scholarly journals Evolving Strategies in First-Line Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Is There a Role for Chemoimmunotherapy?

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (11.5) ◽  
pp. 1408-1410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer R. Brown ◽  
William G. Wierda

With the enormous progress made in treatment and management, many oncologists have called this the golden age of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The past few years alone have seen the approval of multiple agents, including small molecule inhibitors that have led to longer, more durable periods of disease control. However, the introduction of these new drugs into the armamentarium has raised an important question regarding standard of care: is there still a role for chemoimmunotherapy in the first-line setting? At the NCCN 2019 Annual Congress: Hematologic Malignancies, Drs. William G. Wierda and Jennifer R. Brown presented opposing sides of the debate.

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (11.5) ◽  
pp. 1414-1416
Author(s):  
Richard I. Fisher

Over the past several decades, tremendous progress has been made in the treatment of follicular lymphoma. The addition of rituximab to chemotherapy led to significant improvements in survival in the 1990s. Current standard of care in advanced-stage, previously untreated follicular lymphoma is rituximab plus chemotherapy, sometimes followed by rituximab maintenance. Now, as more research is conducted in the field of chemotherapy-free treatment, Dr. Richard I. Fisher discussed the importance of carefully constructed phase II or III trials at the NCCN 2019 Annual Congress: Hematologic Malignancies. He maintained that a nonchemotherapy treatment regimen comprising rituximab + lenalidomide can be considered in carefully selected patients, and that it is currently the only chemotherapy-free treatment that should be recommended.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4696-4696
Author(s):  
Jorge Labrador ◽  
Covadonga Garcia Diaz ◽  
Beatriz Cuevas ◽  
Maria Victoria Cuevas ◽  
Rodolfo Alvarez ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction In the last decade, the incorporation of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (MoAb) (rituximab, obinutuzumab), bendamustine, B-cell receptor inhibitors (ibrutinib) and Bcl-2 antagonists (venetoclax) have changed the paradigm of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) treatment, improving overall survival (OS). Methods We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients diagnosed with CLL between 2003 and 2016 at our center to evaluate: i) the influence of date of diagnosis, before or after 2010; ii) having received new drugs (MoAb or target therapies) in first line or not. Results A total of 182 patients were evaluated: 104 men (57%) and 78 women (43%); median age 74 years (39 - 97), 132 patients were >65 years (72.5%). At diagnosis, 135 (74%), 19 (10%), 15 (8%), 4 (2%) and 9 (5%) were diagnosed as stages 0, I, II, II, III and IV of the Rai classification. While 154 (84%) 15 (8%) and 14 (8%) were classified as Binet's stages A, B and C. Regarding the presence of comorbidities, the median CIRS scale score was 4 (0 - 15). 71 patients (39%) were diagnosed before 2010 and 111 (61%) from 2010 onwards. With a median follow-up of 76 months (range, 20-212), 77/182 (42%) patients had received ≥1 line(s) of treatment: 1: 53%, 2: 26%, 3: 8%, ≥4: 13%. 20 patients (26%) received the first line of treatment before 2010, and 56 (74%) from 2010 onwards. Half of the patients received new drugs in 1st line (n=39), 92% of them from 2010 onwards. 32 patients (41.5%) achieved complete response after 1st line, and 24 (31%) at least a partial response. The median OS of patients diagnosed before 2010 was 66 months (35.32 - 96.68) vs 143 months (95% CI 90.5 - 195.5) (p=0.032) as of 2010. In those ≤ 65 years median OS has not been reached, being 80.5% at 10 years: 65% for those diagnosed before 2010 and 97% after 2010, p=0.036. The median OS of patients > 65 years was 6 years (95% CI 4.17 - 7.83), and increased from 82 months for those diagnosed before 2010, to 110 months in those diagnosed after 2010, p=0.744. Patients treated with new drugs in 1st line increased the median OS from 76 months and 13% at 10 years to a median not reached and OS of 77% at 10 years, p=0.000. This difference was more evident in those ≤ 65 years: 20% vs 100% at 10 years (p=0.012), while it was not statistically significant for those > 65 years (11% vs 50% at 10 years, p=0.181) (Figure 1). However, in a multivariate model including age, sex, CIRS>6 and year of diagnosis (before or after 2010), treatment with new drugs retained statistical significance (HR 0.414; 95% CI 0.183 - 0.935) along with age ≤ 65 years (HR 0.256; 95% CI 0.085 - 0.771) and CIRS ≤ 6 (HR 0.247; 95% CI 0.111 - 0.551). Conclusions In our experience, the introduction of new drugs in the first line has led to an increase in OS, especially in young patients. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Gonzalez-Lopez: Grifols: Other: Advisory board honoraria; Sobi: Other: Advisory board honoraria; Amgen: Other: Advisory board and speakers honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Advisoryboard and speakers honoraria, Research Funding.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 544-550 ◽  
Author(s):  
John G. Gribben ◽  
Susan O'Brien

There have been tremendous advances in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) over the past decade, with the goal of therapy no longer being just to palliate symptoms but now to achieve complete remission, eradicate minimal residual disease, and improve survival. During this period, there have also been major advances in identification of molecular factors associated with increased risk of progression. The clinical utility of these factors is being explored to determine whether we can identify groups of patients who should be treated earlier in their disease course and whether we can tailor therapy for groups of patients with specific molecular markers of disease. First-line chemoimmunotherapy approaches now offer prolonged survival, and there is a need to identify patients who are suitable candidates for allogeneic stem-cell transplantation that uses reduced-intensity conditioning regimens. The vast majority of CLL patients are either too old or do not have sufficiently high-risk disease to warrant these approaches, and effective therapies that can be tolerated by the more frail elderly patients with this disease are urgently needed. Numerous novel agents are being developed, and their role in the first-line treatment of frail patients or those who relapse after previous treatment is being explored in clinical trials.


Hematology ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 2005 (1) ◽  
pp. 285-291
Author(s):  
Michael Hallek ◽  

For the past ten years, there has been a dynamic development of new therapeutic compounds and prognostic parameters for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Hematologists and oncologists are challenged to use these new possibilities for an optimized, risk- and fitness-adapted treatment strategy, with the goal of achieving long-term remissions and preserving a good quality of life. This review is intended to summarize the current knowledge on first-line treatment of CLL.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  
pp. 1167-1174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin L. Lampson ◽  
Haesook T. Kim ◽  
Matthew S. Davids ◽  
Jeremy S. Abramson ◽  
Arnold S. Freedman ◽  
...  

Abstract PI3 kinase (PI3K) activity is critical for survival of neoplastic B cells in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Blockade of PI3K signaling with idelalisib is effective for the treatment of relapsed CLL in combination with the anti-CD20 antibody ofatumumab. In this single-arm, open-label, nonrandomized phase 2 study, we investigated the efficacy and safety of idelalisib with ofatumumab in 27 patients with treatment-naïve CLL in need of therapy. Patients were planned to receive idelalisib for 2 monthly cycles, then idelalisib and ofatumumab for 6 cycles, followed by idelalisib indefinitely. The study was closed early and all patients ceased therapy when an increased rate of death as a result of infection was observed on other first-line idelalisib trials. Median time on therapy was 8.1 months, and median duration of follow-up was 39.7 months. We previously reported high rates of hepatotoxicity in a smaller cohort of patients in this trial; toxicities necessitated therapy discontinuation in 15 patients after a median of 7.7 months. The most frequent grade ≥3 adverse events were transaminitis (52% of patients), neutropenia (33%), and colitis/diarrhea (15%). The best overall response rate (ORR) was 88.9%, including 1 complete response. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 23 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 18-36 months); 11 patients have not yet required second-line therapy. Idelalisib and ofatumumab demonstrated an unacceptable safety profile in the first-line setting, which resulted in a short PFS despite a high ORR. Future development of PI3K inhibitors for use in treatment-naïve CLL will require novel approaches to mitigate toxicities. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02135133.


Author(s):  
Farrukh T. Awan ◽  
Othman Al-Sawaf ◽  
Kirsten Fischer ◽  
Jennifer A. Woyach

Therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia has improved dramatically over the past decade with the introduction of new targeted therapies and a paradigm shift toward targeted therapies for the majority of patients. Better understanding of prognostic factors has helped tailor therapy for individual patients, and work continues to identify optimal therapy for each patient. When therapy is required, most patients will be treated with targeted therapies, either the Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors ibrutinib or acalabrutinib or the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax in combination with obinutuzumab. Without head-to-head comparisons showing differential efficacy among these options, considerations regarding safety, patient preference, and ability to sequence therapy currently influence treatment decisions. Also, clinical trials investigating combinations of these therapies have the potential to further change the standard of care. In this review, we cover the currently available options for the frontline treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and discuss safety considerations and toxicity management with each agent as well as novel combination strategies currently under investigation.


Hematology ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 2005 (1) ◽  
pp. 285-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Hallek ◽  

Abstract For the past ten years, there has been a dynamic development of new therapeutic compounds and prognostic parameters for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Hematologists and oncologists are challenged to use these new possibilities for an optimized, risk- and fitness-adapted treatment strategy, with the goal of achieving long-term remissions and preserving a good quality of life. This review is intended to summarize the current knowledge on first-line treatment of CLL.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 166-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiushi Chen ◽  
Nitin Jain ◽  
Turgay Ayer ◽  
William G. Wierda ◽  
Christopher R. Flowers ◽  
...  

Purpose Oral targeted therapies represent a significant advance for the treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL); however, their high cost has raised concerns about affordability and the economic impact on society. Our objective was to project the future prevalence and cost burden of CLL in the era of oral targeted therapies in the United States. Methods We developed a simulation model that evaluated the evolving management of CLL from 2011 to 2025: chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) as the standard of care before 2014, oral targeted therapies for patients with del(17p) and relapsed CLL from 2014, and for first-line treatment from 2016 onward. A comparator scenario also was simulated where CIT remained the standard of care throughout. Disease progression and survival parameters for each therapy were based on published clinical trials. Results The number of people living with CLL in the United States is projected to increase from 128,000 in 2011 to 199,000 by 2025 (55% increase) due to improved survival; meanwhile, the annual cost of CLL management will increase from $0.74 billion to $5.13 billion (590% increase). The per-patient lifetime cost of CLL treatment will increase from $147,000 to $604,000 (310% increase) as oral targeted therapies become the first-line treatment. For patients enrolled in Medicare, the corresponding total out-of-pocket cost will increase from $9,200 to $57,000 (520% increase). Compared with the CIT scenario, oral targeted therapies resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $189,000 per quality-adjusted life-year. Conclusion The increased benefit and cost of oral targeted therapies is projected to enhance CLL survivorship but can impose a substantial financial burden on both patients and payers. More sustainable pricing strategies for targeted therapies are needed to avoid financial toxicity to patients.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 42-42
Author(s):  
Bandana Ajay Vishwakarma ◽  
Amy Wesa

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common leukemia in adults. CLL is characterized by proliferation and accumulation of monoclonal, small, mature CD5+ B-cells in peripheral blood, bone marrow and secondary lymphoid organs. The current treatment regimens have improved overall survival but CLL patients will eventually experience relapse. The disease is still incurable making it a necessity to discover and screen for new drugs. Patient derived CLL specimens undergo spontaneous apoptosis when grown in culture and is a major limitation to screening for new therapeutic drugs. We have established anin vitroculture conditions which supports growth and proliferation of patient derived primary CLL cells. Champions has a bank of primary CLL patient samples across different Rai stage, genetic mutations and relapsed and refractory cases. Using the optimizedin vitroculture conditions, we tested three CLL human primary samples (models) for proliferation . All three models proliferated 1.5 to to 2-fold in the optimized media in 6 days, as measured using CellTiter-Glo®. We also examined the phenotypic changes in the cells after growing them in the established media. Flow cytometric analysis showed that the CLL cells mostly retained the primary phenotypic characteristic CD5+CD10-Cd19+CD20+ even after being in the culture for 6 days. Next, we screened for sensitivity of primary CLL patient samples (N=10) against known standard of care (SOC) drugs venetoclax, ibrutinib, idelasib, chlorambucil and cytarabine. Primary patient samples derived from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were cultured in 96 well plates in the enriched media and treated with respective drugs over a concentration range over 5 logs. Drug sensitivity was assessed using CellTiter-Glo® luminescent cell viability assay on day 3. Ourin vitroassay indicated that some, but not all patient samples were sensitive to approved standard of care drugs. A relapsed bendamustine pre-treated patient sample was sensitive to all the SOC drugs tested. In addition to drug response, whole exome sequencing and RNAseq are being conducted on these samples, to compare mutational analyses with drug responsiveness. With clinically annotated patient-derived CLL samples, WES and RNAseq plus drug response to standard of care provides a comprehensiveex vivoplatform for the preclinical testing of drug candidates, which may not only provide information on agent efficacy, but that can permit potential biomarker mining and exploration of patient selection criteria for investigational new agents in CLL. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 332-345
Author(s):  
Jean Lachaine ◽  
Catherine Beauchemin ◽  
Kimberly Guinan ◽  
Philippe Thebault ◽  
Andrew Aw ◽  
...  

Background: Continuous oral targeted therapy (OTT) for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) represents an effective therapy but also a major economic burden on the healthcare system. This study aimed to estimate future direct costs, along with the prevalence, of CLL in the era of continuous OTT in Canada. Methods: The economic burden of OTT was modelled and compared to chemoimmunotherapy (CIT), for CLL treatment. The burden was assessed/projected from 2011 to 2025. For the OTT scenario, CIT was considered the standard of care before 2015, while OTT was considered standard of care for patients with either unmutated immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable (IGHV) or del(17p)/TP53 mutations starting in 2015 and, from 2020 onwards, for all first-line treatments except for patients with mutated IGHV. A Markov model was developed including four health states: watchful-waiting, first-line treatment, relapse and death. Costs of therapy, follow-up/monitoring and adverse events were included. Key clinical parameters were extracted from pivotal clinical trials. Results: As incidence rates and rate of survival are increasing, the prevalence of CLL in Canada is projected to increase 1.8-fold, from 8301 patients in 2011 to 14,654 by 2025. Correspondingly, the total annual costs of CLL management are predicted to increase 15.7-fold, from $60.8 million to $957.5 million during that same period. Conclusions: Although OTT enhances survival for patients with CLL, it is nonetheless associated with an important economic burden due to the projected vast increase in costs from 2011 to 2025. Changes in clinical strategies, such as implementation of a fixed OTT treatment duration, could help alleviate financial burden.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document