scholarly journals Testing of platelet function and application of rotary thromboelastometry in order to rationalize chemotherapy during myocardial revascularization and surgical treatment of heart valves

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 119-126
Author(s):  
Danijela Vuković ◽  
Tanja Živković ◽  
Milena Todorović ◽  
Branko Čalija ◽  
Petar Vuković ◽  
...  

Using intraoperative salvage of blood/erythrocytes (ISB/E) in the practice, rationalized application of allogeneic blood products and hemostatic-active drugs - based on "point-of-care" (POC) monitoring findings - it is possible to improve diagnosis and evaluate of transfusion hazards and increase efficacy of therapy of patients with excessive bleedings, with reduction of perioperative morbidity and mortality in cardiac surgery. This study was performed as a prospective analysis of platelet function using "multiple platelet function analyzer" (MEA; by Multiplate) system and examination of hemostasis by rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) during and immediately following myocardial revascularization and surgical treatment of valves in the Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases "Dedinje" for six years period for therapy of 1021 random selected patients. The study aim was to evaluate the influence of ISB/E and hemostatic drugs - indicated based on the results of platelet count and function (Multiplate) and hemostasis monitoring (ROTEM) in compared to allogeneic transfusions - on the incidence of bleedings, treatment efficiency and overall clinical outcome. In the perioperative period, a total of 617 (60.4%) patients were treated with ISB/E reinfusion only. Other patients (404; 39.6%) received allogeneic blood components too. Total 391 of them (38.3%) were treated (together by ISB/E) with transfusion of one to three units of allogeneic red blood cells (RBCs). There were only 13 (1.3%) polytransfunded (typically 10 - 15 units) patients. The rate of cardio-surgical reinterventions due to bleeding was only 2.5%. In conclusion, the application of the ISB/E strategy represents an effective and safe (reduced immune-mediated complications and risk of disease transmission) therapeutic approach. By monitoring MEA/ROTEM and implementation the algorithm of current transfusion therapy, it is possible to reduce significantly of allogeneic blood component therapy. The use of allogeneic RBCs is justified only when the possibilities of autologous transfusion and pharmacological hemostatic therapy have been exhausted.

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 1307-1318
Author(s):  
T. V. Glazanova ◽  
E. R. Shilova ◽  
A. V. Chechetkin ◽  
L. N. Bubnova

Transfusions of blood provide essential therapeutic measures in a number of pathological conditions. However, when carrying out blood component therapy, it is important to consider probability of post-transfusion complications. Most of them are immune-mediated side effects. The unfavorable consequences of blood transfusions can manifest at long-range time periods, and pathogenesis of these phenomena may be associated not only with the presence of alloantibodies. They may be caused by alloimmunization to HLA antigens, leukocyte factors, including cytokines, products of leukocyte degranulation, as well as storage-related erythrocyte damage («storage lesion»), immunomodulatory properties of extracellular vesicles or microparticles derived from blood components, and other factors. Despite significant number of publications on this issue, a lot of unresolved issues still remain, concerning transfusion-related effects of blood components on the immune system of recipients. The review article provides the results of current studies in this area. We present and discuss the results of current studies and the features of transfusion-mediated immunomodulation (TRIM) revealed over recent years, when transfusing different blood components. The role of plasma factors, microparticles, platelets and erythrocytes, HLA sensitization and microchimerism in the development of TRIM is highlighted, the data on occurrence and clinical features of TRIM in perioperative period are presented. A separate section of the review provides information about recent clinical studies, devoted to the issues of TRIM in different clinical cohorts, including newborns, patients with malignant neoplasms, immunocompromised patients after heart and vascular surgery. The data on TRIM incidence in the patients with exhausted immune system due to previous disease or treatment, severe comorbidity, extensive surgical thoracic/abdominal intervention and artificial circulation are also in scope. As based on the studies performed, the role of distinct measures, e.g., washing of erythrocyte concentrates, leukodepletion, and gamma irradiation are discussed in view of potential TRIM prevention. The results of published research do not allow us to draw definite conclusions about the effects of blood component transfusion on the immune system of recipients with respect to differences between the studied groups of patients, characteristics of the studied disorders and clinical situations, diversity of hemocomponents, as well as varying standards of transfusion therapy adopted in different countries. However, the systematic literature review may provide some guidance in transfusion-mediated immune modulation.


2009 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 354-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. M. Gibbs

The aim of this paper was to review the strengths and limitations of current ‘point-of-care’ techniques for the detection of antiplatelet drug effects. The review was based on a Medline search for articles with key words related to “platelet function tests”, “point-of-care”, and “anaesthesia”, published in English between January 1996 and September 2008. It was found that global assessments of ‘haemostasis’, such as the standard thrombelastograph®, Sonoclot®, Clot Signature Analyser® and Hemodyne™, are not specific for platelet function and are essentially insensitive to cyclooxygenase inhibitors (aspirin, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) and P2Y12 antagonists (ticlopidine, clopidogrel). Global assessments of ‘platelet function’, such as the PFA-100® and PlateletWorks®, are more specific for platelet function, but also have limited sensitivity for cyclooxygenase inhibitors and P2Y12 antagonists. The newer devices developed specifically for the assessment of antiplatelet drugs, such as Platelet Mapping, the Impact™ Cone and Platelet Analyser and the VerifyNow®, are more promising, but are not as sensitive as laboratory platelet aggregometry. All three categories of devices detect GpIIb/IIIa antagonists (abciximab, tirofiban, eptfibatide) activity, but not all provide quantitative assessments for monitoring therapy. The limitations appeared to be related to the complexity of platelet function, the multiple pathways of platelet activation, the wide interpatient variability in platelet responses and the interdependence between platelets and other aspects of coagulation. The strengths and limitations of point-of-care devices should be appreciated before they are used to assist clinical decision-making in the perioperative period.


VASA ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 429-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Berent ◽  
Sinzinger

Based upon various platelet function tests and the fact that patients experience vascular events despite taking acetylsalicylic acid (ASA or aspirin), it has been suggested that patients may become resistant to the action of this pharmacological compound. However, the term “aspirin resistance” was created almost two decades ago but is still not defined. Platelet function tests are not standardized, providing conflicting information and cut-off values are arbitrarily set. Intertest comparison reveals low agreement. Even point of care tests have been introduced before appropriate validation. Inflammation may activate platelets, co-medication(s) may interfere significantly with aspirin action on platelets. Platelet function and Cox-inhibition are only some of the effects of aspirin on haemostatic regulation. One single test is not reliable to identify an altered response. Therefore, it may be more appropriate to speak about “treatment failure” to aspirin therapy than using the term “aspirin resistance”. There is no evidence based justification from either the laboratory or the clinical point of view for platelet function testing in patients taking aspirin as well as from an economic standpoint. Until evidence based data from controlled studies will be available the term “aspirin resistance” should not be further used. A more robust monitoring of factors resulting in cardiovascular events such as inflammation is recommended.


2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Herrmann ◽  
Quirin Notz ◽  
Tobias Schlesinger ◽  
Jan Stumpner ◽  
Markus Kredel ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) associated coagulopathy (CAC) leads to thromboembolic events in a high number of critically ill COVID-19 patients. However, specific diagnostic or therapeutic algorithms for CAC have not been established. In the current study, we analyzed coagulation abnormalities with point-of-care testing (POCT) and their relation to hemostatic complications in patients suffering from COVID-19 induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Our hypothesis was that specific diagnostic patterns can be identified in patients with COVID-19 induced ARDS at risk of thromboembolic complications utilizing POCT. Methods This is a single-center, retrospective observational study. Longitudinal data from 247 rotational thromboelastometries (Rotem®) and 165 impedance aggregometries (Multiplate®) were analysed in 18 patients consecutively admitted to the ICU with a COVID-19 induced ARDS between March 12th to June 30th, 2020. Results Median age was 61 years (IQR: 51–69). Median PaO2/FiO2 on admission was 122 mmHg (IQR: 87–189), indicating moderate to severe ARDS. Any form of hemostatic complication occurred in 78 % of the patients with deep vein/arm thrombosis in 39 %, pulmonary embolism in 22 %, and major bleeding in 17 %. In Rotem® elevated A10 and maximum clot firmness (MCF) indicated higher clot strength. The delta between EXTEM A10 minus FIBTEM A10 (ΔA10) > 30 mm, depicting the sole platelet-part of clot firmness, was associated with a higher risk of thromboembolic events (OD: 3.7; 95 %CI 1.3–10.3; p = 0.02). Multiplate® aggregometry showed hypoactive platelet function. There was no correlation between single Rotem® and Multiplate® parameters at intensive care unit (ICU) admission and thromboembolic or bleeding complications. Conclusions Rotem® and Multiplate® results indicate hypercoagulability and hypoactive platelet dysfunction in COVID-19 induced ARDS but were all in all poorly related to hemostatic complications..


2004 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 163-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie M. White ◽  
Rajini Krishnan ◽  
Teddi J. Kueter ◽  
Mary V. Jacoski ◽  
Lisa K. Jennings

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 597-599
Author(s):  
Ninad Chodankar ◽  
Disha Kapadia ◽  
Hemant Mehta

Over the past few decades, oncosurgical procedures are increasing in number, require considerable expertise and training for anaesthetising such patients. Aortic Stenosis itself poses great challenge, causes significant increase in morbidity and mortality in the perioperative period. Head, neck oncosurgical procedures with difficult airway requiring awake fiberoptic intubation in such patients adds to the challenge.We describe once such case of previously operated Carcinoma of oral cavity with new growth involving mandible for excision of tumour with neck dissection and mandibular reconstruction with a free Fibula flap. This patient now presented with anticipated difficult airway with restricted mouth opening and a recent diagnosis of severe Aortic stenosis with mean gradient across aortic valve of 52mmHg and valve area 0.8 cm2.Such patient requires multidisciplinary team approach by cardiologist, anaesthesiologist, surgeon and intensivist to prevent perioperative morbidity and facilitate early recovery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document