scholarly journals Impact of body mass index on the initial in-brace correction in patients with idiopathic scoliosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-75
Author(s):  
Samra Pjanić ◽  
Goran Talić ◽  
Dragana Bojinović-Rodić

Background/Aim: Many factors affect initial in-brace correction and treatment outcome in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Previous studies have observed contradictory results on the role of BMI in orthotic treatment. The aim of this study was to examine whether BMI impacts in-brace correction, isolated and in relation to other predictive factors (curve magnitude, curve location and Risser sign). Methods: A retrospective study has been conducted on patients with idiopathic scoliosis treated with Cheneau-Sobernheim brace, that had no prior treatment. The collected and analysed data included patient demographics, BMI percentile and radiological parameters (curve magnitude in Cobb angle, curve location, Risser sign). The initial in-brace correction was expressed as a percentage of Cobb angle reduction in the brace as opposed to Cobb angle out of brace. Patients were categorised into groups according to their BMI, expressed in percentiles, ie: low BMI (< 5 percentiles), normal BMI (5-85 percentiles) and high BMI (> 85 percentiles). To determine the significant difference and correlation relationship between the examined variables, variance tests, t-test with unequal variance, and Pearson correlation coefficient have been used. Results: The cohort study comprised 213 patients (170 females and 43 males) with a mean age of 13.5 years at brace prescription. Low BMI has been detected in 10 % patients, normal BMI in 78 % and high BMI in 10 % patients. No significant difference in in-brace correction has been found between BMI groups, nor has there been any significant correlation between BMI and in-brace correction. Regarding other factors, significant difference within BMI groups was found between in-brace correction and curve location, as well as in-brace correction and Risser sign. Lumbar curves had significantly better in-brace correction than thoracic curves. Significant correlations between in-brace correction and curve magnitude, curve location and Risser sign were detected. Conclusion: The results of the present study show that, as an independent factor, BMI does not impact in-brace correction. Other factors, such as curve magnitude, curve location and Risser sign, play a more significant role in the orthotic treatment of patients with idiopathic scoliosis.


Neurospine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 437-444
Author(s):  
Reza Razeghinezhad ◽  
Mojtaba Kamyab ◽  
Taher Babaee ◽  
Mohammad Saleh Ganjavian ◽  
Shahrbanoo Bidari

Objective: To evaluate the effect of Milwaukee brace treatment on adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) with large curves (40° to 55°) who refuse to do surgery.Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we gathered the clinical records of all adolescents with AIS with an initial curve of 40° to 55°. They had been referred to our center from December 1990 to January 2017. Although they had been advised to do surgery, they had all refused to do it. Their clinical data were recorded, such as sex, age, Risser sign, scoliosis, and kyphosis curve magnitude (at the beginning of brace treatment, weaning time, brace discontinuation, and minimum of 2 years after the treatment). Based on treatment success, the patients were divided into 2 groups: progressed and nonprogressed.Results: Sixty patients with an average initial Cobb angle of 44.93° ± 4.86° were included. The curve progressed in 57%, stabilized in 25%, and improved in 18% of the patients. In the progressed group (34 patients), 31 patients had undergone surgery. There was no significant association between the age of beginning the brace treatment and the final Cobb angle of nonprogressed group (p > 0.05). However, in-brace correction and initial Risser sign had a significant correlation with curve magnitude at the final follow-up (p < 0.05).Conclusion: Brace treatment seems to be effective in controlling the further curve progression in AIS with 40° and 55° curves. Our results can help physicians make sound decisions about the patients with larger curves who refuse to do surgery.



Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenji Sakamoto ◽  
Seiji Hokimoto ◽  
Shuichi Oshima ◽  
Koichi Nakao ◽  
Kazuteru Fujimoto ◽  
...  

Introduction: Although the counterintuitive association between obesity and mortality has been termed the obesity paradox, the evaluation of obesity was inconsistent, and evidence for an obesity paradox among past studies has been also less consistent. Hypothesis: This inconsistency may be due, in part, to a discrepancy between central obesity, estimated by waist circumference (WC), and body mass index (BMI) as patterns of adiposity. Methods: To elucidate the impact of obesity, 2817 subjects with both WC and BMI data were enrolled from the data of Kumamoto Intervention Conference Study (KICS), a multicenter registry, enrolling consecutive patients undergoing PCI in 15 centers from August 2008 to March 2011 in Japan. Subjects were stratified according to patterns of adiposity (WC or BMI), utilizing NCEP-ATPIII criteria and WHO classification. Results: Subjects’ mean age was 69.8 years, and 28% were female. There were 68 deaths during 12-month follow up. Although obesity defined by WC (ObWC) was associated with lower mortality compared with non-obesity (no-ObWC, p=0.013), no difference was shown between obesity, defined by BMI (ObBMI), and non-obesity (no-ObBMI) (p=0.201). When dividing into 4 categories based on high/low of WC and BMI, subjects with high WC and high BMI had the lowest mortality (1.6%) compared to other 3 categories (high WC low BMI; 1.7%, low WC high BMI; 2.4%, or low WC and low BMI; 3.1%). Kaplan-Meier analysis for all cause mortality showed a significant difference between ObWC and no-ObWC (Log Rank p=0.010), but comparable in BMI (ObOMI vs no-ObBMI, p=0.295). This discrepancy was also observed in the analysis for cardiac death (Figure). In multivariate analysis, in addition to age and CKD, ObWC was an independent predictor for the low mortality (OR; 0.582, 95% CI; 0.342-0.991, p=0.046). Conclusions: In Japanese patients with known CAD who undergo PCI, central obesity but not BMI is associated with the paradoxical protective effect of obesity.



2020 ◽  
Vol 102-B (2) ◽  
pp. 254-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason P. Y. Cheung ◽  
Prudence W. H. Cheung

Aims The aim of this study was to assess whether supine flexibility predicts the likelihood of curve progression in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) undergoing brace treatment. Methods This was a retrospective analysis of patients with AIS prescribed with an underarm brace between September 2008 to April 2013 and followed up until 18 years of age or required surgery. Patients with structural proximal curves that preclude underarm bracing, those who were lost to follow-up, and those who had poor compliance to bracing (<16 hours a day) were excluded. The major curve Cobb angle, curve type, and location were measured on the pre-brace standing posteroanterior (PA) radiograph, supine whole spine radiograph, initial in-brace standing PA radiograph, and the post-brace weaning standing PA radiograph. Validation of the previous in-brace Cobb angle regression model was performed. The outcome of curve progression post-bracing was tested using a logistic regression model. The supine flexibility cut-off for curve progression was analyzed with receiver operating characteristic curve. Results A total of 586 patients with mean age of 12.6 years (SD 1.2) remained for analysis after exclusion. The baseline Cobb angle was similar for thoracic major curves (31.6° (SD 3.8°)) and lumbar major curves (30.3° (SD 3.7°)). Curve progression was more common in the thoracic curves than lumbar curves with mean final Cobb angles of 40.5° (SD 12.5°) and 31.8° (SD 9.8°) respectively. This dataset matched the prediction model for in-brace Cobb angle with less mean absolute error in thoracic curves (0.61) as compared to lumbar curves (1.04). Reduced age and Risser stage, thoracic curves, increased pre-brace Cobb angle, and reduced correction and flexibility rates predicted increased likelihood of curve progression. Flexibility rate of more than 28% has likelihood of preventing curve progression with bracing. Conclusion Supine radiographs provide satisfactory prediction for in-brace correction and post-bracing curve magnitude. The flexibility of the curve is a guide to determine the likelihood for brace success. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(2):254–260.



2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-84
Author(s):  
Alison Anthony ◽  
Reinhard Zeller ◽  
Cathy Evans ◽  
Jennifer A. Dermott

Abstract Study design Retrospective cross-sectional study. Objective To analyze the patient demographic referred for scoliosis to the Hospital for Sick Children to determine the proportion of patients suitable for brace treatment, as per the Scoliosis Research Society guidelines. Summary of background data There is level 1 evidence that bracing in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) decreases the risk of curve progression and need for surgery, but optimal brace treatment requires early curve detection. Methods We performed a retrospective review of 618 consecutive patients who underwent initial assessment in our Spine Clinic between Jan. 1 and Dec. 31, 2014. We included children 10–18 years, with scoliosis greater than 10°, excluding those diagnosed with non-idiopathic curves. Primary outcomes were Cobb angle, menarchal status, and Risser score. We analyzed the effect of specific referral variables (family history, the person who first noticed the curve, and geographic location of residence) on presenting curve magnitude. Results During the study period, 335 children met the inclusion criteria, with an average age of 14.1 ± 1.8 years and a mean Cobb angle of 36.8 ± 14.5°. Brace treatment was indicated in 17% of patients; 18% had curves beyond optimal curve range for bracing (> 40°), and 55% were skeletally mature, therefore not brace candidates. The majority of curves (54%) were first detected by the patient or family member and averaged 7° more than curves first detected by a physician. A family history of scoliosis made no difference to curve magnitude, nor did geographic location of residence. Conclusion The majority of AIS patients present too late for effective management with bracing. Level of evidence III.



2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trixie Mak ◽  
Prudence Wing Hang Cheung ◽  
Teng Zhang ◽  
Jason Pui Yin Cheung

Abstract Background: Thoracic scoliosis has been shown to be associated with hypokyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). However, the relationship of sagittal spino-pelvic parameters with different coronal curve patterns and their influence on patient-perceived quality of life is unknown. This study aims to determine the association between coronal and sagittal malalignment in patients with AIS and to determine their effects on SRS-22r scores. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 1054 consecutive patients with AIS. The coronal Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), PI-LL mismatch (PI-LL), pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS) were measured on standing radiographs. The coronal Cobb angle (mild: 10-20°; moderate: >20-40°; severe: >40°) and PI (low: <35°; average: 35-50°; high: >50°) were divided into 3 sub-groups for comparison. Relationship between coronal curve magnitudes and sagittal parameters was studied as was their association with SRS-22r scores. Results: Low PI had smaller SS (30.1±8.3° vs 44.8±7.7°; p<0.001), PT (-0.3±8.1° vs 14.4±7.5°; p<0.001), and LL (42.0±13.2° vs 55.1±10.6°; p<0.001), negative PI-LL mismatch (-12.1±13.1° vs 4.1±10.5°; p<0.001) as compared to large PI. There were no significant relationships with PI and TK (p=0.905) or curve magnitude (p=0.431). No differences in sagittal parameters were observed for mild, moderate or severe coronal Cobb angles. SRS-22r scores only correlated with coronal Cobb angle and larger Cobb angles were negatively correlated with the function, appearance and pain domains. Conclusions: The sagittal profile for AIS is associated with the pelvic parameters especially PI but not with the coronal curve pattern. All patients have a similar TK regardless of coronal curve type. However, it appears that the coronal deformity is a greater influence on quality of life outcomes especially those >40°.



2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-44
Author(s):  
Chris Yin Wei Chan ◽  
Chee Kidd Chiu ◽  
Yun Hui Ng ◽  
Saw Huan Goh ◽  
Xin Yi Ler ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEThe incidence of postoperative shoulder imbalance following posterior spinal fusion (PSF) is still high in Lenke 1 curves despite following current treatment recommendations for upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) selection. The objective of this retrospective study was to identify differences in preoperative shoulder balance and to report the surgical outcome of two subtypes of Lenke 1 curves (flexible vs stiff) in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).METHODSThe authors grouped patients’ curves as Lenke 1–ve (flexible) when their preoperative proximal thoracic side bending (PTSB) Cobb angle was < 15° and as Lenke 1+ve (stiff) when the PTSB Cobb angle was 15°–24.9°. The authors hypothesized that these two subtypes had distinct preoperative and postoperative shoulder and neck balance following PSF using pedicle screw constructs.RESULTSFifty patients had Lenke 1 (flexible) curves and 61 had Lenke 1 (stiff) curves. The mean preoperative T1 tilt for patients with Lenke 1 (flexible) was −4.9° ± 5.3°, and for those with Lenke 1 (stiff) curves it was −1.0° ± 5.3° (p < 0.001). Mean cervical axis (CA) was −0.1° ± 3.2° for Lenke 1 (flexible) curves and 2.3° ± 3.5° for Lenke 1 (stiff) curves (p < 0.001). Preoperative radiographic shoulder height (RSH) and clavicle angle (Cla-A) were similar between the two curve subtypes. Following surgery, there were significant differences between the subtypes in terms of T1 tilt (p < 0.001), RSH (p = 0.014), and Cla-A (p = 0.031). Interestingly, 41.0% of patients with a Lenke 1 (stiff) curve had +ve T1 tilt compared to 2.0% in Lenke 1 (flexible) group. Moreover, 26.2% of patients with the Lenke 1 (stiff) curve had +ve RSH compared to 12.0% of those with Lenke 1 (flexible) curves. And, 24.6% of patients with Lenke 1 (stiff) had +ve Cla-A compared to 10.0% of those with Lenke 1 (flexible) curves.CONCLUSIONSLenke 1 (flexible) and Lenke 1 (stiff) curves had distinct preoperative T1 tilt and CA measurements. Following PSF, the authors noted +ve T1 tilt in 41% of patients with Lenke 1 (stiff) curves versus 2.0% in those with Lenke 1 (flexible) curves. The authors also noted a significant difference in postoperative RSH and Cla-A measurements.



2016 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 2421-2426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaodong Li ◽  
Xiao Zheng ◽  
Bin Xu ◽  
Dachuan Zhang ◽  
Yun Xu ◽  
...  

Background: This study aimed to investigate the Bmi-1 expression and the clinical significance in colon cancer (CC). Patients and Methods: Bmi-1 expression in tumor tissue and the corresponding normal tissue was detected using immunohistological staining. The correlations between Bmi-1 expression and clinicopathological characteristics and the overall survival (OS) time were analyzed. Results: The median H-scores of Bmi-1 in CC tissues and the corresponding tissues were 80.0 (0-270) and 5.0 (0-90), with no statistically significant difference (Z=-13.7, P<0.001). Bmi-1 expression in CC tissues was not statistically correlated with any characteristics. The median OS times for CC patients with high or low Bmi-1 expression were 53.7 months and 44.9 months, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P = 0.123). The survival rates of patients with low Bmi-1 expression were higher than those of patients with high Bmi-1 expression but the differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Bmi-1 expression in CC tissue is significantly higher than that in corresponding normal tissue. While there may be a trend towards improved survival, this is not statistically significant.



2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Trixie Mak ◽  
Prudence Wing Hang Cheung ◽  
Teng Zhang ◽  
Jason Pui Yin Cheung

Abstract Background Thoracic scoliosis has been shown to be associated with hypokyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). However, the relationship of sagittal spino-pelvic parameters with different coronal curve patterns and their influence on patient-perceived quality of life is unknown. This study aims to determine the association between coronal and sagittal malalignment in patients with AIS and to determine their effects on SRS-22r scores. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted on 1054 consecutive patients with AIS. The coronal Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), PI-LL mismatch (PI-LL), pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS) were measured on standing radiographs. The coronal Cobb angle (mild: 10–20°; moderate: > 20–40°; severe: > 40°) and PI (low: < 35°; average: 35–50°; high: > 50°) were divided into 3 sub-groups for comparison. Relationship between coronal curve magnitudes and sagittal parameters was studied as was their association with SRS-22r scores. Results Low PI had smaller SS (30.1 ± 8.3° vs 44.8 ± 7.7°; p < 0.001), PT (− 0.3 ± 8.1° vs 14.4 ± 7.5°; p < 0.001), and LL (42.0 ± 13.2° vs 55.1 ± 10.6°; p < 0.001), negative PI-LL mismatch (− 12.1 ± 13.1° vs 4.1 ± 10.5°; p < 0.001) as compared to large PI. There were no significant relationships with PI and TK (p = 0.905) or curve magnitude (p = 0.431). No differences in sagittal parameters were observed for mild, moderate or severe coronal Cobb angles. SRS-22r scores only correlated with coronal Cobb angle and larger Cobb angles were negatively correlated with the function, appearance and pain domains. Conclusions The sagittal profile for AIS is associated with the pelvic parameters especially PI but not with the coronal curve pattern. All patients have a similar TK regardless of coronal curve type. However, it appears that the coronal deformity is a greater influence on quality of life outcomes especially those > 40°.



2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Ajsel Oseku ◽  
◽  
Surven Metolli ◽  

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of Schroth exercise on Cobb's angle, vital capacity as well as the improvement of daily activities on patients with idiopathic adolescent scoliosis. Forty patients with idiopathic scoliosis with a Cobb thoracic vertebral angle of 15-30 degrees or higher and the Risser sign stage 3 or higher. The Schroth exercise was applied 3 times a week for 12 weeks. We measured the chest trunk inclination, Cobb angle and vital capacity before and after exercise program. A comprehensive search for all published review articles for spinal deformity was undertaken on PubMed, PEDRO, Google Scholar, Physiopedia up to December 2018. All full-text articles reporting evaluation, validation, surgical, orthotic, and/or physiotherapeutic scoliosis specific exercises (PSSE) treatment outcomes of these spinal deformities were retrieved and analyzed by us and methodology for functional assessment of patients with AIS was developed. Forty patients with idiopathic scoliosis with a Cobb thoracic vertebral angle of 15-30 degrees or higher and the Risser sign stage 3 or higher. The Schroth exercise was applied 3 times a week for 12 weeks. We measured the chest trunk inclination, Cobb angle and vital capacity before and after exercise program. For a period of 12 weeks we accessed adolescents with AIS. All adolescents make Schroth PSSE. The analysis of the results confirms the positive effect of the PSSE to improve muscle endurance, balance and correction of the scoliosis. Within a month from the beginning, patients reported no back pain and within 2 months – a respiratory improvement, an enlargement of the chest, a reduced Cobb angle, an increased vital capacity. PSSE seem to have positive effects by reducing the symptoms and improving functions and body asymmetries. Schroth method is effective of preventing the scoliosis’ progression. The conservative method of treating scoliosis was found to be effective even at a Cobb angle of 35 degrees or higher. In the future, universal methods of approaching exercises and preventive training for the treatment of scoliosis needs to be further developed.



2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (7) ◽  
pp. 644-651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordan R. Covvey ◽  
Olivia Erickson ◽  
David Fiumara ◽  
Kelly Mazzei ◽  
Zachary Moszczenski ◽  
...  

Background: A vancomycin target of area under the curve to minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC:MIC) ratio ≥400 is recommended for treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia. Objective: To evaluate vancomycin total daily dose (TDD) achieving trough targets versus a calculated strategy achieving AUC targets based on body mass index (BMI). Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed within a large hospital network. Patients with MRSA bacteremia were eligible if they received vancomycin with a steady-state trough (15-20 mg/L). Cockcroft-Gault was used to estimate creatinine clearance, calculating vancomycin clearance and AUC. Patients were stratified by BMI (less than/greater than 30 kg/m2). The primary outcome was vancomycin TDD for the trough-based strategy compared with an AUC-dosing strategy. Results: A total of 119 patients were included, including 51 (42.9%) and 68 (57.1%) patients with high- and low-BMI, respectively. The TDD for trough-based dosing (2390.76 ± 1224.59 mg) differed significantly from AUC-based dosing (1985.07 ± 616.18 mg) across the cohort ( P = 0.0014). For patients with high BMI, there was a significant difference ( P < 0.0001) in TDD between trough (2637.25 ± 1327.89 mg) versus AUC (1918.71 ± 625.89 mg) strategies. No difference in TDD between dosing strategies was observed among low-BMI patients. Across all patients, 46 (38.7%) experienced acute kidney injury (AKI); high-BMI patients experienced higher rates of AKI compared with low-BMI patients (54.9 vs 26.5%; P = 0.002). Conclusions and Relevance: An AUC-based dosing strategy may reduce vancomycin TDD required for MRSA bacteremia compared with trough-based dosing, particularly for patients with higher BMI.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document