Enhancing the Prospects for Finding Agreement

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Verdini Trejo
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Gulf Of Mexico ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Political Communication ◽  
Interdisciplinary Research ◽  
General Public ◽  
Colorado River ◽  
Adaptive Leadership ◽  
Environmental Disputes ◽  
Collaborative Decision

Analyzes how the evidence from the Gulf of Mexico and Colorado River cases relates to the four realms of scholarship underpinning and combined through this book’s interdisciplinary research: public dispute resolution, adaptive leadership, collaborative decision-making, and political communication. These four areas, while intersecting in many ways, are often discussed, both in academia and the general public, separately from one another. Exploring the two cases through the combination of several propositions from these four areas, contributes to the development of a number of interdisciplinary practices that can assist stakeholders in the active resolution of transboundary energy, water, and environmental disputes.

Afterword: Building Negotiation Skills

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Verdini Trejo
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Developing Countries ◽  
Resource Management ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Natural Resource Management ◽  
Political Communication ◽  
Natural Resource ◽  
Adaptive Leadership ◽  
Collaborative Decision Making ◽  
Collaborative Decision

After laying out steps to assist and enhance transboundary natural resource management negotiations, the focus here will be to envision, in broad terms, how these steps might be effectively explored, refined, practiced, and disseminated collaboratively between interdependent developed and developing countries. The aim is to give an example of how to bring together various disciplines in order to build capacity at the intersection of public dispute resolution, adaptive leadership, collaborative decision-making, and political communication....

Beyond Hard Bargaining

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Verdini Trejo
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Resource Management ◽  
Political Communication ◽  
Interdisciplinary Research ◽  
Communication Strategies ◽  
Negotiation Process ◽  
The Other ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Preparatory Work ◽  
Collaborative Decision

Outlines the significance of re-thinking the negotiation, leadership, collaborative decision-making, and political communication strategies we rely on to resolve transboundary water and energy conflicts, as it pertains to shaping the economic, environmental, and social prosperity of the communities we belong to. Emphasizes an interdisciplinary research approach to ascertain whether the manner in which governments, industry, and NGOs conduct transboundary resource management negotiations alters the prospects for finding effective agreements. Such factors include: how they frame a dispute; who they send as representatives; what preparatory work they do; what principles they use to structure the negotiation process; how they define their interests and estimate those of the other side; what ground rules they establish; how they respond to unpredictable and uncertain circumstances; by which criteria they create and distribute value; how they insulate the agreement against spoilers; and how they structure follow through.

scholarly journals Model Partisipasi Petani dalam Pengembangan Agrowisata di Desa Kerta, Kecamatan Payangan, Kabupaten Gianyar

2018 ◽  
pp. 415
Author(s):  
I WAYAN DEDI SURYAWAN ◽  
I WAYAN WINDIA ◽  
I MADE SARJANA
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
General Public ◽  
Word Of Mouth ◽  
Tourism Development ◽  
Botanical Garden ◽  
Social Aspects ◽  
Farmer Participation ◽  
Participation Level ◽  
Joint Decisions ◽  
Public Toilets

Farmers Participation Model in Agrowisata Development in Kerta Village,Payangan District, Gianyar Regency. The model of farmer participation in agro-tourism development in Kerta Village,Payangan District, Gianyar Regency is an effort to find out the model of farmerparticipation and farmer participation level in agro-tourism development. The researchlocation is in Kerta Village, Payangan District, Gianyar Regency which is an agro areaof Gianyar Botanical Garden. The method of analysis used is descriptive qualitative.The results showed that the farmers participation model is as follows. (a) Aspects ofmindset; farmers are aware of the potential that exists in Kerta Village that can bedeveloped as agro-tourism. (b) Social aspects; farmers' participation in social aspectssuch as participating in garden arrangement, diversification of commodity diversity,there is also agreement or cooperation between farmer society to sacrifice their land foragro-tourism such as for road and treking. (c) Aspects of artifacts / possessions; peasantcommunity participation in view of the material aspects include the garden andagricultural products, huts / huts for rest, parking lots and public toilets. Farmersparticipation rate is as follows. (a) Manipulation; done by changing the attractiveness ofthe attraction of organic citrus quotes. (b) Dissemination of information; the peasantcommunity conveys information to the general public through word of mouth, socialmedia, billboards installation. (c) Decision-making; demonstrated by their activengrembug to reach joint decisions and participate in village deliberations. (d) Buildingagreements; farmers mutually respect opinion in decision-making to build a deal basedon "Tri Sakti". Suggestion for farmer community to keep participating for agrotourismdevelopment in Kerta Village, considering the enormous potential of agriculture to bedeveloped into agro-tourism area. Through the model of farmer participation in agrotourismdevelopment in Kerta Village, Payangan District, Gianyar Regency, can beused as a reference for agro-tourism development in other regions.

scholarly journals Using argumentation theory to identify the challenges of shared decision-making when the doctor and the patient have a difference of opinion

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia A. Zanini ◽  
Sara Rubinelli
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Communication Skills ◽  
Critical Discussion ◽  
Argumentation Theory ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Ideal Model ◽  
Difference Of Opinion ◽  
The Ideal

This paper aims to identify the challenges in the implementation of shared decision-making (SDM) when the doctor and the patient have a difference of opinion. It analyses the preconditions of the resolution of this difference of opinion by using an analytical and normative framework known in the field of argumentation theory as the ideal model of critical discussion. This analysis highlights the communication skills and attitudes that both doctors and patients must apply in a dispute resolution-oriented communication. Questions arise over the methods of empowerment of doctors and patients in these skills and attitudes as the preconditions of SDM. Overall, the paper highlights aspects in which research is needed to design appropriate programmes of training, education and support in order to equip doctors and patients with the means to successfully engage in shared decision-making.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document