the other hand, are structure-driven: they attempt to describe all possible structures of a language, but say little about meaning, phraseology, or collocation. In both disciplines during the 20th century, the practice of inventing evidence rather than discovering it led to intermittent and unpredictable distortions of fact. Since 1987, attempts have been made in both lexicography (Cobuild) and syntactic theory (pattern grammar, construction grammar) to integrate meaning and phraseology. Corpora now provide empirical evidence on a large scale for lexicosyntactic description, but there is still a long way to go. Many cherished beliefs must be abandoned before a synthesis between empirical lexical analysis and grammatical theory can be achieved. In this paper, by empirical analysis of just one word (the noun way), we show how corpus evidence can be used to tackle the complexities of lexical and constructional meaning, providing new insights into the lexis-grammar interface.

scholarly journals The Resurrected Body, Will It Be of Flesh or Spiritual?

Scrinium ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 225-241
Author(s):  
Antonia S. Kakavelaki
Keyword(s):  
The Other ◽  
Apostle Paul ◽  
Aristotelian Logic ◽  
Gregory Of Nyssa ◽  
Subtle Body ◽  
Cyril Of Alexandria ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Christian View ◽  
Resurrection Of The Dead ◽  
The Dead

The resurrection of the dead according to Origen and Philoponus is spiritual and not of the flesh. Their opinion, contrary to the official Christian view, was influenced by the neo-Platonic doctrine of “the subtle body of the soul” and based upon Aristotelian logic. Origen’s argumentation was formed as a personal interpretation of the passage of the Apostle Paul (1 Cor. 15:39–47) where Paul mentions that the risen body will be spiritual. Philoponus argumentation, on the other hand, was mostly based upon the Aristotelian logic and he thus directed his polemic against the irrationality of the arguments of Cyril of Alexandria and of Gregory of Nyssa.


scholarly journals Imagination and nonliterality : a case study of superhuman entities in religion

1999 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 69
Author(s):  
María Dolores Fernández de la Torre Madueño
Keyword(s):  
Point Of View ◽  
The Other ◽  
Linguistic Community ◽  
Lexical Analysis ◽  
Cognitive Approach ◽  
Cognitive Perspective ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Great Relevance

In the present work we would like to emphasize the aspect of imagination as an element of great relevance in the production of metaphorical processes. With the experientialism upheld by the cognitive approach, people's imaginative ability is established as one of the main arguments to face any lexical analysis from a cognitive perspective. A double focus can be appreciated in the religious vocabulary: On one hand, the experience that the members of a linguistic community live directly and personally and on the other hand, a virtual creation of such an experience, a sort of "imagined experience". In it, imagination would be characterized by the ability to transfer certain conceptualizations and ideas to human domains; conceptualizations and ideas which, from a theological point of view, are neither present nor located in such domains. This focus centers on a series of religious lexemes of a superhuman nature, angel and devil.

scholarly journals Discourse Analysis of a Song Lyric Entitled "We Will Not Go Down”

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 90
Author(s):  
Faizal Risdianto
Keyword(s):  
Discourse Analysis ◽  
Life Experience ◽  
The Other ◽  
Personal Pronoun ◽  
Personal Pronouns ◽  
Lexical Analysis ◽  
Lexical Aspect ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Song Lyric ◽  
Song Lyrics

This library research aimed at finding the three aspect of discourse analysis: contextual, grammatical and lexical aspect of Michael Heart’s song lyrics entitled “We will not go down (Song for Gaza). After analysis it can be found that the life experience and background of the song writer and singer is closely related to the idea proposes within the song lyrics. Whereas, the result of the grammatical and lexical analysis gives a depiction of cohesion and coherence of the song discourse of “We will not Go Down (Song for Gaza)”. There are eight (8) forms of first plural personal pronoun of “We”, four (4) second plural personal pronoun of ‘You” and seven (7) third personal pronouns in various forms. On the other side, it is difficult to find lexical aspects of this song discourse. There is only one form of anaphoric repetition. The repetition of the sentence “We Will Not Go Down” seven times is to influence the hearers whether they are supporters or opponents of the idea brought by the singer/the author that whatever happens Palestinian people will not surrender to every force, nation or people that want to colonialize them. 

Chalcedon Cathedral, Its Reception and Some Aspects of Christology in V - Early VI Century

2019 ◽  
pp. 67-88
Author(s):  
Сергий Кожухов
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Perception ◽  
De Trinitate ◽  
Cyril Of Alexandria ◽  
In Christ

В статье даётся краткий обзор богословского, исторического и культурного восприятия Халкидонского Собора на христианском Востоке во второй половине V - нач. VI в. Его итоги побудили многих богословов предпринять попытку защиты или опровержения решений Халкидона. Причина этому - в учении Собора о наличии двух природ во Христе после воплощения Бога Слова и их единения «в одно Лицо, или Ипостась, Христа». Со стороны последователей Халкидонского Собора, таких как свв. Лев Великий, Геннадий Константинопольский, монах Нефалий, Иоанн Кесарийский, был предпринят ряд попыток объяснить учение о двух природах Христа и единой Ипостаси, или Лица. Христологический синтез Халкидона и свт. Кирилла Александрийского был наиболее представлен Грамматиком через формулу «в Лице Бога Слова», для соединения двух природ, и теопасхитской формулой «Один от Святой Троицы пострадал», что можно назвать первыми шагами к формулированию учения о включении плоти в Ипостась Бога Слова. This article provides a brief overview of the theological, historical and cultural perception of the Chalcedonian Councel in the Christian East in the second half of the V - and the early VI centuries. Its results prompted many theologians to attempt to defend or refute Chalcedon. The reason for this is the teaching of the Council about the presence of two natures in Christ after the incarnation and their unity «in one person or hypostasis of Christ». From the followers of Chalcedon Counsel, such as St. Leo the Great, Gennady of Constantinople, monk Nephalius, John of Caesarea was a number of attempts to explain the doctrine of the two natures and single hypostasis or person. The Christological of synthesis Chalcedon and St. Cyril of Alexandria in the largest degree was presented by the Grammarian in the formula «in the person of God of the Word» to connect the two natures and the theopaschite formula «Unus de Trinitate passus est carne», which can be called the first steps to the formulation of the doctrine of the inclusion of flesh in the hypostasis of God of the Word.

Hollanders, Friezen of Vlamingen?

2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (3) ◽  
pp. 77-98
Author(s):  
Ann Marynissen ◽  
Joost Robbe
Keyword(s):  
Nineteenth Century ◽  
Sixteenth Century ◽  
The Other ◽  
Lexical Analysis ◽  
Low Countries ◽  
Agricultural Communities ◽  
Exact Origin

Abstract Around 1520, a group of settlers from the Low Countries arrived on the Danish island of Amager and quickly became one of the most successful agricultural communities in the country. Since the nineteenth century, the exact origin of these settlers has been the object of scholarly dispute with two positions: one that the settlers originated from Flanders and the other that they originated from Holland. This article outlines arguments for both positions. It then attempts to resolve the dispute by conducting a morphological and lexical analysis of the names of the first settlers. This analysis provides onomastic evidence that excludes the possibility that the settlers originated from Flanders and demonstrates that they most likely originated from the Holland region of West Frisia. This evidence thus supports the hypothesis, based on information in a sixteenth-century Hoorn city chronical, that the settlers originated from the municipality of Hoorn in West Frisia.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document