Estrogen Receptor β

2011 ◽  
Vol 135 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mamoun Younes ◽  
Naoko Honma

Abstract Context—A new class of estrogen receptors was discovered in 1996 and named estrogen receptor β (ER-B); the traditional estrogen receptor, which until a little more than 10 years ago was thought of as the only estrogen receptor in existence, is now called estrogen receptor α. Estrogen receptor β has at least 5 isoforms, which may have different functions and have different tissue distribution. The significance of ER-B expression in tumors was first demonstrated in breast cancer, with several studies demonstrating that women with ER-B–positive breast cancers treated with adjuvant tamoxifen have better survival, independent of estrogen receptor α expression. Pathologists need to be more aware of this increasingly important protein, as it will soon find its way into routine clinical practice. Objective—To provide pathologists with a concise review of ER-B, with special emphasis on current and potential clinical relevance. Data Sources—A search of the English literature in PubMed (National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland) for articles with titles including “estrogen receptor beta,” with emphasis on “immunohistochemistry.” Abstracts were reviewed, and selected articles were used as the basis for writing this review, mostly based on their relevance to pathology. Conclusions—Estrogen receptor β and its isoforms have wider tissue distribution, including the gastrointestinal tract, lung, and brain, than the traditional estrogen receptor, now called estrogen receptor α. Estrogen receptor β expression in breast cancer is associated with favorable outcome in women treated with adjuvant tamoxifen, even in tumors negative for estrogen receptor α. The clinical significance of ER-B expression in tumors other than breast is currently under investigation.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahan Mamoor

Hormones function as growth factors, and estrogen provides growth signals to support and induce the proliferation of breast cancers (1-3). This is the basis of the use of endocrine therapies (4, 5) including tamoxifen and letrozole as first-line treatment for patients with breast cancer. We found through mining published microarray and multiplexed gene expression profiling datasets that the estrogen receptor α (ESR1) was among the genes most differentially expressed in the primary tumors and fine needle aspiration-isolated tumor cells of patients with breast cancer treated with trastuzumab. However, estrogen receptor α was expressed at higher rather than lower levels in the tumors of trastuzumab-treated patients. These data, obtained through blind, systems-level analysis of published microarray data (6-8), suggest that trastuzumab administration in patients with breast cancer is associated with transcriptional induction of the estrogen receptor or selection of tumor clones with high expression of ESR1.


2005 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong Min Baek ◽  
Gi Young Sung ◽  
Do Sang Lee ◽  
Kyung Hwa Chun ◽  
Dong Ho Lee ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Palmieri ◽  
G J Cheng ◽  
S Saji ◽  
M Zelada-Hedman ◽  
A W√§rri ◽  
...  

Estrogen is essential for normal growth and differentiation in the mammary gland. It also supports growth of approximately 50% of primary breast cancers. For this reason, removal of estrogen or blocking of its action with the anti-estrogen, tamoxifen, is the main treatment for estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha)-positive tumors. In 1996, when oncologists became aware of a second ER, ERbeta, there was some doubt as to whether this receptor would be of importance in breast cancer because the clinical consensus was that responsiveness to tamoxifen is related to the presence of ERalpha in breast cancer. Today we know that ERalpha and ERbeta have distinct cellular distributions, regulate separate sets of genes and can oppose each other's actions on some genes. We also know that ERbeta is widely expressed in both the normal and malignant breast and that there are proliferating cells in the breast which express ERbeta. In this review we summarize what is known about ERbeta in breast cancer and examine the possibility that ERbeta-selective ligands may well represent a useful class of pharmacological tools with a novel target, namely proliferating cells expressing ERbeta.


2000 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 114-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Cullen ◽  
T. Maguire ◽  
P. Diggin ◽  
A. Hill ◽  
E. McDermott ◽  
...  

The estrogen receptor (ER) is the most useful marker currently available for breast cancer, being used both to predict response to therapy and assess prognosis. Recently, a new form of the ER, known as ER-beta, was identified. In this preliminary study we show that ER-beta mRNA was expressed less frequently in breast cancers than ER-alpha. ER-alpha but not ER-beta levels correlated with ER protein as determined by ELISA. We conclude that ER-beta is expressed in approximately 50% of breast cancers but it does not appear to be detected by a widely available ELISA.


2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (22) ◽  
pp. 3727-3734 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoko Honma ◽  
Rie Horii ◽  
Takuji Iwase ◽  
Shigehira Saji ◽  
Mamoun Younes ◽  
...  

Purpose The clinicopathologic importance of a second estrogen receptor (ER), ER-β, in breast cancers has been intensely studied; however, there is still no real consensus regarding the clinical utility of an ER-β assay, probably because of the lack of standardized methodology, the presence of several ER-β isotypes (ER-β1-5, and so on), and, more importantly, the lack of convincing data on whether the ER-β status provides clinically useful information over what is already provided by the traditional ER-α/progesterone receptor (PR) assay. A large and systematic study is needed to address these important issues. Patients and Methods Archival materials of 442 invasive breast cancers from women treated with adjuvant tamoxifen monotherapy and with a long follow-up period (median, 11.1 years) were subjected to immunohistochemical study using three commercially available anti–ER-β antibodies that detect ER-β1-3 (ER-βN), ER-β1, and ER-βcx (ER-β2). Results Positive staining for ER-βN or ER-β1 was associated with significantly better survival. By contrast, ER-βcx status did not influence survival. In multivariate analysis, ER-β1 status emerged as an independent predictor of recurrence and mortality. ER-β1 status was significantly associated with survival in postmenopausal, but not premenopausal, women. Importantly, ER-β1 positivity was associated with significantly better survival in patients with ER-α–negative/PR-negative or ER-α–negative/PR–negative/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (triple-negative) tumors, which are widely believed to be hormone unresponsive, have poor prognosis, and require chemotherapy. Conclusion Immunohistochemical examination of ER-β1 in addition to ER-α and PR is clinically important in patients with breast cancer treated with tamoxifen monotherapy. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings.


2004 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 761-770 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vera Cappelletti ◽  
Luigi Celio ◽  
Emilio Bajetta ◽  
Arianna Allevi ◽  
Raffaella Longarini ◽  
...  

It has been proposed that knowledge of estrogen receptor β (ER-β) expression may refine estrogen receptor α (ER-α) predictivity of response to endocrine therapy. We challenged this hypothesis in ERα-positive breast cancers subjected to preoperative antiestrogen treatment. Forty-seven elderly (≥65 years old) women with nonmetastatic, ER-α-positive (by immunohistochemistry) primary breast cancers (> 2 cm in diameter) entered a neoadjuvant hormone therapy protocol (60 mg/day toremifene for 3 months). ER-α and ER-β (ERs) mRNA was determined by semiquantitative RT-PCR, before (on core needle biopsy) and after (on surgical specimens) neoadjuvant treatment. Study end points included: (1) relation between treatment response and ER mRNA expression; and (2) changes in ER expression after treatment. The response was clinically assessed as tumor size change at the end of the preoperative treatment. ER mRNA expression was assessable before and after treatment in 38 and 20 cases respectively. ER-β was co-expressed with ER-α at variable levels and significantly correlated only with progesterone receptor (P = 0.0285). Objective clinical response, including patients with minor change (≥25–<50% tumor shrinkage after treatment), was documented in 68.4% of cases and was independent of ER-β levels or changes. ER-α levels were higher in tumors from patients in complete remission than in those from women achieving partial response or minor change compared with non-responsive patients (median expression values: 801 versus 516 versus 320 arbitrary units) and were consistently down-regulated by preoperative treatment. We conclude that in this elderly patient population with ER-α-positive tumors, ER-β mRNA was neither predictive of response to preoperative toremifene nor provided additional information to the knowledge of ER-α mRNA levels, which, conversely, were directly correlated with likelihood of response.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document