scholarly journals Effect of wheat straw urea treatment and Leucaena leucocephala foliage hay supplementation on intake, digestibility, nitrogen balance and growth of lambs

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 88-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kebede Yadete Getahun
1996 ◽  
Vol 1996 ◽  
pp. 212-212
Author(s):  
I.U. Haq ◽  
E. Owen

Urea-ammonia treatment of straws in the tropics involves mixing 1.0 kg of air dry straw with 1.0 kg of a 40 g/kg urea solution and storing under plastic for at least 4 weeks (Schiere and Ibrahim, 1989). The economics of treatment is dependent on the cost of urea. Treatment cost would reduce, if on-farm-produced urine, e.g. cow urine, could be used as a source of urea. However cow urine is dilute and may contain only 10 g/kg urea or less (Owen, 1993). The present study therefore investigated varying concentrations of urea solution for treating wheat straw at a tropical temperature.


Author(s):  
M.A Jabbar ◽  
H Muzafar ◽  
F.M Khattak ◽  
T.N Pasha ◽  
A Khalique

2013 ◽  
Vol 724-725 ◽  
pp. 373-377
Author(s):  
Xing Yuan Ma ◽  
Xi Ping Yang ◽  
Shu Fang Zhang ◽  
Jun Ma

The article proved the effects of urea treatment on the structure and properties of wheat straw, using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), contact angle analyze (CAA) and thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) other methods. The results show that the urea treatment of wheat straw epidermis and lignin chemical structure has undergone significant changes, most of the inorganic components of wheat straw has dissolved, making the cellulose from the lignin parcels released while the lignin from hard degradable mesh macromolecules into small molecules of a straight chain of easily biodegradable, so that the anaerobic microorganisms to the degradation of cellulose and lignin can be more easily.


1996 ◽  
Vol 1996 ◽  
pp. 212-212
Author(s):  
I.U. Haq ◽  
E. Owen

Urea-ammonia treatment of straws in the tropics involves mixing 1.0 kg of air dry straw with 1.0 kg of a 40 g/kg urea solution and storing under plastic for at least 4 weeks (Schiere and Ibrahim, 1989). The economics of treatment is dependent on the cost of urea. Treatment cost would reduce, if on-farm-produced urine, e.g. cow urine, could be used as a source of urea. However cow urine is dilute and may contain only 10 g/kg urea or less (Owen, 1993). The present study therefore investigated varying concentrations of urea solution for treating wheat straw at a tropical temperature.


Author(s):  
M. Iqbal ◽  
J.D. Leaver

Crop by-products are used as ruminants feeds in many parts of the world, but their high content of lignocellulose and low content of protein limits their use in productive farming systems. The nutritive value and utilization of low quality roughage can be improved by treatment with alkali. Urea is a safe and more readily available chemical than caustic soda in many countries. The objective of this experiment was to investigate the effect of level of urea treated wheat straw in combination with grass silage offered to dairy cattle.


1984 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 158-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. ZORRILLA-RIOS ◽  
G. W. HORN ◽  
C. A. HIBBERD ◽  
W. A. PHILLIPS

Ammoniation of wheat straw increased ruminal digestion of dietary organic matter and duodenal flow of microbial nitrogen. For a growing steer (288 kg) gaining 0.45 kg daily, nitrogen in ammoniated straw replaced that provided by 0.6 kg of soybean meal. Energy supplementation improved nitrogen balance in sheep consuming ammoniated straw. Key words: Straw, ammoniation, microbial-N, protein, energy, ruminants


1974 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 631 ◽  
Author(s):  
PR Bird

The capacity of cattle and sheep to utilize wheat straw was compared, six 15-month-old Hereford steers and six 20-month-old Merino wethers being used. The addition of urea (2.0% of dry matter) to wheat straw (c. 0.3% nitrogen, 0.09% sulphur) significantly increased the intake of energy, the efficiency of digestion and the liveweight gains of both the sheep and the cattle. The addition of sodium sulphate (0.4% of the dry matter) to the ration containing urea significantly increased these responses in the sheep but not in the cattle. Cattle and sheep had a similar capacity to digest the basal straw (22 v. 23 kcal/kg W0.92 per day), but cattle were more efficient than sheep when urea alone was included in the ration (68 v. 42 kcal/kg W0.92 per day day). The further addition of sulphate decreased this disparity (75 v. 64 kcal/kg W0.92 per day) so that the sheep were then also able to derive their maintenance requirement of energy (an estimated 49 kcal/kg W0.92 per day) from the straw. Addition of urea to wheat straw significantly increased the nitrogen balance in cattle but not in sheep. The further addition of sulphate significantly increased this balance in both the sheep and the cattle. Nitrogen balance on the basal straw, straw plus urea, or straw plus urea plus sulphate was –97, –62 and 17 mg nitrogen/kg W0.92 per day respectively for sheep compared with –79, –24 and 32 mg nitrogen/kg W0.92 per day for cattle. Supplemental sodium sulphate (0.4% of the dry matter) without urea slightly decreased the nitrogen balance and tended to depress intake and digestion of feed in both sheep and cattle. Cattle require less dietary sulphur and can cope with a wider nitrogen/sulphur ratio in the feed than sheep, apparently because sulphur is recycled more effectively in cattle. Responses to urea supplementation under grazing conditions may therefore be greater with cattle. ____________________ *Part XII, Aust. J. Biol. Sci., 26: 1429 (1973).p>


1995 ◽  
Vol 44 (Suppl. 1) ◽  
pp. 73-73
Author(s):  
JP Fontenot ◽  
E. Gallo Llorente ◽  
JM Obamahinti ◽  
VG Allen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document