The Economics behind the World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness Index

2011 ◽  
pp. 4-40
Author(s):  
M. Drzeniek-Hanouz ◽  
A. Prazdnichnykh

The journal version of Chapter 1.1 of "The Russia Competitiveness Report 2011: Laying the Foundation for Sustainable Prosperity" prepared by the World Economic Forum and Eurasia Competitiveness Institute analyzes major problems Russia is faced with in this field. Three advantages and five systemic weaknesses of the country are considered. The analysis on the basis of the Global Competitiveness Index shows that real improvements along these five directions could lead to significant increase in competitiveness and growth of welfare in Russia.


Exacta ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 173-182
Author(s):  
Demesio Carvalho Sousa ◽  
Rodrigo Franço Gonçalves ◽  
Lilian Sayuri Sakamoto ◽  
Jair Minoro Abe ◽  
Jose Benedito Sacomano

Neste artigo, estuda-se a importância das patentes e seu impacto no The Business School for the World do Global Innovation Index (GII, 2012) e no desenvolvimento econômico dos países emergentes mediante análise do The Global Competitiveness Index (GCI, 2013) do World Economic Forum (WEF). Os países abordados neste estudo são: Brasil, Rússia, Índia, China e África do Sul (BRICS). Neste contexto, busca-se responder as duas seguintes proposições: A – as patentes podem influenciar de forma favorável o desenvolvimento da inovação de um país integrante do Brics. B – as patentes não influenciam de forma desfavorável nenhum país componente do Brics. A metodologia utilizada privilegiou dados secundários obtidos nos relatórios GII e GCI suportada por uma revisão de literatura e criação de um algoritmo para-analisador. A aplicação da Lógica Paraconsistente Anotada (LPA-2v) forneceu parâmetros para analisar e discutir os resultados a fim de formular estratégias e avaliar tendências.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-20
Author(s):  
Mamta Bhardwaj ◽  
Ajit Singh Naosekpam ◽  
Rupinder Tewari

Purpose This paper represents a comparative study of five Asian countries, namely, Singapore, Taiwan, South Korea, China and India, based on the Global Competitiveness Index (GCI) 2015-2016 published by the World Economic Forum. The purpose of this study is to assess India’s position vis-a-vis the various comparator Asian economies and to identify areas for improvement so as to enhance India’s competitiveness. Design/methodology/approach The study is based on the comparisons and analysis of the ranks of each country. These ranks are based on the indicators related to three categories, i.e. “Basic Requirements”, “Efficiency Enhancers” and “Innovation and Sophistication” Factors. The GCI included data from internationally recognised agencies such as the IMF, the WHO and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Findings On the basis of the aforementioned comparisons among these five Asian economies, it was found that Singapore (Rank-2) has made stupendous economic progress and is amongst the top five successful economies of the world. Taiwan, South Korea and China also have taken significant economic strides and are ranked globally at 15, 26 and 28, respectively. India, on the other hand, is ranked 55 out of 140 nations. Research limitations/implications In this paper, the countries were compared on the basis of their rank in the GCI Report 2015-2016. For an in-depth and more holistic study, comparison can be done by taking into consideration other important reports and analysis in this regard. Originality/value This is an original study where the developments that have taken place in the five Asian economies have been analysed based on the GCI. Most importantly, this study identifies the area/indicator in which India needs to improve to be placed among the developed nations.


Author(s):  
Denis A. Strokatov

In October 2018 an updated Global Competitiveness Index (GCI) 4.0 was introduced in the Global Competitiveness Report2018. Inthe article identify the main differences in the structure and methodology of calculating GCI in the editions of the Global Competitiveness Report 2017–2018 and the Global Competitiveness Report2018. Areview of a number of sources showed that researchers don’t pay enough attention to innovations in the structure and methodology of calculating GCI 4.0. As a result of analyzing the structure and methodology of calculating GCI 4.0, it was revealed that a number of adjustments were made in the Index aimed at marking the importance of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, equalization the conditions when calculating the Index for countries at different stages of development, and taking into account current tendencies of the world economy. In conclusion, the author emphasizes that these innovations have reduced the high degree of subjectivity of the GCI, eliminated a number of difficulties in independent determining the value of the Index and increased the transparency of the calculations.


Ekonomika ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
pp. 28-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vaiva Petrylė

The concept of a country’s competitiveness still does not have a clear and straightforward meaning and remains ambiguous. Different economists stress various aspects of the concept and use a number of different methods to evaluate how competitive a country is. This paper focuses on the Global Competitiveness Index, which is calculated by the World Economic Forum and is one of the most well-known measures of competitiveness. The World Economic Forum (2015) defines the competitiveness of a country as a “set of institutions, policies and factors that determine the level of productivity of a country” and argues that productivity “is the main long-run engine for growth, living standards and prosperity”. The definition suggests that a higher competitiveness ranking shows higher productivity of the country’s economy, which should lead to higher and more sustainable economic growth. In addition, economic growth leads to higher living standards and prosperity of the country’s citizens. In the light of the definition, the paper forms the hypothesis that if a country is ranked to be more competitive (i.e., its Global Competitiveness Index is higher), it should have greater resilience to an economic crisis than less competitive countries. In other words, more competitive countries should have higher and more sustainable economic growth rates than the less competitive countries. In order to check this hypothesis, the paper uses the graphical analysis method and examines the relationship between the Global Competitiveness Index and the economic growth of countries during the period of 2006-2015. The research findings show that there is a weak or no relationship between the Global Competitiveness Index and the GDP growth of countries; however, it is a negative relationship between the Global Competitiveness Index and the standard deviation of the country’s GDP growth. The results argue that the Global Competitiveness Index is not capable of forecasting the future GDP growth rates of a country; however, the Global Competitiveness Index indicates if the country avoids sharp fluctuations in its GDP growth rates and maintains sustainable economic growth throughout the period.


Author(s):  
Anar AITKALIYEVA ◽  
◽  
Alma GALIYEVA ◽  
Aygul TOXANOVA ◽  
◽  
...  

The article discusses the development of transport infrastructure in the Republic of Kazakhstan. This topic is especially relevant to our country with the huge territory and irregular allocation of resources and population. The article analyzes the main indicators of transport infrastructure development, which made it possible to assess its current state. The state of infrastructure is also reflected to the international rankings of the country's competitiveness, so the authors analyzed the World Economic Forum's Global Competitiveness Index by the Infrastructure factor and the World Bank's Logistics Performance Index. Based on the PESTLE analysis, the key environmental factors influencing the functioning and development of the transport industry in Kazakhstan were identified. These facts indicate the need to further improve the policy of transport and infrastructure development of Kazakhstan and develop more effective mechanisms for its implementation.


Author(s):  
Jeļena Volkova ◽  
Ēvalds Višķers

In the era of globalization the term competitiveness has become of essential importance. Each country is showing its interest in it because the results of national economic processes depend on its successful alignment with the international market. The aim of this research is to define the changes in the Latvia’s Competitiveness Index in comparison with the Baltic States during the period 2009-2019. To achieve this aim the following methodology was used: scientific inductive and deductive methods,the monographic and the data based method. The research is based on the results of the assessement of the „Global Competitiveness Index”introduced by the World Economic Forum. Regardless of the methodological drawbacks and changes, the GCI states the status of Estonia as an economic leader among the Baltic States. The tendency seen in the last years shows the levelling of the competitiveness of the Baltic States that can have a positive impact on the development of the region in the further period.  


2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 61-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ewa Lechman

This paper discusses the existing links between changing patterns in the export of goods, broken down by technology-intensity, versus intrenational competitiveness. The study covers nine Central-East European (CEE) economies: Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania and the Slovak Republic, in the time span 2000-2011. We examine the hypothesis of a strong, positive and statistically significant relationship between flows of export of high-tech and ICT manufactures industries goods, and an economy’s level of international competitiveness (approximated by the Global Competitiveness Index - GCI, see: World Economic Forum). Our methodological approach relies on elaboration of each country`s individual export patterns with regard to industries of different technology-intensities, and statistical analysis between the international GCI variable and variables identifying shares in total export of certain industries. Contrary to what was initially expected, our empirical results do not seem to support the hypothesis on statistically positive links between growing shares of high-tech and ICT manufactures industries in the total value of export versus the Global Competitiveness Index in the analyzed countries.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document