Measurement of Foot Dorsiflexion

2004 ◽  
Vol 94 (6) ◽  
pp. 573-577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rolf Scharfbillig ◽  
Sheila D. Scutter
Keyword(s):  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Ankle Joint ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Interrater Reliability ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Adolescent Population ◽  
Ankle Joint Dorsiflexion

The Lidcombe template was introduced in 1991 for the nonweightbearing assessment of ankle joint dorsiflexion, and it has shown excellent reliability in impaired and unimpaired adult populations. We discuss limitations of the original template and test the reliability of a modified apparatus in an adolescent population. Intrarater and interrater reliability were assessed for 14 children (28 limbs) aged 7 to 14 years, returning intraclass correlation coefficient (1,1) results of greater than 0.99 for both aspects of reliability. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 94(6): 573–577, 2004)

scholarly journals Intrarater and Interrater Reliability of Infrared Image Analysis of Forearm Acupoints before and after Moxibustion

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Jiali Lou ◽  
Yongliang Jiang ◽  
Hantong Hu ◽  
Xiaoyu Li ◽  
Yajun Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Image Analysis ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Temperature Change ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Interrater Reliability ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Infrared Image ◽  
Infrared Images ◽  
Intrarater Reliability ◽  
Before And After

The objective of this study was to determine the intrarater and interrater reliabilities of infrared image analysis of forearm acupoints before and after moxibustion. In this work, infrared images of acupoints in the forearm of 20 volunteers (M/F, 10/10) were collected prior to and after moxibustion by infrared thermography (IRT). Two trained raters performed the analysis of infrared images in two different periods at a one-week interval. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to determine the intrarater and interrater reliabilities. With regard to the intrarater reliability, ICC values were between 0.758 and 0.994 (substantial to excellent). For the interrater reliability, ICC values ranged from 0.707 to 0.964 (moderate to excellent). Given that the intrarater and interrater reliability levels show excellent concordance, IRT could be a reliable tool to monitor the temperature change of forearm acupoints induced by moxibustion.

Assessment of Occupational Functioning for Screening of Patients to Occupational Therapy in General Psychiatric Care

1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 193-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lena Haglund ◽  
Lars-Hakan Thorell ◽  
Jan Walinder
Keyword(s):  
Occupational Therapy ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Interrater Reliability ◽  
Psychiatric Care ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Case Analysis ◽  
Occupational Therapist ◽  
Swedish Version

A Swedish version of the Occupational Case Analysis Interview and Rating Scale (OCAIRS-S) has been tested earlier for interrater reliability. The present study, using the second version of OCAIRS-S and including a sample of 145 patients, showed interrater correlations between .88 and .96 (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient). The results indicate that OCAIRS-S predicts which patients should be included in and excluded from occupational therapy and identifies patients who should be observed more before making such decisions. The study indicates a need for further investigations regarding which components in OCAIRS-S influence the occupational therapist in judging the patient's need for occupational therapy.

scholarly journals The reliability and validity of goniometric elbow measurements in adults: A systematic review of the literature

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 274-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne F van Rijn ◽  
Elisa L Zwerus ◽  
Koen LM Koenraadt ◽  
Wilco CH Jacobs ◽  
Michel PJ van den Bekerom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Interrater Reliability ◽  
Literature Search ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Diagnostic Reliability ◽  
Measuring Tool ◽  
Simple Measuring

Background The universal goniometer is a simple measuring tool. With this review we aimed to investigate the reliability and validity of the universal goniometer in measurements of the adults' elbow. Methods Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines were followed and our study protocol was published online at PROSPERO. A literature search was conducted on relevant studies. Methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Appraisal of Diagnostic Reliability (QAREL) scoring system. Results Out of 697 studies yielded from our literature search, 12 were included. Six studies were rated as high quality. The intrarater reliability intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.45 to 0.99, the interrater reliability ranged from intraclass correlation coefficient 0.53–0.97. One study providing instructions on goniometric alignment did not find a difference in expert versus non-expert examiners. Another study in which examiners were not instructed found a higher interrater reliability in expert examiners. One study investigating the validity of the goniometer in elbow measurements found a maximum standard error of the mean of 11.5° for total range of motion. Discussion Overall, the studies showed high intra- and interrater reliability of the universal goniometer. The reliability of the universal goniometer in non-expert examiners can be increased by clear instructions on goniometric alignment.

scholarly journals Reliability of Measurement of Glenohumeral Internal Rotation, External Rotation, and Total Arc of Motion in 3 Test Positions

2014 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 640-646 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A. Kevern ◽  
Michael Beecher ◽  
Smita Rao
Keyword(s):  
Internal Rotation ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Interrater Reliability ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Test Procedure ◽  
Intrarater Reliability ◽  
Testing Procedures ◽  
Test Position

Context: Athletes who participate in throwing and racket sports consistently demonstrate adaptive changes in glenohumeral-joint internal and external rotation in the dominant arm. Measurements of these motions have demonstrated excellent intrarater and poor interrater reliability. Objective: To determine intrarater reliability, interrater reliability, and standard error of measurement for shoulder internal rotation, external rotation, and total arc of motion using an inclinometer in 3 testing procedures in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I baseball and softball athletes. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Athletic department. Patients or Other Participants Thirty-eight players participated in the study. Shoulder internal rotation, external rotation, and total arc of motion were measured by 2 investigators in 3 test positions. The standard supine position was compared with a side-lying test position, as well as a supine test position without examiner overpressure. Results: Excellent intrarater reliability was noted for all 3 test positions and ranges of motion, with intraclass correlation coefficient values ranging from 0.93 to 0.99. Results for interrater reliability were less favorable. Reliability for internal rotation was highest in the side-lying position (0.68) and reliability for external rotation and total arc was highest in the supine-without-overpressure position (0.774 and 0.713, respectively). The supine-with-overpressure position yielded the lowest interrater reliability results in all positions. The side-lying position had the most consistent results, with very little variation among intraclass correlation coefficient values for the various test positions. Conclusions: The results of our study clearly indicate that the side-lying test procedure is of equal or greater value than the traditional supine-with-overpressure method.

Interrater Reliability of Muscle Ultrasonography Image Acquisition by Physical Therapists in Patients Who Have or Who Survived Critical Illness

2020 ◽  
Vol 100 (9) ◽  
pp. 1701-1711 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirby P Mayer ◽  
Sanjay Dhar ◽  
Evan Cassity ◽  
Aaron Denham ◽  
Johnny England ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Skeletal Muscle ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Interrater Reliability ◽  
Physical Therapists ◽  
Physical Therapist ◽  
Image Acquisition ◽  
Intraclass Correlation

Abstract Objective Previous studies have demonstrated that muscle ultrasound (US) can be reliably performed at the patient bedside by novice assessors with minimal training. The primary objective of this study was to determine the interrater reliability of muscle US image acquisition by physical therapists and physical therapist students. Secondarily, this study was designed to elucidate the process for training physical therapists to perform peripheral skeletal muscle US. Methods This was a cross-sectional observational study. Four novices and 1 expert participated in the study. Novice sonographers engaged in a structured training program prior to implementation. US images were obtained on the biceps brachii, quadriceps femoris, and tibialis anterior muscles in 3 groups: patients in the intensive care unit, patients on the hospital ward, and participants in the outpatient gym who were healthy. Reliability of image acquisition was analyzed compared with the expert sonographer. Results Intraclass correlation coefficient values ranged from 0.76 to 0.97 with an average for all raters and all muscles of 0.903, indicating excellent reliability of image acquisition. In general, the experienced physical therapist had higher or similar intraclass correlation coefficient values compared with the physical therapist students in relation to the expert sonographer. Conclusions Excellent interrater reliability for US was observed regardless of the level of experience, severity of patient illness, or patient setting. These findings indicate that the use of muscle US by physical therapists can accurately capture reliable images in patients with a range of illness severity and different clinical practice settings across the continuum of care. Impact Physical therapists can utilize US to obtain images to assess muscle morphology. Lay Summary Physical therapists can use noninvasive US as an imaging tool to assess the size and quality of peripheral skeletal muscle. This study demonstrates that physical therapists can receive training to reliably obtain muscle images in patients admitted to the intensive care unit who may be at risk for muscle wasting and may benefit from early rehabilitation.

The Design, Development, and Reliability Testing of a New Innovative Device to Measure Ankle Joint Dorsiflexion

2016 ◽  
Vol 106 (5) ◽  
pp. 338-343
Author(s):  
James Charles
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Ankle Joint ◽  
Interrater Reliability ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Design Development ◽  
Single Measure ◽  
Ankle Joint Dorsiflexion ◽  
Left And Right ◽  
Treatment Table ◽  
Average Measure

Background: In clinical and research settings, ankle joint dorsiflexion needs to be reliably measured. Dorsiflexion is often measured by goniometry, but the intrarater and interrater reliability of this technique have been reported to be poor. Many devices to measure dorsiflexion have been developed for clinical and research use. An evaluation of 12 current tools showed that none met all of the desirable criteria. The purpose of this study was to design and develop a device that rates highly in all of the criteria and that can be proved to be highly reliable. Methods: While supine on a treatment table, 14 participants had a foot placed in the Charles device and ankle joint dorsiflexion measured and recorded three times with a digital inclinometer. The mean of the three readings was determined to be the ankle joint dorsiflexion. Results: The analysis used was intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). There was very little difference in ICC single or average measures between left and right feet, so data were pooled (N = 28). The single-measure ICC was 0.998 (95% confidence interval, 0.996-0.998). The average-measure ICC was 0.998 (95% confidence interval, 0.995-0.999). Limits of agreement for the average measure were also very good: −1.30° to 1.65°. Conclusions: The Charles device meets all of the desirable criteria and has many innovative features, increasing its appropriateness for clinical and research applications. It has a suitable design for measuring dorsiflexion and high intrarater and interrater reliability.

scholarly journals Brazilian version of the Functional Gait Assessment: translation, reliability, and validity for use on stroke patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 1-22
Author(s):  
Paulo Fonseca ◽  
Kelven Antonio Da Silva ◽  
Vanessa Donato do Vale ◽  
Claudia Santos Oliveira ◽  
Vera Lúcia Dos Santos Alves
Keyword(s):  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Interrater Reliability ◽  
Walking Speed ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Stroke Survivors ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Fast Walking ◽  
Brazilian Version ◽  
Functional Gait

Objective. Translate and adapt the Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) to Brazilian Portuguese as a measure of balance during gait in stroke patients and determine its validity and reliability based on evidence of its measurement properties. Method. A convenience sample of 45 stroke survivors (average of seven months since diagnosis) was included (mean age: 55 years; 51% women). The instrument under consideration was translated and back-translated. The performance of the FGA was assessed by two raters to determine intrarater and interrater reliability. Concurrent and discriminant validity were investigated using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) as well as normal and fast walking speed. Results. No difficulties with the translation were found during the application of the tests. Therefore, no structural or conceptual changes to the translated version were needed to achieve cultural equivalence. Intrarater (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.93) and interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.90) were almost perfect for the total scores. The reliability of single items was also strong, ranging from 0.74 to 0.95. Concurrent validity with other measures of gait and balance was moderate to substantial. The FGA was correlated (p<0.001) with the BBS (0.71), normal walking speed (0.66), and fast walking speed (0.70). Conclusion. The Brazilian version of the FGA is a reliable, valid instrument for assessing functional gait performance in stroke survivors.

scholarly journals Ramp descent performance with the C-Leg and interrater reliability of the Hill Assessment Index

2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 362-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Jason Highsmith ◽  
Jason T Kahle ◽  
Rebecca M Miro ◽  
Larry J Mengelkoch
Keyword(s):  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Interrater Reliability ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Assistive Device ◽  
Minimal Detectable Change ◽  
Assessment Index ◽  
Prosthetic Knee ◽  
Transfemoral Amputees ◽  
The Hill

Background: Transfemoral amputees have decreased ability to descend ramps and hills. The Hill Assessment Index quantifies transfemoral amputee ramp performance, but interrater reliability has not been assessed. Objectives: To determine whether C-Leg use improves hill descent gait and evaluate the Hill Assessment Index’s interrater reliability. Methods: Twenty-one transfemoral amputees descended a ramp while timed and video recorded, using their nonmicroprocessor prosthetic knee. Subjects were fitted and accommodated with a C-Leg and retested. Test times were compared, and ramp performances were independently reviewed using the Hill Assessment Index by two raters. Hill Assessment Index scores were compared between knee conditions within raters for performance and between raters to assess the Hill Assessment Index’s interrater reliability. Results: Mean Hill Assessment Index scores were greater for C-Leg compared to nonmicroprocessor prosthetic knee for both raters. C-Leg resulted in faster ramp descent. Strong correlations resulted between raters on Hill Assessment Index scores for nonmicroprocessor prosthetic knee (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.97) and C-Leg (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.99). Conclusions: C-Leg improves Hill Assessment Index ramp descent performance and time. In descent quality, C-Leg offers the possibility of eliminating assistive device use and/or improving step length in the absence of an assistive device. C-Leg resulted in 23% gait speed increase during ramp descent. The Hill Assessment Index had very good interrater reliability but should be assessed for intrarater reliability, minimal detectable change, and validity. Clinical relevance Transfemoral amputees have difficulty ambulating on ramps. While the C-Leg has been shown to improve ramp descent, this has not been confirmed, and the Hill Assessment Index has not been studied for reliability. This study confirms that the C-Leg improves ramp descent performance and the Hill Assessment Index’s interrater reliability.

scholarly journals Assessment of the Interrater Reliability of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons Microanastomosis Assessment Scale

2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew R. Pines ◽  
Mohammed S. Alghoul ◽  
Youssef J. Hamade ◽  
Mithun G. Sattur ◽  
Rami James N. Aoun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Interrater Reliability ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Educational Impact ◽  
Northwestern University ◽  
The Face ◽  
The University

Abstract BACKGROUND: The potential for simulation-based learning in neurosurgical training has led the Congress of Neurosurgical Surgeons to develop a series of simulation modules. The Northwestern Objective Microanastomosis Assessment Tool (NOMAT) was created as the corresponding assessment tool for the Congress of Neurosurgical Surgeons Microanastomosis Module. The face and construct validity of the NOMAT have been previously established. OBJECTIVE: To further validate the NOMAT by determining its interrater reliability (IRR) between raters of varying levels of microsurgical expertise. METHODS: The NOMAT was used to assess residents’ performance in a microanastomosis simulation module in 2 settings: Northwestern University and the Society of Neurological Surgeons 2014 Boot Camp at the University of Indiana. At Northwestern University, participants were scored by 2 experienced microsurgeons. At the University of Indiana, participants were scored by 2 postdoctoral fellows and an experienced microsurgeon. The IRR of NOMAT was estimated by computing the intraclass correlation coefficient using SPSS v22.0 (IBM, Armonk, New York). RESULTS: A total of 75 residents were assessed. At Northwestern University, 21 residents each performed microanastomosis on 2 model vessels of different sizes, one 3 mm and one 1 mm. At the University of Indiana, 54 residents performed a single microanastomosis procedure on 3-mm vessels. The intraclass correlation coefficient of the total NOMAT scores was 0.88 at Northwestern University and 0.78 at the University of Indiana. CONCLUSION: This study indicates high IRR for the NOMAT. These results suggest that the use of raters with varying levels of expertise does not compromise the precision or validity of the scale. This allows for a wider adoption of the scale and, hence, a greater potential educational impact.

scholarly journals Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of Cranial Anthropometric Measurements in Infants with Positional Plagiocephaly

Children ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. 306
Author(s):  
Iñaki Pastor-Pons ◽  
María Orosia Lucha-López ◽  
Marta Barrau-Lalmolda ◽  
Iñaki Rodes-Pastor ◽  
Ángel Luis Rodríguez-Fernández ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Interrater Reliability ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Anthropometric Measurements ◽  
Intrarater Reliability ◽  
Positional Plagiocephaly ◽  
Altman Plot ◽  
Bland Altman Plot ◽  
Cranial Asymmetry

(1) Background: anthropometric measurements with calipers are used to objectify cranial asymmetry in positional plagiocephaly but there is controversy regarding the reliability of different methodologies. Purpose: to analyze the interrater and intrarater reliability of direct anthropometric measurements with caliper on defined craniofacial references in infants with positional plagiocephaly. (2) Methods: 62 subjects (<28 weeks), with a difference of at least 5 mm between cranial diagonal diameters. Maximal cranial circumference, length and width and diagonal cranial diameters were measured. Intrarater (2 measurements) and interrater (2 raters) reliability was analyzed. (3) Results: intra- and interrater reliability of the maximal cranial length and width and right cranial diagonal was excellent: intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) > 0.9. Intrarater and interrater reliability for the left cranial diagonal was excellent: ICC > 0.9 and difference in agreement in the Bland-Altman plot 0.0 mm, respectively. Intrarater and interrater reliability for the maximal cranial circumference was good: differences in agreement in Bland-Altman plots: intra: −0.03 cm; inter: −0.12 cm. (4) Conclusions: anthropometric measurements in a sample of infants with moderate positional plagiocephaly have shown excellent intra- and interrater reliability for maximal cranial length, maximal cranial width, and right and left cranial diagonals, and good intra- and interrater reliability in maximal cranial circumference measurement.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document