scholarly journals GnT1IP-L specifically inhibits MGAT1 in the Golgi via its luminal domain

eLife ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hung-Hsiang Huang ◽  
Antti Hassinen ◽  
Subha Sundaram ◽  
Andrej-Nikolai Spiess ◽  
Sakari Kellokumpu ◽  
...  

Mouse GnT1IP-L, and membrane-bound GnT1IP-S (MGAT4D) expressed in cultured cells inhibit MGAT1, the N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase that initiates the synthesis of hybrid and complex N-glycans. However, it is not known where in the secretory pathway GnT1IP-L inhibits MGAT1, nor whether GnT1IP-L inhibits other N-glycan branching N-acetylglucosaminyltransferases of the medial Golgi. We show here that the luminal domain of GnT1IP-L contains its inhibitory activity. Retention of GnT1IP-L in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) via the N-terminal region of human invariant chain p33, with or without C-terminal KDEL, markedly reduced inhibitory activity. Dynamic fluorescent resonance energy transfer (FRET) and bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assays revealed homomeric interactions for GnT1IP-L in the ER, and heteromeric interactions with MGAT1 in the Golgi. GnT1IP-L did not generate a FRET signal with MGAT2, MGAT3, MGAT4B or MGAT5 medial Golgi GlcNAc-tranferases. GnT1IP/Mgat4d transcripts are expressed predominantly in spermatocytes and spermatids in mouse, and are reduced in men with impaired spermatogenesis.

2020 ◽  
Vol 168 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eri Ohto-Fujita ◽  
Saaya Hayasaki ◽  
Aya Atomi ◽  
Soichiro Fujiki ◽  
Toshiyuki Watanabe ◽  
...  

Abstract αB-crystallin is highly expressed in the heart and slow skeletal muscle; however, the roles of αB-crystallin in the muscle are obscure. Previously, we showed that αB-crystallin localizes at the sarcomere Z-bands, corresponding to the focal adhesions of cultured cells. In myoblast cells, αB-crystallin completely colocalizes with microtubules and maintains cell shape and adhesion. In this study, we show that in beating cardiomyocytes α-tubulin and αB-crystallin colocalize at the I- and Z-bands of the myocardium, where it may function as a molecular chaperone for tubulin/microtubules. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) analysis revealed that the striated patterns of GFP-αB-crystallin fluorescence recovered quickly at 37°C. FRAP mobility assay also showed αB-crystallin to be associated with nocodazole-treated free tubulin dimers but not with taxol-treated microtubules. The interaction of αB-crystallin and free tubulin was further confirmed by immunoprecipitation and microtubule sedimentation assay in the presence of 1–100 μM calcium, which destabilizes microtubules. Förster resonance energy transfer analysis showed that αB-crystallin and tubulin were at 1–10 nm apart from each other in the presence of colchicine. These results suggested that αB-crystallin may play an essential role in microtubule dynamics by maintaining free tubulin in striated muscles, such as the soleus or cardiac muscles.


2004 ◽  
Vol 164 (5) ◽  
pp. 661-666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine H. Wimmer-Kleikamp ◽  
Peter W. Janes ◽  
Anthony Squire ◽  
Philippe I.H. Bastiaens ◽  
Martin Lackmann

Eph receptors and their cell membrane–bound ephrin ligands regulate cell positioning and thereby establish or stabilize patterns of cellular organization. Although it is recognized that ephrin clustering is essential for Eph function, mechanisms that relay information of ephrin density into cell biological responses are poorly understood. We demonstrate by confocal time-lapse and fluorescence resonance energy transfer microscopy that within minutes of binding ephrin-A5–coated beads, EphA3 receptors assemble into large clusters. While remaining positioned around the site of ephrin contact, Eph clusters exceed the size of the interacting ephrin surface severalfold. EphA3 mutants with compromised ephrin-binding capacity, which alone are incapable of cluster formation or phosphorylation, are recruited effectively and become phosphorylated when coexpressed with a functional receptor. Our findings reveal consecutive initiation of ephrin-facilitated Eph clustering and cluster propagation, the latter of which is independent of ephrin contacts and cytosolic Eph signaling functions but involves direct Eph–Eph interactions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 505 (2) ◽  
pp. 399-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masafumi Hidaka ◽  
Emiko Okabe ◽  
Kodai Hatakeyama ◽  
Heather Zook ◽  
Chiyoko Uchida ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2203-2203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria de la Fuente ◽  
Amal Arachiche ◽  
Marvin T. Nieman

Abstract Abstract 2203 Thrombin is a potent platelet agonist. Thrombin activates platelets and other cells of the cardiovascular system by cleaving its receptors, protease activated receptor 1 (PAR1), PAR4 or both. PARs are G-protein coupled receptors that activate cellular signaling through Gq and G12/13. There is structural evidence that GPCRs, as a class, function as dimers and that dimerization can alter signaling specificity. Our previous studies have determined that PAR4 forms homodimers and have mapped the homodimer interface to transmembrane helix 4 (TM4). We have also shown that coexpression of PAR1 with PAR4 lowers the threshold for PAR4 activation by thrombin ∼10-fold. The purpose of the current study is to examine the physical interaction between PAR1 and PAR4 and how these interactions influence PAR1's ability to enhance PAR4 activation. The PAR1-PAR4 heterodimers were examined by bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) and bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC). Similar to our previous studies with PAR4 homodimers, PAR1 homodimers were constitutive and did not require receptor activation. In contrast, PAR1-PAR4 heterodimers were not detected under basal conditions. However, when the cells were stimulated with 10 nM thrombin, we were able to detect a strong interaction between PAR1 and PAR4. We next examined if PAR1-PAR4 heterodimers would be induced by stimulating PAR1 or PAR4 individually with their agonist peptides TFLLRN (100 μM) or AYPGKF (500 μM), respectively. The agonist peptides were unable to induce heterodimers when added to the cells individually or simultaneously. These data demonstrate that PAR1 and PAR4 require allosteric changes induced by receptor cleavage by thrombin to mediate heterodimer formation. To examine this further, we removed 37 amino acids from the C-terminus of PAR1, which disrupts the eighth helix. The truncated PAR1 was able to form constitutive heterodimers with PAR4 and these heterodimers were unaffected by thrombin. These data suggest that PAR1 is the allosteric modulator of the PAR1-PAR4 heterodimers. Finally, the stability of the constitutive PAR1 and PAR4 homodimers was unchanged in response to thrombin or the agonist peptides. Taken together, these data suggest that PAR1 and PAR4 have a dynamic interaction depending on the context of their expression. Since PAR1 is an attractive antiplatelet target, the molecular interactions of this receptor on the cells surface must be taken into account when developing and characterizing these antagonists. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document